adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

Elections Canada says it won’t require workers to be vaccinated, vows polling safety

Published

 on

OTTAWA —
Elections Canada says it won’t require its polling workers to be fully immunized against COVID-19, but all polling stations will be “highly controlled” with enhanced public safety measures in place.

Chief Electoral Officer Stephane Perrault said on Wednesday that he has consulted widely about the move and continues to seek advice as the pandemic evolves.

“The recommendations do not include mandatory vaccination, whether they be for electors, for workers, or candidate representatives. In the next three weeks or so, poll returning officers will be hiring some 250,000 Canadians to work at the polls to serve approximately 18 million Canadians. These are the same Canadians, these are the same people you meet every day at the grocery store,” said Perrault.

Elections Canada says it will, however, impose additional safety measures at polling stations.

“[Canadians] can expect to see essentially the kind of measures that they now have been seeing for the last 18 months. So, we will have people in charge of ensuring that the place is clean, that the electors are properly distanced. They will see for example these physical transparent barriers that will separate the poll workers,” said Perrault.

Masks will be distributed, hand sanitizer enforced, and disposable pencils required, he added.

The news comes as federal party leaders try to make clear their stance on mandatory vaccinations after the government announced last week that vaccinations would be required of federal workers and most federal industries, as well as commercial air, rail, and cruise ship passengers by the fall.

Since then, debate has erupted around whether a mandatory vaccine policy infringes on individual rights.

Asked whether Elections Canada would refuse a ballot to someone not wearing a mask, Perrault said that if Canadians plan to vote without a mask – unless it is for medical reasons – they should plan to vote by mail.

What about mail-in ballots?

The organization is anticipating a significant increase in mail-in ballots this year compared to last. According to recent surveys, the number of Canadians interested in casting a ballot by mail could be between two and three million, as opposed to approximately 50,000 during the 2019 election.

In anticipation of this, Elections Canada says it has increased the capacity to process mail-in ballots, including implementing an online vote-by-mail application system. This will be a way for those who might be in self-isolation due to COVID-19 to still cast their votes, the agency said.

“All electors who successfully apply will be sent a special ballot voting kit with everything they need to vote. This includes a pre-addressed return envelope with prepaid postage, so there is no cost to electors to return their ballots to us,” said Elections Canada spokesperson Matthew McKenna in an email to CTVNews.ca.

Anyone going this route will also be able to check their status of their application to vote by mail, and see whether or not Elections Canada has received their completed and mailed-back special ballot. Perrault recommended that Canadians who wish to do this to do so early.

“They should leave enough time for their voter kit to get to them and for them to return it to Elections Canada by Election Day,” he said. “For those who are not apply online we will have traditional mail-in forms available.”

Asked how Elections Canada will prevent people who might try to double dip – voting both through mail-in and in-person, Perrault said when an individual opts for postal voting, they are immediately crossed off an official electors list.

“If somebody wishes to vote on polling day and their name is struck they’ll have to explain why and if they’ve lost their ballot, if it’s been misplaced or if they’ve not received it, then they will swear an oath,” he said.

Will there be additional advanced polling days?

There will be four advanced polling days, but no extra in-person days added. While there had been some suggestion of adopting a weekend-long polling period leading up to election day to spread out voters during a pandemic election, that idea didn’t get off the ground after concerns were raised about labour shortages and a limited number of polling locations that would be available for the full voting period, like schools or churches.

Will the location of my polling place be different than it was in 2019?

It’s possible Canadians will be voting in a different location than they have in previous federal elections.

Given the pandemic, Elections Canada says it has faced some challenges in identifying the nearly 18,000 voting locations usually used across the country. They say work is ongoing to nail down which locations will be used as polling places—including potentially renting some spaces. Factoring in the need to keep folks physically distanced, their options are different than in past elections. As a result, “polling places may be in unusual locations or slightly further from electors’ homes,” said McKenna.

Perrault said this is an “unfortunate” reality of hosting the election amid the pandemic.

“We know that some locations will not be the usual ones or may not be accessible so these are unfortunate circumstances but we will do everything we can to make the vote as accessible as possible,” he said.

The location of Canadians’ polling place will be identified on their voter information card, which typically arrives in the mail three weeks before election day.

Could it take longer to count the ballots this time?

Perrault said that it may take a few days longer to count ballots in 2021, but it depends on how many Canadians cast their votes by mail.

“Canadians are used to getting complete results on election night, but it will be different for this election. The count of regular ballots on ordinary polling day and advanced polls will be completed on the night of the election as usual. However, the count of mail-in ballots will start after Election Day,” he said.

With files from CTV News’ Rachel Aiello.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Washington mum on Canada’s latest allegations against India, expulsion of diplomats

Published

 on

OTTAWA – American officials did not condemn India’s response to explosive accusations that its government has been involved in an escalating number of violent crimes in Canada.

On Monday, Ottawa expelled six Indian diplomats after the RCMP said it had credible evidence that Indian agents played a role in extortion, coercion and murder of Canadian citizens on Canadian soil.

U.S. State Department spokesman Matthew Miller would not comment on the substance of these new claims at a news conference on Tuesday, and he did not criticize India’s decision to also expel six Canadian diplomats.

“As we’ve said before, they are serious allegations and we have wanted to see India take them seriously and co-operate with Canada’s investigation. They have chosen an alternate path,” he said.

Miller said the U.S. has long been asking India to co-operate with Canadian authorities. In September 2023, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced that Canadian intelligence services were investigating credible information about a potential link between India’s government and the June 2023 killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Sikh activist, in Surrey, B.C.

Miller’s comments came as an Indian delegation visited Washington to discuss an alleged murder-for-hire plot that U.S. officials revealed last November.

An unsealed indictment alleged an Indian government employee had directed an attempted assassination in the United States, and spoke about others, including Nijjar.

Miller said the visit by what he called the Indian inquiry committee, announced on Monday, was unrelated to the allegations made public by Canadian authorities that same day, calling the timing “completely coincidental.”

White House national security spokesman John Kirby said he would not speak about the Canadian case but said the Indian government’s decision to send an inquiry committee to Washington signals that India is taking the situation seriously.

“I wouldn’t speak for the Canadians one way or another,” he said. “But we have expressed our deep concern about this to our Indian counterparts. They have expressed to us that they are taking it seriously,” Kirby said.

India has insisted Canada has provided it no evidence to back up any of the allegations.

RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme said the force’s deputy commissioner tried to share evidence with Indian police last week but was rebuffed. This past weekend, deputy foreign affairs minister David Morrison, along with the RCMP, presented evidence to India in meetings held in Singapore.

Canada sought India’s agreement to revoke the diplomatic immunity of the six individuals so they could be interviewed, but India refused.

Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly said Monday that India’s refusal to co-operate is why Canada declared the six diplomats persona non grata, which is one of the stiffest penalties Canada can impose under the Vienna Convention.

She also said Monday that she had reached out to Canada’s peers in the Five Eyes intelligence alliance about the situation, which includes the U.S. and New Zealand.

New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters suggested he would let the judicial processes unfold in a statement that did not mention India.

“The alleged criminal conduct outlined publicly by Canadian law enforcement authorities, if proven, would be very concerning,” Peters wrote on X, saying Ottawa had flagged “ongoing criminal investigations into violence and threats of violence against members of its South Asian community.”

Vina Nadjibulla, research vice-president for the Asia Pacific Foundation, said before these statements that it’s crucial Canada receive support from its allies, possibly through diplomatic moves behind the scenes as well as public statements of support.

“We are in uncharted territory, with implications for the diplomatic relationship as well as for Canada’s public safety and national security,” she said.

Nadjibulla said it was notable that Joly accused active diplomats of involvement in criminality, and that she said violence linked to the Indian government had only increased since Canada made public its concerns about Nijjar’s killing last year.

“Canada did what it thought was necessary,” Nadjibulla said.

“In order for Canada, at this stage, to have any kind of co-operation from India and seek accountability for what has happened, we would need India to feel some pressure; we would need India to feel some reason to co-operate.”

In British Columbia, the Sikh gurdwara where Nijjar was president hosted a news conference at which temple leaders and a Sikh independence group called for India’s consulates in Vancouver and Toronto to be shut down.

Gurkeerat Singh, a spokesman for the Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara in Surrey, said that “the safety and the security of Sikhs will still be in question” as long as the missions continued to operate.

Jatinder Singh Grewal of the pro-independence advocacy group Sikhs for Justice, which Nijjar had been involved with, called the consulates “houses of terror” that needed to be shut down.

In Ottawa, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh called Tuesday for “severe sanctions on Indian diplomats” involved in criminal activity. The RCMP said Monday there were six Indian diplomats it sought to question about violent activities in Canada, and those six are the ones Canada expelled.

Singh said Canada must also ban a Hindu group that has been accused of hate speech by Sikh and Muslim groups.

The House of Commons is not sitting this week, preventing an immediate debate on the matter, but Singh said his party will be asking the House public safety committee to study “other steps we can take to keep Canadians safe.”

The Bloc Québécois asked Tuesday for the government to “intensify collaboration with Canada’s allies in terms of intelligence and solidarity, in the face of such acts.” The Conservatives on Monday denounced Canada’s “extremely concerning” allegations as proof that the government had not taken foreign interference and national security seriously.

The Liberal government is also trying to assure Canadian businesses that it wants trade with India to continue even though allegations of illegal activity caused Ottawa to suspend negotiations for a free-trade deal a year ago.

Trade Minister Mary Ng released a statement acknowledging the uncertainty that businesses and investors may have as a result as the diplomatic expulsions. She said the government will continue to support commercial and economic ties between the countries.

“However, we must consider our economic interests with the need to protect Canadians and uphold the rule of law,” she said. “We will not tolerate any foreign government threatening, extorting or harming Canadian citizens on our soil.”

Ng said the government remains “open to a dialogue” with India and looks forward to continuing a “valued relationship.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 15, 2024.

— With files from Kelly Geraldine Malone, Laura Osman and Brenna Owen



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Washington mum on Canada’s latest allegations against India, expulsion of diplomats

Published

 on

OTTAWA – American officials did not condemn India’s response to explosive accusations that its government has been involved in an escalating number of violent crimes in Canada.

On Monday, Ottawa expelled six Indian diplomats after the RCMP said it had credible evidence that Indian agents played a role in extortion, coercion and murder of Canadian citizens on Canadian soil.

U.S. State Department spokesman Matthew Miller would not comment on the substance of these new claims at a news conference on Tuesday, and he did not criticize India’s decision to also expel six Canadian diplomats.

“As we’ve said before, they are serious allegations and we have wanted to see India take them seriously and co-operate with Canada’s investigation. They have chosen an alternate path,” he said.

Miller said the U.S. has long been asking India to co-operate with Canadian authorities. In September 2023, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced that Canadian intelligence services were investigating credible information about a potential link between India’s government and the June 2023 killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Sikh activist, in Surrey, B.C.

Miller’s comments came as an Indian delegation visited Washington to discuss an alleged murder-for-hire plot that U.S. officials revealed last November.

An unsealed indictment alleged an Indian government employee had directed an attempted assassination in the United States, and spoke about others, including Nijjar.

Miller said the visit by what he called the Indian inquiry committee, announced on Monday, was unrelated to the allegations made public by Canadian authorities that same day, calling the timing “completely coincidental.”

White House national security spokesman John Kirby said he would not speak about the Canadian case but said the Indian government’s decision to send an inquiry committee to Washington signals that India is taking the situation seriously.

“I wouldn’t speak for the Canadians one way or another,” he said. “But we have expressed our deep concern about this to our Indian counterparts. They have expressed to us that they are taking it seriously,” Kirby said.

India has insisted Canada has provided it no evidence to back up any of the allegations.

RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme said the force’s deputy commissioner tried to share evidence with Indian police last week but was rebuffed. This past weekend, deputy foreign affairs minister David Morrison, along with the RCMP, presented evidence to India in meetings held in Singapore.

Canada sought India’s agreement to revoke the diplomatic immunity of the six individuals so they could be interviewed, but India refused.

Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly said Monday that India’s refusal to co-operate is why Canada declared the six diplomats persona non grata, which is one of the stiffest penalties Canada can impose under the Vienna Convention.

She also said Monday that she had reached out to Canada’s peers in the Five Eyes intelligence alliance about the situation, which includes the U.S. and New Zealand.

New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters suggested he would let the judicial processes unfold in a statement that did not mention India.

“The alleged criminal conduct outlined publicly by Canadian law enforcement authorities, if proven, would be very concerning,” Peters wrote on X, saying Ottawa had flagged “ongoing criminal investigations into violence and threats of violence against members of its South Asian community.”

Vina Nadjibulla, research vice-president for the Asia Pacific Foundation, said before these statements that it’s crucial Canada receive support from its allies, possibly through diplomatic moves behind the scenes as well as public statements of support.

“We are in uncharted territory, with implications for the diplomatic relationship as well as for Canada’s public safety and national security,” she said.

Nadjibulla said it was notable that Joly accused active diplomats of involvement in criminality, and that she said violence linked to the Indian government had only increased since Canada made public its concerns about Nijjar’s killing last year.

“Canada did what it thought was necessary,” Nadjibulla said.

“In order for Canada, at this stage, to have any kind of co-operation from India and seek accountability for what has happened, we would need India to feel some pressure; we would need India to feel some reason to co-operate.”

In British Columbia, the Sikh gurdwara where Nijjar was president hosted a news conference at which temple leaders and a Sikh independence group called for India’s consulates in Vancouver and Toronto to be shut down.

Gurkeerat Singh, a spokesman for the Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara in Surrey, said that “the safety and the security of Sikhs will still be in question” as long as the missions continued to operate.

Jatinder Singh Grewal of the pro-independence advocacy group Sikhs for Justice, which Nijjar had been involved with, called the consulates “houses of terror” that needed to be shut down.

In Ottawa, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh called Tuesday for “severe sanctions on Indian diplomats” involved in criminal activity. The RCMP said Monday there were six Indian diplomats it sought to question about violent activities in Canada, and those six are the ones Canada expelled.

Singh said Canada must also ban a Hindu group that has been accused of hate speech by Sikh and Muslim groups.

The House of Commons is not sitting this week, preventing an immediate debate on the matter, but Singh said his party will be asking the House public safety committee to study “other steps we can take to keep Canadians safe.”

The Bloc Québécois asked Tuesday for the government to “intensify collaboration with Canada’s allies in terms of intelligence and solidarity, in the face of such acts.” The Conservatives on Monday denounced Canada’s “extremely concerning” allegations as proof that the government had not taken foreign interference and national security seriously.

The Liberal government is also trying to assure Canadian businesses that it wants trade with India to continue even though allegations of illegal activity caused Ottawa to suspend negotiations for a free-trade deal a year ago.

Trade Minister Mary Ng released a statement acknowledging the uncertainty that businesses and investors may have as a result as the diplomatic expulsions. She said the government will continue to support commercial and economic ties between the countries.

“However, we must consider our economic interests with the need to protect Canadians and uphold the rule of law,” she said. “We will not tolerate any foreign government threatening, extorting or harming Canadian citizens on our soil.”

Ng said the government remains “open to a dialogue” with India and looks forward to continuing a “valued relationship.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 15, 2024.

— With files from Kelly Geraldine Malone, Laura Osman and Brenna Owen



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Man, woman charged in theft of 54 anchors in Nova Scotia

Published

 on

METEGHAN CENTRE, N.S. – Police in Nova Scotia have charged a man and a woman in the theft of 54 anchors.

RCMP say the anchors were stolen overnight on Oct. 9 from a business in Meteghan Centre, about 210 kilometres southwest of Halifax.

A news release from the Mounties says the anchors were worth about $11,000 and the theft was reported on Thursday morning.

Investigators identified a “vehicle of interest,” which they managed to find and flag down later that morning.

The release says officers arrested the car’s occupants — a 45-year-old man and a 41-year-old woman — and charged them with theft over $5,000.

Police say the anchors were recovered at a scrapyard in Yarmouth, N.S.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 15, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending