adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Employees want to talk about politics at work, study finds—but it’s a ‘double-edged sword’

Published

 on

 

With the 2024 presidential election cycle picking up and the continuing crisis in the Middle East, political conversations are dominating Americans’ newsfeeds and social media, and spreading into the workplace as well.

According to a recent online survey conducted in October by Glassdoor, 61% of U.S. employees say they have discussed politics at work with colleagues sometime in the past 12 months. In the past year, 8% of online discussions in Company Bowls, Glassdoor’s online conversation feed for employees, have mentioned Joe Biden or Donald Trump and more than 21% have been about the ongoing conflict in Gaza and Israel.

Men (67%) are more likely than women (54%) to talk politics with co-workers, and younger generations are more likely to engage in political conversations than their older counterparts. Overall, men ages 35 and up and women ages 18-34 appear to be the most likely to talk about politics with their colleagues.

Employees expect political conversations, but they come with risks

“I think for a long time it was considered taboo to talk about politics in the workplace, but these conversations have always happened to some degree either in lunchrooms or at bars and happy hours and are now happening in a lot of other places as well with the changing world of work,” Glassdoor’s chief economist Aaron Terrazas tells CNBC Make It.

“Younger generations in particular expect these conversations to happen in the workplace and they expect leadership to be vocal on issues that matter to them.”

Overall, 64% of workers said they feel supported when their company takes a big stance on political issues they care about. With Gen Z and Millennial respondents that number jumped to 70% and 71%, respectively. When looking just at Gen Z and Millennial women, the percentage rose even higher to 81%, compared to around 60% of Gen Z and Millennial men.

But political statements come with risks, Terrazza says. Worker populations are diverse and a stance that supports some might ultimately alienate others. Around 36% of survey respondents said they would not apply to an open position if the company leadership supported a political candidate they did not agree with and around 31% said they would even consider leaving their current position. For Gen Z employees, these numbers rose to 49% and 44%, respectively.

One survey respondent characterized political statements as a “double-edged sword.”

“My company took a position and not one I agree with, which for me is way worse than not taking one at all because now it forces me to support that position by working for them if I choose to remain at my job,” the anonymous executive director responded.

However, this doesn’t necessarily mean that company leaders should avoid political talk all together. Terrazas says it is important for executives to keep a pulse on how employees are viewing political events before making any company-wide statements on controversial events.

How to talk politics at work

Terrazas says that the increasing presence of politics at work is part of a broader shift toward democratization of the workplace. Instead of employees having to support whatever company leadership believes, he thinks employee input should be incorporated into company statements that are made.

“Particularly as we move into next year, it’s going to be all the more important for company leadership to stick their head out on these controversial issues and be in touch with where their employees stand on them,” he says.

As a mid-level executive himself, he says it is important to have these political conversations within teams and then relay the feedback you get to upper management.

Caroline Hopper, managing director of the Citizenship and American Identity program at Aspen Institute agrees. In an interview with CNBC Make It in 2020, Hopper said that in a work environment where political conversations are considered taboo, the discourse is left to the loudest and often most polarizing voices with public platforms, which can lead to more conflict.

When approaching political conversations in the office she said to follow these principles: don’t try to win, listen empathetically, learn what experience formed that opinion, be willing to learn and change your mind, and know when a discussion will not be productive.

“A ‘better argument’ is one in which all parties respect the humanity of others,” Hopper said. “So, there are instances in which a line must be drawn, and exchange cannot be productive.”

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

Gould calls Poilievre a ‘fraudster’ over his carbon price warning

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Liberal House leader Karina Gould lambasted Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre as a “fraudster” this morning after he said the federal carbon price is going to cause a “nuclear winter.”

Gould was speaking just before the House of Commons is set to reopen following the summer break.

“What I heard yesterday from Mr. Poilievre was so over the top, so irresponsible, so immature, and something that only a fraudster would do,” she said from Parliament Hill.

On Sunday Poilievre said increasing the carbon price will cause a “nuclear winter,” painting a dystopian picture of people starving and freezing because they can’t afford food or heat due the carbon price.

He said the Liberals’ obsession with carbon pricing is “an existential threat to our economy and our way of life.”

The carbon price currently adds about 17.6 cents to every litre of gasoline, but that cost is offset by carbon rebates mailed to Canadians every three months. The Parliamentary Budget Office provided analysis that showed eight in 10 households receive more from the rebates than they pay in carbon pricing, though the office also warned that long-term economic effects could harm jobs and wage growth.

Gould accused Poilievre of ignoring the rebates, and refusing to tell Canadians how he would make life more affordable while battling climate change. The Liberals have also accused the Conservatives of dismissing the expertise of more than 200 economists who wrote a letter earlier this year describing the carbon price as the least expensive, most efficient way to lower emissions.

Poilievre is pushing for the other opposition parties to vote the government down and trigger what he calls a “carbon tax election.”

The recent decision by the NDP to break its political pact with the government makes an early election more likely, but there does not seem to be an interest from either the Bloc Québécois or the NDP to have it happen immediately.

Poilievre intends to bring a non-confidence motion against the government as early as this week but would likely need both the Bloc and NDP to support it.

Gould said she has no “crystal ball” over when or how often Poilievre might try to bring down the government

“I know that the end of the supply and confidence agreement makes things a bit different, but really all it does is returns us to a normal minority parliament,” she said. “And that means that we will work case-by-case, legislation-by-legislation with whichever party wants to work with us. I have already been in touch with all of the House leaders in the opposition parties and my job now is to make Parliament work for Canadians.”

She also insisted the government has listened to the concerns raised by Canadians, and received the message when the Liberals lost a Toronto byelection in June in seat the party had held since 1997.

“We certainly got the message from Toronto-St. Paul’s and have spent the summer reflecting on what that means and are coming back to Parliament, I think, very clearly focused on ensuring that Canadians are at the centre of everything that we do moving forward,” she said.

The Liberals are bracing, however, for the possibility of another blow Monday night, in a tight race to hold a Montreal seat in a byelection there. Voters in LaSalle—Émard—Verdun are casting ballots today to replace former justice minister David Lametti, who was removed from cabinet in 2023 and resigned as an MP in January.

The Conservatives and NDP are also in a tight race in Elmwood-Transcona, a Winnipeg seat that has mostly been held by the NDP over the last several decades.

There are several key bills making their way through the legislative process, including the online harms act and the NDP-endorsed pharmacare bill, which is currently in the Senate.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Voters head to the polls for byelections in Montreal and Winnipeg

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canadians in two federal ridings are choosing their next member of Parliament today, and political parties are closely watching the results.

Winnipeg’s Elmwood —Transcona seat has been vacant since the NDP’s Daniel Blaikie left federal politics.

The New Democrats are hoping to hold onto the riding and polls suggest the Conservatives are in the running.

The Montreal seat of LaSalle—Émard—Verdun opened up when former justice minister David Lametti left politics.

Polls suggest the race is tight between the Liberal candidate and the Bloc Québécois, but the NDP is also hopeful it can win.

The Conservatives took over a Liberal stronghold seat in another byelection in Toronto earlier this summer, a loss that sent shock waves through the governing party and intensified calls for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to step down as leader.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Next phase of federal foreign interference inquiry to begin today in Ottawa

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – The latest phase of a federal inquiry into foreign interference is set to kick off today with remarks from commissioner Marie-Josée Hogue.

Several weeks of public hearings will focus on the capacity of federal agencies to detect, deter and counter foreign interference.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and key government officials took part in hearings earlier this year as the inquiry explored allegations that Beijing tried to meddle in the 2019 and 2021 federal elections.

Hogue’s interim report, released in early May, said Beijing’s actions did not affect the overall results of the two general elections.

The report said while outcomes in a small number of ridings may have been affected by interference, this cannot be said with certainty.

Trudeau, members of his inner circle and senior security officials are slated to return to the inquiry in coming weeks.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending