Boomer in the Morning
Elliotte Friedman: NHL’s plan to resume their season, potential hurdles and next season
May 22 2020
Will it all be worth it?
If the NHL is somehow able to salvage the rest of the NHL season in some fashion, one wonders if there aren’t participants and fana who will ultimately wonder if perhaps it would be better to simply move on.
Or if there would be an asterisk beside this year’s Stanley Cup winner?
Take, for example, if the league and teams decide on the most recent proposal to re-start with a best-of-five “play-in” for 16 teams. It could potentially mean that after players re-assemble from all over the globe, go through potential quarantine orders and then a sizeable training camp, they could ultimately have all those efforts erased in a three-game sweep.
How would that sit?
“Good question,” said Calgary Flames GM Brad Treliving during his weekly chat with local reporters.
“With the amount of time everybody has been off, and all the time and energy that would go into relaunching, you want to have enough games. You’d hate to have people go through everything and you come back for a game and now you’re out again. I don’t know what that sweet spot is. If it is the rumoured, best-of-five — that probably seems the fairest. I’m good with that.”
Boomer in the Morning
Elliotte Friedman: NHL’s plan to resume their season, potential hurdles and next season
May 22 2020
At last word the NHLPA executive committee was mulling over okaying the aforementioned format, which would see the top four teams in each conference play one another for seeding, while teams ranked fifth-through-12th in each conference would have a best-of-five play in series to establish the top eight on each side.
Would a modified system like that tarnish the integrity of winning the Stanley Cup, which is generally considered the hardest trophy in sports to win by virtue of its extended war of attrition?
Fact is, such a format would actually be more onerous than that of the 1980s when 16 of the league’s 21 teams opened the playoffs with a best-of-five series before finishing with four rounds of best of sevens.
The proposed format would also see four rounds of best of sevens, which would get Treliving’s approval.
“You also know the backdrop is we don’t have an indefinite period of time to get it all in,” said Treliving.
“To win the Stanley Cup, it’s hard to do that. It’s got to be hard, and from what I’ve read, it’s going to be hard. The difficulty has still got to be there. People have asked at the end of that if there’s an asterisk beside whoever wins this. My comment would be, ‘this is where we are in life.’ I look at it like this is certainly going to be different, but somebody is going to win this, if we get to that point.”
And that, in Treliving’s eyes, would be a win for everyone.
“If we’re getting back to playing hockey that means, No. 1, we’re progressing as a society, which is good, and we’re getting on the other side of this. We’ve awarded the Stanley Cup under different circumstances under different times.
“Whoever wins this will be just as happy and just as proud for whatever format they’ll have to go through. Is it going to be unique? Sure. But everyone is going to have an opportunity to participate in the format and be successful in it.”
A look back at how the Cup was awarded since 1893 shows teams winning in formats ranging from single-game eliminations, two-game total scores to best of sevens.
“We’ve had winners after 48 games and they get rings like everybody else got,” he said, referring to the 1995 and 2013 champions, who won the Cup following lockout-shortened regular seasons.
“Whatever the format is we’ll be excited to be part of that, hopefully, and we’ll go after that. You can’t compare it to what happened last year. Again, we’re in a different time. Hey, getting a haircut these few months seems like you deserve a medal. Small victories.”
Refusing to get too excited or invested in the latest possible plan for obvious reasons, Treliving once again reiterated that no matter what plan the league and its players come up with, none of them can be executed unless the medical experts give their blessing on changing protocols that would include playing in empty hub arenas hosting a large number of teams.
“Again, knowing the athletes, this is a competitive group,” he said.
“If we get back it will be exciting and competitive and very, very compelling.”
The Battle of Alberta ended with the Calgary Flames getting knocked out of the series on Thursday — making Edmonton the sole Canadian team left in the Stanley Cup playoffs.
The Edmonton Oilers emerged victorious in the NHL’s first playoff Battle of Alberta in 31 years. It was a tough loss for Calgarians who were rooting for their home team, but some say they’ll get over the rivalry and root for the Oilers in the fight for the Stanley Cup.
For Flames fan Austin Hill, it comes down to Canadians cheering for their own teams.
“Definitely have to get behind the Oilers,” he said. “When your local team gets eliminated, you have to put your support behind the next Canadian team. It’s the right thing to do.”
It’s bittersweet, though, as the Red Mile on 17th Avenue — the centre for a lot of cheering from bars and restaurants — was quiet Friday morning.
“I really wanted to feel the energy of Calgary, be down here, 17th, feel the Red Mile,” Hill said.
“I would love to see the Oilers and [Connor] McDavid do a playoff run. That would be amazing. That would be a great time for the Oilers and Alberta as well.”
Diehard fans like Brian Baker, who watched the game at the Saddledome, had to take the day off to recover from the loss.
“It was a great game until overtime, and then I didn’t like the ending at all. I had to take today off to recover from the mental anguish of seeing the Oilers go on,” he said.
“They [the Flames] had a good season. Nothing to complain about there. It would have been nice to see them go further.… I would like to see a Canadian team continue on.”
Some might call it jumping on the bandwagon, but others call it being a part of a community.
Australian Thomas Stefoulis, who previously lived in Calgary for a few years, says he thinks Albertans can get past their rivalry, albeit begrudgingly.
“It just leads to feeling that sort of a sense of community, which I think is very valuable. So even if people want to be bandwagon fans, that’s totally fine. Get involved for the day, get involved in the game. It’s just important for keeping community alive,” he said.
Other Calgarians won’t be rooting for the Oilers, or anyone else, for that matter.
“I feel like because it’s kind of done in the city with the Flames being out, I will probably stop watching,” said Kate James-Loth, who is new to the city but got swept up in the playoff excitement and tuned in to the games.
“I have to be loyal now that I live in Calgary.”
With an early end to the series, in Game 5, it’s still unclear who the Oilers will face next, the Colorado Avalanche or St. Louis Blues.
Blue Jays 4 Angels 3
My first Apple TV+ game and there was good and bad. I liked the cleanness of the video. I liked the field noise.
I hated the commentary. They didn’t seem to know anything about the Blue Jays. Talked about Kirk’s speed (speed doesn’t slump), talking about Star Wars way, way too much. The sideline woman talked too much, for my liking.
And they missed action on the field. The Jays’ first run scored while they were showing some set-piece. And they talked to people dressed in Star Wars gear while the game was going on, instead of showing the play.
A heck of a good game.
Alek Manoah was good, maybe as great as he’s been all season, but good. He gave up a couple of solo homers (Jared Walsh and Tyler Wade taking him deep). And he was hurt by some poor defense. Raimel Tapai had a single get through him, giving the runner an extra base and setting up the Angels’ first run.
Manoah went 6, allowed 7 hits, 3 runs, 2 earned, 0 walks and 9 strikeouts.
He was also helped out by a nice play by Bo Bichette. In the fifth inning, with Mike Trout on third, Walsh ground one at Bo. Bo threw home and Trout was just barely out. Called safe on the field, the replay showed that he was out by the slimmest possible margin. I was surprised that they overturned the call on such a close play.
Offensively? Well, we did enough. Barely enough, but enough.
We had 11 hits, 3 extra-base hits (all doubles). We scored:
Lourdes had 3 hits (can we hope he is out of his slump?). Kirk had 2 hits. Everyone else had 1 hit except for the 3 guys at the top of the order. Springer, Espinal (he did make a very nice play at third base), and Guerrero went 0 for 11, with 3 strikeouts, and 2 walks.
Our bullpen did a great job.
Jays of the Day: Gurriel (.573 WPA), Chapman (.172), Romano (.187), Chapman (.172), and Richards (.102). Tapia came close (.090) but that error cost him a JoD.
Suckage: The top of the order, Springer (-.259), Espinal (-.251) and Vlad (-.159). Manoah had the number too (-.119) but I don’t think that’s fair.
Tomorrow night the Jays go for their fourth win in a row. Yusei Kikuchi (2-1, 3.47) vs. Michael Lorenzen (5-2, 3.05). It is a 10:00 Eastern start.
Of note, Lourdes was miked up, but about all we got was him huffing his way into a double. I was hoping for more.
The Calgary Flames built their reputation on Darryl Sutter Hockey – that heavy-forechecking, quality-defending style that smothers opponents and wins back pucks, which makes the burden of creating offence a struggle for their opposition. On the backs of that plan, the Flames allowed the third-fewest goals during the regular season. They were a force.
The Edmonton Oilers can be given no greater compliment than the way the Flames were reduced to playing in the Battle of Alberta, chasing more and more offence to try to keep up with an Oilers top-six that simply could not be stopped. There was a desperation there that we hadn’t seen from the Flames, and by Game 5 I kept thinking, “Just catch the pass and shoot it” rather than trying to rush a one-timer on a hot pass or on one that was in a bad spot. Their usual poise disappeared.
A look at a few of those fanned one-timers in Game 5:
By the end, little of the Flames’ identity was left, not the physical play, not the elite goaltending, or the line of Gaudreau-Lindholm-Tkachuk, which was arguably the best in the league in 2021-22.
The Flames played with offensive impatience, which left room for the Oilers to fly back the other way. Too often it became a track meet, and with that style imposed on the series, the Flames, ironically, were cooked. Rush chances were 11-3 for the Oilers in Game 5.
Apparently, there was also a goal disallowed, but the things below are about how the Oilers got the Flames in a position where one play not going their way could mean the end of the series, and their season.
How did the Oilers do it?
I was tempted to skip over this obvious point because you, the reader, are well aware of what Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl do. But I just couldn’t. How could I? Everything about the Oilers hinged on this, with two players combining for **checks stats** – no, that can’t be right – **checks again** 29 points in five games. They set all kinds of records.
The Flames got much better at slowing down McDavid in Games 4 and 5, but it took all their focus and attention, which opened them up everywhere else.
Depth contributions from Kane, Hyman, RNH
In Game 5, Zach Hyman had one goal and two assists for three points, he was plus-4, he had seven shots, he played nearly 24 minutes, he led the team in hits, he had a big blocked shot, there’s just not much more I can say about this guy.
In the summer, I use a plastic oar to stir my kids’ kiddie pool and get the water going in a “whirlpool,” and that’s what happens when Hyman is on the ice. He’s an oar, and he gets the play going in the direction he’s skating whenever he’s out there.
With McDavid and Draisaitl sucking up all the attention – as they have in years past – the question was asked of the Oilers depth: when those guys see all the best defending, can you capitalize on your extra space or weaker opposition?
Hyman said yes. Evander Kane said yes; he’s on pace to threaten the all-time playoff goals record of 19 (he has 12, so if they Oilers play two more rounds … ?). Ryan Nugent-Hopkins had six points in five games; the Nuge said yes too.
McDavid and Draisaitl were like a collective boxer doing so much damage to the body in the early rounds that their opposition starts to drop their hands, while these guys were suddenly free to take shots at the head.
I thought Oilers coach Jay Woodcroft showed a willingness to be flexible and go away from what’s worked if it wasn’t working on a given night. Case in point: Kane had been on an unbelievable run alongside McDavid, as mentioned above. It would’ve been easy to leave him in that role, no matter what. This is speculation on my part, but I don’t think the Oil loved how Kane defended a Flames set breakout early in the game, followed by his positioning on the Andrew Mangiapane goal. Whether it was that or something else, Woodcroft bumped Kane off that line for Hyman, who did … all the things I mentioned in the section above. It was the perfect change in a game McDavid didn’t have an inch of room and couldn’t create much or drive play. Hyman did it for that line at times.
I also given Woodcroft credit for sticking with what would give the team the best chance in the big picture: Mike Smith over Mikko Koskinen. After Game 1, he could’ve bailed on Smith and been justified. Then Game 2 starts with two softies, where you’d think he’d have a hair trigger, but he stuck with Smith yet again. The roller coaster Mike Smith Experience includes the type of highs you need to get by great opponents, and Woodcroft gave their team the chance to see that through.
An exposed weakness, and a surprise goaltending slump
Flames coach Darryl Sutter gave a telling response in a post-game when he talked about their “inexperienced defence.” They don’t have guys who’ve seen deep runs playing D for them, and, in the end, the little defensive gaffes made just enough room for the Oilers (a miscommunication with Noah Hanifin and Elias Lindholm on the OT winner cost them) to expose them. In Game 5, the Oilers had 18 slot shots to the Flames’ nine.
The Flames needed goaltending to bail them out, but Edmonton has had Jacob Markstrom’s number all year. He ended up posting just an .852 save percentage in the series, and the crease was supposed to be where the Flames had a clear advantage. I haven’t heard it said much lately, but McDavid is in an awkward body position on that OT winner and doesn’t get a ton on it. They needed a few more saves from Markstrom.
When all is said and done, the Battle of Alberta was decided because the Oilers’ best players had their ‘A’ games, and that dictated everything that came next from the Flames. Calgary was reduced to counterpunching, when it had been used to coming out swinging.
In the NHL, the sport’s all-time greats almost always find their way to a championship, as at some level they become all their opponents can think about and the team around them is free to rise up. That’s what’s been happening for the Oilers, and no matter who their next opponent is, that game plan has every chance of being effective in yet another round.
Why Is It Difficult to Get Hired During the Supposed ‘Great Resignation’?
Police encounter people with pellet guns 'with regularity across Canada,' criminologist says – CBC.ca
Team Canada players raised 'concerns' about match with Iran before it was cancelled: Canada Soccer – CBC News
The Hypocrisy that is America (Gun Law)
Senegal: 11 newborn babies die in mysterious inferno
Would Poilievre fund a Fox News Canada? | Canada's National Observer: News & Analysis – Canada's National Observer
Oklahoma Governor signs Bill into law that prohibits abortion
Price of natural gas could climb higher still after cresting multi-year highs – CBC.ca