Conservative leadership candidate Marilyn Gladu says the media is giving unfair attention to prominent male Conservatives who haven’t announced their intentions to run to be the party’s leader instead of to her campaign.
The race for the Conservative Party leadership kicked off earlier this month in the wake of leader Andrew Scheer’s resignation. Gladu, the only female to confirm her candidacy so far, said much news coverage briefly references her candidacy while allocating more time or space to potential male candidates who haven’t announced a bid for leadership.
“I think that there’s been more attention paid to those that have not yet announced, and they get lots of press,” she said. “I think that it’s not fair and it doesn’t necessarily look good on the media because they should be promoting women in politics.”
Gladu’s comments come about two weeks after many leadership hopefuls began mobilizing their campaigns. Speculation over whether well-known politicians like former Conservative Party interim leader Rona Ambrose, former Quebec premier Jean Charest, and Conservative finance critic Pierre Poilievre will enter the race have dominated media headlines in recent weeks.
But Gladu said her candidacy often receives the “cursory one statement” from media outlets.
For instance, this CBC News article that said Gladu has the “steepest hill to climb ” in the race while allotting full graphs to four male politicians, including potential candidates, Poilievre, Charest, and former cabinet minister Erin O’Toole, who hadn’t announced bids for the leadership. Both Poilievre and Charest have since announced they will not be entering the race. O’Toole, meanwhile, has yet to formally announce his candidacy, but has assembled a campaign team.
An engineer of 32 years, Gladu said she’s experienced treatment like this before. While she said she doesn’t know the reason for the media’s treatment of her campaign, she acknowledged that she’s less well-known than candidates like Peter MacKay, who was a Conservative MP from 1997 to 2015 and served as a senior minister in Stephen Harper’s government for almost a decade.
Gladu has been an MP since 2015, serving as the Tories’ health critic since 2017. She also worked as the science critic, and as the chair for the House Status of Women Committee. Gladu was also a youth leader for over 30 years, prior to her career in federal politics, as well as being an engineer. She began her career at Dow Chemical, where she worked for 21 years before becoming the director of engineering at Suncor followed by a consultant role at WorleyParsons.
Recent polls have shown that the only female contestant has the most ground to make up in the race.
A Jan. 16-17 poll conducted by Mainstreet Research for iPolitics found that Peter MacKay would perform the best out of Conservative leadership candidates.
The poll asked 1,470 Canadian adults who they would vote for if a federal election were held today, with four different scenarios of who is Conservative leader: Andrew Scheer, Pierre Poilievre, Marilyn Gladu and Peter MacKay.
MacKay came in first place polling at 31.7 per cent of the vote, followed by Scheer at 30 per cent, Poilievre at 26.9 per cent, and Gladu in fourth place with 24.1 per cent of the vote.
The survey did not ask respondents which party they would back if Erin O’Toole was Conservative leader.
While she knowingly calls herself the race’s “dark horse,” Gladu believes that her personality will resonate with Canadians.
“To know me is to love me and Canadians are going to get to know me over this campaign,” she said.
The Sarnia—Lambton MP also says a female leader would help the party attract new voters, something she said is necessary if the party hopes to win future elections. She also said she’s able to build relationships with young people, another key factor to winning election as the younger voting demographic becomes larger.
Along with Gladu and MacKay, the leadership race includes Richard Decarie, a social conservative from Quebec; Alberta-based businessman Rick Peterson; and rookie MP Derek Sloan.
Emergencies Act: Social media was key to protests, expert says
Social media acted as the “central nervous system” of the “Freedom Convoy” protest in Ottawa last winter, the Public Order Emergency Commission heard Tuesday as it considered the role of misinformation in the lead up to the invocation of the Emergencies Act.
The policy phase this week follows six weeks of fact-finding hearings into the events that led to that decision, which included testimony about online threats and the role social media played in organizing the protest against COVID-19 public health measures.
Before thousands of trucks started rolling toward Ottawa last January, a loose group of protest organizers communicated mainly over TikTok and Facebook, the commission heard over those weeks of testimony. Many of them had never met in person until the protest began.
“Social media was the central nervous system of the convoy, and exploration of its role crosses numerous domains, such as law, psychology, history, sociology and public policy, to name a few,” Emily Laidlaw, the Canada Research Chair in Cybersecurity Law at the University of Calgary, wrote in a report for the commission.
Social media was used to fundraise, connect organizers and spread their message. It was also used to contrast the accounts of traditional media outlets and provide a different view of what was happening on the ground, Dax D’Orazio, a political scientist and post-doctoral fellow with Queen’s University, testified during an expert panel discussion before the commission Tuesday.
“It was a way of creating meaning, finding community and building, eventually, momentum for social and a political movement,” he said.
The inquiry is seeking the expert input to bolster its analysis of whether the government was right to use the Emergencies Act in response to protests that took over downtown Ottawa and halted trade at several border crossings.
The expert testimony will inform Commissioner Paul Rouleau’s recommendations about how to modernize the Emergencies Act and identify other areas for further study. It will also help him and his team study the impact of the purposeful or inadvertent spread of false information during the protest, which was explicitly written into the commission’s mandate.
Experts testified that regulating disinformation is a difficult prospect, especially since it’s not illegal to spread falsehoods.
“It’s lawful but awful,” said Laidlaw during the panel discussion. “For the government to create legislation that targets lawful expression, it likely won’t survive constitutional scrutiny.”
The experts defined disinformation as the intentional spread of false information, while misinformation was described as people spreading false information that they themselves believe to be true.
It would be difficult to draft laws that distinguish between the two, said Jonathon Penney, a legal scholar at York University. “It’s a question of intent,” he said.
The panellists also explored the relationship between extremist views and social media, which can provide an echo chamber that serves to confirm people’s existing biases.
Studies have shown the internet can help entrench extremist values, said Vivek Venkatesh, an education professor at Concordia University.
People who subscribe to extremist views increasingly turn to “fringe media” instead of taking in news from traditional sources, said David Morin, a national security expert with Sherbrook University, who spoke at the panel in French.
He said “self-made journalists” associated with those fringe outlets were present in Ottawa during the convoy protest, and produced “alternative information” for viewers.
For example, Morin said some alternative media sources reported that hundreds of thousands of protesters attended the Ottawa demonstration, when police reports show the true number was far lower.
The inquiry is on a tight timeline to complete its work, with Rouleau expected to submit final recommendations to Parliament at the beginning of February.
Another panel on the flow of essential goods and services, critical infrastructure and trade corridors was scheduled for Tuesday afternoon.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 29, 2022.
U.S., European media outlets urge end to prosecution of Julian Assange
The United States should end its prosecution of Julian Assange, leading media outlets from the United States and Europe that had collaborated with the WikiLeaks founder said on Monday, citing press freedom concerns.
“This indictment sets a dangerous precedent, and threatens to undermine America’s First Amendment and the freedom of the press,” editors and publishers of the Guardian, the New York Times, Le Monde, Der Spiegel, and El País said in an open letter.
Assange is wanted by U.S. authorities on 18 counts, including a spying charge, related to WikiLeaks’ release of confidential U.S. military records and diplomatic cables. His supporters say he is an anti-establishment hero who has been victimized because he exposed U.S. wrongdoing, including in conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Monday marked twelve years since those media outlets collaborated to release excerpts from over 250,000 documents obtained by Assange in the so-called “Cablegate” leak.
The material was leaked to WikiLeaks by the then American soldier Chelsea Manning and revealed the inner workings of U.S. diplomacy around the globe. The documents exposed “corruption, diplomatic scandals and spy affairs on an international scale,” the letter said.
In August, a group of journalists and lawyers sued the CIA and its former director Mike Pompeo over allegations the intelligence agency spied on them when they visited Assange during his stay in Ecuador’s embassy in London.
Assange spent seven years in the embassy before being dragged out and jailed in 2019 for breaching bail conditions. He has remained in prison in London while his extradition case is decided. If extradited to the United States, he faces a sentence of up to 175 years in an American maximum security prison.
His legal team has appealed to the High Court in London to block his extradition in a legal battle that has dragged on for more than a decade.
“Publishing is not a crime,” the media outlets said in their letter on Monday.
Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Washington, Editing by Rosalba O’Brien
Top media outlets demand US end prosecution of Julian Assange
US charges against WikiLeaks founder threaten press freedom and set ‘dangerous precedent’, US and European media say.
The United States must end its prosecution of Julian Assange, top global media organizations have urged, saying the US indictment against the WikiLeaks founder threatens free expression and freedom of the press.
In an open letter on Monday, five leading media outlets denounced the US’s prosecution against Assange, who is wanted on 18 counts, including a spying charge.
“This indictment sets a dangerous precedent and threatens to undermine America’s First Amendment and the freedom of the press,” wrote the editors and publishers of The New York Times, The Guardian, Le Monde, Der Spiegel and El Pais.
“Holding governments accountable is part of the core mission of a free press in a democracy.”
The letter comes exactly 12 years after the media outlets published revelations gleaned from WikiLeaks’s release of more than 250,000 confidential US military records and diplomatic cables, known as “Cablegate”.
The material was leaked to WikiLeaks by then-US soldier Chelsea Manning and revealed the inner workings of Washington’s diplomacy around the world.
The documents exposed “corruption, diplomatic scandals and spy affairs on an international scale”, Monday’s letter said.
“Twelve years after the publication of ‘Cablegate’, it is time for the US government to end its prosecution of Julian Assange for publishing secrets. Publishing is not a crime,” the media outlets said.
The 2019 US justice department indictment accused Assange of causing “serious damage” to US national security with the leak, as well as putting US government sources in danger of physical harm or detention.
But Assange’s supporters say he is being prosecuted for exposing US wrongdoing, including those committed during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
He remains in custody in Britain pending a US extradition request to face trial and could face up to 175 years in prison in the US if found guilty. Assange is appealing against the British government’s approval of his extradition.
Monday’s letter noted that, when Barack Obama was president and Joe Biden his vice president, the US administration held off on indicting Assange, as journalists involved could have also had to face prosecution.
That changed under President Donald Trump, when the US justice department charged Assange under the 1917 Espionage Act, which the media outlets said “has never been used to prosecute a publisher or broadcaster”.
The letter is the latest example of pressure on President Biden’s administration to end Assange’s prosecution.
Last year, leading human rights groups, including Amnesty International and the American Civil Liberties Union, called on Washington to drop the charges.
“The indictment of Mr Assange threatens press freedom because much of the conduct described in the indictment is conduct that journalists engage in routinely – and that they must engage in in order to do the work the public needs them to do,” they wrote.
In July, Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador also said he gave a letter to Biden in defence of Assange, while also renewing a previous offer of asylum to the WikiLeaks founder.
“I left a letter to the president about Assange, explaining that he did not commit any serious crime, did not cause anyone’s death, did not violate any human rights, and that he exercised his freedom, and that arresting him would mean a permanent affront to freedom of expression,” Lopez Obrador said.
Colombia’s left-wing President Gustavo Petro said last week that he met with WikiLeaks spokespeople and planned to ask Biden not to charge a journalist “just for telling the truth”.
Why Investors Are Buying Copper Today for a Green Energy Future
In Uncertain Times, Vancouver Island’s Real Estate Market Serves Stability
Is It a Good Idea to Invest in Casinos in Canada?
Silver investment demand jumped 12% in 2019
Iran anticipates renewed protests amid social media shutdown
Search for life on Mars accelerates as new bodies of water found below planet’s surface
Business16 hours ago
How Fintech Impacts Payday Lending
Science9 hours ago
Scientists revive 48500-year-old ‘zombie virus’ buried in ice
Investment8 hours ago
Is It a Good Idea to Invest in Casinos in Canada?
Economy22 hours ago
What protests in China may mean for the economy
News23 hours ago
Immigration in Canada: Refugee’s plea for housing answered
Business9 hours ago
How RBC pulled off its highly-coveted $13.5-billion deal for HSBC Canada — with some unintended help from Ottawa
Economy11 hours ago
Remarks by President Biden on Growing the Economy and Creating Good-Paying Jobs – The White House
Sports18 hours ago
Canada still looking to make 2022 FIFA World Cup history against Morocco