adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

Google and Meta pulling news will 'devastate' the industry, says Canadian publisher – CBC.ca

Published

 on


If Google and Meta pull content from Canadian news outlets it would “devastate” the industry, says Village Media CEO Jeff Elgie.

Village Media runs 25 community news websites, including six in northern Ontario – Sudbury.com, Soo Today, Bay Today, Elliot Lake Today, Timmins Today and Northern Ontario Business.

Elgie told CBC News he has been against Bill C-18, otherwise known as the Online News Act, from the start.

300x250x1

The law, which received royal assent last month, requires tech giants like Google and Meta to pay media outlets for news content they share or otherwise repurpose on their platforms.

In response, both Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, and Google have said they will pull Canadian news content from their platforms when the law comes into effect later this year.

A smiling man wearing glasses.
Jeff Elgie is the CEO of Sault Ste. Marie, Ont. based Village Media, which operates 25 local news websites, including six in northern Ontario. (Village Media)

Elgie said about 50 per cent of the traffic to his company’s websites comes from Facebook and Google.

“The whole approach with this bill in our opinion has been flawed from the get go,” Elgie said.

“[It’s] based on the notion that Google and Facebook steal content from publishers, which of course is not at all true. We, since the beginning, have always happily put our content on Google and Facebook because of the tremendous amount of traffic and audience that we get back from that.”

Elgie said losing access to those platforms will make it especially difficult for small publishers like Village Media to expand into new communities.

The company started in Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., and Elgie said they already have a strong foothold in that community. 

“There’s this behaviour where if anything happens in the city that’s significant, the first thing people do is they just go to Soo Today,” he said.

But if he were to enter a new market, the local news website would need to build up a local readership first.

“There’s no reasonably cost effective way to get in front of an online audience without those platforms,” he said, referring to Facebook and Google.

Some publishers support the bill

Other publishers in Canada lobbied in favour of the bill arguing it would help level the playing field in the competition for ad dollars against tech giants.

The CBC’s corporate stance is in favour of the bill.

“We know that one law won’t solve all of the challenges of the news business in Canada,” said CBC director of media relations Leon Mar in an email to CBC News.

“But we believe the Online News Act will contribute to the sustainability of news organizations, at a time when 80 per cent of digital ad revenue goes to Facebook and Google.”

On Wednesday, the CBC joined the government of Canada in pausing advertising on Facebook and Instagram.

“Access to news, a plurality of voices and a diversity of viewpoints are all cornerstones of a healthy democracy,” the CBC said in a press release.

“We join other Canadian media organizations that are calling for Canadians’ access to news — all news, from all outlets, both public and private — to be protected.”

Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez said Wednesday that he is still talking with Google to reach a deal, and avoid a Canadian news blackout on its platforms.

But Meta has not resumed talks with the federal government.

Elgie said he believes a deal is more likely, and important to reach, with Google.

But he said Meta has been pulling away from news for several years, and it would not surprise him if they pull away completely.

Morning North9:38How will Canada’s Online News Act affect local media?

With the Online News Act becoming law, what’s the future for local news in northern Ontario? The CEO of Village Media tells us why he thinks the new act, also known as Bill C-18, is a bad idea and will be harmful to small news websites.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

US says China’s ‘global information manipulation’ threatens freedoms – Al Jazeera English

Published

 on


We use cookies and data to

  • Deliver and maintain Google services
  • Track outages and protect against spam, fraud, and abuse
  • Measure audience engagement and site statistics to understand how our services are used and enhance the quality of those services

If you choose to “Accept all,” we will also use cookies and data to

  • Develop and improve new services
  • Deliver and measure the effectiveness of ads
  • Show personalized content, depending on your settings
  • Show personalized ads, depending on your settings

If you choose to “Reject all,” we will not use cookies for these additional purposes.

300x250x1

Non-personalized content is influenced by things like the content you’re currently viewing, activity in your active Search session, and your location. Non-personalized ads are influenced by the content you’re currently viewing and your general location. Personalized content and ads can also include more relevant results, recommendations, and tailored ads based on past activity from this browser, like previous Google searches. We also use cookies and data to tailor the experience to be age-appropriate, if relevant.

Select “More options” to see additional information, including details about managing your privacy settings. You can also visit g.co/privacytools at any time.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

US accuses China of global media manipulation

Published

 on

WASHINGTON: China is manipulating global media through censorship, data harvesting and covert purchases of foreign news outlets, the United States said on Thursday (Sep 28), warning the trend could lead to a “sharp contraction” of global freedom of expression.

The US State Department said in a report that Beijing has spent billions of dollars annually on information manipulation efforts, including by acquiring stakes in foreign media through “public and non-public means”, sponsoring online influencers and securing distribution agreements that promote unlabelled Chinese government content.

The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In July, Beijing responded to a NATO communique accusing it of coercive policies and spreading disinformation by saying the statement disregarded basic facts, deliberately discredited China and distorted its policies.

The US report comes amid controversy over China’s efforts in recent years to expand the global footprint of its government-controlled media, especially as geopolitical competition between Beijing and Washington has intensified. Chinese leaders have sought to combat the negative images of China they feel are spread by world media.

300x250x1

Citing public reports and “newly acquired government information”, the State Department’s Global Engagement Center said that Beijing had created its own information ecosystem by co-opting foreign political elites and journalists. It had also invested in satellite networks and digital television services in developing regions that prioritise Chinese state-backed media content.

Chinese data harvesting overseas “has enabled Beijing to fine-tune global censorship by targeting specific individuals and organisations”, it said.

“Unchecked, Beijing’s efforts could result in …. a sharp contraction of global freedom of expression,” the report said.

Despite unprecedented resources devoted to the campaign, Beijing had encountered “major setbacks” when targeting democratic countries due to local media and civil society push back, according to the report, which was produced under a congressional mandate to detail state information manipulation.

Related:
728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

China’s manipulation of media threatens global freedoms, says US report

Published

 on

China is manipulating global media through censorship, data harvesting and covert purchases of foreign news outlets, according to a new report from the US state department, which warned the trend could lead to a “sharp contraction” of global freedom of expression.

The report released on Thursday found that Beijing had spent billions of dollars annually on information manipulation efforts, including by acquiring stakes in foreign media through “public and non-public means”, sponsoring online influencers and securing distribution agreements that promote unlabelled Chinese government content.

Security guards walk by a poster of 19th Hangzhou Asian Games
Chinese state media censors itself after highlighting poem about corrupt leaders
Read more

The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In July, Beijing responded to a Nato communique accusing it of coercive policies and spreading disinformation by saying the statement disregarded basic facts, deliberately discredited China and distorted its policies.

The US report comes amid controversy over China’s efforts in recent years to expand the global footprint of its government-controlled media, especially as geopolitical competition between Beijing and Washington has intensified. Chinese leaders have sought to combat the negative images of China they feel are spread by world media.

300x250x1

Citing public reports and “newly acquired government information”, the state department’s global engagement center said that Beijing had created its own information ecosystem by co-opting foreign political elites and journalists. It had also invested in satellite networks and digital television services in developing regions that prioritise Chinese state-backed media content.

china media boats illustration
Inside China’s audacious global propaganda campaign
Read more

Chinese data harvesting overseas “has enabled Beijing to fine-tune global censorship by targeting specific individuals and organisations”, it said.

“Unchecked, Beijing’s efforts could result in … a sharp contraction of global freedom of expression,” the report said.

Despite unprecedented resources devoted to the campaign, Beijing had encountered “major setbacks” when targeting democratic countries due to local media and civil society pushback, according to the report, which was produced under a congressional mandate to detail state information manipulation.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending