In a lot of ways, smart speakers are the ideal home stereo for the streaming music generation. Telling an Amazon Echo to play whatever song was on your mind for the first time was a bit of a revelation. And music remains one of the most-used and most crucial features of any smart speaker. The only problem is lots of them sound terrible.
Sonos, Google, Apple and Amazon all have smart speakers where music quality is paramount, but a $200 Echo Studio or Sonos one is a tough sell next to a $50 Echo Dot or Nest Mini. Google is trying to fill the gap between those two extremes with the $100 Nest Audio, a speaker that effectively replaces the original Google Home that arrived four years ago. That speaker was meant to be a jack of all trades Google Assistant device, but the Nest Audio has a focus on music quality that wasn’t present in the original. Google piled on praise for the Nest Audio’s ability to deliver music “the way it should sound,” so I’ve spent the last week deciding if a rather diminutive speaker meets those lofty claims.
Sounds great when two speakers are paired in stereo
Attractive minimalist design
Comes in five colors
Google Assistant remains a solid option for smart home control
Some music fans will want larger speakers with better audio quality
Music service support is somewhat limited
For $100, the Nest Audio offers dramatically better music quality than what you get from small speakers like the Nest Mini. It’s not the best-sounded smart speaker on the market, but for most people it’ll be a major upgrade and it won’t break the bank.
Be the first to review the Nest Audio? Your ratings help us make the buyer’s guide better for everyone.
That small size was the first thing I noticed when unboxing the Nest Audio. It’s hard to get a sense for how big it is from Google’s promo pics and videos, but it’s less than 7 inches tall and only 3 inches thick. It’s slightly bigger than the original Google Home, and about the same height as the Sonos One, but much thinner (the One is about 4.7 inches thick). That small size means the Nest Audio is easy to tuck away wherever you want, but it also made me question if it could sound as good as Google promised.
Like all of Google’s current speakers, it is covered with audio-transparent cloth that comes in five colors: Chalk, Charcoal, Sage, Sand and Sky. (I got the boring but versatile “Chalk” option.) Nest Audio is the first of Google’s speakers that is entirely covered with cloth, which adds a nice uniformity to its appearance. The front has four LEDs that activate when you’re talking to the speaker, and the back contains a power port and mute switch. Finally, there are invisible touch-sensitive buttons on the top to play or pause audio and adjust the volume. Sadly (but not surprisingly), there’s no audio input jack like there is on the Home Max, so you won’t be able to use it with a turntable or other stereo equipment.
If you’ve set up a Google Assistant device before, nothing has changed. You do it through the Google Home app for iOS and Android; Just plug in the Nest Audio, open the app and go through the simple instructions that get your speaker connected to WiFI. You’ll also pick your preferred music service.
If you haven’t used a Google speaker before, it’s worth noting that you can’t use a few of the more popular music apps: Apple Music and Amazon Music are not available.Google Assistant does work with YouTube Music, Pandora, Deezer and Spotify. Not having access to Amazon or Apple is a bummer — but between Spotify and YouTube Music, most Nest Audio users should be covered. Besides, pretty much every music app on Android will let you cast to the Nest Audio, even Apple Music.
Once that’s all set, you can start asking Nest Audio to play whatever you want to hear, whether it’s music, podcasts, audiobooks or streams from apps like TuneIn or IHeartRadio. The experience isn’t very different from what the Google Assistant has done for years, which isn’t a bad thing. Google does say that the Nest Audio should be faster at commands like skipping songs and adjusting volume because of the ML hardware engine, which processes some commands on-device rather than in the cloud. I didn’t notice a difference compared to the Home Max, which is the Google Assistant speaker I use the most. But my colleague Cherlynn Low says she noticed a significant improvement over the original Home.
I will say that the Assistant isn’t always the best at identifying the music I ask it to play, though, an experience corroborated by our Managing Editor Terrence O’Brien. Telling it to “play some music I like” always pulled up “That’s What I Like” by Bruno Mars, while asking it to “play Metallica’s self-titled album” would pull up a specific song from the record followed by a bunch of other random Metallica tunes. Some of that appears to be due to the Assistant not understanding what I was looking for, but it also had to do with the music service I was using. When I asked for the self-titled Metallica album on Spotify, I got just what I expected.
From a feature perspective, the Nest Audio is basically identical to the Nest Mini and other Google Assistant speakers — so what I really wanted to know was how it sounds. My initial impression wasn’t overwhelmingly positive. Right out of the box it sounded a bit muddy, especially at lower volumes. Specifically, mids and highs mushed together, though the bass performance was clearly better than what you’d get out of the original Google Home or Nest Mini. That’s thanks to its dedicated 75mm woofer and 19mm tweeter; the Google Home and Nest Mini make do with a single driver.
For context, I spend most of my days listening to either a single Apple HomePod ($300), a pair of Google Home Max speakers ($600) or a pair of Sonos Play:1 speakers (Play:1 is no longer available, but two of the sonically identical Sonos One SL costs $360). Expecting similar sound from a $100 speaker that’s much smaller than those isn’t really fair.
After spending some time with the Nest Audio, I gained an appreciation for its sound quality. For a relatively small, single speaker, it succeeds at offering drastically better audio than you’ll get from options like the original Google Home, the Nest Mini or Amazon’s older Echo Dots (I haven’t heard the new one yet). As a speaker meant to be affordable while offering good music quality, I think Google hit the mark.
Turning the volume up to between 50 and 80 percent gave some noticeable thump and increased clarity to electro-pop like Chvrches or The Japanese House, and it did a good job at reproducing the distinct layered guitars of Metallica’s black album, even though it’s not a stereo speaker. A delicate song like “Beatrice” by Dizzy built to a wonderful crescendo with vocals coming through strong and clear. The unusual instrumentation of Gustavo Santaololla’s score for The Last of Us Part II was another good test case, as the baritone and bass guitars used throughout had enough low-end to come through with power. Overall, the bass presence isn’t massive, but it’s noticeable.
That said, the Nest Audio can’t compete with a single Sonos One. When properly tuned using the company’s TruePlay algorithm, the One is much louder and offers fuller, more distinct sound. But again, we’re talking about a speaker that costs twice as much. What Google pulls off here for $100 in a compact space is impressive and far exceeds what it did in 2016 with the Google Home. But if you’re an avid music listener you might benefit from a larger speaker.
Google’s Home Max and Apple’s HomePod both listen to and dynamically tune their sound — that keeps the bass from getting overly boomy when a speaker is up against a wall, for example. The Nest Audio, on the other hand, doesn’t continuously tune itself. Instead, Google tuned the speaker in its labs and in test homes using data from more than 2,500 simulated placements of the speaker.
The speaker does have some adaptive software, though. Media EQ analyses what you’re listening to (music vs. podcasts, for example) and adapts the audio to best fit the content. Ambient IQ, meanwhile, adapts the Assistant output based on background noise so you can better hear it in a noisier environment. I can’t say I noticed much of a difference, but I mainly used the speakers for music.
Probably the biggest issue I had with the Nest Audio was simply that its three-microphone array wasn’t as sensitive as those in the HomePod or Home Max. I often had to repeat myself a few times to get the speaker’s attention while playing back music. And one time, the speaker made the grave mistake of thinking I wanted the volume at 100 percent when I was just asking it to turn the volume down. In case you were wondering, the Nest Audio can be painfully loud at full volume.
That’s doubly true when pairing two Nest Audio speakers in stereo. Basically all smart speakers let you do this now, so it’s not an unexpected feature, but it improves the entire Nest Audio experience in a notable way. Obviously, stereo separation is important for serious music listeners, but having two speakers going simultaneously means everything simply sounds better, with vastly improved presence, bass response and overall volume. If you have a larger living room that you want to fill with sound, I’d recommend shelling out for two of these speakers and running them as a stereo pair.
At this point, the smart speaker market is pretty crowded, but there aren’t a lot of speakers in the $100 range that have the Nest Audio’s focus on sound quality. A natural comparison point is Amazon’s new, spherical Echo, but we haven’t had a chance to test it yet. That said, I’ve been fairly impressed with the audio improvements Amazon has made to its Echo products over the years — if you prefer Alexa over the Google Assistant, there’s a good chance that the new Echo might be the better option.
If you up your budget to $200, though, speakers like Amazon’s Echo Studio and the Sonos One provide even better sound quality. No surprise, given that they cost twice as much and are significantly larger than the Nest Audio. But if you’re looking to spend that much, two Nest Audio speakers give you the flexibility of running in stereo or setting up a multi-room system.
While the Nest Audio didn’t immediately impress me, I think Google’s execution is smart. It’s not trying to replace larger, high-quality speakers like the Sonos One or its own Home Max. Instead, it provides a huge audio quality upgrade over small, cheap speakers like the Nest Mini and is significantly better than the original Google Home, without pushing the price into the $200 range. Google’s also selling them in a pair for $180, which makes a stereo or multi-room setup easily attainable. That said, price is still the bottom line for most people, so I expect the Echo Dot and Nest Mini to remain the more popular options.
If you care at all about music, though, I urge you to consider the Nest Audio instead. Smart speakers are not a necessity, they’re a luxury, so budget an extra $50 and enjoy your music with improved bass and an audio presence that goes far beyond what you’ll get from a budget device. While the Nest Audio isn’t the best I’ve ever heard, it’s better than what lots of people currently use to listen to music. The combination of “good enough” sound quality and a low price point make it one of the best smart speakers you can buy.
All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Whether you’ve already preordered your iPhone 12 or 12 Pro or are waiting for the iPhone 12 mini or Pro Max to launch, Raptic’s new cases for the entire iPhone 12 lineup are available now. The Raptic Shield iPhone 12 cases features 10-foot military-grade drop protection, a machined aluminum frame with clear backing to show off your iPhone’s color, and even an antimicrobial treatment. Read on for a closer look, as well as a special 20% off with code code “9to5MACiP12“ at checkout.
The Raptic Shield offers a great blend of form and function for your device. The case goes beyond MIL-STD-810G protection standards with testing that includes 10-foot drops onto concrete. The front of the case features a raised 1.2 mm lip, which offers further defense against rough surfaces, and forceful impacts on your screen.
Raptic’s Shield case incorporates a machined aluminum frame to offer complete protection of the iPhone 12’s new bezel design. The durable machined frame is also paired with a soft rubber bumper in addition to the honeycomb interior lining on the case, which provides superior shock absorption and multi-faceted protection on your device.
The Shield’s one-piece construction makes the case super easy to put on and take off, and was designed to complement the iPhone’s premium build. And with a clear polycarbonate back, you don’t have to choose between having reliable protection and seeing your iPhone 12’s color and sleek design.
Another valuable touch is that the Raptic Shield’s frame and back are infused with an antimicrobial treatment to keep your iPhone 12 clean and hygienic. The antimicrobial agents act to keep bacteria from gathering on the most frequently touched surfaces of your device. It’s also compatible with all Qi-certified chargers.
According to MacRumors, charging your iPhone wirelessly using Apple’s new MagSafe Charger while the device is in a case can leave circular imprints on the outer surface of the case from contact with Apple’s induction charging accessory.
This would indicate that while the issue exists in other soft cases as well, Apple’s leather cases may be most prone to it.
The same document also warns against having credit cards, security badges, passports, or other items with magnetic strips or RFID chips between an iPhone and a MagSafe Charger to avoid damage, that an iPhone won’t charge wirelessly if it is also connected to a wired charger, and that if an iPhone gets too warm during wireless charging, iOS might not let it charge past 80%.
Apple’s leather cases for the iPhone 12 and 12 Pro — the only members of the iPhone 12 family launched so far — won’t be available for pre-order until November 6, so if Apple’s already warning users of the problem, they know how significant it really is.
Who is Among Us Hacker Eris Loris? What do we know about this entity and what do we not? And how should Among Us players act in this state of crisis?
There is no doubt of the fact that Eris Loris’s Among Us hack has shaken the game’s player base to its core. Fans are outraged on all social media platforms & Innersloth has had to rush out an emergency fix. However, the issue is still far from being resolved.
Fans are worried and angry that the hack is spreading. Certain major sites also believe that there’s a political angle to all of this. Now, the devs, of course, can’t solve this issue in a jiffy and the crisis will take time to resolve itself. So, in this article, we try to discern who or what Eris Loris is. And based on that, here’s a list of the do’s and don’ts you guys, as players, should exercise at this moment.
We’re are super duper aware of the current hacking issue and we’re looking into it. We will be pushing out an emergency server update so people who are in game will get kicked from games. Please play private games or with people that you trust!!! Bare with us!! 😰
First of all, unlike what many fans are guilty of doing, let’s not handle this issue personally. A large no. of fans out there are trying to find out “Eris Loris’s” personal info and whereabouts. We strictly advise you against that. Not only is it criminal to do so but it is also not a solution to the problem. It could also easily get you in trouble.
Now, to answer who or what Eris Loris is, we’re not sure if it’s a real person at all. In fact, given his online activities, he seems more of a functional creation and less of a person. Many players on Reddit are also calling him a “bot”. They’re also referring to the lot who are spreading his message in lobbies as “army of bots”.
An argument against Eris being a fake person though lies in the fact that his YouTube account is 3 years old. His obscure YouTube channel is, of course, the source of most of our info. One wonders why a man would create a fake account almost 3 years before a game gains traction, right?
Irrespective of whether Eris is real or fake though, the people behind Eris are certainly human beings of a questionable taste. A majority of his YouTube titles are aggressive and one of them also features the vile N-word. So, the signs of a designated “hate spreader” are there.
Among Us Spam Attack: The ideal crisis response to the hack.
First and foremost, on the list of do’s and don’ts, do not subscribe to the infamous YouTube channel or comment on his videos. It’s not worth it in terms of bringing about a solution and simply makes the account more famous and relevant. This is very dangerous. Giving anarchists a voice on social media can have serious consequences.
Secondly, stay away from public lobbies and ban Eris Loris or anyone who sends his trademark message right away. Also, stay off the North American server when playing on public lobbies. The North American server is the one which Eris Loris has targetted and compromised for now. So, the Europe & Asia servers are relatively safe. You may still have to deal with the usual small hacks but those are insignificant compared to this.
Also worth nothing that the reason I didn’t roll this update out sooner is that I was afraid of false positives:
You totally might see the game think you’re hacking when you’re not. I’ve done my best to find this kind of bug, but my hand is forced this time.
A fight against the Among Us Hack: Plea to the fans.
Lastly, and this is purely out of empathy for Among Us, have patience with Innersloth. Among Us is an Indie game which the devs never designed as a grand hit. The dev team at Innersloth is a hard-working group of 3 and they are trying their best to solve the issue.
Give them some time to fix things and don’t give up on the game. Stay off public lobbies and you’ll do just fine. Private lobbies can be great fun with the right people as our favourite streamers prove daily. So, gather friends from your locality and make one of those!
Also, check out our list of The 5 best Among Us Players cum Streamers to watch! for some nice content to lift up your spirits with. There’s no doubt of the fact that Among Us has been a very positive gift to the gaming community this year. It’s uniting power has been great. And it’s paramount that we help keep this wonderful creation alive!
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.