adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

Google news changes in Canada: Lessons to learn

Published

 on

Canadian lawmakers are locked in a dispute with internet technology companies over a law that would compel them to pay news publishers for content, years after a similar regulatory saga played out in Australia.

On Thursday, Google followed Meta in announcing plans to block news for Canadian users now that the Online News Act has become law. It is expected to take effect later this year.

Google spokesperson Zaitoon Murji told BNNBloomberg.ca in an email that the company made the “extremely difficult decision” to remove Canadian news links from its search, Google News and Google Discover platforms, calling its issues with the legislation “unworkable” and unlikely to be resolved through regulations.

“We’re disappointed it has come to this,” Murji said. “None of our suggestions for changes to C-18 were accepted.”

After Google’s move on Thursday, Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez sent a written statement calling the companies’ moves “deeply irresponsible and out of touch … especially when they make billions of dollars off of Canadian users” with advertising.

Australia’s regulatory experiment – the first of its kind in the world – also got off to a rocky start, but it has since seen tech companies, news publishers and the government reach a middle ground.

Canada can learn some lessons from Australia’s story, but experts who spoke with BNNBloomberg.ca cautioned that different economic, political and geographic realities could lead to a different outcome.

WHAT HAPPENED IN AUSTRALIA?

In both Australia and Canada, governments introduced legislation aimed at forcing online technology companies like Google and Facebook parent Meta into agreements to pay news producers for content shared on their platforms.

Tech companies opposed the laws in both cases.

Rob Nicholls, associate professor of regulation and governance at the University of New South Wales, explained in an email that in Australia, both Meta and Google threatened to leave the country if the law came into effect.

Google “did not change its local policies dramatically,” he said, but it does now follow a different product schedule from the U.S.

Facebook cut off access to news temporarily in 2021 in response to the legislation. Nicholls noted that it also blocked access to other pages such as health departments and charities, prompting threats from the Australian health department to pull advertising – an idea floated on Twitter by Canadian legislator Anthony Housefather in response to Meta’s latest moves here.

After a week, both Facebook and Google entered in to negotiations with news businesses in Australia and since then, the law has never had to be enforced.

The Australian government has since declared its News Media Bargaining Code “a success to date” in a December 2022 review of its first year in effect, pointing to more than 30 commercial agreements between tech companies and news producers.

Nicholls said there has been an estimated A$150 million in annual revenue from the law – though that fell short of what those in the media businesses wanted. There have also been concerns raised that smaller outlets have been shut out from receiving funds.

WHAT’S CHANGED: GEOGRAPHY, FINANCES AND THE PASSAGE OF TIME

Nicholls said geography – the proximity between Canada and other markets – is one major difference from the Australian context.

“Australia is a long way from other Meta and Google operations – there is no land border to the South,” he said.

Gavin Adamson, an associate professor in digital journalism at Toronto Metropolitan University, also said Canada’s closeness to the U.S. “adds a complication,” because tech companies “wouldn’t want to be in the position to start negotiations to pay news agencies in a country with a vastly bigger media network.”

Michael Geist, Canada research chair in internet and e-commerce law at the University of Ottawa, said another factor that has changed from the Australian context is the financial situation tech companies now find themselves in. Meta has been focused on cutting costs in its “year of efficiency,” and it may be “less willing to cut big cheques that don’t give the company much value.” Google has also made job cuts this year in the face of similar tech industry headwinds.

There is also a slight difference between the two laws. In Australia, the government has more of a say in who the law would apply to, and in Canada the CRTC makes the final call, which has the companies concerned about the process, Geist added.

Regulations are the last option to find middle ground, Geist said, but Meta and Google have both said they don’t believe regulatory tweaks will be enough to halt their plans.

Google said it hasn’t received assurance from the government that its primary concerns – forced payment for links and “uncapped financial liability” – will be resolved.

GOVERNMENTS VS BIG TECH

Beyond the issue of supporting news producers, the situation also highlights the difficulty governments face when it comes to reigning in powerful big tech companies.

Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez invoked that dynamic in a statement to BNNBloomberg.ca on Thursday.

“The Online News Act levels the playing field by putting the power of big tech in check,” he said in an emailed statement.”

“Big tech would rather spend money to change their platforms to block Canadians from accessing good quality and local news instead of paying their fair share to news organizations.”

The companies and the Canadian government both have a lot on the line when it comes to the law, Geist said.

For Meta, it’s an opportunity to send a signal to other governments about regulations they will tolerate, and that’s one reason Geist does not think Meta will back down from its threats.

“They would really lose pretty much all credibility with other countries at this stage if they walked away,” he said.

Meta’s decision was predictable, Geist argued, as the company had long threatened to remove links in light of the pending law. But “the Google response was always more uncertain,” he wrote in a Thursday blog post, because “it values news in a way that Meta does not.”

“Meta pointed to data demonstrating that news contributed little to user news feeds and that was highly substitutable. By contrast, Google search results are its bread and butter and removing Canadian news results makes its flagship product undeniably worse,” Geist wrote.

“That surely presented an unwelcome choice either way: agree to flawed legislation that creates a dangerous precedent on paying for links or knowingly decrease the value of its own service.”

The federal Liberal government has “backed itself into a corner” with its positioning on the law, he noted in Monday’s interview, because they went ahead with their plan despite having other options to help the news sector. If tech giants pull news, news publishers would take a significant financial hit, he added.

“Both their policy measures and the government’s own credibility on this is at stake,” he said by phone.

Adamson pointed to mounting “bad PR” when it comes to the tech companies’ corporate citizenship, and said companies “have to see the benefits of a strong democracy and with that included a healthy media ecosystem.”

“That includes a bit of a financial hit, but it also boosts your financial outlook from a social governance perspective,” he told BNNBloomberg.ca in an email. “If I was the government, I would just keep underlining that point.”

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

Rodriguez told the media this week that the government will offer unspecified support for news producers should Meta and Google block local news. The government on Thursday said it was working with Google to get clarity on its next steps.

Google spokesperson Murji said the company is “concerned” about how the law could reduce access to news in Canada, and it plans to participate in the regulatory process.

“We hope that the Government will be able to outline a viable path forward,” Murji said.

Nicholls said the threats by both Meta and Google are “credible,” and both companies could feasibly follow through.

Adamson said he expects a “political stand-off” between the companies and the government for the next little while.

“I would still be surprised to see Alphabet and Meta back out of Canada altogether with respect to news content on their platforms but it’s hard to know,” he said.

Geist, meanwhile, said he disagrees with those who sees Meta’s repeated threats to pull news as a bluff.

“Part of their goal may now well be to make it clear it was not a bluff,” Geist said.

If news is pulled from online platforms in Canada, he said advocates may stop pushing the Australian model for making tech pay for news, and Canada could become a cautionary tale for what can go wrong.

“We may end up with others saying ‘Don’t be like Canada,’ where you find major social networks cutting off news within the country.”

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

News

STD epidemic slows as new syphilis and gonorrhea cases fall in US

Published

 on

 

NEW YORK (AP) — The U.S. syphilis epidemic slowed dramatically last year, gonorrhea cases fell and chlamydia cases remained below prepandemic levels, according to federal data released Tuesday.

The numbers represented some good news about sexually transmitted diseases, which experienced some alarming increases in past years due to declining condom use, inadequate sex education, and reduced testing and treatment when the COVID-19 pandemic hit.

Last year, cases of the most infectious stages of syphilis fell 10% from the year before — the first substantial decline in more than two decades. Gonorrhea cases dropped 7%, marking a second straight year of decline and bringing the number below what it was in 2019.

“I’m encouraged, and it’s been a long time since I felt that way” about the nation’s epidemic of sexually transmitted infections, said the CDC’s Dr. Jonathan Mermin. “Something is working.”

More than 2.4 million cases of syphilis, gonorrhea and chlamydia were diagnosed and reported last year — 1.6 million cases of chlamydia, 600,000 of gonorrhea, and more than 209,000 of syphilis.

Syphilis is a particular concern. For centuries, it was a common but feared infection that could deform the body and end in death. New cases plummeted in the U.S. starting in the 1940s when infection-fighting antibiotics became widely available, and they trended down for a half century after that. By 2002, however, cases began rising again, with men who have sex with other men being disproportionately affected.

The new report found cases of syphilis in their early, most infectious stages dropped 13% among gay and bisexual men. It was the first such drop since the agency began reporting data for that group in the mid-2000s.

However, there was a 12% increase in the rate of cases of unknown- or later-stage syphilis — a reflection of people infected years ago.

Cases of syphilis in newborns, passed on from infected mothers, also rose. There were nearly 4,000 cases, including 279 stillbirths and infant deaths.

“This means pregnant women are not being tested often enough,” said Dr. Jeffrey Klausner, a professor of medicine at the University of Southern California.

What caused some of the STD trends to improve? Several experts say one contributor is the growing use of an antibiotic as a “morning-after pill.” Studies have shown that taking doxycycline within 72 hours of unprotected sex cuts the risk of developing syphilis, gonorrhea and chlamydia.

In June, the CDC started recommending doxycycline as a morning-after pill, specifically for gay and bisexual men and transgender women who recently had an STD diagnosis. But health departments and organizations in some cities had been giving the pills to people for a couple years.

Some experts believe that the 2022 mpox outbreak — which mainly hit gay and bisexual men — may have had a lingering effect on sexual behavior in 2023, or at least on people’s willingness to get tested when strange sores appeared.

Another factor may have been an increase in the number of health workers testing people for infections, doing contact tracing and connecting people to treatment. Congress gave $1.2 billion to expand the workforce over five years, including $600 million to states, cities and territories that get STD prevention funding from CDC.

Last year had the “most activity with that funding throughout the U.S.,” said David Harvey, executive director of the National Coalition of STD Directors.

However, Congress ended the funds early as a part of last year’s debt ceiling deal, cutting off $400 million. Some people already have lost their jobs, said a spokeswoman for Harvey’s organization.

Still, Harvey said he had reasons for optimism, including the growing use of doxycycline and a push for at-home STD test kits.

Also, there are reasons to think the next presidential administration could get behind STD prevention. In 2019, then-President Donald Trump announced a campaign to “eliminate” the U.S. HIV epidemic by 2030. (Federal health officials later clarified that the actual goal was a huge reduction in new infections — fewer than 3,000 a year.)

There were nearly 32,000 new HIV infections in 2022, the CDC estimates. But a boost in public health funding for HIV could also also help bring down other sexually transmitted infections, experts said.

“When the government puts in resources, puts in money, we see declines in STDs,” Klausner said.

___

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

World’s largest active volcano Mauna Loa showed telltale warning signs before erupting in 2022

Published

 on

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Scientists can’t know precisely when a volcano is about to erupt, but they can sometimes pick up telltale signs.

That happened two years ago with the world’s largest active volcano. About two months before Mauna Loa spewed rivers of glowing orange molten lava, geologists detected small earthquakes nearby and other signs, and they warned residents on Hawaii‘s Big Island.

Now a study of the volcano’s lava confirms their timeline for when the molten rock below was on the move.

“Volcanoes are tricky because we don’t get to watch directly what’s happening inside – we have to look for other signs,” said Erik Klemetti Gonzalez, a volcano expert at Denison University, who was not involved in the study.

Upswelling ground and increased earthquake activity near the volcano resulted from magma rising from lower levels of Earth’s crust to fill chambers beneath the volcano, said Kendra Lynn, a research geologist at the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory and co-author of a new study in Nature Communications.

When pressure was high enough, the magma broke through brittle surface rock and became lava – and the eruption began in late November 2022. Later, researchers collected samples of volcanic rock for analysis.

The chemical makeup of certain crystals within the lava indicated that around 70 days before the eruption, large quantities of molten rock had moved from around 1.9 miles (3 kilometers) to 3 miles (5 kilometers) under the summit to a mile (2 kilometers) or less beneath, the study found. This matched the timeline the geologists had observed with other signs.

The last time Mauna Loa erupted was in 1984. Most of the U.S. volcanoes that scientists consider to be active are found in Hawaii, Alaska and the West Coast.

Worldwide, around 585 volcanoes are considered active.

Scientists can’t predict eruptions, but they can make a “forecast,” said Ben Andrews, who heads the global volcano program at the Smithsonian Institution and who was not involved in the study.

Andrews compared volcano forecasts to weather forecasts – informed “probabilities” that an event will occur. And better data about the past behavior of specific volcanos can help researchers finetune forecasts of future activity, experts say.

(asterisk)We can look for similar patterns in the future and expect that there’s a higher probability of conditions for an eruption happening,” said Klemetti Gonzalez.

___

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Waymo’s robotaxis now open to anyone who wants a driverless ride in Los Angeles

Published

 on

 

Waymo on Tuesday opened its robotaxi service to anyone who wants a ride around Los Angeles, marking another milestone in the evolution of self-driving car technology since the company began as a secret project at Google 15 years ago.

The expansion comes eight months after Waymo began offering rides in Los Angeles to a limited group of passengers chosen from a waiting list that had ballooned to more than 300,000 people. Now, anyone with the Waymo One smartphone app will be able to request a ride around an 80-square-mile (129-square-kilometer) territory spanning the second largest U.S. city.

After Waymo received approval from California regulators to charge for rides 15 months ago, the company initially chose to launch its operations in San Francisco before offering a limited service in Los Angeles.

Before deciding to compete against conventional ride-hailing pioneers Uber and Lyft in California, Waymo unleashed its robotaxis in Phoenix in 2020 and has been steadily extending the reach of its service in that Arizona city ever since.

Driverless rides are proving to be more than just a novelty. Waymo says it now transports more than 50,000 weekly passengers in its robotaxis, a volume of business numbers that helped the company recently raise $5.6 billion from its corporate parent Alphabet and a list of other investors that included venture capital firm Andreesen Horowitz and financial management firm T. Rowe Price.

“Our service has matured quickly and our riders are embracing the many benefits of fully autonomous driving,” Waymo co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana said in a blog post.

Despite its inroads, Waymo is still believed to be losing money. Although Alphabet doesn’t disclose Waymo’s financial results, the robotaxi is a major part of an “Other Bets” division that had suffered an operating loss of $3.3 billion through the first nine months of this year, down from a setback of $4.2 billion at the same time last year.

But Waymo has come a long way since Google began working on self-driving cars in 2009 as part of project “Chauffeur.” Since its 2016 spinoff from Google, Waymo has established itself as the clear leader in a robotaxi industry that’s getting more congested.

Electric auto pioneer Tesla is aiming to launch a rival “Cybercab” service by 2026, although its CEO Elon Musk said he hopes the company can get the required regulatory clearances to operate in Texas and California by next year.

Tesla’s projected timeline for competing against Waymo has been met with skepticism because Musk has made unfulfilled promises about the company’s self-driving car technology for nearly a decade.

Meanwhile, Waymo’s robotaxis have driven more than 20 million fully autonomous miles and provided more than 2 million rides to passengers without encountering a serious accident that resulted in its operations being sidelined.

That safety record is a stark contrast to one of its early rivals, Cruise, a robotaxi service owned by General Motors. Cruise’s California license was suspended last year after one of its driverless cars in San Francisco dragged a jaywalking pedestrian who had been struck by a different car driven by a human.

Cruise is now trying to rebound by joining forces with Uber to make some of its services available next year in U.S. cities that still haven’t been announced. But Waymo also has forged a similar alliance with Uber to dispatch its robotaxi in Atlanta and Austin, Texas next year.

Another robotaxi service, Amazon’s Zoox, is hoping to begin offering driverless rides to the general public in Las Vegas at some point next year before also launching in San Francisco.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending