adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

How a group of Toronto tenants turned to a risky last resort and got a ‘huge victory’

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – In the middle of the small crowd — near the tents, the lineup of kids awaiting face painting, the snack table — stood a jubilant Chiara Padovani.

“When I say ‘tenant, you say ‘power,'” she commanded to several dozen tenants, who chanted back with gusto.

What looked like a summer block party in front of two north-end Toronto apartment buildings last month was a celebration of what renters who withheld payments for months called a “huge victory.”

The Landlord and Tenant Board had issued an interim order requiring Barney River Investments, which managed the properties at 1440 and 1442 Lawrence Ave. West, to do immediate maintenance work on long-needed repairs.

The decision, which the tenants’ lawyer said might be the first of its kind, came after a 10-month rent strike.

“When tenants just like you come together — organize together, celebrate together, eat together and work together — we win,” Padovani declared at the gathering.

Other tenants are taking the same gamble: since May 2023, Toronto has seen a wave of such strikes in which hundreds of renters have withheld rent across the city.

First, the residents of 71, 75 and 79 Thorncliffe Park Dr. in the city’s east end stopped paying their rent. Then, tenants at 33 King St. and 22 John St. on the west side of the city did the same.

Last October, more than 100 tenants of the Lawrence Avenue buildings followed suit, seeking urgent repairs in dozens of units and the withdrawal of applications the landlord filed with the board to increase rent above provincial guidelines.

The north-enders were the first to see results, as tenants in the other buildings still await hearings at the Landlord and Tenant Board.

The Lawrence Avenue tenants said they had done everything they could to resolve the issue before withholding rent, from sending petitions, trying to meet the landlord, speaking with local politicians and making calls to the city — all to no avail. The problems went unfixed, they said: broken tiles, mould on ceilings, holes in the walls that gave cockroaches and mice free rein.

“This rent strike started really as a last resort,” said Padovani, the founder of the York South-Weston Tenants Union that represents tenants on Lawrence Avenue and at two other buildings.

During an Aug. 1 hearing, Patrick Shea, an adjudicator at the Landlord and Tenant Board, handed down the temporary order for repairs to be made.

“I am satisfied that the tenants have made out a strong prima facie case that they will be entitled to an order to rectify those issues,” he said of the disrepair, according to a recording of the hearing obtained by The Canadian Press.

He also ordered tenants to resume paying their rent as of Aug. 1.

A final decision in the case – on proposed above-guideline rent increases and maintenance in common areas – has not yet been made, but “issues that can be addressed in the interim should be addressed in the interim,” said Shea.

The Canadian Press made several unsuccessful attempts to reach Barney River Investments for comment, including phone calls, emails and an in-person visit to the corporation’s office in downtown Toronto.

Tenant Yogesh Khatri said the landlord started inspecting units in need of repair less than a week after the board’s order came.

“They have to check all the units. They have to fix all the problems,” he said.

Rashid Limbada, who has lived in his building for more than three decades, welcomed the news: “Everybody is happy.”

But another dispute still persists, Limbada said, referring to the landlord’s attempt to have tenants pay above-guideline rent increases.

In Ontario, landlords are permitted to increase rent without approval of the Landlord and Tenant Board up to a threshold set by the province each year. The rent increase guideline for 2024 was set at 2.5 per cent, the same rate as the year before. The guidelines do not apply to new buildings occupied for the first time as residences after Nov. 15, 2018.

The board’s interim order could inspire more tenants to mobilize for their rights, argued Ricardo Tranjan, a political economist at the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

“Every victory, every win of a tenant group is a win for the tenants’ class,” said Tranjan.

Now is an important moment, he said, when groups are clearly getting stronger — and bolder.

People are protesting outside of landlords’ offices, advocating with local politicians and submitting group petitions more than ever in cities such as Ottawa, Vancouver and Montreal, Tranjan said, though rent strikes have not been as common historically.

That could be on the verge of changing, he said.

Tenants currently withholding rent at 22 John St. are before the Landlord and Tenant Board this week. A hearing over 33 King St. is expected in October.

Those at the Thorncliffe Park Drive buildings are still waiting for a hearing date.

One tenant there, Sameer Beyan, explained that the central issue is over applications for above-guideline rent increases. Tenants tried to tell the landlord that many families are living on a fixed income and cannot afford the extra rent, but the effort failed, he said.

“They don’t want to talk to us. They do not want to respond to us. So we have escalated our actions to do rent striking,” Beyan said.

For those celebrating on the Lawrence Avenue lawn last month, the process isn’t over yet, but the board’s interim decision has given them a boost.

“If they don’t do these repairs, there will be consequences,” Aliah El-houni, a lawyer representing the tenants, told the gathering.

“We don’t know of any other interim orders like this ever having been granted by the board,” said El-houni, the co-director at the non-profit Community Justice Collective.

“And it is not because we killed it in court. It is because you killed it on the ground.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 20, 2024.

Source link

News

Australia plans a social media ban for children under 16

Published

 on

 

MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — The Australian government announced on Thursday what it described as world-leading legislation that would institute an age limit of 16 years for children to start using social media, and hold platforms responsible for ensuring compliance.

“Social media is doing harm to our kids and I’m calling time on it,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said.

The legislation will be introduced in Parliament during its final two weeks in session this year, which begin on Nov. 18. The age limit would take effect 12 months after the law is passed, Albanese told reporters.

The platforms including X, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook would need to use that year to work out how to exclude Australian children younger than 16.

“I’ve spoken to thousands of parents, grandparents, aunties and uncles. They, like me, are worried sick about the safety of our kids online,” Albanese said.

The proposal comes as governments around the world are wrestling with how to supervise young people’s use of technologies like smartphones and social media.

Social media platforms would be penalized for breaching the age limit, but under-age children and their parents would not.

“The onus will be on social media platforms to demonstrate they are taking reasonable steps to prevent access. The onus won’t be on parents or young people,” Albanese said.

Antigone Davis, head of safety at Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, said the company would respect any age limitations the government wants to introduce.

“However, what’s missing is a deeper discussion on how we implement protections, otherwise we risk making ourselves feel better, like we have taken action, but teens and parents will not find themselves in a better place,” Davis said in a statement.

She added that stronger tools in app stores and operating systems for parents to control what apps their children can use would be a “simple and effective solution.”

X did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday. TikTok declined to comment.

The Digital Industry Group Inc., an advocate for the digital industry in Australia, described the age limit as a “20th Century response to 21st Century challenges.”

“Rather than blocking access through bans, we need to take a balanced approach to create age-appropriate spaces, build digital literacy and protect young people from online harm,” DIGI managing director Sunita Bose said in a statement.

More than 140 Australian and international academics with expertise in fields related to technology and child welfare signed an open letter to Albanese last month opposing a social media age limit as “too blunt an instrument to address risks effectively.”

Jackie Hallan, a director at the youth mental health service ReachOut, opposed the ban. She said 73% of young people across Australia accessing mental health support did so through social media.

“We’re uncomfortable with the ban. We think young people are likely to circumvent a ban and our concern is that it really drives the behavior underground and then if things go wrong, young people are less likely to get support from parents and carers because they’re worried about getting in trouble,” Hallan said.

Child psychologist Philip Tam said a minimum age of 12 or 13 would have been more enforceable.

“My real fear honestly is that the problem of social media will simply be driven underground,” Tam said.

Australian National University lawyer Associate Prof. Faith Gordon feared separating children from there platforms could create pressures within families.

Albanese said there would be exclusions and exemptions in circumstances such as a need to continue access to educational services.

But parental consent would not entitle a child under 16 to access social media.

Earlier this year, the government began a trial of age-restriciton technologies. Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, the online watchdog that will police compliance, will use the results of that trial to provide platforms with guidance on what reasonable steps they can take.

Communications Minister Michelle Rowland said the year-long lead-in would ensure the age limit could be implemented in a “very practical way.”

“There does need to be enhanced penalties to ensure compliance,” Rowland said.

“Every company that operates in Australia, whether domiciled here or otherwise, is expected and must comply with Australian law or face the consequences,” she added.

The main opposition party has given in-principle support for an age limit at 16.

Opposition lawmaker Paul Fletcher said the platforms already had the technology to enforce such an age ban.

“It’s not really a technical viability question, it’s a question of their readiness to do it and will they incur the cost to do it,” Fletcher told Australian Broadcasting Corp.

“The platforms say: ’It’s all too hard, we can’t do it, Australia will become a backwater, it won’t possibly work.’ But if you have well-drafted legislation and you stick to your guns, you can get the outcomes,” Fletcher added.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

A tiny grain of nuclear fuel is pulled from ruined Japanese nuclear plant, in a step toward cleanup

Published

 on

 

TOKYO (AP) — A robot that has spent months inside the ruins of a nuclear reactor at the tsunami-hit Fukushima Daiichi plant delivered a tiny sample of melted nuclear fuel on Thursday, in what plant officials said was a step toward beginning the cleanup of hundreds of tons of melted fuel debris.

The sample, the size of a grain of rice, was placed into a secure container, marking the end of the mission, according to Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, which manages the plant. It is being transported to a glove box for size and weight measurements before being sent to outside laboratories for detailed analyses over the coming months.

Plant chief Akira Ono has said it will provide key data to plan a decommissioning strategy, develop necessary technology and robots and learn how the accident had developed.

The first sample alone is not enough and additional small-scale sampling missions will be necessary in order to obtain more data, TEPCO spokesperson Kenichi Takahara told reporters Thursday. “It may take time, but we will steadily tackle decommissioning,” Takahara said.

Despite multiple probes in the years since the 2011 disaster that wrecked the. plant and forced thousands of nearby residents to leave their homes, much about the site’s highly radioactive interior remains a mystery.

The sample, the first to be retrieved from inside a reactor, was significantly less radioactive than expected. Officials had been concerned that it might be too radioactive to be safely tested even with heavy protective gear, and set an upper limit for removal out of the reactor. The sample came in well under the limit.

That’s led some to question whether the robot extracted the nuclear fuel it was looking for from an area in which previous probes have detected much higher levels of radioactive contamination, but TEPCO officials insist they believe the sample is melted fuel.

The extendable robot, nicknamed Telesco, first began its mission August with a plan for a two-week round trip, after previous missions had been delayed since 2021. But progress was suspended twice due to mishaps — the first involving an assembly error that took nearly three weeks to fix, and the second a camera failure.

On Oct. 30, it clipped a sample weighting less than 3 grams (.01 ounces) from the surface of a mound of melted fuel debris sitting on the bottom of the primary containment vessel of the Unit 2 reactor, TEPCO said.

Three days later, the robot returned to an enclosed container, as workers in full hazmat gear slowly pulled it out.

On Thursday, the gravel, whose radioactivity earlier this week recorded far below the upper limit set for its environmental and health safety, was placed into a safe container for removal out of the compartment.

The sample return marks the first time the melted fuel is retrieved out of the containment vessel.

Fukushima Daiichi lost its key cooling systems during a 2011 earthquake and tsunami, causing meltdowns in its three reactors. An estimated 880 tons of fatally radioactive melted fuel remains in them.

The government and TEPCO have set a 30-to-40-year target to finish the cleanup by 2051, which experts say is overly optimistic and should be updated. Some say it would take for a century or longer.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said there have been some delays but “there will be no impact on the entire decommissioning process.”

No specific plans for the full removal of the fuel debris or its final disposal have been decided.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Strong typhoon threatens northern Philippine region still recovering from back-to-back storms

Published

 on

 

MANILA, Philippines (AP) — A strong typhoon was forecast to hit the northern Philippines on Thursday, prompting a new round of evacuations in a region still recovering from back-to-back storms a few weeks ago.

Typhoon Yinxing is the 13th to batter the disaster-prone Southeast Asian nation this season.

“I really pity our people but all of them are tough,” Gov. Marilou Cayco of the province of Batanes said by telephone. Her province was ravaged by recent destructive storms and is expected to be affected by Yinxing’s fierce wind and rain.

Tens of thousands of villagers were returning to emergency shelters and disaster-response teams were again put on alert in Cagayan and other northern provinces near the expected path of Yinxing. The typhoon was located about 175 kilometers (109 miles) east of Aparri town in Cagayan province on Thursday morning.

The slow-moving typhoon, locally named Marce, was packing sustained winds of up to 165 kilometers (102 miles) per hour and gusts of up to 205 kph (127 mph) and was forecast to hit or come very near to the coast of Cagayan and outlying islands later Thursday.

The coast guard, army, air force and police were put on alert. Inter-island ferries and cargo services and domestic flights were suspended in northern provinces.

Tropical Storm Trami and Typhoon Kong-rey hit the northern Philippines in recent weeks, leaving at least 151 people dead and affecting nearly 9 million others. More than 14 billion pesos ($241 million) worth of rice, corn and other crops and infrastructure were damaged.

The deaths and destruction from the storms prompted President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to declare a day of national mourning on Monday when he visited the worst-hit province of Batangas, south of the capital, Manila. At least 61 people perished in the coastal province.

Trami dumped one to two months’ worth of rain in just 24 hours in some regions, including in Batangas.

“We want to avoid the loss of lives due to calamities,” Marcos said in Talisay town in Batangas, where he brought key Cabinet members to reassure storm victims of rapid government help. “Storms nowadays are more intense, extensive and powerful.”

In 2013, Typhoon Haiyan, one of the strongest recorded tropical cyclones, left more than 7,300 people dead or missing, flattened entire villages and caused ships to run aground and smash into houses in the central Philippines.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending