adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

How Canada comes up with its terrorist list and what it means to be on it – CBC.ca

Published

 on


The Canadian government has added 13 groups to its list of terrorist organizations, including the Proud Boys, making it the first country to designate the neo-fascist group a terrorist entity.

In a government statement Wednesday, Public Safety Minister Bill Blair said the additions to the list, which was created in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, are “an important step in our effort to combat violent extremism in all forms.” 

With the additions to the list, there are now 73 terrorist entities listed under the Criminal Code, all of which face financial and legal ramifications due to their designation.

Who decides which groups are designated as terrorist entities? What does it mean for those who are members of such groups? Read on to find out.

What makes a group a terrorist entity?

A group may be designated as a terrorist entity if there are “reasonable grounds” to believe it has “knowingly carried out, attempted to carry out, participated in or facilitated a terrorist activity,” according to Section 83.05 of the Criminal Code.

A group may also be listed if there are grounds to believe it has “knowingly acted on behalf of, at the direction of or in association with, an entity involved in a terrorist activity.”

WATCH | Canada adds 13 groups to list of terrorist entities:

Canada’s Public Safety Minister Bill Blair designates 13 new groups as terrorist entities. 1:08

How is that decided?

The process of designating a terrorist group begins with a cross-government consultation that identifies potential groups for addition to the list, according to the Public Safety Department.

A criminal and/or security intelligence report is then completed, followed by an assessment by the Department of Justice to determine whether the threshold is met to add the group to the list.

The minister of public safety then reviews the criminal and/or security intelligence report. If they have reasonable grounds to believe that the group in question meets the threshold, they make a recommendation to cabinet to place the group on the list.

What are the consequences?

While it is not necessarily a crime to be a member of a listed group, there can be serious criminal and financial consequences for groups that are designated terrorist entities.

Banks and financial institutions can now freeze the group’s assets, and police can charge anyone who financially or materially supports the group.

Under section 83 of the Criminal Code, those who knowingly deal with the property or finances of a terrorist entity face penalties of up to 10 years in prison.

WATCH | Public safety minister on why Proud Boys were designated terrorists:

Public Safety Minister Bill Blair announced today that the federal government will designate 13 groups as terrorist entities, including neo-fascist organization the Proud Boys, as well as those linked to al-Qaeda, ISIS and neo-Nazis. 2:27

A Canadian organization’s charitable status may be denied or revoked if it maintains connections to listed entities. As well, those seeking entry into Canada may be denied if they are found to be associated with a listed entity.

A listing can also make it easier to remove the designated group’s online content.

Can a group appeal a terrorist designation?

At Wednesday’s briefing, Blair said that there are “several safeguards” in place to ensure the system is “balanced, fair and meets the appropriate legal threshold.”

Any listed entity may apply to the public safety minister to challenge its inclusion on the list. At that point, the group will get access to unclassified information and summaries that were part of the case in support of its addition to the list.

After an appeal is submitted, the minister has 90 days to make a decision. If the minister decides not to remove the entity from the list, the Criminal Code also allows for a review of the minister’s decision by the federal court.

Is a terrorist designation permanent?

The government is required to review each entity on the list every five years to determine whether it should remain on the list. 

Seven entities, including al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent and al-Shabaab, were recently assessed and deemed to warrant continued listing, the government said Wednesday.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Suspicious deaths of two N.S. men were the result of homicide, suicide: RCMP

Published

 on

Nova Scotia RCMP say their investigation into two suspicious deaths earlier this month has concluded that one man died by homicide and the other by suicide.

The bodies of two men, aged 40 and 73, were found in a home in Windsor, N.S., on Sept. 3.

Police say the province’s medical examiner determined the 40-year-old man was killed and the 73-year-old man killed himself.

They say the two men were members of the same family.

No arrests or charges are anticipated, and the names of the deceased will not be released.

RCMP say they will not be releasing any further details out of respect for the family.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Turning the tide: Quebec premier visits Cree Nation displaced by hydro project in 70s

Published

 on

For the first time in their history, members of the Cree community of Nemaska received a visit from a sitting Quebec premier on Sunday and were able to share first-hand the story of how they were displaced by a hydroelectric project in the 1970s.

François Legault was greeted in Nemaska by men and women who arrived by canoe to re-enact the founding of their new village in the Eeyou Istchee James Bay region, in northern Quebec, 47 years ago. The community was forced in the early 1970s to move from its original location because members were told it would be flooded as part of the Nottaway-Broadback-Rupert hydro project.

The reservoir was ultimately constructed elsewhere, but by then the members of the village had already left for other places, abandoning their homes and many of their belongings in the process.

George Wapachee, co-author of the book “Going Home,” said community members were “relocated for nothing.”

“We didn’t know what the rights were, or who to turn to,” he said in an interview. “That turned us into refugees and we were forced to abandon the life we knew.”

Nemaska’s story illustrates the challenges Legault’s government faces as it looks to build new dams to meet the province’s power needs, which are anticipated to double by 2050. Legault has promised that any new projects will be developed in partnership with Indigenous people and have “social acceptability,” but experts say that’s easier said than done.

François Bouffard, an associate professor of electrical engineering at McGill University, said the earlier era of hydro projects were developed without any consideration for the Indigenous inhabitants living nearby.

“We live in a much different world now,” he said. “Any kind of hydro development, no matter where in Quebec, will require true consent and partnership from Indigenous communities.” Those groups likely want to be treated as stakeholders, he added.

Securing wider social acceptability for projects that significantly change the landscape — as hydro dams often do — is also “a big ask,” he said. The government, Bouchard added, will likely focus on boosting capacity in its existing dams, or building installations that run off river flow and don’t require flooding large swaths of land to create reservoirs.

Louis Beaumier, executive director of the Trottier Energy Institute at Polytechnique Montreal, said Legault’s visit to Nemaska represents a desire for reconciliation with Indigenous people who were traumatized by the way earlier projects were carried about.

Any new projects will need the consent of local First Nations, Beaumier said, adding that its easier to get their blessing for wind power projects compared to dams, because they’re less destructive to the environment and easier around which to structure a partnership agreement.

Beaumier added that he believes it will be nearly impossible to get the public — Indigenous or not — to agree to “the destruction of a river” for a new dam, noting that in recent decades people have come to recognize rivers as the “unique, irreplaceable riches” that they are.

Legault’s visit to northern Quebec came on Sept. 15, when the community gathers every year to remember the founding of the “New Nemaska,” on the shores of Lake Champion in the heart of the boreal forest, some 1,500 kilometres from Montreal. Nemaska Chief Clarence Jolly said the community invited Legault to a traditional feast on Sunday, and planned to present him with Wapachee’s book and tell him their stories.

The book, published in 2022 along with Susan Marshall, is filled with stories of Nemaska community members. Leaving behind sewing machines and hunting dogs, they were initially sent to two different villages, Wapachee said.

In their new homes, several of them were forced to live in “deplorable conditions,” and some were physically and verbally abused, he said. The new village of Nemaska was only built a few years later, in 1977.

“At this time, families were losing their children to prison-schools,” he said, in reference to the residential school system. “Imagine the burden of losing your community as well.”

Thomas Jolly, a former chief, said he was 15 years old when he was forced to leave his village with all his belongings in a single bag.

Meeting Legault was important “because have to recognize what happened and we have to talk about the repercussions that the relocation had on people,” he said, adding that those effects are still felt today.

Earlier Sunday, Legault was in the Cree community of Eastmain, where he participated in the official renaming of a hydro complex in honour of former premier Bernard Landry. At the event, Legault said he would follow the example of his late predecessor, who oversaw the signing of the historic “Paix des Braves” agreement between the Quebec government and the Cree in 2002.

He said there is “significant potential” in Eeyou Istchee James Bay, both in increasing the capacity of its large dams and in developing wind power projects.

“Obviously, we will do that with the Cree,” he said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Quebec premier visits Cree community displaced by hydro project in 1970s

Published

 on

NEMASKA – For the first time in their history, members of the Cree community of Nemaska received a visit from a sitting Quebec premier on Sunday and were able to share first-hand the story of how they were displaced by a hydroelectric project in the 1970s.

François Legault was greeted in Nemaska by men and women who arrived by canoe to re-enact the founding of their new village in the Eeyou Istchee James Bay region, in northern Quebec, 47 years ago. The community was forced in the early 1970s to move from their original location because they were told it would be flooded as part of the Nottaway-Broadback-Rupert hydro project.

The reservoir was ultimately constructed elsewhere, but by then the members of the village had already left for other places, abandoning their homes and many of their belongings in the process.

George Wapachee, co-author of the book “Going Home,” said community members were “relocated for nothing.”

“We didn’t know what the rights were, or who to turn to,” he said in an interview. “That turned us into refugees and we were forced to abandon the life we knew.”

The book, published in 2022 by Wapachee and Susan Marshall, is filled with stories of Cree community members. Leaving behind sewing machines and hunting dogs, they were initially sent to two different villages, 100 and 300 kilometres away, Wapachee said.

In their new homes, several of them were forced to live in “deplorable conditions,” and some were physically and verbally abused, he said. The new village of Nemaska was only built a few years later, in 1977.

“At this time, families were losing their children to prison-schools,” he said, in reference to the residential school system. “Imagine the burden of losing your community as well.”

Legault’s visit came on Sept. 15, when the community gathers every year to remember the founding of the “New Nemaska,” on the shores of Lake Champion in the heart of the boreal forest, some 1,500 kilometres from Montreal. Nemaska Chief Clarence Jolly said the community invited Legault to a traditional feast on Sunday, and planned to present him with Wapachee’s book and tell him their stories.

Thomas Jolly, a former chief, said he was 15 years old when he was forced to leave his village with all his belongings in a single bag.

Meeting Legault was important “because have to recognize what happened and we have to talk about the repercussions that the relocation had on people,” he said, adding that those effects are still felt today.

Earlier Sunday, Legault had been in the Cree community of Eastmain, where he participated in the official renaming of a hydro dam in honour of former premier Bernard Landry.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending