adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

How to quit quitting social media, and try something that might actually stick.

Published

 on

This is part of Quit It, a series of essays on stopping things—or not.

In January of last year, while visiting a friend in Florida, I found myself staring at a cluster of palm trees. As the fronds blew in the wind, they produced an almost ASMR-like sensation in my brain. I felt kind of high.

But I wasn’t! I was just taking a break from Instagram. Instead of looking at palm trees on my phone, like I usually do, I was looking at the literal palm trees around me. They weren’t perfect, the way that palm trees online are—but, wow, they were a marvel.

We all know that social media can tank your mental health and destroy your brain. I—perhaps like you?—have fantasized about fully quitting one platform or another, or leaving the whole enterprise behind for good, for quite some time now. And yet, after that vacation, I signed back into Instagram (OK, OK: I signed in briefly during it; I ran an ultramarathon on the trip and I couldn’t resist bragging). I’ve sworn off Twitter and its descendants, only to realize that those places are really, really useful for my job. I’ve even thought I was quitting Facebook for good … thought it so strongly that I wrote about doing so … only to realize that Facebook really does have its merits after all (groups; remembering birthdays). God help me, I’ve even begun posting on LinkedIn, just a little bit. I mean, I want people in my professional network to read the stories I edit.

In my fantasy life, I do not use social media. There, I am a calmer person, using my newfound swaths of abundant, unlocked brain space to read and write.

Back in reality, though? Well, these platforms are just part of the fabric of how we interact with the world now, even if they can also serve to make us feel distracted, dull, and generally worse. Quitting them entirely would take a lot of effort, and I think would ultimately serve to make me less connected with the world, not more tuned into it. So I’ve developed a new strategy—not to hold the bar so high that quitting is the goal. To lower it, and to make peace with that.

After I got back from that Florida trip, I devised the following truce with Instagram: I don’t have it on my phone. This naturally cuts down on the time I spend on the platform dramatically. No scrolling in bed (well, unless I take my laptop in bed, which, yes, I do constantly). No looking at pictures of other people’s beautiful palm-tree vacations while I’m freezing on a subway platform. It also reduces the amount of time I spend posting on Instagram. I have to really want to post something. A picture from my wedding? Yes. A picture of my dog in a fluffy coat? Well, I’ll just send that to the family group chat.

Lots of people, it turns out, have these little truces. “My relationship with social media hinges on boundaries and balance,” says Candice Lim, co-host of Slate’s ICYMI, about internet culture.
She has two X/Twitter accounts, a professional one and one “where I repost Lee Pace thirst traps.” She also keeps her phone set to grayscale, on the advice of a tech-y friend, though she’s not really sure if this helps. “My Twitter timeline is still funny in black and white!” (Instagram, less so.)

Leigh Stein, the author of the novel Self Care, a satire of Girlboss-y influencers, practices a “Tech Sabbath”: “I turn off my phone completely from Friday night to around Saturday evening, Saturday late-afternoon.” If there’s an emergency, people can reach her through her husband. It’s something she’s hoping to do more regularly in 2024.

Jessi Gold, a psychiatrist based in Tennessee, is trying to use social media mindfully, mostly by actively noticing when she’s starting to tense up or grind her teeth. She’ll talk herself through the feeling: “Hey, what’s that about, do you need a break?” And she’ll try to not go online to endlessly look at information about the news and other things that dominated discussions at work. She’ll let herself read up a little bit, and then tell herself “you need to really do something for you.”

Arthur C. Brooks, who, among many things, co-hosts a podcast with Oprah, tells me he will simply have other people run his social media accounts when he knows it’s going “to start getting at me, like when I have a book coming out.” His advice for the rest of us who don’t have that option: Keep it to 30 minutes a day, all in one sitting.

I also got the advice to strictly limit social media use from Anna Lembke, though what that limit and use looks like will vary person to person. Lembke does not have a truce with social media: She avoids it, and in fact only got a smartphone recently, and only uses the device for work purposes. How does she maintain this almost monk-like existence? She’s the author of Dopamine Nation, as well as the chief of the Stanford Addiction Medicine Dual Diagnosis Clinic, where some of the patients have issues with, yes, social media, so she has a deeper understanding than most of us as to how it can warp our sense of the world.

Despite these credentials and personal habits, she is oriented toward getting people to a place where they can use social media in healthy moderation, if that’s what they choose. She often has patients entirely cut out problem apps for a month, which can “reset reward pathways” in the brain, making it naturally easier to reduce use going forward. “You want to start with a dopamine fast, and then create a very specific plan,” she explains. If you never “reset” your brain, she theorizes, you might find yourself making a huge effort to cut back while still constantly craving a fix, which is a shitty middle ground to be in.

Moderation isn’t the starting point for everyone. In 2019, Kevin Roose, a technology columnist at the New York Times, wrote a piece titled “How I Ditched My Phone and Unbroke My Brain” in which he detailed the strict boundaries he set around phone use in order to improve his relationship with it. It was … working, and then, well, the pandemic happened. “All of a sudden, minimizing screen time didn’t seem like the biggest priority,” he told me.

Eventually, instead of trying to treat his phone like an “obstacle to be overcome,” he started thinking about what his phone was useful for. He ditched what he calls the “barrier apps” that limit screen time, and now he has a folder with a green check mark that contains apps like Kindle and Audible, and one with a red flag emoji that contains apps like TikTok; the categorization serves as a gentle reminder to not get sucked in. He also had a kid, which his says helps keep him accountable. “He’s watching, and so I want to model good behavior for him.”

Liz Moody, the author of 100 Way to Change Your Life, likewise doesn’t limit herself to a set amount of time—but she’s strict about not scrolling right after she wakes up, and right before she goes to bed. Her book even includes the suggestion to literally change your life by simply keeping your phone out of your bedroom. Many people’s reaction to this is so outsized that she already has responses to common excuses to do otherwise (“But I use it as an alarm!” “You can buy an alarm clock for less than $10.”).

Moody also recommends asking yourself, “What am I trying to achieve in the time I’m spending on social media?” and then unfollowing accounts ruthlessly that don’t fit that goal. (“What if looking at other peoples’ beach vacations makes me relaxed? I ask Moody. “I just think you need to be incredibly honest with yourself,” she says.)

By the time I talked to Moody, I’d already unfollowed most of the true influencers who were making my life miserable, so I did a round of culling on Instagram that involved something I’d come to realize was sapping my energy in a more specific way: the type of person who I once knew in real life, but don’t any longer. Sometimes it’s nice to keep in touch passively on Instagram. But some of these people’s posts were—crucially—just making me kind of irritated, even gossipy and bitchy. If there’s one thing that I really hope to quit about social media this year, it’s hate-following.

I felt kind of guilty about this. Why are my reactions to these random acquaintances making me feel so catty? A conversation with Matt Bell, a professor of creative writing at Arizona State University and the author of Refuse to Be Done: How to Write and Rewrite a Novel in Three Drafts, helped me see this differently. He follows a lot of authors, and he put it this way: It’s just easy to dislike the version of a person that shows up on a platform, even someone whom you like in any other form (one-on-one conversation, at parties, in their longer, more considered written work, etc.). If social media “didn’t have mute and block, I wouldn’t be able to use it,” he says, later adding, “to show someone your mute list would be like—a kind of intimacy I maybe have with no one.” You can mute the people who, if you told them to their face, would be upset to learn you muted them. We are, in fact, still allowed our privacy, even if we have to remember to claim it.

One thing I learned while writing this piece is that actual research doesn’t have as much to offer when it comes to categorizing the benefits of fully quitting these platforms. That’s because “it’s difficult to find participants who will agree to be randomly assigned the task of dropping social media forever,” wrote John Malouff, a professor of behavioral science at the University of New England in Australia, in a piece on the Conversation. But on a recent phone call, he told me that he’s working on studying the success of various interventions that people use to cut down on scrolling. And he had something to tell me, in the meantime, about what the basics of psychology say about quitting: “If you strip something away, you create a void,” he explained. Twitter isn’t (just) silly or stupid—you are going there because it’s giving you something. The key is finding what that is and finding a reasonable way to get it, maybe a little bit by using a Twitter replacement, and a little bit by looking elsewhere in the world for it.

So, this year, along with yet again setting more boundaries for myself around scrolling, I’m also trying to fill my life up with the kind of stuff that naturally takes me away from my phone. More books, more yoga, more restorative yoga, specifically, where you just lie down in a room in various shapes for an hour. The kind of stuff that’s fulfilling—but too boring to go online and brag about.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

What to stream this weekend: ‘Civil War,’ Snow Patrol, ‘How to Die Alone,’ ‘Tulsa King’ and ‘Uglies’

Published

 on

 

Hallmark launching a streaming service with two new original series, and Bill Skarsgård out for revenge in “Boy Kills World” are some of the new television, films, music and games headed to a device near you.

Also among the streaming offerings worth your time as selected by The Associated Press’ entertainment journalists: Alex Garland’s “Civil War” starring Kirsten Dunst, Natasha Rothwell’s heartfelt comedy for Hulu called “How to Die Alone” and Sylvester Stallone’s second season of “Tulsa King” debuts.

NEW MOVIES TO STREAM SEPT. 9-15

Alex Garland’s “Civil War” is finally making its debut on MAX on Friday. The film stars Kirsten Dunst as a veteran photojournalist covering a violent war that’s divided America; She reluctantly allows an aspiring photographer, played by Cailee Spaeny, to tag along as she, an editor (Stephen McKinley Henderson) and a reporter (Wagner Moura) make the dangerous journey to Washington, D.C., to interview the president (Nick Offerman), a blustery, rising despot who has given himself a third term, taken to attacking his citizens and shut himself off from the press. In my review, I called it a bellowing and haunting experience; Smart and thought-provoking with great performances. It’s well worth a watch.

— Joey King stars in Netflix’s adaptation of Scott Westerfeld’s “Uglies,” about a future society in which everyone is required to have beautifying cosmetic surgery at age 16. Streaming on Friday, McG directed the film, in which King’s character inadvertently finds herself in the midst of an uprising against the status quo. “Outer Banks” star Chase Stokes plays King’s best friend.

— Bill Skarsgård is out for revenge against the woman (Famke Janssen) who killed his family in “Boy Kills World,” coming to Hulu on Friday. Moritz Mohr directed the ultra-violent film, of which Variety critic Owen Gleiberman wrote: “It’s a depraved vision, yet I got caught up in its kick-ass revenge-horror pizzazz, its disreputable commitment to what it was doing.”

AP Film Writer Lindsey Bahr

NEW MUSIC TO STREAM SEPT. 9-15

— The year was 2006. Snow Patrol, the Northern Irish-Scottish alternative rock band, released an album, “Eyes Open,” producing the biggest hit of their career: “Chasing Cars.” A lot has happened in the time since — three, soon to be four quality full-length albums, to be exact. On Friday, the band will release “The Forest Is the Path,” their first new album in seven years. Anthemic pop-rock is the name of the game across songs of love and loss, like “All,”“The Beginning” and “This Is the Sound Of Your Voice.”

— For fans of raucous guitar music, Jordan Peele’s 2022 sci-fi thriller, “NOPE,” provided a surprising, if tiny, thrill. One of the leads, Emerald “Em” Haywood portrayed by Keke Palmer, rocks a Jesus Lizard shirt. (Also featured through the film: Rage Against the Machine, Wipers, Mr Bungle, Butthole Surfers and Earth band shirts.) The Austin noise rock band are a less than obvious pick, having been signed to the legendary Touch and Go Records and having stopped releasing new albums in 1998. That changes on Friday the 13th, when “Rack” arrives. And for those curious: The Jesus Lizard’s intensity never went away.

AP Music Writer Maria Sherman

NEW SHOWS TO STREAM SEPT. 9-15

— Hallmark launched a streaming service called Hallmark+ on Tuesday with two new original series, the scripted drama “The Chicken Sisters” and unscripted series “Celebrations with Lacey Chabert.” If you’re a Hallmark holiday movies fan, you know Chabert. She’s starred in more than 30 of their films and many are holiday themed. Off camera, Chabert has a passion for throwing parties and entertaining. In “Celebrations,” deserving people are surprised with a bash in their honor — planned with Chabert’s help. “The Chicken Sisters” stars Schuyler Fisk, Wendie Malick and Lea Thompson in a show about employees at rival chicken restaurants in a small town. The eight-episode series is based on a novel of the same name.

Natasha Rothwell of “Insecure” and “The White Lotus” fame created and stars in a new heartfelt comedy for Hulu called “How to Die Alone.” She plays Mel, a broke, go-along-to-get-along, single, airport employee who, after a near-death experience, makes the conscious decision to take risks and pursue her dreams. Rothwell has been working on the series for the past eight years and described it to The AP as “the most vulnerable piece of art I’ve ever put into the world.” Like Mel, Rothwell had to learn to bet on herself to make the show she wanted to make. “In the Venn diagram of me and Mel, there’s significant overlap,” said Rothwell. It premieres Friday on Hulu.

— Shailene Woodley, DeWanda Wise and Betty Gilpin star in a new drama for Starz called “Three Women,” about entrepreneur Sloane, homemaker Lina and student Maggie who are each stepping into their power and making life-changing decisions. They’re interviewed by a writer named Gia (Woodley.) The series is based on a 2019 best-selling book of the same name by Lisa Taddeo. “Three Women” premieres Friday on Starz.

— Sylvester Stallone’s second season of “Tulsa King” debuts Sunday on Paramount+. Stallone plays Dwight Manfredi, a mafia boss who was recently released from prison after serving 25 years. He’s sent to Tulsa to set up a new crime syndicate. The series is created by Taylor Sheridan of “Yellowstone” fame.

Alicia Rancilio

NEW VIDEO GAMES TO PLAY

— One thing about the title of Focus Entertainment’s Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2 — you know exactly what you’re in for. You are Demetrian Titus, a genetically enhanced brute sent into battle against the Tyranids, an insectoid species with an insatiable craving for human flesh. You have a rocket-powered suit of armor and an arsenal of ridiculous weapons like the “Chainsword,” the “Thunderhammer” and the “Melta Rifle,” so what could go wrong? Besides the squishy single-player mode, there are cooperative missions and six-vs.-six free-for-alls. You can suit up now on PlayStation 5, Xbox X/S or PC.

— Likewise, Wild Bastards isn’t exactly the kind of title that’s going to attract fans of, say, Animal Crossing. It’s another sci-fi shooter, but the protagonists are a gang of 13 varmints — aliens and androids included — who are on the run from the law. Each outlaw has a distinctive set of weapons and special powers: Sarge, for example, is a robot with horse genes, while Billy the Squid is … well, you get the idea. Australian studio Blue Manchu developed the 2019 cult hit Void Bastards, and this Wild-West-in-space spinoff has the same snarky humor and vibrant, neon-drenched cartoon look. Saddle up on PlayStation 5, Xbox X/S, Nintendo Switch or PC.

Lou Kesten

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Trump could cash out his DJT stock within weeks. Here’s what happens if he sells

Published

 on

Former President Donald Trump is on the brink of a significant financial decision that could have far-reaching implications for both his personal wealth and the future of his fledgling social media company, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG). As the lockup period on his shares in TMTG, which owns Truth Social, nears its end, Trump could soon be free to sell his substantial stake in the company. However, the potential payday, which makes up a large portion of his net worth, comes with considerable risks for Trump and his supporters.

Trump’s stake in TMTG comprises nearly 59% of the company, amounting to 114,750,000 shares. As of now, this holding is valued at approximately $2.6 billion. These shares are currently under a lockup agreement, a common feature of initial public offerings (IPOs), designed to prevent company insiders from immediately selling their shares and potentially destabilizing the stock. The lockup, which began after TMTG’s merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), is set to expire on September 25, though it could end earlier if certain conditions are met.

Should Trump decide to sell his shares after the lockup expires, the market could respond in unpredictable ways. The sale of a substantial number of shares by a major stakeholder like Trump could flood the market, potentially driving down the stock price. Daniel Bradley, a finance professor at the University of South Florida, suggests that the market might react negatively to such a large sale, particularly if there aren’t enough buyers to absorb the supply. This could lead to a sharp decline in the stock’s value, impacting both Trump’s personal wealth and the company’s market standing.

Moreover, Trump’s involvement in Truth Social has been a key driver of investor interest. The platform, marketed as a free speech alternative to mainstream social media, has attracted a loyal user base largely due to Trump’s presence. If Trump were to sell his stake, it might signal a lack of confidence in the company, potentially shaking investor confidence and further depressing the stock price.

Trump’s decision is also influenced by his ongoing legal battles, which have already cost him over $100 million in legal fees. Selling his shares could provide a significant financial boost, helping him cover these mounting expenses. However, this move could also have political ramifications, especially as he continues his bid for the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential race.

Trump Media’s success is closely tied to Trump’s political fortunes. The company’s stock has shown volatility in response to developments in the presidential race, with Trump’s chances of winning having a direct impact on the stock’s value. If Trump sells his stake, it could be interpreted as a lack of confidence in his own political future, potentially undermining both his campaign and the company’s prospects.

Truth Social, the flagship product of TMTG, has faced challenges in generating traffic and advertising revenue, especially compared to established social media giants like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook. Despite this, the company’s valuation has remained high, fueled by investor speculation on Trump’s political future. If Trump remains in the race and manages to secure the presidency, the value of his shares could increase. Conversely, any missteps on the campaign trail could have the opposite effect, further destabilizing the stock.

As the lockup period comes to an end, Trump faces a critical decision that could shape the future of both his personal finances and Truth Social. Whether he chooses to hold onto his shares or cash out, the outcome will likely have significant consequences for the company, its investors, and Trump’s political aspirations.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Arizona man accused of social media threats to Trump is arrested

Published

 on

Cochise County, AZ — Law enforcement officials in Arizona have apprehended Ronald Lee Syvrud, a 66-year-old resident of Cochise County, after a manhunt was launched following alleged death threats he made against former President Donald Trump. The threats reportedly surfaced in social media posts over the past two weeks, as Trump visited the US-Mexico border in Cochise County on Thursday.

Syvrud, who hails from Benson, Arizona, located about 50 miles southeast of Tucson, was captured by the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office on Thursday afternoon. The Sheriff’s Office confirmed his arrest, stating, “This subject has been taken into custody without incident.”

In addition to the alleged threats against Trump, Syvrud is wanted for multiple offences, including failure to register as a sex offender. He also faces several warrants in both Wisconsin and Arizona, including charges for driving under the influence and a felony hit-and-run.

The timing of the arrest coincided with Trump’s visit to Cochise County, where he toured the US-Mexico border. During his visit, Trump addressed the ongoing border issues and criticized his political rival, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, for what he described as lax immigration policies. When asked by reporters about the ongoing manhunt for Syvrud, Trump responded, “No, I have not heard that, but I am not that surprised and the reason is because I want to do things that are very bad for the bad guys.”

This incident marks the latest in a series of threats against political figures during the current election cycle. Just earlier this month, a 66-year-old Virginia man was arrested on suspicion of making death threats against Vice President Kamala Harris and other public officials.

Continue Reading

Trending