adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Immigration minister says AI isn’t making final immigration decisions

Published

 on

Immigration, Citizenship and Refugees Minister Sean Fraser says new technology has greatly accelerated processing times in his department — but he insists that artificial intelligence (AI) isn’t making any final decisions on whether an immigration application is approved.

Fraser told a press conference on Friday that Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) has used new “advanced analytics” technology to great effect.

“We use these new technologies across a wide variety of our immigration systems, and what we’ve seen is massive gains in productivity,” Fraser said.

Fraser did not specify the nature of the technology but instead insisted that humans still have a role to play at IRCC.

“Just to dispel any fears that may exist, a human being is still responsible for every final decision,” Fraser said.

“It is not possible for an AI system or an advanced analytics system to make a final determination on a person’s admissibility or eligibility.”

Fraser said a human officer’s evaluation is needed “to protect the integrity” of the process.

Fraser’s announcement was about the use of the new system for temporary resident visa (TRV) applicants intended to reunite family members in Canada.

Family members seeking permanent residency status in Canada can apply for a temporary visitor’s visa to join their sponsor while they wait for their application to be approved. Fraser said such visas are often denied because of the possibility that applicants might not leave once they expire.

The new system uses advanced analytics to identify people who have a permanent residency application in the system and approve their visa to visit Canada more quickly. Fraser said he hopes the turnaround time can now be reduced to as little as 30 days.

“This means that family members will be able to travel to Canada more quickly and be with their loved ones sooner than was previously the case,” Fraser said.

The new system will sift through the person’s application and determine how likely it is that they will be granted permanent residency. Those with a high likelihood will be put in a category that fast-tracks their temporary visa.

So far, the approval rate for applications under the new system is higher than 98 per cent, Fraser said.

He also announced Friday that spouses and dependent children with temporary visas will be given open work permits, regardless of whether they apply before or after they arrive in Canada.

That means spouses won’t have to wait to start working after they arrive in Canada.

“We know it’s critical that they’re able to support themselves and their families as soon as possible,” Fraser said.

Conservative immigration critic Tom Kmiec said the minister’s announcement does not go far enough and the minister’s numbers on processing times don’t align with figures he received from IRCC last month.

“It doesn’t address the key issue, which is really long processing times, which are getting longer, not shorter,” Kmiec said.

“This department has doubled its staff since 2015 and doubled its budget since 2015. Why can’t taxpayers get the results that they’re paying for?”

Conservative MP Tom Kmiec rises during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill on March 10, 2023. Kmiec said processing times for immigration applications are getting longer, not shorter. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Kmiec said he’s hearing from constituents who are waiting up to five years for their spousal sponsorship applications to be approved.

But Will Tao, a Vancouver-based immigration lawyer, said the changes are welcome.

“It’s a shake-up for sure,” Tao said after the minister’s announcement Friday.

“I think it’s a good move, in many respects.”

The increased use of advanced analytics has raised concerns about the types of data being used to inform machine-based decision-making, and whether such systems could discriminate against some families based on where they’re from or other characteristics, Tao said.

“I think that’s something needs to be dug into a little bit more, about this idea that it applies the same to everybody, because I think in immigration we know that’s not the case,” he said. “There are always discrepancies.”

Liberal MP calls minister ‘Mr. Sexy’ at announcement

Liberal MP Hedy Fry raised eyebrows at the event Friday when she introduced Fraser as “Mr. Sexy” and spent much of her speaking time commenting on his looks.

“I’d like to hand the mic over to the Honourable Sean ‘Mr. Sexy’ Fraser,” Fry said.

Earlier in her speech, Fry said Fraser was recently voted “sexiest man on [Parliament] Hill,” but did not say who conducted the survey.

Fraser chuckled and hugged Fry on his way to the podium but did not mention Fry’s comments.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

Trump is consistently inconsistent on abortion and reproductive rights

Published

 on

 

CHICAGO (AP) — Donald Trump has had a tough time finding a consistent message to questions about abortion and reproductive rights.

The former president has constantly shifted his stances or offered vague, contradictory and at times nonsensical answers to questions on an issue that has become a major vulnerability for Republicans in this year’s election. Trump has been trying to win over voters, especially women, skeptical about his views, especially after he nominated three Supreme Court justices who helped overturn the nationwide right to abortion two years ago.

The latest example came this week when the Republican presidential nominee said some abortion laws are “too tough” and would be “redone.”

“It’s going to be redone,” he said during a Fox News town hall that aired Wednesday. “They’re going to, you’re going to, you end up with a vote of the people. They’re too tough, too tough. And those are going to be redone because already there’s a movement in those states.”

Trump did not specify if he meant he would take some kind of action if he wins in November, and he did not say which states or laws he was talking about. He did not elaborate on what he meant by “redone.”

He also seemed to be contradicting his own stand when referencing the strict abortion bans passed in Republican-controlled states since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Trump recently said he would vote against a constitutional amendment on the Florida ballot that is aimed at overturning the state’s six-week abortion ban. That decision came after he had criticized the law as too harsh.

Trump has shifted between boasting about nominating the justices who helped strike down federal protections for abortion and trying to appear more neutral. It’s been an attempt to thread the divide between his base of anti-abortion supporters and the majority of Americans who support abortion rights.

About 6 in 10 Americans think their state should generally allow a person to obtain a legal abortion if they don’t want to be pregnant for any reason, according to a July poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Voters in seven states, including some conservative ones, have either protected abortion rights or defeated attempts to restrict them in statewide votes over the past two years.

Trump also has been repeating the narrative that he returned the question of abortion rights to states, even though voters do not have a direct say on that or any other issue in about half the states. This is particularly true for those living in the South, where Republican-controlled legislatures, many of which have been gerrymandered to give the GOP disproportionate power, have enacted some of the strictest abortion bans since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

Currently, 13 states have banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy, while four more ban it after six weeks — before many women know they’re pregnant.

Meanwhile, anti-abortion groups and their Republican allies in state governments are using an array of strategies to counter proposed ballot initiatives in at least eight states this year.

Here’s a breakdown of Trump’s fluctuating stances on reproductive rights.

Flip-flopping on Florida

On Tuesday, Trump claimed some abortion laws are “too tough” and would be “redone.”

But in August, Trump said he would vote against a state ballot measure that is attempting to repeal the six-week abortion ban passed by the Republican-controlled Legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis.

That came a day after he seemed to indicate he would vote in favor of the measure. Trump previously called Florida’s six-week ban a “terrible mistake” and too extreme. In an April Time magazine interview, Trump repeated that he “thought six weeks is too severe.”

Trump on vetoing a national ban

Trump’s latest flip-flopping has involved his views on a national abortion ban.

During the Oct. 1 vice presidential debate, Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social that he would veto a national abortion ban: “Everyone knows I would not support a federal abortion ban, under any circumstances, and would, in fact, veto it.”

This came just weeks after Trump repeatedly declined to say during the presidential debate with Democrat Kamala Harris whether he would veto a national abortion ban if he were elected.

Trump’s running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, said in an interview with NBC News before the presidential debate that Trump would veto a ban. In response to debate moderators prompting him about Vance’s statement, Trump said: “I didn’t discuss it with JD, in all fairness. And I don’t mind if he has a certain view, but I don’t think he was speaking for me.”

‘Pro-choice’ to 15-week ban

Trump’s shifting abortion policy stances began when the former reality TV star and developer started flirting with running for office.

He once called himself “very pro-choice.” But before becoming president, Trump said he “would indeed support a ban,” according to his book “The America We Deserve,” which was published in 2000.

In his first year as president, he said he was “pro-life with exceptions” but also said “there has to be some form of punishment” for women seeking abortions — a position he quickly reversed.

At the 2018 annual March for Life, Trump voiced support for a federal ban on abortion on or after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

More recently, Trump suggested in March that he might support a national ban on abortions around 15 weeks before announcing that he instead would leave the matter to the states.

Views on abortion pills, prosecuting women

In the Time interview, Trump said it should be left up to the states to decide whether to prosecute women for abortions or to monitor women’s pregnancies.

“The states are going to make that decision,” Trump said. “The states are going to have to be comfortable or uncomfortable, not me.”

Democrats have seized on the comments he made in 2016, saying “there has to be some form of punishment” for women who have abortions.

Trump also declined to comment on access to the abortion pill mifepristone, claiming that he has “pretty strong views” on the matter. He said he would make a statement on the issue, but it never came.

Trump responded similarly when asked about his views on the Comstock Act, a 19th century law that has been revived by anti-abortion groups seeking to block the mailing of mifepristone.

IVF and contraception

In May, Trump said during an interview with a Pittsburgh television station that he was open to supporting regulations on contraception and that his campaign would release a policy on the issue “very shortly.” He later said his comments were misinterpreted.

In the KDKA interview, Trump was asked, “Do you support any restrictions on a person’s right to contraception?”

“We’re looking at that and I’m going to have a policy on that very shortly,” Trump responded.

Trump has not since released a policy statement on contraception.

Trump also has offered contradictory statements on in vitro fertilization.

During the Fox News town hall, which was taped Tuesday, Trump declared that he is “the father of IVF,” despite acknowledging during his answer that he needed an explanation of IVF in February after the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law.

Trump said he instructed Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., to “explain IVF very quickly” to him in the aftermath of the ruling.

As concerns over access to fertility treatments rose, Trump pledged to promote IVF by requiring health insurance companies or the federal government to pay for it. Such a move would be at odds with the actions of much of his own party.

Even as the Republican Party has tried to create a national narrative that it is receptive to IVF, these messaging efforts have been undercut by GOP state lawmakers, Republican-dominated courts and anti-abortion leaders within the party’s ranks, as well as opposition to legislative attempts to protect IVF access.

___

The Associated Press receives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about AP’s democracy initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan Party’s Scott Moe, NDP’s Carla Beck react to debate |

Published

 on

 

Saskatchewan‘s two main political party leaders faced off in the only televised debate in the lead up to the provincial election on Oct. 28. Saskatchewan Party Leader Scott Moe and NDP Leader Carla Beck say voters got a chance to see their platforms. (Oct. 17, 2024)

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan political leaders back on campaign trail after election debate

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan‘s main political leaders are back on the campaign trail today after hammering each other in a televised debate.

Saskatchewan Party Leader Scott Moe is set to make an announcement in Moose Jaw.

Saskatchewan NDP Leader Carla Beck is to make stops in Regina, Saskatoon and Prince Albert.

During Wednesday night’s debate, Beck emphasized her plan to make life more affordable and said people deserve better than an out-of-touch Saskatchewan Party government.

Moe said his party wants to lower taxes and put money back into people’s pockets.

Election day is Oct. 28.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending