adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Tech

iPhone 14 with A15 Bionic chip? At the end of the day, it's all about marketing – 9to5Mac

Published

 on


Every year, Apple announces a new generation iPhone. Sometimes it comes with a brand new design, sometimes not. But the only thing we know for sure is that the new iPhone will feature a new chip – at least that was the case until now. Recent rumors suggest that some iPhone 14 models will keep the A15 Bionic chip from this year’s models. But why would Apple do that?

What the rumors are saying

The well-known analyst Ming-Chi Kuo reported this month that only the high-end iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max models will have the new “A16” chip, while the mid-range iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Max models (the mini model is expected to be replaced by a new 6.7-inch phone) will be equipped with the A15 Bionic chip.

300x250x1

9to5Mac corroborated Kuo’s report with independent sources, which also suggest that two of this year’s four new iPhone models will be powered by the A15 Bionic chip, while the other two will have the next generation Apple Silicon chip. Both Kuo and 9to5Mac’s sources also suggest that all new iPhones will have 6GB of RAM, while currently the cheapest models come with 4GB of RAM.

So this is what the iPhone 14 lineup will look like:

  • 6.1-inch iPhone 14 with A15 chip
  • 6.7-inch iPhone 14 Max with A15 chip
  • 6.1-inch iPhone 14 Pro with A16 chip
  • 6.7-inch iPhone 14 Pro with A16 chip

But would Apple release a new flagship device with an old chip? It turns out that the company has done this before, and it’s all about marketing.

The strategy behind Apple’s chip names

Since the iPhone 4 was introduced in 2010 with the first Apple-custom chip called “A4,” the new chips that came after have always followed the same nomenclature. We have had A5, A6, A7, and the list goes on.

However, in 2012, Apple had to create an even more powerful chip for the new third-generation iPad, which was the first to have a high-resolution Retina display. This chip was based entirely on the A5 chip from the iPhone 4s and iPad 2, but the new version had a quad-core GPU while the original had a dual-core GPU.

To differentiate the new chip and make it sound like something more powerful, Apple named it A5X. Since then, all new chips created specifically for the iPad have had the “X” in their name as a way to indicate that they are faster due to the more powerful GPU and more RAM. This strategy was used until 2018, when Apple released the third generation iPad Pro with the A12X chip.

In 2020, instead of creating a more powerful version of the A13 chip for the new iPad Pro, Apple simply reused the same A12X chip from the 2018 iPad Pro, but this time with an extra GPU core enabled. That change was enough for Apple to rebrand the chip as “A12Z Bionic.”

The M1 and a new era for Apple Silicon

When Apple finally decided to migrate Macs from Intel processors to their own silicon, they once again needed a strong name to emphasize that these chips are even more powerful and different from anything the company has done before – so they came up with the M1 chip.

However, on the inside, M1 is basically what Apple would name A14X in the past, as the chip found inside the latest iMac and MacBook Air is essentially the iPhone 12’s A14 chip with more CPU and GPU cores. Apple then created more powerful M1 Pro, M1 Max, and M1 Ultra variants, all based on the same A14 chip.

The “M1” name has become extremely appealing, or don’t you think that having an iPad Air with the M1 chip sounds more amazing than something with an A14X chip? My point is, Apple uses marketing in its favor to make even the smallest changes into something bigger, and it can easily do that with iPhone chips.

Which chip will be in the iPhone 14?

As I recently noted in another article, Apple currently has two different versions of the A15 Bionic chip, although they don’t advertise them using different names. The regular A15 Bionic chip used in the iPhone 13 and iPad mini 6 models has a six-core CPU and a five-core GPU with 4GB of RAM. However, iPhone 13 Pro models have an enhanced A15 Bionic chip with a six-core GPU and 6GB of RAM.

This extra GPU core gives the iPhone 13 Pro about 34% more graphics power when compared to the iPhone 13, while the 6GB of RAM ensures that more apps can remain in the background for longer.

We don’t know why Apple would use the A15 chip in the next generation iPhone. This could be related to component shortages or the company simply realized that most average consumers would not even notice the difference between a brand new A16 chip and the current A15.

However, when we say that some models of the iPhone 14 will have the A15 chip, it doesn’t mean that it will have the same A15 chip as the iPhone 13. Apple might use the high-end version of its chip with a better GPU and 6GB of RAM and call it A15X, just like it did with the A12Z chip in the 2020 iPad Pro.

Apple could even call it the A16 chip and create a new chip with a different architecture named A16 Pro, as it has been doing with Mac chips. The Apple Watch Series 7 has the same CPU as the Apple Watch Series 6, but the chips are named “Apple S6” and “Apple S7” due to minor internal changes that have been made to the SoC.

Whatever the chip inside the iPhone 14 is, Apple’s marketing team certainly has something in mind to make it sound like a brand new thing.

Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news:

[embedded content]

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

OnePlus Teases Its First Tablet Ahead of Launch Event – CNET

Published

 on


OnePlus has been rumored to have a tablet in the works, and now we’re getting an official peek at the device ahead of a launch event next month. A teaser image posted to OnePlus’ Indian website and shared with TechRadar on Thursday shows a prominent camera bump central along the tablet’s edge. The tablet will be called the OnePlus Pad.

While it’s hard to distinguish in the official photo, unofficial renders from OnLeaks and MySmartPrice suggest the camera will be on the longer edge of the tablet, keeping it centered when the tablet is used in a landscape position. 

300x250x1

OnePlus’ Indian website says the tablet will be announced at its Feb. 7 Cloud 11 launch event where the company will also debut the OnePlus 11 and OnePlus 11R smartphones, OnePlus Buds Pro 2 and a new OnePlus TV. Mention of the new devices is absent from its US website, sparking speculation that the tablet won’t be widely available outside of India at launch.

OnePlus didn’t immediately return request for comment.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

The Dead Space remake is a grisly cut of classic horror

Published

 on

a:hover]:text-black text-gray-13 dark:text-gray-e9 dark:[&>a:hover]:text-gray-e9 [&>a]:shadow-underline-gray-13 [&>a:hover]:shadow-underline-black dark:[&>a]:shadow-underline-gray-63 dark:[&>a:hover]:shadow-underline-gray-63″>Isaac Clarke goes back to the USG Ishimura.

a:hover]:text-gray-63 text-gray-63 dark:[&>a:hover]:text-gray-bd dark:text-gray-bd dark:[&>a]:text-gray-bd [&>a]:shadow-underline-gray-63 [&>a:hover]:shadow-underline-black dark:[&>a]:shadow-underline-gray dark:[&>a:hover]:shadow-underline-gray”>Image: EA

In October 2017, publisher Electronic Arts unceremoniously shut down its studio Visceral Games, best known for shooter series Dead Space. Visceral was part of a dwindling breed at EA, devoted to linear high-budget games instead of a profitable “live service” model. One former employee noted that even the popular Dead Space 2 had been considered a financial failure, and the odds of a new one appearing in the near future seemed small. Yet tomorrow, EA will do just that, releasing a remake of the original 2008 Dead Space developed by its Canadian team Motive Studio. The Dead Space remake isn’t the path I’d have chosen for a resurrection of one of my favorite series. It also happens to be great.

Dead Space (2023) is most obviously a better-looking version of Dead Space (2008). Debuting on next-generation consoles and PC, it’s the kind of game where everything glistens, from the slimy explosive tentacles wreathing its futuristic spaceship to the ornate brassy ridges on protagonist Isaac Clarke’s suit. But beneath that surface, Motive has polished the foundations of Dead Space with changes drawn from its 2011 sequel as well as some simple yet effective new ideas. Rather than an elaborate reimagining in the vein of the Resident Evil 2 remake, a metanarrative experiment like the Final Fantasy VII Remake, or a user-friendly transformation of a tough-to-play classic like the yet-unreleased System Shock remake, it’s just an immensely solid update to an already excellent game — and one that couldn’t have come at a better time.

The Dead Space franchise is a third-person shooter series defined by a clever twist: you’re in a disaster zone overrun by grotesque zombie-like monstrosities dubbed “necromorphs,” but instead of a bullet to the head, the creatures go down when you sever their blade- or bomb-like limbs. While horror games have explored just about every permutation of the hideously twisted human form, Dead Space forces you to confront it with combat that feels like gruesome surgery — aided by weapons based on power tools like plasma cutters and radial arm saws as well as telekinetic powers and a time-slowing ability called stasis.

The Dead Space remake — like the original — sets this action on a mining spaceship called the USG Ishimura, which has gone unexpectedly silent after cracking open a planet in the depths of space. Engineer Isaac Clarke boards the Ishimura hoping to repair it and track down his girlfriend, a doctor named Nicole Brennan. Instead, he and his team find themselves thwarted at every turn, not only by the necromorph outbreak but also by a mysterious sabotage operation and their own increasingly unstable mental states. Isaac learns the outbreak stems from an apparently madness-inducing alien artifact brought on board the Ishimura. And a powerful religious cult called the Church of Unitology, which is, of course, absolutely nothing like the Church of Scientology, may be helping it spread.

300x250x1

Dead Space was initially conceived as a sequel to the exploration-heavy immersive sim System Shock 2, and although that plan was abandoned early in development, the influence feels evident in the original and carries over to the remake. The Ishimura is a fairly small and self-contained location, full of looping shortcuts and a tram backbone that lets you move easily between levels. (It’s unsurprisingly reminiscent of Arkane’s 2017 Prey, another indirect System Shock successor.) Both iterations of the game involve fixing problems by backtracking through flickering corridors and cavernous common areas, blasting the monsters that burst out of vents or play dead in plain sight. It’s a structure that Dead Space’s two direct sequels would downplay, moving toward comparatively linear level design.

A spaceship trench with asteroids.

A spaceship trench with asteroids.

 

a:hover]:text-black text-gray-13 dark:text-gray-e9 dark:[&>a:hover]:text-gray-e9 [&>a]:shadow-underline-gray-13 [&>a:hover]:shadow-underline-black dark:[&>a]:shadow-underline-gray-63 dark:[&>a:hover]:shadow-underline-gray-63″>Frustrating sections like an asteroid-shooting run have been heavily overhauled.

But while the original Dead Space established the basic combat system, some of the series’ best elements came later. Dead Space 2 turned telekinesis into a full-fledged secondary combat option — letting you do things like freeze an enemy with stasis, chop its arm off with a plasma cutter, and pin it to a wall with its own severed limb. It’s so intuitive that the original game feels incomplete without it, and the same goes for some other features, like free-floating zero-gravity sections that let you jet through the vacuum of space rather than just hopping between walls with magnetic boots.

The Dead Space remake is the best that playing a Dead Space game has ever felt. (I ran through it on a PC with a controller and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 graphics card, the game’s recommended spec.) On top of combining the first and second game’s best elements, Motive has overhauled a few undeniably bad encounters, particularly a couple of interminable cannon-blasting set pieces that now feel far snappier and less repetitive. It maintains the methodical but not artificially slow pace of the original, creating suspense with shameless sudden blackouts and enemy jump scares but mostly avoiding the heavily scripted sensory assaults and quicktime sequences that Dead Space 2 became known for. Isaac will certainly take his share of physical and mental punishment, but Dead Space is emphatically a horror game — something to play with and master, not simply be subjected to.

And the remake introduces a few welcome tweaks of its own. The game largely keeps Dead Space’s original array of weapons, but it buffs some of the less popular ones with fresh alternate fire modes — the flamethrower, for instance, can now produce a protective wall of fire. As you attack enemies, you’ll see chunks of their flesh visibly erode, letting you know how close you are to severing a limb. One weapon takes things further with a fire mode that strips off entire layers of skin and muscle, leaving brittle animate skeletons that you can knock out with another weapon. It’s gory and over the top, and I can’t get enough of it.

Dead Space still happily embraces the shooter genre’s artificial yet satisfying shorthands. Enemies have familiar glowing weak spots to aim for, and you’ll stomp gigantic supply crates to release the futuristic equivalent of a single $100 bill, carefully collecting money for supplemental ammo and dopamine-drip upgrades like new suits. On top of being glossy and dramatically lit compared to their 2008 counterparts, the levels are now full of clearly marked stuff to smash and throw at enemies; I have never been so aware of furniture’s potential impalement value. Some doors and lockers are gated behind a new “clearance” system that lets you open them later, when you’ve collected credentials off the bodies of dead crew officers, giving you an organic way to learn about the people on the Ishimura.

The upgrades encourage exploration, too. Like before, you collect power nodes that you can weld to your weapons and suit at benches scattered through the levels. But this time, some of those welding points are unlocked by items that enable specific special functions, like setting enemies on fire with plasma shots. While the powers aren’t necessarily new, the items add an extra incentive to poke around the ship. And they’re far simpler than the confusing modular weapons in Dead Space 3, an okay-at-best game whose influence is nearly undetectable in the remake.

The riskiest moves Motive makes aren’t mechanical but narrative. Dead Space began as a relatively simple space-horror story that evoked Event Horizon, but its plot became more lore heavy and tortured with each game and supplemental tie-in bookDead Space 3’s climax is as baroquely incoherent as a fever dream, culminating in the decision to (spoilers) make players physically fight a moon. And between the first two games, Isaac underwent a dramatic shift from a silent masked protagonist to a character voiced by actor Gunner Wright, who plays the man as a combination of weary, snarky, and horrifically traumatized.

Wright came on board for the Dead Space remake, giving Isaac a voice in conversations that have been extended, centering characters’ motivations and backstories more clearly. You’re no longer playing a silent figure constantly ordered around by snippy superiors doing the bare minimum to convey where you’re supposed to go but, instead, a competent technician who has a tense but collegial relationship with his team. A series of side missions, which are basically just encouragements to explore specific optional rooms, also give a little extra background on his relationship with Nicole and what she’s been doing on the ship.

Games writer Tom Bissell once laid out a passionate argument against Dead Space 2’s expanded plot and Wright’s voice acting, arguing that a horror game protagonist’s vulnerability “annuls any need for ‘character’ or ‘personality’” to make players care. “Isaac is not relaying an experience. He is, rather, the relay we carry and protect during our experience,” Bissell declared. “The Isaac of the first Dead Space was so moving precisely because you had no idea what was inside his head.”

But I always found Isaac’s inexpressiveness in Dead Space distracting because it was so ostentatiously stiff in a story about ordinary people having a brush with madness and tragedy. A first-person control system lets the protagonist simply disappear, but a third-person avatar makes it impossible to ignore all of the moments that someone would normally react and doesn’t. (A lot of these reactions were buried in the original game’s menu text, which is written from Isaac’s perspective.) Wright imbues the character with an endearing charm that makes him fun not only to protect but also to be around for 15 or 16 hours. It’s enough to make me forget that Motive has made Isaac a generic brunet in his rare unmasked scenes, rather than keeping his distinctive salt-and-pepper hair.

Isaac Clarke and Zach Hammond staring at a screen in Dead Space

Isaac Clarke and Zach Hammond staring at a screen in Dead Space

 

a:hover]:text-black text-gray-13 dark:text-gray-e9 dark:[&>a:hover]:text-gray-e9 [&>a]:shadow-underline-gray-13 [&>a:hover]:shadow-underline-black dark:[&>a]:shadow-underline-gray-63 dark:[&>a:hover]:shadow-underline-gray-63″>We no longer stan a gray king.

Isaac’s companions, including Nicole, have been rewritten to feel more engaging and human. We’re thankfully past the period where blockbuster shooters have to pretend to be nuanced high art, but the remake is simply better at pragmatic genre storytelling: the underappreciated craft of giving characters enough personality and relatable motivation that I want to listen to them talk. The remake is weakest toward the end, where it feels either rushed or hemmed in by the original script. But it still pulls a little twist that’s compellingly creepy, even if it doesn’t change the story’s ultimate trajectory.

The Dead Space remake feels clean and good in a way that few big-budget Western titles do right now. In 2008, Dead Space seemed like a variation on any number of story-based horror shooters. It was directly inspired by Resident Evil 4 (which itself is getting a remake this year) but also shared DNA with first-person games like BioShock and Half-Life 2, which beat it by a few years to telekinesis and weaponized industrial tools. But in 2023’s world of modest indie narrative games and sprawling open-world AAA slogs, it stands nearly alone. The closest equivalent, Dead Space creator Glen Schofield’s The Callisto Protocol, seemed almost embarrassed to be a game instead of an unforgiving interactive movie.

Sadly, I’m not sure what Motive’s success here means. I’ve seen the game compared to a director’s cut, but none of Dead Space’s original primary creators are involved, and the term suggests a level of deference toward designers that EA simply hasn’t shown. Dead Space remains a relic from an age of self-contained prestige shooters that almost certainly isn’t coming back; I’m not even sure Motive’s approach would work for remaking the series’ other games. But none of that diminishes the sheer ridiculous pleasure of ripping up a zombie with a sawblade and stomping it for loot.

Dead Space will release on January 27th for PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X and S, and PC.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

OnePlus's first tablet will finally debut next month – Android Police

Published

 on



The Android tablet scene is not as diverse as that of Android smartphones. Samsung makes many of the best Android tablets worth your money, with options from Lenovo, Xiaomi, and others primarily meant to cater to the low-end market. OnePlus, known for providing flagship-level hardware on its phones, is rumored to have been working on a tablet of its own since at least 2021. The device reportedly even entered private testing in India earlier this year. Now, the company seems all set to take wraps off its first Android tablet at its upcoming Cloud 11 event next month.


OnePlus is scheduled to announce the OnePlus 11 and Buds Pro 2 at its Cloud 11 event in India on February 7. A recent teaser confirmed the OnePlus 11R would also launch on the same day. Now, the company is teasing the imminent launch of its first tablet on the event’s site as well. If you head to the Cloud 11 website, you will see the OnePlus 11 and Buds Pro 2 lying on a tablet-like device (via Android Authority), with the latter’s rounded edges and slim bezels being visible. This is as good a confirmation as we can get about the OnePlus Pad finally making its debut.

300x250x1

OnePlus Pad teaser with OnePlus 11 and OnePlus Buds 2 Pro on top

Source: OnePlus

The exact specs of OnePlus’s first tablet have not leaked so far. Given the state of the Android tablet market, the OnePlus Pad is unlikely to have high-end specs. And like some Nord products, the tablet could only launch in specific markets where the company deems it will appeal to more customers. If that does end up being the case, don’t expect the OnePlus Pad to come to the US.

OnePlus’s close ties with Oppo and Realme could mean the OnePlus Pad is just a re-branded Realme Pad, which is a low-end tablet packing a 10.4-inch display and a MediaTek Helip G80 chipset. Thankfully, we won’t have to wait long to get our first look at the OnePlus Pad and its complete specs.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending