adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

Is the U.S. Economy Going to Crash? What Experts Are Saying Now About the Impact of Coronavirus. – Barron's

Published

 on



Illustration by Joel Arbaje

As the novel coronavirus spreads across the U.S., economists are reassessing their forecasts for how the outbreak will affect the domestic economy.

Economic data so far haven’t offered much insight into the toll Covid-19, the respiratory disease caused by the coronavirus, might already be taking. The jobs report released Friday, for example, was strong but hardly reflective of the current state as the Labor Department surveyed businesses mid-February, before the disease really started spreading domestically. The situation escalated Saturday when New York became the latest state to declare a state of emergency, joining California, Washington, and Florida.

As more people get sick, events are canceled, and Americans stay home, economists are scrambling to stay on top of the growing risks to the outlook. Many have said the U.S. economic impact would be relatively contained, but the mood is darkening.

Here’s an edited look at what some economists are now saying:

IHS Markit chief economist Joel Prakken:

Fear and financial stress stemming from the coronavirus will materially weaken 2020 economic growth. There were developments in the latest gross domestic report [the economy grew 2.1% in the fourth quarter] that had a bearing on the near-term outlook. Fourth-quarter personal income, for example, was revised sharply lower, implying less support for consumer spending before the virus kicked in.

Meanwhile, market volatility has surged, risk spreads have widened, and equity values have dropped roughly 10% over the last two weeks—wiping out roughly $4 trillion of household net worth, or about $31,000 per household. Unless reversed fully and quickly, this will weigh on consumer spending over the next few years.

More immediately, weakening consumer attitudes will likely slow consumer spending in the second quarter, and businesses are likely to put some investment plans on hold until the outlook clears up.

Following 2.0% growth in the first quarter of this year, we now look for 1.1% GDP growth in the second quarter, followed by 1.9% growth averaged over the rest of 2020. This yields 1.8% growth this year, down from last month’s forecast of 2.1% growth.

The Federal Reserve has already cut the funds rate target by a half percentage point in response to growing Covid-19 risks, and we expect a quarter-point cut in April. The unemployment rate is likely to begin drifting higher this year. We are not forecasting a recession, but the risks have risen.

Lydia Boussour and Gregory Daco, U.S. economists at Oxford Economics:

The bond market signal is particularly worrisome as the 10-year Treasury yield fell as low as 0.66% on Friday—and below 1% for the first time ever last week. We stress that rate cuts are no panacea, and in the absence of a coordinated health and fiscal response, the situation is likely to get worse before it gets better.

The increasingly widespread coronavirus along with the accompanying ‘virus fear’ is severely disrupting travel activity, leading consumers and businesses to curtail demand and disrupting global and domestic supply chains. With financial markets amplifying the disruptions, we have revised the estimated drag from the virus to 0.4 percentage point, or $80 billion, bringing our 2020 GDP forecast to 1.3%. With real output growth flirting with 1% from a year ago in the first half of this year, this will leave the economy highly vulnerable to adverse shocks. We have therefore lifted our recession odds from 25% to 35%.

We continue to stress the main economic risk from the virus is not contagion, or mortality, but rather it stems from the actions that national and local authorities have taken to curb the outbreak—the ‘lockdown paradox.’ While our baseline forecast does not include a lockdown scenario, we note that if authorities decide to close schools, severely restrict travel, and limit all nonessential movement, the U.S. economy will fall into a recession—putting an end to its longest economic expansion ever.

Since the coronavirus outbreak appears to be roughly six weeks behind the China outbreak, we expect to see further disruptions to both supply and demand in the coming weeks. It may be that the disruptions to activity linger well into the second quarter. As such, anticipating a so-called V-shaped recovery would be misguided. A U-shaped path for GDP growth now appears the most likely scenario.

If the coronavirus outbreak becomes a global pandemic, the consequences will be much more severe, with GDP tumbling 1.7 percentage points relative to a no-virus scenario. The total output loss would surpass $300 billion in the resulting recession, with more than 1.5 million individuals losing their jobs.

The New York Federal Reserve:

The New York Fed Staff Nowcast GDP estimate, revised lower on Friday, stands at 1.7% for the first quarter and 1.3% for the second quarter.

News from this week’s data decreased the forecast for the first quarter by 0.4% and decreased the second-quarter estimate by 1%. Negative surprises from the Institute for Supply Management’s manufacturing survey (ISM) drove most of the decrease.

Brett Ryan, U.S. economist at Deutsche Bank:

We expect the Federal Reserve to lower the fed-funds rate by another 0.5% on March 18. In addition, we now project real GDP growth to be flat in the first half of the year—the slowest two-quarter growth rate since the crisis—with the second quarter showing a contraction of 0.6% at an annualized rate.

Economic activity should begin to normalize in the third quarter and rebound more robustly in the final three months of the year. On net, we expect growth this year to come in near 1.6%, about 0.6% below our previous forecast. Offsetting this weaker near-term profile, we have upgraded our 2021 growth forecast to 2.5%, helped by a more accommodative Fed stance.

To be sure, the degree of economic disruption from the coronavirus is subject to significant uncertainty. However, the dislocations in financial markets over the past couple of weeks and heightened concerns over the virus are likely to meaningfully dampen consumer and business confidence.

The downgrade to our growth forecast stems mostly from softer consumer spending, as we now project real personal-consumption expenditures to expand just 0.7% annualized in the first half of the year, compared to 2.2% in our previous forecast.

A pandemic of this nature will no doubt affect all sectors and disrupt the supply and demand sides of the economy. On the demand side, the impact of the coronavirus will be felt throughout the economy as travel and leisure activity are curtailed. Spending on transportation services, food services, accommodations and recreations services—which account for around 13.6% of real personal-consumption expenditures—are likely to be most significantly pared back. One useful comparison here might be the third quarter of 2001, when these categories of spending dropped 4% annualized in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

In addition, the expected disruptions to the labor market coupled with the recent shock to financial conditions are likely to drag on consumer confidence, thus further denting spending on other discretionary items.

Write to Lisa Beilfuss at lisa.beilfuss@barrons.com

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

A timeline of events in the bread price-fixing scandal

Published

 on

 

Almost seven years since news broke of an alleged conspiracy to fix the price of packaged bread across Canada, the saga isn’t over: the Competition Bureau continues to investigate the companies that may have been involved, and two class-action lawsuits continue to work their way through the courts.

Here’s a timeline of key events in the bread price-fixing case.

Oct. 31, 2017: The Competition Bureau says it’s investigating allegations of bread price-fixing and that it was granted search warrants in the case. Several grocers confirm they are co-operating in the probe.

Dec. 19, 2017: Loblaw and George Weston say they participated in an “industry-wide price-fixing arrangement” to raise the price of packaged bread. The companies say they have been co-operating in the Competition Bureau’s investigation since March 2015, when they self-reported to the bureau upon discovering anti-competitive behaviour, and are receiving immunity from prosecution. They announce they are offering $25 gift cards to customers amid the ongoing investigation into alleged bread price-fixing.

Jan. 31, 2018: In court documents, the Competition Bureau says at least $1.50 was added to the price of a loaf of bread between about 2001 and 2016.

Dec. 20, 2019: A class-action lawsuit in a Quebec court against multiple grocers and food companies is certified against a number of companies allegedly involved in bread price-fixing, including Loblaw, George Weston, Metro, Sobeys, Walmart Canada, Canada Bread and Giant Tiger (which have all denied involvement, except for Loblaw and George Weston, which later settled with the plaintiffs).

Dec. 31, 2021: A class-action lawsuit in an Ontario court covering all Canadian residents except those in Quebec who bought packaged bread from a company named in the suit is certified against roughly the same group of companies.

June 21, 2023: Bakery giant Canada Bread Co. is fined $50 million after pleading guilty to four counts of price-fixing under the Competition Act as part of the Competition Bureau’s ongoing investigation.

Oct. 25 2023: Canada Bread files a statement of defence in the Ontario class action denying participating in the alleged conspiracy and saying any anti-competitive behaviour it participated in was at the direction and to the benefit of its then-majority owner Maple Leaf Foods, which is not a defendant in the case (neither is its current owner Grupo Bimbo). Maple Leaf calls Canada Bread’s accusations “baseless.”

Dec. 20, 2023: Metro files new documents in the Ontario class action accusing Loblaw and its parent company George Weston of conspiring to implicate it in the alleged scheme, denying involvement. Sobeys has made a similar claim. The two companies deny the allegations.

July 25, 2024: Loblaw and George Weston say they agreed to pay a combined $500 million to settle both the Ontario and Quebec class-action lawsuits. Loblaw’s share of the settlement includes a $96-million credit for the gift cards it gave out years earlier.

Sept. 12, 2024: Canada Bread files new documents in Ontario court as part of the class action, claiming Maple Leaf used it as a “shield” to avoid liability in the alleged scheme. Maple Leaf was a majority shareholder of Canada Bread until 2014, and the company claims it’s liable for any price-fixing activity. Maple Leaf refutes the claims.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 19, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:L, TSX:MFI, TSX:MRU, TSX:EMP.A, TSX:WN)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

S&P/TSX composite up more than 250 points, U.S. stock markets also higher

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was up more than 250 points in late-morning trading, led by strength in the base metal and technology sectors, while U.S. stock markets also charged higher.

The S&P/TSX composite index was up 254.62 points at 23,847.22.

In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 432.77 points at 41,935.87. The S&P 500 index was up 96.38 points at 5,714.64, while the Nasdaq composite was up 486.12 points at 18,059.42.

The Canadian dollar traded for 73.68 cents US compared with 73.58 cents US on Thursday.

The November crude oil contract was up 89 cents at US$70.77 per barrel and the October natural gas contract was down a penny at US2.27 per mmBTU.

The December gold contract was up US$9.40 at US$2,608.00 an ounce and the December copper contract was up four cents at US$4.33 a pound.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 19, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:GSPTSE, TSX:CADUSD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Construction wraps on indoor supervised site for people who inhale drugs in Vancouver

Published

 on

 

VANCOUVER – Supervised injection sites are saving the lives of drug users everyday, but the same support is not being offered to people who inhale illicit drugs, the head of the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS says.

Dr. Julio Montaner said the construction of Vancouver’s first indoor supervised site for people who inhale drugs comes as the percentage of people who die from smoking drugs continues to climb.

The location in the Downtown Eastside at the Hope to Health Research and Innovation Centre was unveiled Wednesday after construction was complete, and Montaner said people could start using the specialized rooms in a matter of weeks after final approvals from the city and federal government.

“If we don’t create mechanisms for these individuals to be able to use safely and engage with the medical system, and generate points of entry into the medical system, we will never be able to solve the problem,” he said.

“Now, I’m not here to tell you that we will fix it tomorrow, but denying it or ignoring it, or throw it under the bus, or under the carpet is no way to fix it, so we need to take proactive action.”

Nearly two-thirds of overdose deaths in British Columbia in 2023 came after smoking illicit drugs, yet only 40 per cent of supervised consumption sites in the province offer a safe place to smoke, often outdoors, in a tent.

The centre has been running a supervised injection site for years which sees more than a thousand people monthly and last month resuscitated five people who were overdosing.

The new facilities offer indoor, individual, negative-pressure rooms that allow fresh air to circulate and can clear out smoke in 30 to 60 seconds while users are monitored by trained nurses.

Advocates calling for more supervised inhalation sites have previously said the rules for setting up sites are overly complicated at a time when the province is facing an overdose crisis.

More than 15,000 people have died of overdoses since the public health emergency was declared in B.C. in April 2016.

Kate Salters, a senior researcher at the centre, said they worked with mechanical and chemical engineers to make sure the site is up to code and abidies by the highest standard of occupational health and safety.

“This is just another tool in our tool box to make sure that we’re offering life-saving services to those who are using drugs,” she said.

Montaner acknowledged the process to get the site up and running took “an inordinate amount of time,” but said the centre worked hard to follow all regulations.

“We feel that doing this right, with appropriate scientific background, in a medically supervised environment, etc, etc, allows us to derive the data that ultimately will be sufficiently convincing for not just our leaders, but also the leaders across the country and across the world, to embrace the strategies that we are trying to develop.” he said.

Montaner said building the facility was possible thanks to a single $4-million donation from a longtime supporter.

Construction finished with less than a week before the launch of the next provincial election campaign and within a year of the next federal election.

Montaner said he is concerned about “some of the things that have been said publicly by some of the political leaders in the province and in the country.”

“We want to bring awareness to the people that this is a serious undertaking. This is a very massive investment, and we need to protect it for the benefit of people who are unfortunately drug dependent.” he said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 18, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending