adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Jamie Sarkonak: Maple Leafs coach Sheldon Keefe signs

Published

 on

Nearly one year ago, the Conservative Party of Canada elected its new leader, Pierre Poilievre. The event preceding his coronation was lined with the favoured rituals of progressive politics; it opened with the singing of the national anthem, followed by a land acknowledgement noting the event’s location on unceded Algonquin territory and a four-minute Indigenous blessing.

Since then, the party’s interest in shibboleths has waned and deference to progressive politics is likely to be absent at the upcoming policy convention from Sept. 7 to 9. Instead, members are seeking to reject identity politics outright while empowering the party’s grassroots.
A total of 60 policy proposals will make their way to the convention in September, along with a number of others that would modify the party’s constitution. Common themes include the culture war, innovation-focused environmental policy, military improvements and Canadian sovereignty in the face of foreign interference.A good handful of proposals seek to enshrine a Conservative response to the near-ubiquity of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) that’s taken hold in Canada under Justin Trudeau’s Liberals. Now, Conservatives have the opportunity to take a safe and principled stance on cultural policy that was, until recently, considered taboo. They would be wise to do so.

One proposal would specify that the party constitution’s usage of “equality” refers to equal opportunities — not equal outcomes, which is the common progressive understanding of the term. Another such amendment would affirm “the existence of only one human race” as a nod to merit-based, race-neutral policy.

Numerous proposed changes to the policy book would take an anti-DEI stance in universities, workplaces and the public service. One suggests an accord between the feds and the provinces to ensure free speech is protected in the academe — a nice idea in theory, but what’s really needed is restrictions on federal grants to the ever-growing field of academic activism.

In workplaces generally, another proposal would reject any kind of “forced political, cultural or ideological” training. While this would be an improvement to the status quo, it would fall far short of paring back the ideological laws that encourage race-based hiring (specifically, the Employment Equity Act that normalized identity-based workplace policies in the first place).

“Those employed in the public sector, unions or self-regulated trades/professions should not be forced to make affirmations, or participate in ideological programs, as a condition of employment or practice,” reads the proposal.

Another policy change would spurn the new emphasis on identity by federal research funding agencies when it comes to handing out awards and hiring people. Instead, it would direct that merit be the primary driver of these choices. It’s a laudable first step, but more effective would be the revocation of funding for any grants awarded under the auspices of DEI.

On gender, the party is being asked to contemplate where it falls on expression, identity and biological sex. One policy would define “woman” in the policy book as “adult female” and affirm the right of women to single-sex spaces, such as in prisons, shelters, locker rooms, washrooms, sports, awards, grants and scholarships. Another would ban “altering medicinal or surgical interventions on minors under 18 to treat gender confusion or dysphoria.”

These proposals are a far cry from the party’s approach to gender and kids in 2021, which involved hastily supporting a conversion therapy ban through Parliament. That bill, notably, only banned the “conversion” of trans-identified children into their biological sex. It did not ban the “conversion” of children comfortable with their biological sex into being transgender.

Since then, other jurisdictions like the United Kingdom have cracked down on the trendy but scientifically questionable practice of unrestricted gender affirmation. Similarly, data on gender-neutral facilities have, at least in the U.K., shown to carry a significantly higher risk of violence.

On crime and urban decay, members are asking the party to formalize a tougher stance. One proposal seeks harsher punishment for pedophilia-related crimes (which could very easily be struck down by the courts, but the idea is nice). Another would have breaching parole conditions made into a crime — because it isn’t at present. Another demands stricter bail laws.

These approaches to crime are being paired with a push for treatment-focused addictions policies in the wake of the country’s rising opioid crisis. One policy proposal calls for a national addictions strategy. Another calls for treatment programs and “not to provide the person with easier access to drugs by drug consumption sites or decriminalizing drugs.”

In response to the threat of foreign interference, one policy proposal would ban military co-operation and research participation with China, while ending Chinese ownership in Canadian companies. More generally, a number of pro-military proposals will be debated: one seeks a change to the party constitution that would “promote a well-armed military;” one would have Canada try to join additional military alliances; and one calls for a national cybersecurity standard.

On a more positive note, a common theme that can be gleaned from other proposals is the desire of Canadians to build. One proposal asks for an Arctic naval base, while another seeks a Hudson Bay port. Others support high-speed passenger rail and the construction of more transport capacity to move product to port. Party members’ approach to energy, meanwhile, focuses on improving technology, rather than taxation) and researching carbon capture technology, battery-based storage and small modular reactors.

At this point, we can’t know what will and what won’t pass into the party’s constitution and policy book. But overall, the sampling of what’s on the table broadly reflects the issues of today.

Interestingly, the membership has less to say about affordability. One proposal, to assist Canadians navigating the housing shortage, would push for rental payment history to be factored into mortgage considerations. Another would cap capital gains taxes to a lifetime maximum of $1 million rather than having the 50 per cent rate follow everyone around for a lifetime (a move that, surely, would help make Canada more affordable for the rich at least). More reasonable is a suggestion to bump the floor for small business GST registration to $47,000 from the current $30,000.

Absent from the slate of proposals is family policy — something one might expect in a country that can no longer seem to sustain its population without immigration. One proposal supports the removal of GST from maternity and newborn expenses, but that’s about it.

Party members are mostly mum on family formation, but many proposals are being put forth to help seniors instead. Proposals call for a national senior strategy, for palliative care to be declared a right in the Canada Health Act, for increased benefits, tax credits and financial assistance and for income splitting of retirement income before age 65. One even calls for the elimination of income taxes for those aged 65 or older. Hungary, meanwhile, has instituted tax exemptions for large families and young mothers. With nearly no natural population growth, one might expect Conservatives to take a similar approach.

It’s great that the Conservatives are no longer ceding cultural policy to the Liberals. It’s also great that the party membership is looking to solve Canada’s problems by building out infrastructure while not caving to progressive dogmas on crime. It will be a victory if the party membership formally moves the needle on these issues in September — in the long term, though, a firm stance on cultural policy should be paired with a firm stance on supporting young families.

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending