adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Business

Jesse Kline: Liberals hold up $34B Trans Mountain boondoggle as example of socialist success – National Post

Published

 on


If this pipeline is so great for the economy, wouldn’t having more pipelines be even better?

Get the latest from Jesse Kline straight to your inbox

Article content

After more than a decade of jurisdictional squabbling, political grandstanding, activist obstructionism, legal wrangling and bureaucratic delays, the Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion gained final approval earlier this week and began shipping oil on Wednesday.

Despite coming in years behind schedule and nearly $27 billion over budget, the pipeline is being hailed by some Liberals as a triumph of Big Government, with the “golden” or “final” weld on April 11 drawing parallels to the Last Spike driven into John A. Macdonald’s Canadian Pacific Railway on Nov. 7, 1885.

Advertisement 2

Article content

Article content

“There are those who claim that the only good thing government can do when it comes to economic growth is to get out of the way,” Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland said in her budget speech in the House of Commons on April 16. The line was intended to bait the Conservatives, and it worked perfectly, drawing a boisterous applause from the Opposition benches.

“I would like to introduce those people, those people who just cheered,” Freeland continued, “to the talented trades people and the brilliant engineers who, last Thursday, made the final weld, it’s known as the ‘golden weld,’ on a great national project: the Trans Mountain Pipeline.”

As a stone-faced Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault looked on in horror, the finance minister proceeded to pat her government on the back, saying that, “It took an activist, determined Liberal government to get it built. And last week, the Bank of Canada estimated that this project alone will add one-quarter of a percentage point to Canada’s GDP.”

It was the most cringe-worthy part of a very cringey speech, and it speaks to the complete lack of self-doubt these Liberals have in their ability to solve any challenge by bringing the full weight of centralized government to bear on it.

Article content

Advertisement 3

Article content

Yet Freeland’s boasts raise an obvious question: if this pipeline is so great for the economy, wouldn’t having more pipelines be even better?

It should be remembered that although the Trudeau government did swoop in and buy the fledgling pipeline project from Texas-based Kinder Morgan in 2018 for $4.5 billion, it came with a trade-off.

When Prime Minister Justin Trudeau gave his blessing to the Trans Mountain expansion in 2016, he also put the final nail in the coffin of the Northern Gateway and Energy East pipelines — both of which would have been built by Canadian companies using private capital.

A year after buying the pipeline, the federal government passed bills that imposed an arduous approvals process on new infrastructure projects and banned tanker traffic off the coast of northern British Columbia, effectively ensuring that no more pipelines would get approved, and even if one did, much of the West Coast would be off limits.

From then on, Trudeau was on easy street, able to hold up Trans Mountain as a multi-billion dollar proof that his government cares about the economy, while ensuring that the numerous other pipeline projects that had been proposed over the years never got off the ground. The icing on the cake was that U.S. President Joe Biden did the dirty work of killing the Keystone XL pipeline for him.

Advertisement 4

Article content

The Liberals have since imposed strict emissions limits on the oil and gas industry, making it less appealing to investors.

Nonetheless, some have been trying to spin this as a win for Alberta, and the Canadian economy as a whole. “Frankly, a bit of celebration would be in order,” wrote Kelly Cryderman, the Globe and Mail’s Calgary columnist. “Canada got a big, complicated project done.”

Which highlights the low bar we’ve set in this country. It took more than four years for the Trudeau Liberals to build a pipeline, once construction actually started, from Edmonton to Burnaby, B.C. — about the same amount of time it took the Macdonald Tories to build a transcontinental railway from Bonfield, Ont., to Port Moody, B.C. And with a price tag of $34 billion, Trans Mountain ended up being one of the most expensive infrastructure projects in Canadian history.

Yes, Trudeau ended up overseeing the construction of a pipeline to the West Coast — something his pro-oil predecessor, Prime Minister Stephen Harper, failed to do. But purchasing the pipeline is not what allowed it to get past the legal hurdles put up by the City of Burnaby and the Province of British Columbia. It simply gave the project more time to wait out the court processes, which Kinder Morgan had said it was unwilling to do.

Advertisement 5

Article content

Trudeau could have used his bully pulpit and control over the federal purse strings to pressure B.C. politicians into accepting a project that has always clearly been in the national interest (it’s not like the prime minister has ever had any qualms about strong-arming other levels of government into accepting his dictates). And he could have fought to get the other major pipeline proposals approved, in the hopes that enough eggs in different baskets would hatch at least one chick.

Instead, he nationalized the chicken coop, put all his eggs in one basket and turned it into the boondoggle that every large government infrastructure projects ends up being. This perhaps wouldn’t be so bad if the Liberals didn’t now expect us to thank them for driving private investors out of the country, and then saving the day with money pilfered from hard-working Canadian taxpayers like you and I.

National Post
jkline@postmedia.com
Twitter.com/accessd

Recommended from Editorial

  1. U.S. President Joe Biden announces that the U.S. will ban imports of Russian fossil fuels, during a press conference in the White House in Washington, D.C., on March 8.

    Jesse Kline: Joe Biden begs dictators for oil while Canada’s energy industry remains hobbled

  2. Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, centre, delivers the fiscal update in the House of Commons in Ottawa, on Thursday.

    Jesse Kline: Chrystia Freeland’s plan to repel business from Canada

Article content

Get the latest from Jesse Kline straight to your inbox

Comments

Join the Conversation

This Week in Flyers

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Telus prioritizing ‘most important customers,’ avoiding ‘unprofitable’ offers: CFO

Published

 on

 

Telus Corp. says it is avoiding offering “unprofitable” discounts as fierce competition in the Canadian telecommunications sector shows no sign of slowing down.

The company said Friday it had fewer net new customers during its third quarter compared with the same time last year, as it copes with increasingly “aggressive marketing and promotional pricing” that is prompting more customers to switch providers.

Telus said it added 347,000 net new customers, down around 14.5 per cent compared with last year. The figure includes 130,000 mobile phone subscribers and 34,000 internet customers, down 30,000 and 3,000, respectively, year-over-year.

The company reported its mobile phone churn rate — a metric measuring subscribers who cancelled their services — was 1.09 per cent in the third quarter, up from 1.03 per cent in the third quarter of 2023. That included a postpaid mobile phone churn rate of 0.90 per cent in its latest quarter.

Telus said its focus is on customer retention through its “industry-leading service and network quality, along with successful promotions and bundled offerings.”

“The customers we have are the most important customers we can get,” said chief financial officer Doug French in an interview.

“We’ve, again, just continued to focus on what matters most to our customers, from a product and customer service perspective, while not loading unprofitable customers.”

Meanwhile, Telus reported its net income attributable to common shares more than doubled during its third quarter.

The telecommunications company said it earned $280 million, up 105.9 per cent from the same three-month period in 2023. Earnings per diluted share for the quarter ended Sept. 30 was 19 cents compared with nine cents a year earlier.

It reported adjusted net income was $413 million, up 10.7 per cent year-over-year from $373 million in the same quarter last year. Operating revenue and other income for the quarter was $5.1 billion, up 1.8 per cent from the previous year.

Mobile phone average revenue per user was $58.85 in the third quarter, a decrease of $2.09 or 3.4 per cent from a year ago. Telus said the drop was attributable to customers signing up for base rate plans with lower prices, along with a decline in overage and roaming revenues.

It said customers are increasingly adopting unlimited data and Canada-U.S. plans which provide higher and more stable ARPU on a monthly basis.

“In a tough operating environment and relative to peers, we view Q3 results that were in line to slightly better than forecast as the best of the bunch,” said RBC analyst Drew McReynolds in a note.

Scotiabank analyst Maher Yaghi added that “the telecom industry in Canada remains very challenging for all players, however, Telus has been able to face these pressures” and still deliver growth.

The Big 3 telecom providers — which also include Rogers Communications Inc. and BCE Inc. — have frequently stressed that the market has grown more competitive in recent years, especially after the closing of Quebecor Inc.’s purchase of Freedom Mobile in April 2023.

Hailed as a fourth national carrier, Quebecor has invested in enhancements to Freedom’s network while offering more affordable plans as part of a set of commitments it was mandated by Ottawa to agree to.

The cost of telephone services in September was down eight per cent compared with a year earlier, according to Statistics Canada’s most recent inflation report last month.

“I think competition has been and continues to be, I’d say, quite intense in Canada, and we’ve obviously had to just manage our business the way we see fit,” said French.

Asked how long that environment could last, he said that’s out of Telus’ hands.

“What I can control, though, is how we go to market and how we lead with our products,” he said.

“I think the conditions within the market will have to adjust accordingly over time. We’ve continued to focus on digitization, continued to bring our cost structure down to compete, irrespective of the price and the current market conditions.”

Still, Canada’s telecom regulator continues to warn providers about customers facing more charges on their cellphone and internet bills.

On Tuesday, CRTC vice-president of consumer, analytics and strategy Scott Hutton called on providers to ensure they clearly inform their customers of charges such as early cancellation fees.

That followed statements from the regulator in recent weeks cautioning against rising international roaming fees and “surprise” price increases being found on their bills.

Hutton said the CRTC plans to launch public consultations in the coming weeks that will focus “on ensuring that information is clear and consistent, making it easier to compare offers and switch services or providers.”

“The CRTC is concerned with recent trends, which suggest that Canadians may not be benefiting from the full protections of our codes,” he said.

“We will continue to monitor developments and will take further action if our codes are not being followed.”

French said any initiative to boost transparency is a step in the right direction.

“I can’t say we are perfect across the board, but what I can say is we are absolutely taking it under consideration and trying to be the best at communicating with our customers,” he said.

“I think everyone looking in the mirror would say there’s room for improvement.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:T)

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

TC Energy cuts cost estimate for Southeast Gateway pipeline project in Mexico

Published

 on

 

CALGARY – TC Energy Corp. has lowered the estimated cost of its Southeast Gateway pipeline project in Mexico.

It says it now expects the project to cost between US$3.9 billion and US$4.1 billion compared with its original estimate of US$4.5 billion.

The change came as the company reported a third-quarter profit attributable to common shareholders of C$1.46 billion or $1.40 per share compared with a loss of C$197 million or 19 cents per share in the same quarter last year.

Revenue for the quarter ended Sept. 30 totalled C$4.08 billion, up from C$3.94 billion in the third quarter of 2023.

TC Energy says its comparable earnings for its latest quarter amounted to C$1.03 per share compared with C$1.00 per share a year earlier.

The average analyst estimate had been for a profit of 95 cents per share, according to LSEG Data & Analytics.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TRP)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

BCE reports Q3 loss on asset impairment charge, cuts revenue guidance

Published

 on

 

BCE Inc. reported a loss in its latest quarter as it recorded $2.11 billion in asset impairment charges, mainly related to Bell Media’s TV and radio properties.

The company says its net loss attributable to common shareholders amounted to $1.24 billion or $1.36 per share for the quarter ended Sept. 30 compared with a profit of $640 million or 70 cents per share a year earlier.

On an adjusted basis, BCE says it earned 75 cents per share in its latest quarter compared with an adjusted profit of 81 cents per share in the same quarter last year.

“Bell’s results for the third quarter demonstrate that we are disciplined in our pursuit of profitable growth in an intensely competitive environment,” BCE chief executive Mirko Bibic said in a statement.

“Our focus this quarter, and throughout 2024, has been to attract higher-margin subscribers and reduce costs to help offset short-term revenue impacts from sustained competitive pricing pressures, slow economic growth and a media advertising market that is in transition.”

Operating revenue for the quarter totalled $5.97 billion, down from $6.08 billion in its third quarter of 2023.

BCE also said it now expects its revenue for 2024 to fall about 1.5 per cent compared with earlier guidance for an increase of zero to four per cent.

The company says the change comes as it faces lower-than-anticipated wireless product revenue and sustained pressure on wireless prices.

BCE added 33,111 net postpaid mobile phone subscribers, down 76.8 per cent from the same period last year, which was the company’s second-best performance on the metric since 2010.

It says the drop was driven by higher customer churn — a measure of subscribers who cancelled their service — amid greater competitive activity and promotional offer intensity. BCE’s monthly churn rate for the category was 1.28 per cent, up from 1.1 per cent during its previous third quarter.

The company also saw 11.6 per cent fewer gross subscriber activations “due to more targeted promotional offers and mobile device discounting compared to last year.”

Bell’s wireless mobile phone average revenue per user was $58.26, down 3.4 per cent from $60.28 in the third quarter of the prior year.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:BCE)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending