adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

Joe Biden begins media blitz as he tries to break into the coronavirus conversation – CNN

Published

3 years ago

 on


Local news networks in New York City, Washington and elsewhere had broken into “The View” for live coverage of governors’ and mayors’ daily press briefing on the crisis.
As the former vice president begins a media blitz aimed at forcing himself into the national conversation, the episode demonstrated how hard it has been for Biden to break through amid the focus on the actions of the federal, state and local governments.
It’s an irony of the moment Biden is in: Over five decades in the Senate and as vice president, Biden had an official role in every major crisis the nation faced. Now, on the verge of clinching the Democratic presidential nomination, he’s on the sidelines — stuck at home with no votes to cast or decisions to make.
Visit CNN’s Election Center for full coverage of the 2020 race
Instead, Biden is offering shadow briefings, critiquing Trump’s handling of health and economic matters and detailing what he’d do differently.
Biden told hosts of “The View” that he plans to do interviews regularly from a new studio set up in a recreation room at his home in Wilmington, Delaware.
Later Tuesday, he was interviewed by CNN’s Jake Tapper. He chided Trump for suggesting earlier in the day that Americans could return to work by Easter, April 12, and said Trump should use the Defense Production Act to force companies to produce needed supplies like masks and respirators.
“He says he’s a war-time president — well God, act like one. Move. Fast,” Biden said.
Biden also appeared on MSNBC Tuesday, and his campaign scheduled a press briefing for Wednesday.
On Monday, Biden made an on-camera public appearance for the first time in nearly a week with a speech focused on the coronavirus response.
The speech showed Biden’s team is still working out how to manage its new reality as it grappled with technical miscues. By Tuesday’s appearance on “The View,” those had been smoothed out.
In his speech, he praised New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s handling of the pandemic. Cuomo, meanwhile, was midway through his own briefing — which cable news networks were airing live, ignoring Biden. It was another illustration of Biden’s struggle to break through in an environment in which most media and public focus is on concrete steps being taken in response to the crisis.
Aides have said they are looking for new channels for Biden and his campaign to communicate with the public. Rob Flaherty, Biden’s digital director, said among the options being considered are podcasts and long-form videos.
Ron Klain, a top Biden adviser who led former President Barack Obama’s Ebola response, did a whiteboard explanation of Trump’s coronavirus response and Biden’s plan that has been viewed 4.3 million times on Twitter, nearly 400,000 times on Instagram and 235,000 times on Facebook.
Biden said Tuesday he is beginning his days with back-to-back 90-minute briefings — one from a team of health experts his campaign assembled; another on the economic fallout of the pandemic.
The changes coronavirus has forced Biden to make extend beyond the campaign trail. He said on CNN that everyone who enters his house — including the Secret Service — has to wear a mask and gloves. His grandchildren, who live a mile away, visit daily, but Biden and his wife Jill sit on their back porch while his grandchildren sit in the backyard, Biden said. He said he hasn’t experienced any symptoms or been tested for coronavirus, but is following the recommendations of health experts.
Adding to the awkwardness of the political moment is that Biden — while dominant in recent primaries — hasn’t yet cemented the Democratic presidential nomination, and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders remains in the race.
With states pushing their primaries back to June, it could take that long for Biden to accumulate the 1,991 delegates necessary to become the nominee. CNN’s estimates show Biden at 1,139 delegates to date — a 316-delegate lead over Sanders’ 823, but not enough to end the race with 42% of delegates yet to be awarded in states that haven’t yet voted.
Biden on Tuesday wouldn’t pressure Sanders to drop out, saying that their staffs have had “discussions.”
“I think it’s up to Bernie,” Biden said. “As I’ve said, I was asked this question about every other person that had been in the race. It’s not for me to tell them to drop out.”
Meanwhile, Sanders’ campaign appears set to drift on for the foreseeable future despite the absence of any clear path to the nomination.
He has remained active and engaged with supporters through his robust social media channels, but he has largely gone missing from the national political stage, which has shifted to the states at the front lines of the crisis.
Sanders returned to Capitol Hill this week, but spent the period before at home in Burlington, Vermont, where he livestreamed a “fireside chat,” joined in-person by campaign manager Faiz Shakir. Since then, he’s hosted digital roundtables focused on the coronavirus response, tying its shortcomings into his calls for “Medicare for All” and debt forgiveness, with progressive allies like New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. He also held an online rally.
On Saturday, the campaign announced that it had raised more than $2 million over two days for five charities on the front lines of the crisis. Sanders has also hired staffers for New York’s late April primary.
But Sanders’ absence from Washington over the weekend raised eyebrows, especially when he became the only senator not under quarantine to miss a procedural vote on the still-unresolved congressional stimulus package.
“His absence was effectively a no vote, so he was engaging on policy remotely,” said Keane Bhatt, Sanders’ communication director in the Senate.
Sanders acknowledge that the campaign was in a “bizarre moment” during an interview with MSNBC on Monday night.
“What we are doing is transitioning our campaign to a virtual campaign. We had a wonderful town meeting last night with several of the leading members of Congress, which I thought was very productive, had a large viewing audience,” Sanders said. “So we’re kind of moving day by day.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Media

The social media apps we use, from best to worst – Mashable

Published

26 mins ago

 on

June 3, 2023

By


For a bunch of people who supposedly hate social media, we sure do spend a lot of time on it.

Just 33 percent of U.S. adults have “some or a lot” of trust in social media, according to a late 2022 report from the Pew Research Center(opens in a new tab), and people who spend time on social media are more likely to experience mental health problems(opens in a new tab), including depression. According to BroadbandSearch, an independent research site that compares internet providers, the average American spends a little more than two hours a day on (opens in a new tab)the very same hurtful platforms they purport not to trust. And it seems like new social media platforms — any sort of online space in which people are publicly chatting with each other, including Facebook and Twitter and TikTok and, yes, LinkedIn — are popping up every day.

SEE ALSO:

The best sex and dating apps for hooking up

300x250x1

There aren’t loads of social media platforms that are brand new in 2023, but there are dozens that we spend our time on every day that have had some pretty radically nightmarish moments in 2023. Unfortunately, as it is the middle of the year, it’s time to rank these nightmares.

While evaluating these social media platforms, I’ve considered five questions: 

  1. How widely-used is the app?

  2. How grumpy does the app make me because of the content?

  3. How grumpy does the app make me because of the interface?

  4. How likely is the app to disrupt democracy?

  5. How annoying are the influencers on that app?

There are many apps that launched recently that didn’t make the list — Geneva, Diem, Melon, Pineapple, Somewhere Good — because they just aren’t widely-used enough to asses just how awful they are. I’m omitting far-right social media apps like Parler and Gab — they are all worse than the apps I’m writing about here, and their content is too vile for me to make fun of in a listicle.

Here are the social media platforms that have stolen our brains so far in 2023, from least bad to worst. This list is just my opinion, but it is also correct.

Mastodon

A very nice escape from Twitter for the 20 minutes it was relevant.

BeReal

Fine, but no one uses it anymore so it is now therefore boring. Boring, to be clear, is not necessarily an insult when it comes to social media (see: Facebook further down the list, which I wish was more boring).

Artifact

Boring but alright. 

BlueSky

This app seems fine but I don’t have access to it. Send me an invite and I will do my best to accurately review it.

Lemon8

A new app that is annoying to me, but others find it lovely.

LinkedIn

There are LinkedInfluencers(opens in a new tab), which is annoying but not actively harmful.

Substack

Stay with me, but the newsletter platform is kind of killing it this year. It launched chats and a Notes feature to rival Twitter and some of the more popular Substack writers make a pretty good living from their newsletters. It’s this far down, though, because Substack isn’t without its problems: The platform allows some pretty hateful speech, like the transphobic newsletter from Graham Linehan. 

Snapchat

This would be higher if it didn’t force Snapchat AI onto every single user.

TikTok

Can be vile, but can also feed you a pretty consistent number of frog videos. It’s lower down because entire nations are banning it for — you guessed it — potential threats to democracy.

Instagram

I swear to God if I get fed one more video about dieting I’m going to scream.

Facebook

Unfortunately for Facebook, most of us simply refuse to forget 2016(opens in a new tab) and the Facebook Papers. There’s an old saying in Tennessee(opens in a new tab) — I know it’s in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, ruin democracy once, shame on — shame on you. Ruin democracy twice — you can’t get democracy ruined again.

Twitter

Elon Musk 🥴

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

OPEC denies media access to Reuters, Bloomberg, WSJ for weekend policy meets

Published

10 hours ago

 on

June 2, 2023

By

VIENNA, June 2 (Reuters) – OPEC has denied media access to reporters from Reuters, Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal to report on oil policy meetings in Vienna this weekend, reporters, Bloomberg and people familiar with the matter said on Friday.

The three media organizations are among the world’s leading suppliers of financial news and information. They report on the outcome of policy meetings between OPEC and its allies, where ministers make decisions that impact the price of the world’s most traded commodity.

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies is a group known as OPEC+ and includes top oil producers Saudi Arabia and Russia. Ministers from the group, which pumps more than 40% of the world’s oil supply, are scheduled to gather on Saturday and Sunday for regular biannual meetings.

OPEC staff declined on Friday to give media accreditation to Reuters journalists to cover the event. The staff handling media accreditation at one of Vienna’s luxury hotels said they could not issue accreditation without an invite. They did not comment when asked why Reuters reporters received no invites.

300x250x1

OPEC has not responded to requests for comment from Reuters this week on why it has not invited or accredited Reuters reporters for the meet.

“We believe that transparency and a free press serve both readers and markets, and we object to this restriction on coverage,” a spokesperson for Reuters, the news and media division of Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI.TO), said on Friday.

“Reuters will continue to cover OPEC in an independent, impartial and reliable way in keeping with the Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.”

A reporter from Bloomberg was also denied accreditation on Friday, a person familiar with the matter said.

A Bloomberg spokesperson confirmed on Friday the company has not been given accreditation to cover the OPEC meeting.

The Wall Street Journal did not respond to a request for comment.

Reporters from the three outlets, many of whom have been covering OPEC meetings for years, did not receive invitations from OPEC ahead of the meeting.

Without accreditation, journalists cannot enter the OPEC Secretariat where the ministers meet, or attend press conferences during the event.

Reporters at other media outlets including trade publications Argus and Platts received accreditation on Friday. Argus confirmed its reporters have been accredited and will attend. Platts did not respond immediately to a request for comment.

Reporting by Alex Lawler, Dmitry Zhdannikov, Ahmad Ghaddar, Julia Payne, Maha El Dahan; writing by Simon Webb; Editing by Marguerita Choy

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

OPEC denies media access to Reuters, Bloomberg, WSJ for weekend policy meets – Yahoo Canada Finance

Published

11 hours ago

 on

June 2, 2023

By


VIENNA (Reuters) – OPEC has denied media access to reporters from Reuters, Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal to report on oil policy meetings in Vienna this weekend, reporters, Bloomberg and people familiar with the matter said on Friday.

The three media organizations are among the world’s leading suppliers of financial news and information. They report on the outcome of policy meetings between OPEC and its allies, where ministers make decisions that impact the price of the world’s most traded commodity.

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies is a group known as OPEC+ and includes top oil producers Saudi Arabia and Russia. Ministers from the group, which pumps more than 40% of the world’s oil supply, are scheduled to gather on Saturday and Sunday for regular biannual meetings.

300x250x1

OPEC staff declined on Friday to give media accreditation to Reuters journalists to cover the event. The staff handling media accreditation at one of Vienna’s luxury hotels said they could not issue accreditation without an invite. They did not comment when asked why Reuters reporters received no invites.

OPEC has not responded to requests for comment from Reuters this week on why it has not invited or accredited Reuters reporters for the meet.

“We believe that transparency and a free press serve both readers and markets, and we object to this restriction on coverage,” a spokesperson for Reuters, the news and media division of Thomson Reuters Corp, said on Friday.

“Reuters will continue to cover OPEC in an independent, impartial and reliable way in keeping with the Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.”

A reporter from Bloomberg was also denied accreditation on Friday, a person familiar with the matter said.

A Bloomberg spokesperson confirmed on Friday the company has not been given accreditation to cover the OPEC meeting.

The Wall Street Journal did not respond to a request for comment.

Reporters from the three outlets, many of whom have been covering OPEC meetings for years, did not receive invitations from OPEC ahead of the meeting.

Without accreditation, journalists cannot enter the OPEC Secretariat where the ministers meet, or attend press conferences during the event.

Reporters at other media outlets including trade publications Argus and Platts received accreditation on Friday. Argus confirmed its reporters have been accredited and will attend. Platts did not respond immediately to a request for comment.

(Reporting by Alex Lawler, Dmitry Zhdannikov, Ahmad Ghaddar, Julia Payne, Maha El Dahan; writing by Simon Webb; Editing by Marguerita Choy)

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending