adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Joe Biden’s Big New Hampshire Blunder

Published

 on

CONCORD, N.H. — By scrapping Iowa, demoting New Hampshire from its first-in-the-nation perch and moving up South Carolina to begin the balloting, President Joe Biden was hoping to preempt a nuisance primary challenge that could embarrass him before the general election. But that may be precisely what he has invited upon himself.

While Iowa has gone quietly, New Hampshire has unsurprisingly refused to cede its cherished role, greeting the demand about as favorably as they would a request to give up the Red Sox or concede the inferiority of Dunkin’ coffee. The threat of being stripped of delegates in one party’s primary in a single election was hardly enough for the state to give up a 123-year-tradition that New Hampshire holds the first primary — a rite that also happens to be required by state law.

New Hampshire’s intransigence was entirely predictable, and Biden should have known as much. Yet he let his animus toward Iowa or New Hampshire, where he never gained traction in his three presidential bids, and his desire to reward South Carolina, which vaulted him to the White House, steer his thinking.

Now, the Granite State will once again hold an election to begin the presidential nominating process, Biden will not appear on the ballot and Democratic insiders here are being made to organize a write-in campaign to ensure that the sitting president prevails when the vote is held in January. Which may have been the end of the story before last Friday.

That’s when, just hours before New Hampshire’s filing deadline closed, an earnest Midwestern congressman made clear he wasn’t totally free of guile and, to borrow from the famed Tammany Hall leader George Washington Plunkitt, saw his opportunities and he took ’em.

Mixing the enthusiasm of a pre-adolescent gazing up at a T-Rex likeness and the happy warrior joy of his political hero Hubert Humphrey, Rep. Dean Phillips (D-Minn.) let out back-to-back “wows,” signed his declaration of candidacy and paid the $1,000 to appear on New Hampshire’s presidential ballot.

Then he went about preying on New Hampshire’s insecurities with the appetite of a T-Rex.

“I learned to love my country right here in New Hampshire,” Phillips said, recounting to the photographers, reporters and state officials cramped into the Secretary of State’s capitol office his summers spent at a camp in the White Mountains. (The camp is technically in Maine though along the New Hampshire border, as the Union Leader reported.) He also revealed his inscription on the paperwork: “I love New Hampshire.”

Having made it official, Phillips went into the next room, sat down with a group of New Hampshire reporters and responded to the easiest question he may ever receive.

“Yes,” Phillips said, he would return the state to its role at the start of the presidential nominating process. “The country can and must learn from New Hampshire.”

Taking it all in with a look of foreboding was Terry Shumaker. A longtime Democratic power player, whose fidelity to Bill Clinton in 1992 won him a Caribbean ambassadorship, Shumaker knows from New Hampshire primaries. And as he watched a self-funding, idealistic, slightly quirky 54-year-old lambaste Washington’s “grotesque” fundraising industrial complex while vowing to take questions from New Hampshire voters one town hall at a time, well, the old hand has seen enough races here to know what resonates in an independent-minded state where independents can swing primaries.

“His advisers and the D.N.C. made a big mistake, this was not necessary,” Shumaker said of the president’s inner circle and the national party. “There was no reason to displace us.”

It’s understandable that Shumaker — whose support for Biden goes back to the president’s first presidential bid in 1987 — would fault staff members. But I’m reliably told it was Biden himself who wanted to reorder the party’s nominating calendar to make South Carolina the leadoff state, rewarding the state that revived his 2020 candidacy and elevating the more moderate Black voters who shape Democratic primaries there.

It’s possible that Biden’s New Hampshire nuisance won’t fully materialize. Phillips is clearly torn over whether to criticize the president. On Friday he veered, at times only seconds apart, between praising Biden and presenting barely veiled attacks on his age and economic record. Unlike past primary challengers who ran on a policy critique, the Minnesotan’s case is chiefly about Biden’s electoral viability.

And while Phillips didn’t open his campaign using summer as a verb, for the wealthy heir to an alcoholic-beverage fortune to try to relate to a state by recalling his youth there at sleepaway camp is, no matter how genuine the affection, ripe for mockery and a sign of new he is to this process. Some high-level Democrats sought to push former Rep. Tim Ryan of Ohio into the primary against Biden, I’m told, and his grittier style may have been better suited for this moment of economic unease.

Then there’s the matter of Phillips’s shotgun marriage with hard-charging former GOP consultant Steve Schmidt, which could work out wonderfully but could also prove a distraction.

Perhaps most significantly, if Phillips is persuaded his candidacy will only help former President Donald Trump by weakening Biden, it’s plausible he will stand down.

However, that moment may have passed when Biden refused even to take the congressman’s call last week. Philips was clearly still stung on Friday as he recounted how his chief of staff was told by Biden’s legislative affairs director, Shuwanza Goff, that the White House was tracking the news and there was no need for a phone call.

Now, Phillips’ mere presence in the race presents a dilemma for Biden in a contest he was attempting to marginalize.

If he urges the well-connected New Hampshire Democrats overseeing his write-in campaign — a roster that includes former state party chair Kathy Sullivan and veteran strategist Jim Demers — to stand down, he would effectively hand the primary to Phillips. If the group goes forward with the write-in push, though, Biden must prevail lest he face the same humiliation that has stung incumbent presidents dating to when Estes Kefauver took his coonskin cap north and helped drive Harry Truman from the 1952 presidential race.

And remember, other incumbent presidents have won New Hampshire but still been bruised by the stronger-than-expected showing of their opponents. That list includes, perhaps most famously, Lyndon Johnson in 1968 (also a write-in ), who only narrowly defeated Eugene McCarthy, and Gerald Ford in 1976 and George H.W. Bush in 1992, who both had to fend off opponents to their right. None of them survived to win another term.

To those who say New Hampshire is moot now because there’s no delegates at stake, at least if the D.N.C. doesn’t cave, I’d point out that delegate accumulation was beside the point for most of these races. It’s the perception of the state’s results that shapes campaigns.

“There’s very little upside and lots of downside for Biden,” said Steve Duprey, a half-century veteran of New Hampshire politics. A former state GOP chair and close ally of New Hampshire’s former third senator, John McCain, Duprey voted for Biden in 2020.

“If he ignores New Hampshire or half-asses it, he loses,” said Duprey. “But if he goes all-in and blesses the write-in and loses then it’s even worse.” The only answer: “He’s got to win now.”

Luring Biden in, at least symbolically, would of course be just deserts for the protectors of the state’s primary. But if New Hampshire’s political class is particularly sensitive at this moment, consider why.

One party has dumped Iowa entirely and attempted to demote New Hampshire. And the other party is poised to nominate a candidate who doesn’t bother with any of the purportedly essential rites of passage that, the two states claim, make them unique.

Trump isn’t holding house parties, town halls or even participating in any debates. Yes, he’s a celebrity and yes he’s a de facto incumbent for many Republicans. But he did the same fly-in-for-a-rally-and-leave routine in 2016 and it hardly hurt him in New Hampshire. If he can do it again this time and still win, well, just what exactly makes this state different than the others?

I posed a version of this question to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis when he came through the state earlier in the month and he got the same voracious look as Phillips.

“I think as we get closer, the people who think they’re entitled to the nomination, that is going to burn them,” DeSantis said of Trump’s refusal to engage with voters or his fellow candidates, adding: “You have to earn this. It’s something that they expect. They want to be able to kick the tire.”

That may be wishful thinking, at least with Trump, but it’s not hard to find New Hampshire leaders charmed by such appeals, in part because they’re worried about losing a lucrative franchise, politically and otherwise, for the state.

“I think he will pay a price for not showing up and being here and doing the things that he should be doing,” Tim Lang, a GOP state senator from the Laconia area, predicted of Trump.

I talked to Lang at a Republican candidate forum in Nashua, the sort that Trump never attends, in which at least one top surrogate introduced his preferred candidate by reminding the GOP voters in attendance of who is campaigning the Granite State way.

“Nobody honors the First In The Nation primary more than Nikki Haley,” said retired Gen. Don Bolduc, citing the former South Carolina governor’s many town hall meetings in his introduction of Haley.

It all may sound like so much self-absorption from a state clinging to a fading tradition, never mind that Iowa and New Hampshire were already becoming soundstages for increasingly nationalized primaries.

Yet I’ve covered enough races here to know that, as Duprey put it, “New Hampshire voters like you to show up.”

Phillips intends to do that and began his campaign vowing to break McCain’s record of total town halls held, an ambitious goal for the two and a half months before New Hampshire’s likely mid-to-late January primary date.

As with McCain’s 2000 campaign, Phillips intends to offer extensive press access. And as he rolled with a group of reporters and photographers on his new campaign bus, already decorated with his father’s old baseball glove and a stack of books including J. William Fulbright’s “The Arrogance of Power,” he offered a preview of what he intends to tell New Hampshire voters.

“There’s a culture of civic engagement in this state that I think is unique,” Phillips said. “People literally commit to vetting the very candidates that the rest of the country will soon be considering. It doesn’t mean that the other states don’t matter, they matter just as much. But the tradition is we start here.”

As for Biden’s decision to try to push back New Hampshire, he said it amounted to an attempt to “disenfranchise” New Hampshire’s voters.

“We’ve seen a lot of leaders in this country who like to change the rules when the rules don’t suit them,” said Phillips.

Benjamin Johansen contributed to this report.

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending