adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Post Politics Now: A first hurdle for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson en route to the Supreme Court – The Washington Post

Published

 on


Welcome to Post Politics Now, a new live experience from The Washington Post that puts the day’s political headlines into context. Each weekday, we’ll guide you through the news from the White House, Capitol Hill and campaign trail with assists from some of the best political reporters in the business providing insights and analysis you won’t get elsewhere.

This afternoon, Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Mitt Romney (R-Utah) said they’ll support the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, forging a clear path to Jackson’s confirmation and her ascent to history as the first Black woman to sit on the court. The two Republicans announced their decisions moments after the Judiciary Committee voted to advance Jackson’s nomination to the full Senate. Jackson now has the support of at least three Republicans in the full Senate vote — Sen. Susan Collins of Maine said last week that she would vote to confirm her.

Your daily dashboard

  • 1:45 p.m.: Biden talked about jobs and infrastructure at a White House event focused on trucking. Watch video here.
  • 2:45 p.m.: White House press secretary Jen Psaki conducted a briefing. Watch video here.
  • 4:30 p.m.: The Senate Judiciary Committee voted on Jackson’s nomination. You can watch video of the meeting here.
  • 6 p.m.: House Republicans held a news conference following a briefing by the National Border Patrol Council. Watch video here.

Got a question about politics? Submit it here. At 1:30 p.m. weekdays, return to this space and we’ll address what’s on the mind of readers.

Lena H. Sun: A relative lull in covid brings agency action — Centers for Disease Control Director Rochelle Walensky made clear she wanted to make changes when she began her tenure. She may be trying to take advantage of this moment in the pandemic — a relative lull — to get a review underway to address many of the criticisms. In the past, other directors, such as Tom Frieden, who helmed CDC from 2009 to 2017, have made structural changes as well. It remains to be seen how big or deep this revamp will be considering two of the three senior officials she is tasking to provide feedback are longtime veterans of the agency.

Lena H. Sun, National reporter focusing on health
Headshot of Matt Viser

Matt Viser: Sullivan says attacks in Ukraine aren’t yet ‘genocide’ — Jake Sullivan, the national security adviser, has become a regular guest in the White House briefing room in recent weeks, offering the Biden administration’s latest thinking on the Russian invasion of Ukraine.On Monday, he came again, apologizing at the start, saying he had a lot to say: “My remarks are not going to be brief.” The latest attacks were “tragic,” he said, and “shocking.” But he said they were, unfortunately, not altogether surprising and, he added, didn’t yet reach the level of genocide.He said there would be additional sanctions announced this week. He reiterated unity among the West. And he said the latest intelligence shows that Russia is shifting its goals but not letting go of its aim to dominate Ukraine.“The next stage of this conflict may very well be protracted,” he said, a period that he estimated could be months or longer. “We should be under no illusions that Russia will adjust its tactics, which have included and will likely continue to include wanton and brazen attacks on civilian targets.”

Matt Viser, White House reporter
12:32 p.m.
Headshot of Seung Min Kim

Seung Min Kim: Graham goes where McConnell won’t — It’s a question I’ve wanted Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to answer for some months: If Republicans take back the Senate majority and there is a hypothetical Supreme Court vacancy in 2023, would he give Biden’s nominee a hearing?In his typical fashion, McConnell has declined to answer. But Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C), who last chaired the Judiciary Committee when Republicans controlled the Senate, effectively said the quiet part out loud Monday morning during a committee meeting to consider Jackson’s nomination: “I’ll say this, if we get back the Senate and we are in charge of this body,” and there are “judicial openings, we will talk to our colleagues on the other side. But if we were in charge, she would not have met before this committee.”Graham, though, caveats it slightly by saying that it was Jackson specifically who would not have been taken up by a GOP-controlled Senate — especially since, as he said, there was another candidate perceived as more moderate whom Biden had considered. (Graham was clearly referring to South Carolina federal judge J. Michelle Childs, one of the finalists.) But Democrats have certainly assumed Biden won’t get a single judge confirmed if McConnell runs the Senate, and Graham’s comments Monday added a bit more evidence to that view.

Seung Min Kim, White House reporter
10:54 a.m.
Headshot of David Weigel

David Weigel: Some things have changed since Sarah Palin’s last run — The last time Palin appeared on Alaska’s ballot, George W. Bush was in the White House, Donald Trump was hosting “The Apprentice” — and she was urging voters to unseat Rep. Don Young (R).Palin’s last-minute entry into the race to replace Young, who died last month, shook up what had been a crowded but low-wattage race. So did Trump’s endorsement of her Sunday with a reminder that “she shocked many when she endorsed me very early in 2016.” As of Monday, 50 candidates had filed for Young’s open seat, and none had anything close to Palin’s name recognition, much less Trump’s.But Palin isn’t running in a Republican primary, the sort of contest where Trump’s endorsement has been most effective. One reason for the flood of candidates is that the June 11 election is the first to be held under a new “top four” system approved by voters in 2020.Every contender will appear on the same, long ballot, regardless of party, and the four who get the most votes will head to a second ballot Aug. 16. That will be the state’s first ranked-choice federal election, with voters rating their choices from 1 to 4, and votes being tallied up until one candidate cracks 50 percent support.

David Weigel, National reporter covering politics
10:00 a.m.
Headshot of Paul Kane

Paul Kane: The week ahead on the Hill — Both the House and Senate launch a busy legislative week Monday, with the hope of departing Thursday or Friday for a more than two-week spring break after lawmakers plan to dig deeper into the Jan. 6 investigation and make history with a Supreme Court confirmation.The nomination of Jackson to replace retiring Justice Stephen G. Breyer will dominate action in the Senate, where the Judiciary Committee is expected to deadlock Monday afternoon. Late Monday, Senate Democrats will use a procedural vote to bring the first Black woman’s nomination to the Supreme Court to the full Senate, then hold several days of debate before casting a final confirmation vote Thursday or Friday.All 50 members of the Democratic caucus, plus Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), have indicated support for this history-making selection. All eyes will be on Sens. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) to see if they add more bipartisan support.In the House, Democrats plan to vote out contempt of Congress citations against a pair of former Trump White House officials, Peter Navarro and Dan Scavino Jr., for refusing to cooperate with the select committee investigating the January 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.Meanwhile, bipartisan negotiations continue, with Romney leading the GOP side, on a roughly $10 billion package of pandemic relief funds to prepare the nation for the next likely surge in coronavirus cases, to purchase more vaccines, testing capacity and treatments for the disease.

Paul Kane, Senior congressional correspondent and columnist
Headshot of Annie Linskey

Annie Linskey: The week ahead at the White House (which includes a return by Obama) — President Biden kicks off this week with splashy events on inflation and health care, an attempt by the White House to refocus attention on a domestic agenda which has been eclipsed recently by war in Ukraine.On Monday, Biden will give remarks on his efforts to attract more workers to the understaffed trucking industry via an outdoor event that the White House promises will be replete with “some big trucks.” On Tuesday, former president Barack Obama returns to the White House to talk with Biden about health care.Both appearances are designed to highlight ways that Biden is working to bring down prices. Polls show that inflation is a top concern for Americans and that rising prices are expected to be a major theme of the upcoming midterms elections. In Michigan on Saturday night, former president Donald Trump previewed the argument in a lengthy speech laced with references to high costs.The same polls reveal a small silver lining for Biden on inflation: Most voters don’t blame president for the price increases, with many citing either the pandemic or profit-taking by large companies as the culprit. But voters do want to see that Biden is trying to do something about the problem.

Annie Linskey, National reporter covering the White House.
Headshot of Robert Barnes

Robert Barnes: Jackson could have to wait awhile before taking her seat — If Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is confirmed to the Supreme Court this week, she’ll be in the unusual position of being something like a “justice-in-waiting.”That’s because Justice Stephen G. Breyer, the man she once worked for as a clerk and whose seat she would take, said his retirement will take place at the end of the current term.That usually is at the end of June or early July; Breyer has one last set of oral arguments this month. Then the court will continue rendering decisions in all the cases it has heard since October, including a challenge to Roe v. Wade.

Robert Barnes, Reporter covering the U.S. Supreme Court

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

Political Earthquake in British Columbia: Kevin Falcon Suspends B.C. United Campaign, Backs Conservatives

Published

 on

In a move that sent shockwaves through British Columbia’s political landscape, B.C. United leader Kevin Falcon announced on Wednesday that his party would suspend its campaign for the upcoming provincial election and throw its support behind John Rustad’s resurgent B.C. Conservatives. This unprecedented decision has left political watchers and analysts scrambling to make sense of the ramifications for the province’s political future.

Kevin Falcon, who took the reins of the B.C. Liberals—now rebranded as B.C. United—in February 2022, delivered the stunning news at a press conference that left many in disbelief. The former cabinet minister, known for his confidence and assertiveness, appeared uncharacteristically somber and introspective as he explained the rationale behind his decision.

Shachi Kurl, president of the Angus Reid Institute, observed the stark contrast in Falcon’s demeanor. “This is a man who has always exuded confidence, even cockiness, throughout his political career. But today, he seemed on the brink of tears, visibly struggling with the weight of this decision,” Kurl noted. The emotional toll of Falcon’s announcement was evident, underscoring the gravity of the situation both personally and professionally for the B.C. United leader.

The roots of B.C. United’s collapse can be traced back to two key decisions made by Falcon: the expulsion of John Rustad from the party and the controversial rebranding from the B.C. Liberals to B.C. United. Rustad, who was removed from the party in February 2023 for questioning climate change science, quickly capitalized on his dismissal by revitalizing the dormant B.C. Conservative Party. Since then, Rustad has attracted a growing number of former B.C. United MLAs and candidates to his cause, turning the B.C. Conservatives into a formidable political force.

The decision to rebrand the B.C. Liberals as B.C. United, which was meant to signal a fresh start for the party, has been widely criticized as poorly timed and poorly executed. Bill Bennett, a former Liberal cabinet minister, lamented the lack of public understanding of the new brand. “There was no real effort to rebrand and help the public grasp who B.C. United was. The entire process lacked sufficient resources, which ultimately led to its failure,” Bennett said.

Political scientists have been quick to analyze the implications of Falcon’s decision to suspend B.C. United’s campaign. Stewart Prest, a political science lecturer at the University of British Columbia (UBC), expressed shock at the sudden turn of events. “This was a party that, just moments ago, was preparing to compete in this election. To suddenly wave the white flag and step aside in favor of another party is unprecedented. We haven’t seen anything quite like this before,” Prest remarked.

The move has also raised questions about Falcon’s leadership and the future of B.C. United. Gerald Baier, an associate professor of political science at UBC, suggested that Falcon’s decision to expel Rustad may be viewed as the pivotal moment in his leadership. “If Falcon could go back and change one decision, it would likely be the expulsion of Rustad. That move set off a chain reaction that ultimately led to the party’s collapse,” Baier explained.

With B.C. United stepping aside, the B.C. Conservatives are now positioned to become the main opposition to the ruling B.C. NDP in the upcoming election, scheduled for October 19. However, the transition will not be without its challenges. The Conservatives will need to decide which B.C. United candidates to include on their slate, a process that could leave some candidates and voters in a state of uncertainty.

As the political landscape in British Columbia shifts dramatically, the upcoming election promises to be one of the most closely watched and hotly contested in recent memory. The decision by Falcon to back the B.C. Conservatives has not only upended the election but has also reshaped the future of politics in the province. As the dust settles, all eyes will be on John Rustad and his ability to capitalize on this newfound momentum.

In conclusion, Kevin Falcon’s decision to suspend B.C. United’s campaign and endorse the B.C. Conservatives marks a pivotal moment in British Columbia’s political history. The move has raised numerous questions about the future of B.C. United, the leadership of the B.C. Conservatives, and the upcoming election itself. As the province braces for what promises to be a highly volatile election season, one thing is clear: British Columbia’s political landscape will never be the same.

Continue Reading

Politics

No conflict in handling of B.C. zero-emission grants, says auditor general

Published

 on

 

VICTORIA – British Columbia’s auditor general says his office has found no evidence of a conflict of interest in the handling of provincial grants for the zero-emission vehicle sector, after an accusation by a truck maker earlier this year.

Michael Pickup says in a statement the investigation looked into accounting firm MNP’s handling of Advanced Research and Commercialization grant applications, reviewing “a significant amount of information” from the company, the government and all applicants.

Pickup says the results show no evidence MNP wrote grant applications for clients, influenced the evaluation process to benefit clients or used its administering of the program to “recruit” clients for the company’s other services.

In April, the provincial legislature unanimously directed Pickup’s office to examine allegations by electric-hybrid truck maker Edison Motors that MNP was both administering the grants and offering services to help businesses with applications.

The Office of the Auditor General says the allegations from Edison, which is based in Merritt, B.C., suggested MNP “was offering to write grant applications in exchange for a success fee while also deciding who received grant funding.”

MNP said at the time that the allegations were “false and misleading.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 28, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Prime Ontario agricultural land to be protected amid energy expansion, minister says

Published

 on

 

Certain solar farms will be banned on prime agricultural land in Ontario as the province expands energy production to meet demand in the coming decades, Energy Minister Stephen Lecce said Wednesday.

Ontario is looking to add some 5,000 megawatts of energy to the grid, with Lecce directing the Independent Electricity System Operator to secure “technology agnostic” energy resources. That means the province will use a mix of natural gas, hydroelectric, renewables, nuclear and biomass energy sources, he said.

But the province is making efforts to protect key agricultural areas in the process, the minister said.

Ground-mounted solar panels will be prohibited on prime agricultural farmland, said Lecce, who pledged the province would “never misuse” those lands.

“Our farmers need more energy more than ever,” Lecce said.

“They need access to to affordable energy and so we made a commitment to work with them on a policy that ultimately will respect prime agricultural land.”

Other energy products being considered on prime agricultural land will now require an impact assessment before proceeding.

The province is also giving power to municipalities to decide if they want a particular energy project.

“Long gone are the days where Queen’s Park imposes projects on unwilling communities, undermining those agricultural areas,” Lecce said.

The news is welcome to farmers, said Drew Spoelstra, the president of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture.

“The new energy procurement framework is a major step forward for Ontario,” he said.

“Reliable and affordable energy is incredibly important to the growth of the Ontario economy, including food production, food processing and the agri-food sector.”

Farmers and Premier Doug Ford’s government have had an up-and-down relationship in recent years in light of the Greenbelt scandal.

The province had said they were going to build 50,000 homes on the protected Greenbelt, which includes prime agricultural land. But several investigations by provincial bodies found the process was flawed as it favoured some developers with ties to the government over others.

Farmers did not like the possible encroachment onto farmland and joined the chorus to denounce the Greenbelt move. Last summer, amid mounting public pressure to reverse course, Ford walked back those Greenbelt plans.

Lecce’s announcement Wednesday comes as the province’s electricity demand is expected to grow by about two per cent each year, although that could be even higher depending on electrification within the broader economy.

The IESO has said the province will need at least 60 per cent more energy by 2050.

Ontario has also recently been adding electricity storage projects, with an eye to about 2,500 megawatts, and the IESO said the province’s emerging battery fleet will pair well with wind and solar, so that the power generated by those methods can be stored and injected into the grid when needed.

Ford cancelled 750 renewable energy contracts shortly after his Progressive Conservatives formed government in 2018, after the former Liberal government faced widespread anger over the long-term contracts with clean power producers at above-market rates.

The province is also moving ahead with nuclear energy expansion, including seeking to refurbish units at the Pickering nuclear plant, build small modular reactors at the Darlington nuclear plant and exploring a new, large-scale plant at Bruce Power.

In 2021, the electricity system was 94 per cent emissions free, but that is now down to 87 per cent as it uses natural gas to meet demand.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 28, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending