adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

LinkedIn Isn’t the Place to Express Your Frustrations and Anger

Published

 on

LinkedIn Profile to Generate Job

“The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.” – Arab proverb.

If you spend time on LinkedIn, you’ll undoubtedly notice the platform has become overrun with barking dogs—job seekers who are frustrated and angry—while employers keep moving on, looking after their self-interests.

Job seekers expressing their “emotions” online aren’t doing themselves any favours. It’s common knowledge employers Google candidates and check their LinkedIn activity to determine whether they’re interview-worthy. An employer’s reputation and brand are represented by its employees, making it prudent to vet candidates’ online behaviour by looking for red flags such as:

 

  • Offensive behaviour
  • Narcissistic behaviour
  • Content designed to provoke (trolling)
  • False information
  • Negative (read: bashing) posts about former employers or employers in general.

 

The last red flag is worth noting as employer-related negative posts are increasingly prevalent. Some posts I’ve read come across as if the poster is waging a holy war against employers.

Three reasons you shouldn’t complain online:

 

  1. Complaining is toxic.
  2. Complaining is not leading.
  3. Complaining keeps you stuck where you are.

 

“Don’t be overheard complaining… not even to yourself.” – Marcus Aurelius.

Describing something—an event, an experience, a person—negatively (complaining) without indicating the next steps or plans to fix the problem or yourself is easy. The act of complaining requires little thought and no action.

What good has complaining ever done? Publicly venting your frustrations and anger may feel like you’re “sticking it to the man,” but does it change your circumstances, increase your chances of landing a job, or make you happier?

Self-proclaiming career coaches and resume writers serve their self-interest by telling job seekers that the reason they’re not getting interviews is because their resume sucks. While this may be true, it’s rarely mentioned that employers may be turned off by a job seeker’s online behaviour.

I’ve met many job seekers with a rockstar-like resume, frustrated they weren’t getting interviews. After reading some of their LinkedIn comments, I can see why employers aren’t contacting them. I know of two instances where a job offer was rescinded due to the to-be employee’s online behaviour. While your resume is important, what’s more important—critical to landing interviews—is your digital footprint.

Employers will disregard your candidacy no matter how skilled or experienced you are if they feel your online behaviour may affect their brand and reputation; hence, your online behaviour has consequences. Whether those consequences benefit or hinder your job search is entirely up to you. Keep your rants, vents, and anger about employers and the job market off LinkedIn and other social media platforms. While your feelings may be valid, your behaviour isn’t.

More than ever, Image is everything!

Instead of showing your network and employers your armchair opinions about how employers don’t know how to hire, show why you should be hired. Do not allow your ego to lead you to think your opinions and rants will influence employers’ hiring decisions. On the other hand, while complaining may feel cathartic, it hinders your job search efforts because:

 

Complaining is never a good look.

When you post complaints on LinkedIn, you put your negativity on full display for your network and employers to see. Furthermore, you’re publicly biting the hands that you want to feed you. Regardless of how you frame a “rant” or “venting,” it’ll likely convey a bitter, angry, or entitlement tone, which isn’t an impression you want to give to your network and employers.

 

  • “Wow, this person would be difficult to work with.”
  • “This person has a poor attitude.”
  • “Why’s this person painting all employers with the same brush?”
  • “This person is playing the ‘I’m a victim!’ card.”
  • “This person needs to stop blaming everyone.”

Appearing bitter and angry towards employers will hinder your job search.

 

Complaining in public shows a lack of emotional control and judgment.

Managing your emotions and responding appropriately to challenging situations is a crucial aspect of being a professional. Complaining about your job search difficulties or criticizing employer hiring practices on LinkedIn shows a lack of self-control and judgment of the possible consequences of your online behaviour.

Understandably, employers seek employees who can remain calm under pressure, handle setbacks gracefully, and project a positive, solution-focused attitude. Publicly expressing your frustrations suggests you might have trouble handling workplace challenges or negative feedback.

 

Complaining makes you appear entitled.

Complaining gives the impression that you feel entitled to a job and have unrealistic expectations, which are turnoffs.

Employers gravitate towards candidates they feel will be grateful for the opportunity, eager to contribute, and committed to achieving success. When you complain, you appear focused more on what you believe you are entitled to than what you can offer.

LinkedIn is the most powerful tool you have at your disposal to reach employers. Hence, you want to project an image that attracts employers as opposed to repelling employers, which is what you’re doing when you complain about employers and the job market.

 

Bashing employers on LinkedIn won’t change how they look after their self-interests. Focus on your self-interests; to find an employer you’ll want to align your career with. Barking at employers won’t stop the caravan from moving on.

_____________________________________________________________________

 

Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers “unsweetened” job search advice. You can send Nick your questions to artoffindingwork@gmail.com.

News

Mark Carney to lead Liberal economic task force ahead of next election

Published

 on

NANAIMO, B.C. – Former Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney will chair a Liberal task force on economic growth, the party announced Monday as Liberal MPs meet to strategize for the upcoming election year.

Long touted as a possible leadership successor to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Carney was already scheduled to address caucus as part of the retreat in Nanaimo, B.C., this week.

The Liberals say he will help shape the party’s policies for the next election, and will report to Trudeau and the Liberal platform committee.

“As chair of the Leader’s Task Force on Economic Growth, Mark’s unique ideas and perspectives will play a vital role in shaping the next steps in our plan to continue to grow our economy and strengthen the middle class, and to urgently seize new opportunities for Canadian jobs and prosperity in a fast-changing world,” Trudeau said in a statement Monday.

Trudeau is expected to address Liberal members of Parliament later this week. It will be the first time he faces them as a group since MPs left Ottawa in the spring.

Still stinging from a devastating byelection loss earlier this summer, the caucus is now also reeling from news that its national campaign director has resigned and the party can no longer count on the NDP to stave off an early election.

Last week, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh ended his agreement with Trudeau to have the New Democrats support the government on key votes in exchange for movement on priorities such as dental care.

All of this comes as the Liberals remain well behind the Conservatives in the polls despite efforts to refocus on issues like housing and affordability.

Some Liberal MPs hope to hear more about how Trudeau plans to win Canadians back when he addresses his team this week.

Carney appears to be part of that plan, attempting to bring some economic heft to a government that has struggled to resonate with voters who are struggling with inflation and soaring housing costs.

Trudeau said several weeks ago that he has long tried to coax Carney to join his government. The economist and former investment banker spent five years as the governor of the Bank of Canada during the last Conservative government before hopping across the pond to head up the Bank of England for seven years.

Carney is just one of a host of names suggested as possible successors to Trudeau, who has insisted he will lead the party into the next election despite simmering calls for him to step aside.

Those calls reached a new intensity earlier this summer when the Conservatives won a longtime Liberal stronghold in a major byelection upset in Toronto—St. Paul’s.

But Trudeau held fast to his decision to stay and rejected calls to convene his entire caucus over the summer to respond to their concerns about their collective prospects.

The prime minister has spoken with Liberal MPs one-on-one over the last few months and attended several regional meetings ahead of the Nanaimo retreat, including Ontario and Quebec, which together account for 70 per cent of the caucus.

While several Liberals who don’t feel comfortable speaking publicly say the meetings were positive, the party leader has mainly held to his message that he is simply focused on “delivering for Canadians.”

Conservative House leader Andrew Scheer was in Nanaimo ahead of the meeting to express his scorn for the Liberal strategy session, and for Carney’s involvement.

“It doesn’t matter what happens in this retreat, doesn’t matter what kinds of (communications) exercise they go through, or what kind of speculation they all entertain about who might lead them in the next election,” said Scheer, who called a small press conference on the Nanaimo harbourfront Monday.

“It’s the same failed Liberal policies causing the same hardships for Canadians.”

He said Carney and Trudeau are “basically the same people,” and that Carney has supported Liberal policies, including the carbon tax.

The three-day retreat is expected to include breakout meetings for the Indigenous, rural and women’s caucuses before the full group convenes later this week.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 9, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Peter Nygard sentenced to 11 years for sexual assault convictions

Published

 on

TORONTO – Former fashion mogul Peter Nygard is a “sexual predator” who showed no empathy for his victims, an Ontario judge said Monday as he sentenced the disgraced tycoon to 11 years in prison for his crimes in Toronto.

The 83-year-old’s time behind bars will work out to a little less than seven years after accounting for credit he received for time already spent in custody, and Nygard will be eligible to apply for parole in two years.

Justice Robert Goldstein, who presided over the case, called Nygard “a Canadian success story gone very wrong.”

“Peter Nygard is a sexual predator,” Goldstein told the court in issuing his sentence.

Nygard, who arrived in court in a wheelchair, did not address the courtroom when given the opportunity.

He was convicted of four counts of sexual assault last November but acquitted of a fifth count as well as one of forcible confinement.

The charges stemmed from allegations dating from the 1980s until the mid-2000s, as multiple women accused Nygard of sexually assaulting them at his company’s headquarters in Toronto.

Nygard’s lawyer had argued for a six-year sentence, citing her client’s age and poor health, while the Crown sought a sentence of 15 years.

The judge dismissed the argument for a shorter sentencing, noting that Nygard has been receiving special treatment in custody due to his various health issues and that his advanced age is not reason enough to limit the sentence. Goldstein also suggested Nygard had been exaggerating his health issues in his submissions to the court.

The judge further said one of several aggravating factors in the case was the fact that one of the victims was just 16 years old.

Nygard’s lawyer previously argued in court that a lengthy sentence would be “crushing” for her client, who has Type 2 diabetes and deteriorating vision, among other health issues.

Nygard founded a fashion company in Winnipeg in 1967 that ultimately became Nygard International.

His company produced women’s clothing under several brand names and had corporate facilities in both Canada and the U.S. His stores throughout Winnipeg were once draped in his photos.

Aside from his Toronto case, Nygard is also facing charges in Quebec, Manitoba and the United States.

He was first arrested in Winnipeg in 2020 under the Extradition Act after he was charged with nine counts in New York, including sex trafficking and racketeering charges.

In May, Manitoba’s highest court dismissed Nygard’s application for a judicial review of his extradition order, finding there was no reason to interfere with the order issued by then-justice minister David Lametti.

None of the criminal charges against Nygard in Quebec, Manitoba or the U.S. have been tested in court, and he has denied all allegations against him.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 9, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Former fashion tycoon Peter Nygard’s long-delayed sentencing expected today

Published

 on

TORONTO – Former fashion mogul Peter Nygard is expected to be sentenced for his sexual assault convictions today, after multiple delays in the case that have stretched for months.

The 83-year-old was convicted on four charges last November but the sentencing process has dragged on for several reasons, including Nygard’s difficulties in retaining legal counsel.

The sentencing was postponed once again last month because one of the Crown attorneys was out of the country.

Nygard’s latest lawyer is seeking a six-year sentence, citing her client’s age and health issues, while prosecutors have asked for a sentence of 15 years.

Nygard, who once helmed a successful women’s fashion company, was accused of sexually assaulting multiple women at his firm’s Toronto headquarters from the 1980s until the mid-2000s.

He was ultimately convicted of four counts of sexual assault but acquitted of a fifth count as well as one of forcible confinement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 9, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending