adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Mark Rutte, the Dutch prime minister, quits politics

Published

 on

THERE HE WAS again, friendly, imperturbable and in command, even as he announced the end of his political career. Mark Rutte has led the Netherlands since October 2010, making him the senior national leader in the EU after Viktor Orban and the longest-serving Dutch prime minister in history. But on July 10th Mr Rutte told the Dutch parliament that he would not run in an early election slated for November, having unexpectedly dissolved his coalition government on July 7th over a thorny but minor dispute regarding asylum rules. It seemed a small thing to bring down a titan. But Mr Rutte’s decision was not so much a response to issues as an effort to end his time in office on his own terms.

The fall of the government provoked widespread surprise. Given the limited policy stakes, many observers saw it as the prime minister’s strategy to put his centre-right Liberal (VVD) party in a better electoral position. Mr Rutte, whose sole weakness is voters’ long-standing suspicion that his sunny exterior conceals the heart of a scheming tactician, could not abide this. “In the past few days there has been speculation about my motives, and the only answer is: [the interests of] the Netherlands,” he said in a brief statement to parliament. Although it earned him long applause from MPs, not all were convinced.

Mr Rutte is known internationally for his smiling demeanour and his habit of cycling to work while munching an apple. His regular-guy image, equally at home in a suit or jeans and polo shirt, meshes well with Dutch culture’s odd combination of sober Calvinism and unapologetic hedonism. Domestically, his great strength has been his ability to define his party as the centre. Mr Rutte’s longevity is all the more remarkable because the Netherlands has one of the most fractured political landscapes in the world. The VVD towers over other parties, but still holds only 34 of the 150 seats in a parliament that boasts 20 different fractions; only one other manages more than 20 MPs.

Over the past two decades ever-more seats have gone to hard-right anti-immigrant parties such as the Party for Freedom (PVV), led by Geert Wilders, and a series of imitators. These outfits tend to siphon off voters from the right of the VVD. In one analysis Mr Rutte’s decision to end his coalition over immigration was a sign of the growing strength of Europe’s conservative populists. In fact, things are more complicated.

The proximate cause of the government’s fall was a months-long negotiation over changes to the Dutch asylum system, launched after the reception centre which initially takes in nearly all asylum-seekers overflowed last summer. (The government has closed others over the years.) Asylum-seekers were forced to sleep under tarpaulins; an infant died. The right-of-centre parties in Mr Rutte’s four-party coalition—the VVD and the Christian Democrats—wanted the new system to discourage asylum-seekers. The two left-of-centre parties—the left-liberal D66 party and the small Christian Union—wanted to protect refugees’ rights.

A compromise was reportedly close. The breaking-point was the VVD’s insistence on slowing down family reunification for refugees, a measure that would have affected less than 11,000 immigrants per year, many of them children. That is a small fraction of the Netherlands’ net immigration (some 228,000 last year). The country sits roughly in the EU’s middle in terms of asylum applications per capita.

As for the political threat to the VVD, Mr Wilders’s vote share has been stagnant for a decade, and newer hard-right parties have floundered. The big populist newcomer is the Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB), a four-year-old party that took a fifth of the nationwide vote in provincial elections on March 15th. But its main concern is opposition to environmental and climate measures, particularly nitrogen-emission limits that force the government to choose between closing cattle farms or freezing construction (amid a housing crisis). On immigration and asylum, the BBB has taken a vague but moderate stance.

Some analysts thought Mr Rutte might have decided to blow up his coalition over asylum so as to define the next election as a battle against the left over immigration. That would put the VVD on stronger ground than a contest with the BBB over climate change. In the debate on July 10th opposition leaders accused the party of cynical manoeuvring. Even Mr Rutte’s exit from politics has not dispelled the suspicion that his every move was calculated.

When he entered government in 2002 as state secretary for social affairs, Mr Rutte said he planned on staying for “four or five years”. The former executive at Unilever, a food consortium, expected to return to the business world. Instead, by 2006 he was the leader of the VVD, narrowly chosen by the members over a hardline anti-immigrant candidate. (The next year he kicked her out of the party.)

Mr Rutte’s first cabinet, in 2010, was a minority coalition with support from the far-right PVV, but after Mr Wilders pulled his backing over budget cuts Mr Rutte pivoted to the centre. His second government in 2012 was a grand coalition with the Labour party, his third and fourth sprawling alliances with D66, the Christian Democrats and the Christian Union.

In bidding Mr Rutte farewell on July 10th, opposition leaders mentioned a series of scandals that have compromised his trustworthiness over the past few years. His government was slow to admit the state’s responsibility for earthquakes caused by gas extraction in the country’s north. Thousands of parents unjustly accused of child-benefit fraud have yet to be compensated. Mr Rutte stepped down over the affair in 2021, but came first in the elections soon after. The second-place finisher, Sigrid Kaag of D66, found herself forced to re-enter a coalition with him.

Mr Rutte will remain as caretaker prime minister until a new coalition is formed after November’s election. That could be a lengthy process: in 2021 coalition talks took nearly ten months. The VVD has announced it will select a new prime-ministerial candidate within the week. But it has no one on its benches with Mr Rutte’s authority and political talent.

Mr Rutte is unlikely to disappear. He is widely rumoured to be a candidate to replace Jens Stoltenberg as head of NATO when his (extended) term runs out next year. As for Dutch politics, the prime minister has defined the centre for so long that it is unclear where it lies without him. Opposition leaders attacked Mr Rutte during the debate for dissolving his coalition in the middle of crises over nitrogen, migration and the war in Ukraine. Pieter Omtzigt, an independent MP, wryly noted that he had never expected his colleagues to reproach Mr Rutte for leaving. As the Netherlands enters a period of political turbulence, more of them may find themselves missing his calm, upbeat, infuriatingly slick presence.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

NDP declares victory in federal Winnipeg byelection, Conservatives concede

Published

 on

 

The New Democrats have declared a federal byelection victory in their Winnipeg stronghold riding of Elmwood—Transcona.

The NDP candidate Leila Dance told supporters in a tearful speech that even though the final results weren’t in, she expected she would see them in Ottawa.

With several polls still to be counted, Conservative candidate Colin Reynolds conceded defeat and told his volunteers that they should be proud of what the Conservatives accomplished in the campaign.

Political watchers had a keen eye on the results to see if the Tories could sway traditionally NDP voters on issues related to labour and affordability.

Meanwhile in the byelection race in the Montreal riding of LaSalle—Émard—Verdun the NDP, Liberals and Bloc Québécois remained locked in an extremely tight three-way race as the results trickled in slowly.

The Liberal stronghold riding had a record 91 names on the ballot, and the results aren’t expected until the early hours of the morning.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Another incumbent BC United MLA to run as Independent as Kirkpatrick re-enters race

Published

 on

 

VANCOUVER – An incumbent BC United legislative member has reversed her decision not to seek re-election and has announced she’ll run as an Independent in the riding of West Vancouver-Capilano in the upcoming British Columbia election.

Karin Kirkpatrick has been a vocal critic of BC United Leader Kevin Falcon’s decision last month to suspend the party’s campaign and throw support behind the B.C. Conservatives under John Rustad.

Kirkpatrick announced her retirement this year, but said Monday that her decision to re-enter the race comes as a direct result of Falcon’s actions, which would force middle-of-the-road voters to “swing to the left” to the NDP or to move further right to the Conservatives.

“I did hear from a lot of constituents and a lot of people who were emailing me from across B.C. … that they didn’t have anybody to vote for,” she said. “And so, I looked even at myself, and I looked at my riding, and I said, ‘Well, I no longer have anybody to vote for in my own riding.’ It was clearly an issue of this missing middle for the more moderate voter.”

She said voters who reached out “don’t want to vote for an NDP government but felt deeply uncomfortable” supporting the provincial Conservatives, citing Rustad’s tolerance of what she calls “extreme views and conspiracy theorists.”

Kirkpatrick joins four other incumbent Opposition MLAs running as Independents, including Peace River South’s Mike Bernier, Peace River North’s Dan Davies, Prince George-Cariboo’s Coralee Oakes and Tom Shypitka in Kootenay-Rockies.

“To be honest, we talk just about every day,” Kirkpatrick said about her fellow BC United incumbents now running as Independents. “We’re all feeling the same way. We all need to kind of hold each other up and make sure we’re doing the right thing.”

She added that a number of first-time candidates formerly on the BC United ticket are contacting the group of incumbents running for election, and the group is working together “as good moderates who respect each other and lift each other up.”

But Kirkpatrick said it’s also too early to talk about the future of BC United or the possibility of forming a new party.

“The first thing we need to do is to get these Independent MLAs elected into the legislature,” she said, noting a strong group could play a power-broker role if a minority government is elected. “Once we’re there then we’re all going to come together and we’re going to figure out, is there something left in BC United, BC Liberals that we can resurrect, or do we need to start a new party that’s in the centre?”

She said there’s a big gap left in the political spectrum in the province.

“So, we just have to do it in a mindful way, to make sure it’s representing the broadest base of people in B.C.”

Among the supporters at Kirkpatrick’s announcement Monday was former longtime MLA Ralph Sultan, who held West Vancouver-Capilano for almost two decades before retiring in 2020.

The Metro Vancouver riding has been a stronghold for the BC Liberals — the former BC United — since its formation in 1991, with more than half of the votes going to the centre-right party in every contest.

However, Kirkpatrick’s winning margin of 53.6 per cent to the NDP’s 30.1 per cent and the Green’s 15.4 per cent in the 2020 election shows a rising trend for left-leaning voters in the district.

Mike McDonald, chief strategy officer with Kirk and Co. Consulting, and a former campaign director for the BC Liberals and chief of staff under former Premier Christy Clark, said Independent candidates historically face an uphill battle and the biggest impact may be splitting votes in areas where the NDP could emerge victorious.

“It really comes down to, if the NDP are in a position to get 33 per cent of the vote, they might have a chance of winning,” McDonald said of the impact of an Independent vote-split with the Conservatives in certain ridings.

He said B.C. history shows it’s very hard for an Independent to win an election and has been done only a handful of times.

“So, the odds do not favour Independents winning the seats unless there is a very unique combination of circumstances, and more likely that they play a role as a spoiler, frankly.”

The B.C. Conservatives list West Vancouver School District Trustee Lynne Block as its candidate in West Vancouver-Capilano, while the BC NDP is represented by health care professional Sara Eftekhar.

Kirkpatrick said she is confident that her re-entry to the race will not result in a vote split that allows the NDP to win the seat because the party has always had a poor showing in the riding.

“So, even if there is competition between myself and the Conservative candidate, it is highly unlikely that anything would swing over to the NDP here. And I believe that I have the ability to actually attract those NDP voters to me, as well as the Conservatives and Liberals who are feeling just lost right now.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Blinken is heading back to the Middle East, this time without fanfare or a visit to Israel

Published

 on

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Secretary of State Antony Blinken heads to Egypt on Tuesday for his 10th trip to the Middle East since the war in Gaza began nearly a year ago, this one aimed partly at refining a proposal to present to Israel and Hamas for a cease-fire deal and release of hostages.

Unlike in recent mediating missions, America’s top diplomat this time is traveling without optimistic projections from the Biden administration of an expected breakthrough in the troubled negotiations.

Also unlike the earlier missions, Blinken has no public plans to go to Israel to meet with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on this trip. The Israeli leader’s fiery public statements — like his declaration that Israel would accept only “total victory” when Blinken was in the region in June — and some other unbudgeable demands have complicated earlier diplomacy.

Blinken is going to Egypt for talks Wednesday with Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty and others, in a trip billed as focused both on American-Egyptian relations and Gaza consultations with Egypt.

The tamped-down public approach follows months in which President Joe Biden and his officials publicly talked up an agreement to end the war in Gaza as being just within reach, hoping to build pressure on Netanyahu’s far-right government and Hamas to seal a deal.

The Biden administration now says it is working with fellow mediators Egypt and Qatar to come up with a revised final proposal to try to at least get Israel and Hamas into a six-week cease-fire that would free some of the hostages held by Hamas in exchange for Palestinian prisoners held by Israel. Americans believe public attention on details of the talks now would only hurt that effort.

American, Qatari and Egyptian officials still are consulting “about what that proposal will contain, and …. we’re trying to see that it’s a proposal that can get the parties to an ultimate agreement,” State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said Monday.

The State Department pointed to Egypt’s important role in Gaza peace efforts in announcing last week that the Biden administration planned to give the country its full $1.3 billion in military aid, overriding congressional requirements that the U.S. hold back some of the funding if Egypt fails to show adequate progress on human rights. Blinken told Congress that Egypt has made progress on human rights, including in freeing political prisoners.

Blinken’s trip comes amid the risk of a full-on new front in the Middle East, with Israel threatening increasing military action against the Hezbollah militant organization in Lebanon. Biden envoy Amos Hochstein was in Israel on Monday to try to calm tensions after a stop in Lebanon.

Hezbollah has one of the strongest militaries in the Middle East, and like Hamas and smaller groups in Syria and Iraq it is allied with Iran.

Hezbollah and Israel have exchanged strikes across Israel’s northern border with Lebanon since the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas started the war in Gaza. Hezbollah says it will ease those strikes — which have uprooted tens of thousands of civilians on both sides of the border — only when there’s a cease-fire in Gaza.

Hochstein told Netanyahu and other Israeli officials that intensifying the conflict with Hezbollah would not help get Israelis back in their homes, according to a U.S. official. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the private talks, said Hochstein stressed to Netanyahu that he risked sparking a broad and protracted regional conflict if he moved forward with a full-scale war in Lebanon.

Hochstein also underscored to Israeli officials that the Biden administration remained committed to finding a diplomatic solution to the tensions on Israel’s northern border in conjunction with a Gaza deal or on its own, the official said.

Netanyahu told Hochstein that it would “not be possible to return our residents without a fundamental change in the security situation in the north.” The prime minister said Israel “appreciates and respects” U.S. support but “will do what is necessary to maintain its security and return the residents of the north to their homes safely.”

Israel Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, meanwhile, warned in his meeting with Hochstein that “the only way left to ensure the return of Israel’s northern communities to their homes will be via military action,” his office said.

In Gaza, the U.S. says Israel and Hamas have agreed to a deal in principle and that the biggest obstacles now include a disagreement on details of the hostage and prisoner swap and control over a buffer zone on the border between Gaza and Egypt. Netanyahu has demanded in recent weeks that the Israeli military be allowed to keep a presence in the Philadelphi corridor. Egypt and Hamas have rejected that demand.

The Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7 killed about 1,200 people. Militants also abducted 250 people and are still holding around 100 hostages. About a third of the remaining hostages are believed to be dead.

Israel’s offensive in Gaza has killed more than 41,000 Palestinians, said Gaza’s Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and militants in its count. The war has caused widespread destruction, displaced a majority of Gaza’s people and created a humanitarian crisis.

Netanyahu says he is working to bring home the hostages. His critics accuse him of slow-rolling a deal because it could bring down his hardline coalition government, which includes members opposed to a truce with the Palestinians.

Asked earlier this month if Netanyahu was doing enough for a cease-fire deal, Biden said, simply, “no.” But he added that he still believed a deal was close.

___

Associated Press writer Aamer Madhani contributed to this report.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending