adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

Media rights: It’s not a bursting bubble, but definitely a tight marketplace as media companies study their options

Published

 on

When NASCAR executives sat down earlier this year to plot a strategy around the circuit’s upcoming media rights negotiations, they knew talks would not be as straightforward as they were the last time their rights were up.

That was a decade ago when the cable business was at its apex, and NASCAR’s two broadcast partners — Fox and NBC — were building out their all-sports channels, FS1 and NBCSN. Fox and NBC needed programming for those channels and didn’t blink at paying a nearly 50% increase for those rights.

That market doesn’t exist today.

It’s not a bursting sports rights bubble that cynics have been predicting for the past three decades. But as consumers continue to drop their pay-TV subscriptions and move toward streaming services, media companies have started giving these deals a lot more scrutiny.

Keeping a close eye on media rights

Sports properties that have media rights deals expiring within the next three years:
 Atlantic 10 Conference
Big East Conference
Breeders’ Cup
College Football Playoff (expanded format)
Formula One
French Open
IndyCar
Kentucky Derby
NASCAR
NBA
NCAA (championships other than men’s basketball)
NHL (Canada)
Notre Dame Football
Preakness
Serie A
UFC

In the case of bigger properties, like NASCAR, that means deals are taking much longer to complete than its executives originally expected.

Back in the spring, sources said to expect new NASCAR deals by the middle of summer. In the middle of the summer, they pushed the likely agreements to Labor Day. This week, executives did not want to hazard a guess, not even off the record.

By all accounts, NASCAR’s negotiations are going smoothly. Fox and NBC have told NASCAR officials that they want to renew at slight increases over their current deal. To help secure a healthy increase in overall media revenue, the circuit carved out a package of six midseason races. Amazon and Turner have showed the most interest in that package.

Back in July, NASCAR sold its second-tier package, the Xfinity Series, to The CW for about $115 million per year.

Other properties have not been as fortunate.

Take the Pac-12 Conference, for example. Back in 2013, the Pac-12 had a handshake agreement to take its games to NBC. But ESPN and Fox teamed up on a last-minute deal, paying more than the market rate, to keep NBC from getting a foothold in the college sports market. Combined, ESPN and Fox would pay the Pac-12 $250 million per year, which at the time was the richest TV deal for any college conference.

This year, ESPN and Amazon showed initial interest in a Pac-12 deal. Conference officials originally said they wanted to more than double the $250 million per year that ESPN and Fox were paying. The conference’s university presidents, who pushed for that increase, didn’t understand the changing marketplace, even as both ESPN and Amazon suffered through rounds of layoffs.

The Pac-12 ultimately received an offer from Apple that was not enough to keep the conference together.

The tightening sports rights marketplace also hit WWE, which sold its “SmackDown” series to NBC at a 40% increase. Financial markets, though, expected a bigger increase and punished WWE’s parent, TKO Group. Its stock price dropped 14% the day after the deal was announced and it hasn’t recovered.

Several big ticket sports properties are trying to sell their rights in this suddenly tight-fisted media environment.

WWE still has its top “Raw” package on the market, as does the UFC, which will see its current ESPN deal end in 2025. NASCAR’s new deals still aren’t finalized. And networks have begun talking about buying the added games from the expected College Football Playoff expansion.

Then, of course, comes the biggest non-NFL deal, when the NBA takes its rights to market. The league’s current deals with ESPN and Turner end after the 2024-25 season, and several network and sports business experts expect that deal to take a significant amount of money out of the market.

The NBA’s exclusive negotiating window with ESPN and Turner ends in the spring. Both companies have said they want to keep the NBA. NBC, Amazon, Apple, YouTube and Netflix are expected to engage the NBA once its exclusive window with ESPN and Turner is up.

Traditional media executives and their digital counterparts bristle at the idea that the current sports rights environment is a manufactured bubble that is bursting. These companies still place a lot of value on sports rights. It’s just that they are being more discerning on the types of sports they are willing to pay to have on their air.

It has created a situation where the biggest leagues and conferences — the NFL, NBA and top college conferences — still will command top dollar. The next tier of sports rights will be dependent on timing.

Turner, for example, took meetings about College Football Playoff rights. If it renews the NBA, it’s unlikely to be interested in the CFP. If, for whatever reason, it does not keep the NBA, it will be interested.

The bottom rung of sports rights is the one that will see rights fee money shrink considerably. In the current environment, networks are much less likely to take a flier on, say, a pickleball deal than they would have been in the past.

Media companies are making these decisions based on one main question: Will a sport drive distribution revenue or subscriber growth? Of course, the sport also has to generate viewership and ad sales.

For smaller leagues, networks will need to have business plans that show profitability from ad sales, since they are unlikely to drive distribution revenue.

The NWSL is closing in on deals with Amazon, CBS, ESPN and Scripps that, all told, will pay the league in the low eight figures, up from the $1.5 million CBS currently is paying. Sources with those media companies say they can sell enough ads around these games to justify the deal.

The other component to the tightening sports marketplace is that digital streaming companies, such as Amazon, Apple, Google and Netflix, are not spending as wildly on sports content as leagues and teams had hoped.

Amazon, for example, has approached the market in a manner similar to traditional media companies’ networks, where it wants specific packages rather than a tonnage of programming, according to several executives who have negotiated with the companies.

When Amazon was negotiating for Big Ten and Pac-12 rights, it wanted packages of programming that it could stream exclusively on specific nights. Think of the way it holds the exclusive rights to the NFL’s Thursday night games.

Apple, on the other hand, wants to control everything on a global basis and negotiates the types of deals where leagues and conferences share in the risk. As part of the Pac-12 deal that it negotiated, Apple would have held all global rights to that conference.

Google cut an NFL deal to carry “Sunday Ticket,” but so far has not been engaged in other rights deals. And Netflix takes calls from all the leagues and conferences, but it has yet to make a big splash in the business.

The good news is that the digital giants have dabbled in sports and are happy enough with sports rights that they are still cutting new deals.

The bad news is that their interest is not making up for the cutbacks from traditional media companies, creating the tightest sports rights marketplace in decades.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Trump could cash out his DJT stock within weeks. Here’s what happens if he sells

Published

 on

Former President Donald Trump is on the brink of a significant financial decision that could have far-reaching implications for both his personal wealth and the future of his fledgling social media company, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG). As the lockup period on his shares in TMTG, which owns Truth Social, nears its end, Trump could soon be free to sell his substantial stake in the company. However, the potential payday, which makes up a large portion of his net worth, comes with considerable risks for Trump and his supporters.

Trump’s stake in TMTG comprises nearly 59% of the company, amounting to 114,750,000 shares. As of now, this holding is valued at approximately $2.6 billion. These shares are currently under a lockup agreement, a common feature of initial public offerings (IPOs), designed to prevent company insiders from immediately selling their shares and potentially destabilizing the stock. The lockup, which began after TMTG’s merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), is set to expire on September 25, though it could end earlier if certain conditions are met.

Should Trump decide to sell his shares after the lockup expires, the market could respond in unpredictable ways. The sale of a substantial number of shares by a major stakeholder like Trump could flood the market, potentially driving down the stock price. Daniel Bradley, a finance professor at the University of South Florida, suggests that the market might react negatively to such a large sale, particularly if there aren’t enough buyers to absorb the supply. This could lead to a sharp decline in the stock’s value, impacting both Trump’s personal wealth and the company’s market standing.

Moreover, Trump’s involvement in Truth Social has been a key driver of investor interest. The platform, marketed as a free speech alternative to mainstream social media, has attracted a loyal user base largely due to Trump’s presence. If Trump were to sell his stake, it might signal a lack of confidence in the company, potentially shaking investor confidence and further depressing the stock price.

Trump’s decision is also influenced by his ongoing legal battles, which have already cost him over $100 million in legal fees. Selling his shares could provide a significant financial boost, helping him cover these mounting expenses. However, this move could also have political ramifications, especially as he continues his bid for the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential race.

Trump Media’s success is closely tied to Trump’s political fortunes. The company’s stock has shown volatility in response to developments in the presidential race, with Trump’s chances of winning having a direct impact on the stock’s value. If Trump sells his stake, it could be interpreted as a lack of confidence in his own political future, potentially undermining both his campaign and the company’s prospects.

Truth Social, the flagship product of TMTG, has faced challenges in generating traffic and advertising revenue, especially compared to established social media giants like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook. Despite this, the company’s valuation has remained high, fueled by investor speculation on Trump’s political future. If Trump remains in the race and manages to secure the presidency, the value of his shares could increase. Conversely, any missteps on the campaign trail could have the opposite effect, further destabilizing the stock.

As the lockup period comes to an end, Trump faces a critical decision that could shape the future of both his personal finances and Truth Social. Whether he chooses to hold onto his shares or cash out, the outcome will likely have significant consequences for the company, its investors, and Trump’s political aspirations.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Arizona man accused of social media threats to Trump is arrested

Published

 on

Cochise County, AZ — Law enforcement officials in Arizona have apprehended Ronald Lee Syvrud, a 66-year-old resident of Cochise County, after a manhunt was launched following alleged death threats he made against former President Donald Trump. The threats reportedly surfaced in social media posts over the past two weeks, as Trump visited the US-Mexico border in Cochise County on Thursday.

Syvrud, who hails from Benson, Arizona, located about 50 miles southeast of Tucson, was captured by the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office on Thursday afternoon. The Sheriff’s Office confirmed his arrest, stating, “This subject has been taken into custody without incident.”

In addition to the alleged threats against Trump, Syvrud is wanted for multiple offences, including failure to register as a sex offender. He also faces several warrants in both Wisconsin and Arizona, including charges for driving under the influence and a felony hit-and-run.

The timing of the arrest coincided with Trump’s visit to Cochise County, where he toured the US-Mexico border. During his visit, Trump addressed the ongoing border issues and criticized his political rival, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, for what he described as lax immigration policies. When asked by reporters about the ongoing manhunt for Syvrud, Trump responded, “No, I have not heard that, but I am not that surprised and the reason is because I want to do things that are very bad for the bad guys.”

This incident marks the latest in a series of threats against political figures during the current election cycle. Just earlier this month, a 66-year-old Virginia man was arrested on suspicion of making death threats against Vice President Kamala Harris and other public officials.

Continue Reading

Media

Trump Media & Technology Group Faces Declining Stock Amid Financial Struggles and Increased Competition

Published

 on

Tech News in Canada

Trump Media & Technology Group’s stock has taken a significant hit, dropping more than 11% this week following a disappointing earnings report and the return of former U.S. President Donald Trump to the rival social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. This decline is part of a broader downward trend for the parent company of Truth Social, with the stock plummeting nearly 43% since mid-July. Despite the sharp decline, some investors remain unfazed, expressing continued optimism for the company’s financial future or standing by their investment as a show of political support for Trump.

One such investor, Todd Schlanger, an interior designer from West Palm Beach, explained his commitment to the stock, stating, “I’m a Republican, so I supported him. When I found out about the stock, I got involved because I support the company and believe in free speech.” Schlanger, who owns around 1,000 shares, is a regular user of Truth Social and is excited about the company’s future, particularly its plans to expand its streaming services. He believes Truth Social has the potential to be as strong as Facebook or X, despite the stock’s recent struggles.

However, Truth Social’s stock performance is deeply tied to Trump’s political influence and the company’s ability to generate sustainable revenue, which has proven challenging. An earnings report released last Friday showed the company lost over $16 million in the three-month period ending in June. Revenue dropped by 30%, down to approximately $836,000 compared to $1.2 million during the same period last year.

In response to the earnings report, Truth Social CEO Devin Nunes emphasized the company’s strong cash position, highlighting $344 million in cash reserves and no debt. He also reiterated the company’s commitment to free speech, stating, “From the beginning, it was our intention to make Truth Social an impenetrable beachhead of free speech, and by taking extraordinary steps to minimize our reliance on Big Tech, that is exactly what we are doing.”

Despite these assurances, investors reacted negatively to the quarterly report, leading to a steep drop in stock price. The situation was further complicated by Trump’s return to X, where he posted for the first time in a year. Trump’s exclusivity agreement with Trump Media & Technology Group mandates that he posts personal content first on Truth Social. However, he is allowed to make politically related posts on other social media platforms, which he did earlier this week, potentially drawing users away from Truth Social.

For investors like Teri Lynn Roberson, who purchased shares near the company’s peak after it went public in March, the decline in stock value has been disheartening. However, Roberson remains unbothered by the poor performance, saying her investment was more about supporting Trump than making money. “I’m way at a loss, but I am OK with that. I am just watching it for fun,” Roberson said, adding that she sees Trump’s return to X as a positive move that could expand his reach beyond Truth Social’s “echo chamber.”

The stock’s performance holds significant financial implications for Trump himself, as he owns a 65% stake in Trump Media & Technology Group. According to Fortune, this stake represents a substantial portion of his net worth, which could be vulnerable if the company continues to struggle financially.

Analysts have described Truth Social as a “meme stock,” similar to companies like GameStop and AMC that saw their stock prices driven by ideological investments rather than business fundamentals. Tyler Richey, an analyst at Sevens Report Research, noted that the stock has ebbed and flowed based on sentiment toward Trump. He pointed out that the recent decline coincided with the rise of U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential nominee, which may have dampened perceptions of Trump’s 2024 election prospects.

Jay Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida, offered a grim long-term outlook for Truth Social, suggesting that the stock would likely remain volatile, but with an overall downward trend. “What’s lacking for the true believer in the company story is, ‘OK, where is the business strategy that will be generating revenue?'” Ritter said, highlighting the company’s struggle to produce a sustainable business model.

Still, for some investors, like Michael Rogers, a masonry company owner in North Carolina, their support for Trump Media & Technology Group is unwavering. Rogers, who owns over 10,000 shares, said he invested in the company both as a show of support for Trump and because of his belief in the company’s financial future. Despite concerns about the company’s revenue challenges, Rogers expressed confidence in the business, stating, “I’m in it for the long haul.”

Not all investors are as confident. Mitchell Standley, who made a significant return on his investment earlier this year by capitalizing on the hype surrounding Trump Media’s planned merger with Digital World Acquisition Corporation, has since moved on. “It was basically just a pump and dump,” Standley told ABC News. “I knew that once they merged, all of his supporters were going to dump a bunch of money into it and buy it up.” Now, Standley is staying away from the company, citing the lack of business fundamentals as the reason for his exit.

Truth Social’s future remains uncertain as it continues to struggle with financial losses and faces stiff competition from established social media platforms. While its user base and investor sentiment are bolstered by Trump’s political following, the company’s long-term viability will depend on its ability to create a sustainable revenue stream and maintain relevance in a crowded digital landscape.

As the company seeks to stabilize, the question remains whether its appeal to Trump’s supporters can translate into financial success or whether it will remain a volatile stock driven more by ideology than business fundamentals.

Continue Reading

Trending