adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Health

Mend the weak link, bar social gatherings by law – Winnipeg Free Press

Published

 on



When government issues a new law, most Manitobans follow it. It may take the threat of sanctions to gain compliance but most people obey the law, whether they agree with it or not.

By contrast, if government simply urges people to behave a certain way (without the weight of law) fewer will comply.

It’s human nature, and it has been seen in spades in Manitoba during the COVID-19 pandemic.

300x250x1

There have been two tracks of communication coming from the province: public health orders approved by cabinet, and “advice” from chief provincial public health officer Dr. Brent Roussin.

The messaging not to socialize outside households falls into the latter category.

Roussin has urged people not to intermingle outside their homes, but it’s just his advice — it’s not the law. By law, people are still allowed to invite up to five guests into their household.

That’s astonishing, given the COVID-19 case numbers in Manitoba. Hospital capacity is at a near-breaking point, ICUs are well above normal capacity, and there is now an alarming shortage of healthy, qualified health-care staff.

If Manitoba continues at this pace, the impact on mortality rates and hospital capacity will be catastrophic.

Roussin has urged people not to intermingle outside their homes, but it’s just his advice ‐ it’s not the law. By law, people are still allowed to invite up to five guests into their household.

Provincial officials came close last week to banning gatherings. They announced tough new rules Nov. 10, but got cold feet. Two days later, they issued a watered-down public health order that left gatherings of five intact (including the household-plus-five clause).

Roussin continues to urge people not to socialize outside their households. He’s been doing that for more than a month; it’s not working.

Manitobans can still invite up to five people into their homes to watch sporting events, have dinner, share drinks or socialize anyway they please. Many are, usually without face masks. It’s preposterous.

It doesn’t have to be the same five people, either. Households can host different people on different days, creating dozens of potential COVID-19 contacts in a single week.

If the rules aren’t crystal clear, even during a pandemic, people will get away with as much as they can.

Roussin argues it wasn’t practical to ban socializing outside households because there are exceptions to the rule, such as the need for some to assist ailing grandparents or provide child care to extended family.

It’s a weak argument.

Other jurisdictions, such as British Columbia, have drafted rules banning socializing outside households, while exempting those types of interactions. Manitoba could do the same, as it does with other aspects of its public health orders.

If government wants greater compliance, it has to put it in law, whether it’s widely enforced or not.

Wearing a mask in indoor public places is mandatory. But under Sec. 14(3) of the Manitoba order, there are seven exemptions where it doesn’t apply (including when someone can’t wear a mask for medical reasons).

It’s unclear whether Roussin intended last week to eliminate gatherings through a public health order and later changed his mind or whether the premier’s office overruled it. Either way, it was a mistake.

If government wants greater compliance, it has to put it in law, whether it’s widely enforced or not.

On Monday, Roussin said government needs more buy-in from the public when it comes to following the spirit and the letter of its orders. He complained some retail outlets were not following the 25 per cent capacity rule. (More enforcement is required if that’s happening.)

Government has to step up and turn some of its “advice” into legal orders, if it wants to improve compliance. It’s naive to expect the same results from both.

Premier Brian Pallister said Monday the province’s efforts to beat COVID-19 are only as good as the weakest link.

Allowing people to gather in their homes with others is one of the weakest links in the public health arsenal. It contributes to the spread of the virus, drives up hospital numbers, and results in more deaths.

It’s time to fix that link.

tom.brodbeck@freepress.mb.ca

Tom Brodbeck
Columnist

Tom has been covering Manitoba politics since the early 1990s and joined the Winnipeg Free Press news team in 2019.

   Read full biography

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Pregnant women in the Black Country urged to get whooping cough vaccine – BBC.com

Published

 on


Pregnant women urged to get whooping cough vaccine

Babies are routinely given the vaccine at eight, 12 and 16 weeks

Pregnant women in the Black Country are being urged to get vaccinated against whooping cough after a rise in cases.

The bacterial infection of the lungs spreads very easily and can cause serious problems, especially in babies and young children.

The Black Country Integrated Care Board (ICB) is advising pregnant women between 16 and 32 weeks to contact their GP to get the vaccine so their baby has protection from birth.

300x250x1

The UK Health Security Agency warned earlier this year of a steady decline in uptake of the vaccine in pregnant women and children.

Symptoms of the infection, also known as “100-day cough”, are similar to a cold, with a runny nose and sore throat.

Sally Roberts, chief nursing officer for the ICB, which covers Wolverhampton, Dudley, Walsall and Sandwell, said anyone could catch it, but it was more serious for young children and babies.

“Getting vaccinated while you’re pregnant is highly effective in protecting your baby from developing whooping cough in the first few weeks of their life – ideally from 16 weeks up to 32 weeks of pregnancy,” she said.

“If for any reason you miss having the vaccine, you can still have it up until you go into labour.”

Follow BBC West Midlands on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to: newsonline.westmidlands@bbc.co.uk

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Measles cases stabilize in Montreal – CityNews Montreal

Published

 on


The number of measles cases has stabilized, according to the Montreal Public Health.

Since March 25, there have been no contaminations reported within the community.

“Our teams have identified all contact cases of measles,” said media relations advisor Geneviève Paradis. “It’s a laborious task: each measles case produces hundreds of contacts.”

300x250x1

All community transmission cases since February 2024 have been caused by returning travelers who were either unvaccinated or partially vaccinated.

Currently, there are 18 measles cases in Montreal – with 46 total in Quebec. This according to the April 18 figures from the provincial government.

“With the summer vacations approaching, if you’re travelling, it is essential to check if you are protected against measles,” explained Paradis.

According to Montreal Public Health, a person needs to have received two doses after the age of 12 months to be immunized against the virus.

They’ve launched a vaccination campaign throughout the region, and currently, 11,341 people have been vaccinated against measles in Montreal between March 19 and April 15.

Vaccination is also being provided in schools and at local service points.

“The vaccination operation is under the responsibility of the five CIUSSS of the territory,” concluded Paradis.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Risk of bird flu spreading to humans is ‘enormous concern’, says WHO – The Guardian

Published

 on


The World Health Organization has raised concerns about the spread of H5N1 bird flu, which has an “extraordinarily high” mortality rate in humans.

An outbreak that began in 2020 has led to the deaths or killing of tens of millions of poultry. Most recently, the spread of the virus within several mammal species, including in domestic cattle in the US, has increased the risk of spillover to humans, the WHO said.

“This remains I think an enormous concern,” the UN health agency’s chief scientist, Jeremy Farrar, told reporters in Geneva.

300x250x1

Cows and goats joined the list of species affected last month – a surprising development for experts because they were not thought susceptible to this type of influenza. US authorities reported this month that a person in Texas was recovering from bird flu after being exposed to dairy cattle, with 16 herds across six states infected apparently after exposure to wild birds.

The A(H5N1) variant has become “a global zoonotic animal pandemic”, Farrar said.

“The great concern of course is that in … infecting ducks and chickens and then increasingly mammals, that virus now evolves and develops the ability to infect humans and then critically the ability to go from human to human,” he added.

So far, there is no evidence that H5N1 is spreading between humans. But in the hundreds of cases where humans have been infected through contact with animals over the past 20 years, “the mortality rate is extraordinarily high”, Farrar said, because humans have no natural immunity to the virus.

From 2003 to 2024, 889 cases and 463 deaths caused by H5N1 have been reported worldwide from 23 countries, according to the WHO, putting the case fatality rate at 52%.

The recent US case of human infection after contact with an infected mammal highlights the increased risk. When “you come into the mammalian population, then you’re getting closer to humans”, Farrar said, warning that “this virus is just looking for new, novel hosts”.

Farrar called for increased monitoring, saying it was “very important understanding how many human infections are happening … because that’s where adaptation [of the virus] will happen”.

“It’s a tragic thing to say, but if I get infected with H5N1 and I die, that’s the end of it,” he said. “If I go around the community and I spread it to somebody else then you start the cycle.”

He said efforts were under way towards the development of vaccines and therapeutics for H5N1, and stressed the need to ensure that regional and national health authorities around the world had the capacity to diagnose the virus.

This was being done so that “if H5N1 did come across to humans, with human-to-human transmission”, the world would be “in a position to immediately respond”, Farrar said, calling for equitable access to vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending