During his more than 30 years in local and provincial politics, “Bognor” Bill Murdoch was never short of things to say.
During his more than 30 years in local and provincial politics, “Bognor” Bill Murdoch was never short of things to say.
So it was Wednesday, when Murdoch held court from his bed in Chapman House, sounding strong and philosophical, though looking physically diminished. He’s been in hospice one week.
“Might have come to the end of the road, hey? Who knows,” he told a visitor.
“With you, who knows,” the visitor quipped.
“Well, I really don’t know. But we’re prepared for it.”
He talked about his years as Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound’s maverick MPP; a Progressive Conservative whose put his constituents before his party, all while displaying a keen ability to find the spotlight.
Murdoch’s Montreal Canadiens jerseys, signed by Habs greats, and other hockey memorabilia occupy the wall opposite his bed. He has a collection of 800 jerseys.
Hospice staff came and went. One smiled and asked him how much lunch he’d eaten. Family and friends have been visiting to wish him well.
He’s had a two-year fight with bouts of cancer and when he entered a coma in Owen Sound hospital, he was moved to the hospice. But Murdoch surprised everyone by waking up, hungry for a meal and hopeful.
It’s been 11 years since the 77-year-old left provincial politics. But the four-term MPP was never far. He’s been was on the air hosting the Open Line radio show on CFOS 560 AM. On Friday, people will be invited to call in with memories of him and he plans to listen in.
He helped found the Bruce Grey Music Hall of Fame, which fire destroyed this past January, along with the legion in Hepworth. Murdoch mentioned a concert fundraiser is coming up for it.
And Murdoch added his voice in 2017 to the ultimately successful pleas of fellow past Grey County wardens to keep Grey Gables a Grey County long-term care facility.
Murdoch lost his first run at the riding in 1987 to Liberal Ron Lipsett. But he won in 1990, beating Lipsett who placed third behind New Democrat Peggy Hutchinson. Murdoch handily won the following three provincial elections and chose not to run in 2011.
He was a passionate fighter who chose an independent path at Queen’s Park, where he felt power was too centralized and too many decisions were made for the elected members like him.
The premier picks the ministers, their associates and chairs of committees, which Murdoch has said caucus should do. And he’s suggested people should elect candidates who vow to do what the voters want, not what the premier tells them to.
“There’s not the democracy that we think we have in Canada. We elect dictators. There’s no doubt about it,” he said when he announced his retirement.
Wednesday he said it’s getting worse. Nothing personal, but the premier’s appointment of Rick Byers as the party’s nominee in this riding offended Murdoch’s guiding principle that locals should decide, he said. Byers won the election in June.
Murdoch also resented the expectations of party allegiance and said MPPs should only have to toe the party line on financial votes. He never was given a cabinet post and it’s easy to imagine why. But he was told why by then-premier Mike Harris.
“Mike sat down with me, he said Bill, I can’t put you in cabinet. I’d like to but you won’t do what you’re told,” Murdoch recounted Wednesday. “So I said, ‘I know. I’ll do what I think’s right for my riding.’”
Murdoch has admitted he probably attended the legislature the least of any MPP then because he said he saw no point in being there when he could be attending constituency events and serving local needs.
Sometimes his positions were controversial.
He was a ceaseless opponent of the Niagara Escarpment Commission because it overrode local say. It’s become “less intrusive,” perhaps because of the years of pushback, he said. Groups should buy land to protect it, and he joined and supports one which is doing this.
His popular opposition to industrial wind farms was based again on government overriding local decision-making.
An though he fought for an inquiry in to the Walkerton water disaster, opposition parties called for his resignation in 2003 when he suggested his Tory government bore no responsibility for the disaster and refused to apologize.
The Bognor beef farmer was an outspoken critic of his own government. And he despised the “Toronto mentality” in which unelected “bureaucrats” decided what’s best for rural ridings like his.
Some called it grandstanding and said he’d have achieved more for the riding by going along with his party. But that wouldn’t have been Murdoch’s way.
Murdoch says he understood media play an important part in the game of politics and he took advantage, whether he liked the media or not.
“You played the game the way you had to play it. I think. And I wasn’t always right either. I’d be the first to admit that.”
He was temporarily kicked out of caucus in 2008 after he opposed then-PC Leader John Tory’s support for funding private religious schools, suggesting Tory should find a new job. Yet he said he liked Tory.
In 2003, he threatened to embarrass Tim Hudak, then the consumer and business services minister, by calling for his resignation in the legislature the next day if government plans to close land registry offices in the morning happened — and they didn’t.
During his time in Mike Harris’ government, he stood up and demanded the resignation of a government minister, Bob Runciman, who tried to close Owen Sound Jail. Ultimately it was closed.
The inquiry into the Walkerton water tragedy was achieved after a standoff with the premier. At first Harris wanted a committee to study it, Murdoch has said. When the opposition demanded an inquiry, Murdoch told the Tories he would vote with the Liberals and NDP, which would look bad for the government.
Shortly before the vote on the Liberal motion, which was defeated, Murdoch was again urged to side with his party and was told Harris would call an inquiry the next morning if he did. Both men kept their ends of the agreement.
“I’m not bragging. But that’s why Mike broke. Because he couldn’t have a member from the area vote against him,” Murdoch said Wednesday.
Murdoch said he got what he wanted from Harris concerning Walkerton, including the Walkerton Clean Water Training Centre, which opened under the Liberal government. But he was irked that he wasn’t invited to help open it.
In fairness, Murdoch didn’t only target his party members.
He called Dalton McGuinty, when he was Ontario’s Liberal premier, a liar, in the legislature, for not consulting widely as promised about the new harmonized sales tax. Murdoch was tossed out then, too, but wouldn’t leave for two days.
And many times he directed his wrath at The Sun Times, even calling for a boycott of the paper after a Sun Times editorial endorsed another candidate.
Before provincial politics, Murdoch served 12 years on the former Sydenham Township council. By the mid- ’80s, concerns had grown about the many rural lot severances granted by Grey County’s planning approvals committee, which Murdoch chaired.
It ultimately led to the province assuming temporary planning authority in the county in 1991 and criticizing Grey’s planning procedures. At the time, Murdoch blamed a “Toronto mentality” for the takeover and “socialism to the very limit.”
His private involvement as a development partner in Sydenham Mills, a 25-lot luxury subdivision proposed for a hardwood bush lot in the township, which the Ontario Municipal Board ultimately rejected in 1990, also stirred up concerns.
It pitted provincial ministries and environmentalists against Murdoch, who was reeve of Sydenham at the time, and his development partners.
Though not especially religious, Murdoch remains open to a miracle, he said. He doesn’t want to die but acknowledges he doesn’t have much say about it. He feels badly for his family but they’ll move on, and so will the world, he said.
“The disease, whatever it is, is in my lung. They can’t operate. And we’ve quit any medication.” They’re keeping him comfortable, he said. “I know they feed me well.”
“I think he’s remarkable,” said his wife Sue. “And all the support we’ve seen, really over the last two years that he’s been ill, is amazing. And since we came here, just incredible.”
“But that’s a tribute to him, because he has a way with people,” she said, her voice catching at the thought.
Pakistan’s leaders and the man who wants to unseat them are engaged in high stakes political brinkmanship that is taking a toll on the collective psyche of the nation’s people – and many are exhausted.
As their politicians argue, citizens struggle with soaring inflation against an uptick in militant attacks. In major cities, residents regularly navigate police roadblocks for protests, school closures and internet shutdowns. And in the northern province of Kyber Pakhtunkhua, three people died last Thursday in a stampede to get subsidized bags of flour.
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s government is attempting to unlock billions of dollars in emergency financing from the International Monetary Fund, a process delayed since last November – but some people aren’t prepared to wait.
Government statistics show a surge in the number of citizens leaving Pakistan – up almost threefold in 2022 compared to previous years.
Zainab Abidi, who works in tech, left Pakistan for Dubai last August and says her “main worry” is for her family, who she “really hopes can get out.”
Others, like Fauzia Rashif, a cleaner in Islamabad, don’t have the option to leave.
“I don’t have a passport, I’ve never left the country. These days the biggest concern is the constant expenses. I worry about my children but there really isn’t anywhere to go,” she said.
Experts say the pessimism about the Pakistan’s stability in the months ahead is not misplaced, as the country’s political heavyweights tussle for power.
Maleeha Lodhi, former Pakistan ambassador to the United Nations, Britain and the United States, told CNN the “prolonged and intense nature” of the confrontation between Pakistan’s government and former Prime Minister Imran Khan is “unprecedented.”
She said the only way forward is for “all sides to step aside and call for a ceasefire through interlocutors to agree on a consensus for simultaneous provincial and national elections.”
That solution, however, is not something that can easily be achieved as both sides fight in the street – and in court.
The current wave of chaos can be traced back to April 2022, when Khan, a former cricket star who founded the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Party (PTI), was ousted from office in a vote of no confidence on grounds of mismanaging the economy.
In response, Khan rallied his supporters in street protests, accusing the current government of colluding with the military and the United States in a conspiracy to remove him from office, claims both parties rejected.
Khan survived an assassination attempt last November during one of his rallies and has since been beset with legal troubles spearheaded by Sharif’s government. As of March 21, Khan was facing six charges, while 84 have been registered against other PTI workers, according to the central police office in Lahore. However, Khan’s party claims that 127 cases have been lodged against him alone.
Earlier this month, attempts to arrest Khan from his residence in Lahore led to violent clashes with the police and Khan’s supporters camped outside. Khan told CNN the government was attempting to arrest him as a “pretext for them to get out of (holding) elections,” a claim rejected by information minister Mariyam Aurangzeb.
Days later, more clashes erupted when police arrived with bulldozers to clear the supporters from Khan’s home, and again outside Islamabad High Court as the former leader finally complied with an order to attend court.
Interior minister Rana Sanaullah told reporters that the police operation intended to “clear no-go areas” and “arrest miscreants hiding inside.” Human Rights Watch accused the police of using “abusive measures” and urged all sides to show restraint.
General elections are due to be held this October, but Khan has been pushing for elections months earlier. However, it’s not even clear if he’ll be able to contest the vote due to the push by the government to disqualify him.
Disqualification will mean that Khan can’t hold any parliamentary position, become involved in election campaigns, or lead his party.
Khan has already been disqualified by Pakistan’s Election Commission for making “false statements” regarding the sale of gifts sent to him while in office – an offense under the country’s constitution – but it will take the courts to cement the disqualification into law. A court date is still to be set for that hearing.
Yasser Kureshi, author of the book “Seeking Supremacy: The Pursuit of Judicial Power in Pakistan,” says Khan’s “ability to mobilize support” will “help raise the costs of any attempt to disqualify him.”
However, he said if Pakistan’s powerful military – led by government-appointed former spy chief Lt. Gen. Syed Asim Munir, who Khan once fired – is determined to expel the former leader, it could pressure the judiciary to rule him out, no matter how much it inflames Khan’s supporters.
“If the military leadership is united against Khan and committed to disqualifying and purging him, the pressure from the military may compel enough judges to relent and disqualify Khan, should that be the consensus within the military top brass,” said Kureshi, a lecturer in South Asian Studies at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom.
Qaiser Imam, president of the Islamabad Bar Association, disagreed with this statement. “Political parties, to save their politics, link themselves with certain narratives or perceptions which generally are never found correct,” he told CNN.
The Pakistan Armed Forces has often been blamed for meddling in the democratic process to maintain its authority, but in a statement last November outgoing army chief, Gen. Qamar Javed Bajwa, said a decision had been made in February that the military would not interfere in politics.
The army has previously rejected Khan’s claims it had anything to do with purported attempts on his life.
Some say the government’s recent actions have added to perceptions that it’s trying to stack the legal cards against Khan.
This week, the government introduced a bill to limit the power of the Chief Justice, who had agreed to hear a claim by the PTI against a move to delay an important by-election in Punjab, Pakistan’s most populated province, and one considered a marker for the party most likely to win national leadership.
It had been due to be held on April 30, but Pakistan’s Election Commission pushed it to October 8, citing security concerns.
In a briefing to international media last Friday, Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif said the security and economic situation had deteriorated in the past two months, and it was more cost effective to hold the vote at the same time as the general election.
The decision was immediately condemned by Khan as an act that “violated the constitution.”
Lodhi, the former ambassador, has criticized the delay, tweeting that a security threat had been “invoked to justify whatever is politically expedient.”
The PTI took the matter to the Supreme Court, where it’s still being heard.
Some have accused Khan of also trying to manipulate the court system in his favor.
Kureshi said the judiciary is fragmented, allowing Khan to “venue-shop” – taking charges against him from one judge to seek a more sympathetic hearing with another.
“At this time it seems that even the Supreme Court itself is split on how to deal with Imran Khan, which helps him maneuver within this fragmented institutional landscape,” Kureshi said.
The increasing acrimony at the highest level of politics shows no sign of ending – and in fact could prolong the uncertainty for Pakistan’s long-suffering people.
Khan is adamant the current government wants him dead without offering much tangible evidence. And in comments made to local media on Sunday, Sanaullah said the government once viewed Khan as a political opponent but now sees him as the “enemy.”
“(Khan) has in a straightforward way brought this country’s politics to a point where either only one can exist, either him or us. If we feel our existence is being negated, then we will go to whatever lengths needed and, in that situation, we will not see what is democratic or undemocratic, what is right and what is wrong,” he added.
PTI spokesman Fawad Chaudhry said the comments were “offensive” and threatened to take legal action. “The statement … goes against all norms of civilized world,” he said.
Ahmed Bilal Mehboob, the director the Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency, says Khan’s popularity gave him “the power to cripple the country,” should he push supporters to show their anger in the street.
However, Mehboob said Khan’s repeated attempts to call for an early election could create even more instability by provoking the government to impose article 232 of the constitution.
That would place the country under a state of emergency, delaying elections for a year.
And that would not be welcomed by a weary public already tired of living in uncertain times.
Correction: This story has been updated to correct the name of Gen. Qamar Javed Bajwa, the former army chief.
Lawyers representing Toronto MP Han Dong served Global News and several of its journalists with a libel notice over reporting alleging he spoke to a Chinese diplomat in February 2021 about delaying the release of the two Michaels who were detained in China at the time, and that he was a ‘witting affiliate’ of Chinese interference networks.
Dong tweeted a press release from his legal team announcing that the libel notice had been served Friday evening.
“We demanded that Global News issue a full apology and retraction of the false, malicious, irresponsible, and defamatory statements that Global News has published and broadcast about Mr. Dong,” the release from Polley Faith LLP reads.
Representatives from Global News told CTVNews.ca the network is “unable to provide comment” but referred back to a statement issued earlier this week saying: “Global News is governed by a rigorous set of Journalistic Principles and Practices. We are very mindful of the public interest and legal responsibility of this important accountability reporting.”
The libel notice comes after Global News published a story on March 23 alleging Han Dong told the Chinese consul general to Toronto that keeping Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor in prison would be politically damaging to the opposition Conservatives—an allegation Dong vehemently denies.
Last month, Global News also reported Dong was preferred by Beijing over another Chinese Canadian Liberal, and that he was a “witting affiliate” of Chinese interference networks.
The network attributed the information to unnamed national security officials. CTV News has not verified the allegations.
Under Ontario’s defamation law, the first step in a claim requires Dong to send the notice to the media outlet before filing a lawsuit seeking damages.
“Mr. Dong intends to bring a libel action against Global News and the people responsible for these publications to address these wrongs and clear his name,” Polley Faith LLP says.
In the notice of libel, Dong’s lawyers say he objects to “defamatory articles and broadcasts concerning him, published by Global News and Corus Entertainment.”
The court document demands the articles and broadcasts be taken down from Global News’ website within seven days, as well as demands a full apology and retraction of the story.
Since the report was released, Dong has stepped down from the Liberal caucus and now sits as an Independent MP.
Dong recently voted with the opposition and against the Liberals on a motion calling for a full public inquiry into alleged foreign interference in Canadian elections. In his statement, he said he did this to show that he had “nothing to hide.”
With files from CTV National News Senior Political Correspondent Glen McGregor
Former Conservative leader Erin O’Toole says that after more than a decade in politics, he will not seek re-election and plans to resign his seat this spring.
The Ontario MP led the Conservatives and served as official Opposition leader from August 2020 until February 2022, when a majority of his caucus voted to remove him from the post.
“I am a proud Conservative and had the unique privilege to lead our party amid a challenging time for our country,” he said in a statement shared on social media Friday morning.
“The Conservative Party is the party of Confederation and I know it will return to government offering the hope and ideas our country so desperately needs.
“I will help in any way I can.”
His ousting followed months of tensions over O’Toole’s management of caucus and attempts to moderate the party’s image after two consecutive election losses. Those efforts led to claims that he flip-flopped on key policy positions, including on carbon pricing and gun control, angering the party’s base. He also struggled to satisfy many with his position on vaccine mandates.
The ultimate shove came while the protesters of the “Freedom Convoy” descended on downtown Ottawa, honking their horns and decrying COVID-19 health restrictions. Many of them used expletive-laden flags critical of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that O’Toole said in a late 2022 blog post he hoped to see fewer of going forward.
In that same post, he warned of growing polarization in Canadian politics and suggested that symbols like the anti-Trudeau flags were “slowly normalizing rage and damaging our democracy.”
He wrote at the time that Trudeau was “my political opponent, not my enemy.”
Besides taking up more writing, the MP has kept a low profile on Parliament Hill since his time as leader ended.
In interviews he has given since, O’Toole has reflected on the difficulties of leading the party during the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic and in the face of suspected Chinese election meddling, which the party alleges targeted several Conservative-held ridings as O’Toole took a hawkish stand against the regime.
The military veteran-turned-lawyer was first elected in a 2012 byelection. He served as parliamentary secretary to the minister for international trade, then veterans affairs minister during the final year of Stephen Harper’s Conservative government before it lost power in 2015.
O’Toole took a first crack at running for the party leadership in the crowded 2017 race to replace Harper. He finished third.
He successfully ran for a second time in 2020, beating out his chief opponent, former cabinet minister Peter MacKay.
“I have been fortunate to have the opportunity to advance issues that I believe are critically important — from veterans’ mental health, to military preparedness, nuclear energy, Arctic sovereignty and a range of other important issues,” O’Toole said in Friday’s statement.
“I will continue to advance these interests and serve my constituents until the end of this session.”
Fellow Conservative MPs Scott Aitchison and Michelle Rempel Garner wished O’Toole, his wife and their two kids all the best on social media Friday, as did party president Rob Batherson.
O’Toole’s statement said he first broke the decision to his Durham constituency during a speech to a local trade board.
The upcoming seat vacancy is one of several that will need to be filled in byelections, unless a general election is called in the near future.
Last month, Candice Bergen, a longtime Manitoba MP who took over as interim leader after O’Toole, also announced she was leaving.
Edmonton Oilers deliver a statement performance in a 2-0 shutout of L.A.: Cult of Hockey Player Grade
The art of picking the perfect colour
UK economy avoids recession but businesses still wary
Staff reassigned to children’s ICU in Winnipeg, some surgeries postponed: Shared Health – Global News
Apr 1: Tyrannosaur lips, bald eagles dine on beef, saving the orbital environment and more… – CBC.ca
For resort town workers, housing scarcity is worsening
High-risk places affected by respiratory outbreaks
'Pandora's Box': Doctors Warn of Rising Plant Fungus Infections in People After 'First of Its Kind' Case – VICE