adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

New coronavirus shocks Texas economy and unemployment could spike – The Texas Tribune

Published

 on


HOUSTON — The novel coronavirus is sparking an economic slide that has sent governments scrambling, put people out of work and left businesses on the brink of closing, if they haven’t already.

In Texas, the economic double whammy of the public health crisis combined with the steep drop in oil prices has experts here unclear about how deeply COVID-19 will impact the state’s economy.

But they are certain about the sensation it will deliver.

300x250x1

“It’s going to hurt,” said Julia Coronado, a financial consultant who also teaches at the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas at Austin. “There’s the health shock and the oil shock. It’s going to be an extra hit on the state’s economy.”

As Texans limit how much they’re in public as they wait out the public health crisis, many people have lost jobs or had their hours cut by businesses adapting to limited or shuttered operations. That’s left unknown numbers of Texans in need of money to cover housing costs and other essential expenses. President Donald Trump’s administration put together a $1 trillion economic stimulus plan, about half of which is earmarked as direct payments to individuals.

But experts warned they don’t know yet when money will arrive.

Many hope Congress can agree — quickly — on the package’s details, after the U.S. Senate passed legislation Wednesday that would allow free testing for COVID-19, expand paid sick leave measures and provide financial boosts to food assistance programs.

Meanwhile, John W. Diamond, director of the Center for Public Finance at Rice University’s Baker Institute, said Texas’ 3.5% unemployment rate, barely better than the country’s 3.6% rate, likely will not last.

From March 8 through March 14, there were 19,968 unemployment insurance claims filed with the Texas Workforce Commission, 7,383 more than were filed during the same week in 2019. But those new figures don’t include people out of jobs or facing fewer hours since local governments across the state banned dine-in restaurant service and shuttered bars this week. Gov. Greg Abbott is expected to make an announcement Thursday about whether he plans statewide closures of bars and a statewide prohibition on dine-in services at restaurants.

Analysts expect the state’s unemployment number to go up once this week’s numbers are recorded.

“I wouldn’t be shocked if we saw unemployment levels here up to 5%,” Diamond said.

The Texas Workforce Commission, which receives unemployment insurance claim applications, expects to see a crush of submissions, but a spokesman said the agency “has over 1,000 staff helping support unemployment insurance services.”

Milena Arias, 26, moved to Austin in late February to look for jobs in mass communications. She had only been a server at Lucy’s Fried Chicken for a week and a few days when the local chain laid her off, anticipating a loss of business due to the COVID-19 crisis.

Arias has been planning to file for unemployment, but she hasn’t been able to cut through the busy phone lines at the Texas Workforce Commission. She said she understands the spike in traffic but wishes government agencies would have had a plan for the economic impacts of the coronavirus.

“That’s kind of the frustrating thing, its definitely like no one was prepared for this,” Arias said.

Larry Stuart, an employment lawyer in Houston, said employees could apply for unemployment benefits if they are laid off, they are furloughed or their hours are significantly reduced. Employers, if they’d prefer, could cut an employee’s hours but continue offering the employee work on a scaled-down, part-time basis, and the employee could still apply for unemployment, Stuart said.

Whether unemployment benefits will be enough to stem an economic slide is another question.

“There’s a good chance we’re going to go into a recession,” said Stuart, who’s also a business professor at Rice University. “And that doesn’t bode well for longer-term employment.”

Meanwhile, the state is sitting on billions in its Economic Stabilization Fund, analysts said. But the same forces hurting the economy and household finances are also battering state revenues and coffers.

The majority of the state budget relies on retail sales tax revenues and the energy sector, which saw oil prices plummet to around $22 a barrel Wednesday, down from over $60 a barrel at the beginning of the year, perhaps shaking the industry more in Texas than anywhere else.

“Texas is likely to go from pulling up the national economy, like it did last year, to pulling down the national economy this year,” said Keith R. Phillips, an economist with the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas since 1984. “And that’s because of the sharp decline of the energy sector.”

Some form of relief, however, could come with housing — at least for some people. On Wednesday, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development announced a 60-day moratorium on evictions and foreclosures for homeowners with federally backed loans.

But experts say that all homeowners and renters deserve relief during the ongoing crisis.

In Texas, housing advocates are calling for a statewide moratorium on evictions and foreclosures of mortgages that are not backed by the federal government. Abbott’s patchwork response to the virus has left Texans in different counties facing different financial fates as many workers’ abilities to earn income are undermined by the need to stop the spread of the virus.

“We have to think that this is an incredibly traumatic moment, and it is inhumane to continue pursuing evictions,” said Christina Rosales, deputy director of the advocacy organization Texas Housers.

Some counties and courts are considering evictions and foreclosures “nonessential” cases and are following the recommendations of the state judicial branch to temporarily postpone them. But, Rosales said, there isn’t any uniformity.

“Some are halting them for two weeks, some for two months,” she said. “We don’t have any idea how long this will last, but ideally this needs to be uniform, and the state can accomplish that.”

A spokesman for Abbott’s office did not respond to requests for comment about what the governor’s options are or whether he is considering any moratoriums on evictions and foreclosures.

Smaller businesses have not typically received great amounts of money from large federal economic stimulus packages, as large sectors such as energy and the airlines often have. But the latest federal stimulus package does have $300 billion earmarked for such companies.

And the U.S. Small Business Administration announced updates Tuesday to its application process in hopes of expediting it, which could be a viable option for many businesses in Texas hit hard by social distancing that experts say will slow the public health crisis.

“It’s really a difficult spot for small businesses right now,” Phillips said, “because they don’t know how long this is going to last. And I wish I could tell them. I wish I knew that.”

Carrington Tatum and Juan Pablo Garnham contributed to this report.

Disclosure: The McCombs School of Business and Rice University have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

Related News

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Can falling interest rates improve fairness in the economy? – The Globe and Mail

Published

 on


The ‘poor borrower’ narrative rules in media coverage of the Bank of Canada and high interest rates, and that’s appropriate.

A lot of people have been financially slammed by the rate hikes of the past couple of years, which have made it much more expensive to carry a mortgage, lines of credit and other borrowing. The latest from the Bank of Canada suggests rate cuts will come as soon as this summer, which on the whole would be a welcome development. It’s not just borrowers who need relief – the boarder economy has slowed to a crawl because of high borrowing costs.

But high rates are also a big win for some people. Specifically, those who have little or no debt and who have a significant amount of money sitting in savings products and guaranteed investment certificates. The country’s most well-off people, in other words.

300x250x1

Lower rates will mean diminished returns for savers and less interest paid by borrowers. It’s a stretch to say lower rates will improve financial inequality, but they do add a little more fairness to our financial system.

Wealth inequality is often presented as the chasm between well-off people able to pay for houses, vehicles, trips and high-end restaurant meals and those who are driving record use of food banks and living in tent cities. High interest rates and inflation have given us more nuance in wealth inequality. People fortunate enough to have bought houses in recent years are staggering as they try to manage mortgage payments that have risen by hundreds of dollars a month. You can see their struggles in rising numbers of late payments and debt defaults.

Rates are expected to fall in a measured, gradual way, which means their impact on financial inequality won’t be an instant gamechanger. But if the Bank of Canada cuts 0.25 of a percentage point off the overnight rate in June and again in July, many borrowers will start noticing how much less interest they’re paying, and savers will find themselves earning less.


Subscribe to Carrick on Money

Are you reading this newsletter on the web or did someone forward the e-mail version to you? If so, you can sign up for Carrick on Money here.


Rob’s personal finance reading list

Snowballs and avalanches

A look at two strategies for paying off debt – the debt avalanche and the debt snowball. I’ll go with the avalanche.

How not to ruin your kitchen countertop

Anyone who has renovated a kitchen lately knows how expensive stone countertops can be. Look after yours by protecting it from a few common kitchen items.

What you need to know about stock market corrections

A helpful explanation of stock market corrections. It seems an opportune time to look at corrections, given how volatile stocks have been lately. Like scouts, investors should always be prepared.

Put that snack back

Food inflation requires more careful grocery shopping. Here’s a roundup of food products – cookies, snacks, ice cream – that don’t taste as good as they used to. Food companies have always adjusted their recipes from time to time. Is this happening more because of inflation’s impact on raw material prices? A U.S. list – most products are available are familiar to Canadians, too.


Ask Rob

Q: I have Tangerine children’s accounts for my kids. Can you suggest a better alternative?

A: The rate on the Tangerine children’s account is 0.8 per cent, which actually compares well to the big banks and their comparable accounts. For kids aged 13 and up, check out something new called the JA Money Card.

Do you have a question for me? Send it my way. Sorry I can’t answer every one personally. Questions and answers are edited for length and clarity.


Tools and guides

A comprehensive guide on how to build a good credit score.


In the social sphere

Social Media: An offbeat way of fighting high food costs

Watch: Is now the hardest time ever to buy a home?

Money-Free Zone: Singer-songwriter Maggie Rogers has a new album called Don’t Forget Me and it’s generating some buzz because it’s a great listen. Smooth vocals and a laid back countryish vibe that hits a faster pace on one of my favourite cuts, Drunk.


More PF from The Globe

– He keeps ‘a few thousand in crisp new bills’ at home – is that a good idea?

– The pension pivot: Employers recognizing that workers need help with debt as much as retirement

– Her bond ETF is ‘a dud and not promising at all’ – should she sell?

– Despite high fees, Canadians remain perplexingly loyal to mutual funds. Here’s why


More Rob Carrick and money coverage

Subscribe to Stress Test on Apple podcasts or Spotify. For more money stories, follow me on Instagram and Twitter, and join the discussion on my Facebook page. Millennial readers, join our Gen Y Money Facebook group.

Even more coverage from Rob Carrick:

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

LIVE: Freeland joins panel on Indigenous economy – CTV News Montreal

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

LIVE: Freeland joins panel on Indigenous economy  CTV News Montreal

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

What to read about India's economy – The Economist

Published

 on


AS INDIA GOES to the polls, Narendra Modi, the prime minister, can boast that the world’s largest election is taking place in its fastest-growing major economy. India’s GDP, at $3.5trn, is now the fifth biggest in the world—larger than that of Britain, its former colonial ruler. The government is investing heavily in roads, railways, ports, energy and digital infrastructure. Many multinational companies, pursuing a “China plus one” strategy to diversify their supply chains, are eyeing India as the unnamed “one”. This economic momentum will surely help Mr Modi win a third term. By the time he finishes it in another five years or so, India’s GDP might reach $6trn, according to some independent forecasts, making it the third-biggest economy in the world.

But India is prone to premature triumphalism. It has enjoyed such moments of optimism in the past and squandered them. Its economic record, like many of its roads, is marked by potholes. Its people remain woefully underemployed. Although its population recently overtook China’s, its labour force is only 76% the size. (The percentage of women taking part in the workforce is about the same as in Saudi Arabia.) Investment by private firms is still a smaller share of GDP than it was before the global financial crisis of 2008. When Mr Modi took office, India’s income per person was only a fifth of China’s (at market exchange rates). It remains the same fraction today. These six books help to chart India’s circuitous economic journey and assess Mr Modi’s mixed economic record.

Breaking the Mould: Reimagining India’s Economic Future. By Raghuram Rajan and Rohit Lamba. Penguin Business; 336 pages; $49.99

300x250x1

Before Mr Modi came to office, India was an unhappy member of the “fragile five” group of emerging markets. Its escape from this club owes a lot to Raghuram Rajan, who led the country’s central bank from 2013 to 2016. In this book he and Mr Lamba of Pennsylvania State University express impatience with warring narratives of “unmitigated” optimism and pessimism about India’s economy. They make the provocative argument that India should not aspire to be a manufacturing powerhouse like China (a “faux China” as they put it), both because India is inherently different and because the world has changed. India’s land is harder to expropriate and its labour harder to exploit. Technological advances have also made services easier to export and manufacturing a less plentiful source of jobs. Their book is sprinkled with pen portraits of the kind of industries they believe can prosper in India, including chip design, remote education—and well-packaged idli batter. Both authors regret India’s turn towards tub-thumping majoritarianism, which they think will ultimately inhibit its creativity and hence its economic prospects. Nonetheless this is a work of mitigated optimism.

New India: Reclaiming the Lost Glory. By Arvind Panagariya. Oxford University Press; 288 pages

This book provides a useful foil for “Breaking the Mould”. Arvind Panagariya took leave from Columbia University to serve as the head of a government think-tank set up by Mr Modi to replace the old Planning Commission. The author is ungrudging in his praise for the prime minister and unsparing in his disdain for the Congress-led government he swept aside. Mr Panagariya also retains faith in the potential of labour-intensive manufacturing to create the jobs India so desperately needs. The country, he argues in a phrase borrowed from Mao’s China, must walk on two legs—manufacturing and services. To do that, it should streamline its labour laws, keep the rupee competitive and rationalise tariffs at 7% or so. The book adds a “miscellany” of other reforms (including raising the inflation target, auctioning unused government land and removing price floors for crops) that would keep Mr Modi busy no matter how long he stays in office.

The Lost Decade 2008-18: How India’s Growth Story Devolved into Growth without a Story. By Puja Mehra. Ebury Press; 360 pages; $21

Both Mr Rajan and Mr Panagariya make an appearance in this well-reported account of India’s economic policymaking from 2008 to 2018. Ms Mehra, a financial journalist, describes the corruption and misjudgments of the previous government and the disappointments of Mr Modi’s first term. The prime minister was exquisitely attentive to political threats but complacent about more imminent economic dangers. His government was, for example, slow to stump up the money required by India’s public-sector banks after Mr Rajan and others exposed the true scale of their bad loans to India’s corporate titans. One civil servant recounts long, dull meetings in which Mr Modi monitored his piecemeal welfare schemes, even as deeper reforms languished. “The only thing to do was to polish off all the peanuts and chana.”

The Billionaire Raj: A Journey Through India’s New Gilded Age. By James Crabtree. Oneworld Publications; 416 pages; $7.97

For a closer look at those corporate titans, turn to the “Billionaire Raj” by James Crabtree, formerly of the Financial Times. The prologue describes the mysterious late-night crash of an Aston Martin supercar, registered to a subsidiary of Reliance, a conglomerate owned by Mukesh Ambani, India’s richest man. Rumours swirl about who was behind the wheel, even after an employee turns himself in. The police tell Mr Crabtree that the car has been impounded for tests. But he spots it abandoned on the kerb outside the police station, hidden under a plastic sheet. It was still there months later. Mr Crabtree goes on to lift the covers on the achievements, follies and influence of India’s other “Bollygarchs”. They include Vijay Mallya, the former owner of Kingfisher beer and airlines. Once known as the King of Good Times, he moved to Britain from where he faces extradition for financial crimes. Mr Crabtree meets him in drizzly London, where the chastened hedonist is only “modestly late” for the interview. Only once do the author’s journalistic instincts fail him. He receives an invitation to the wedding of the son of Gautam Adani. The controversial billionaire is known for his close proximity to Mr Modi and his equally close acquaintance with jaw-dropping levels of debt. The bash might have warranted its own chapter in this book. But Mr Crabtree, unaccustomed to wedding invitations from strangers, declines to attend.

Unequal: Why India Lags Behind its Neighbours. By Swati Narayan. Context; 370 pages; $35.99

Far from the bling of the Bollygarchs or the ministries of Delhi, Swati Narayan’s book draw son her sociological fieldwork in the villages of India’s south and its borderlands with Bangladesh and Nepal. She tackles “the South Asian enigma”: why have some of India’s poorer neighbours (and some of its southern states) surpassed India’s heartland on so many social indicators, including health, education, nutrition and sanitation. Girls in Bangladesh have a longer life expectancy than in India, and fewer of them will be underweight for their age. Her argument is illustrated with a grab-bag of statistics and compelling vignettes: from abandoned clinics in Bihar, birthing centres in Nepal, and well-appointed child-care centres in the southern state of Kerala. In a Bangladeshi border village, farmers laugh at their Indian neighbours who still defecate in the fields. She details the cruel divisions of caste, class, religion and gender that still oppress so many people in India and undermine the common purpose that social progress requires.

How British Rule Changed India’s Economy: The Paradox of the Raj. By Tirthankar Roy. Springer International; 159 pages; $69.99

Many commentators describe the British Empire as a relentless machine for draining India’s wealth. But that may give it too much credit. The Raj was surprisingly small, makeshift and often ineffectual. It relied too heavily on land for its revenues, which rarely exceeded 7% of GDP, points out Tirthankar Roy of the London School of Economics. It spent more on infrastructure and less on luxuries than the Mughal empire that preceded it. But it neglected health care and education. India’s GDP per person barely grew from 1914 to 1947. Mr Roy reveals the great divergence within India that is masked by that damning average. Britain’s “merchant Empire”, committed to globalisation, was good for coastal commerce, but left the countryside poor and stagnant. Unfortunately, for the rural masses, moving from rural areas to the city was never easy. Indeed, some of the social barriers to mobility that Mr Roy lists in this book about India’s economic past still loom large in books about its future.

Also try

We regularly publish special reports on India, the latest, in April 2024, focuses on the economy. Please also subscribe to our weekly Essential India newsletter, to make sure you don’t miss any of our comprehensive coverage of the country’s economy, politics and society.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending