adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Art

Not 'Real Art' – The Sheridan Press

Published

 on


It’s funny how our egos can churn a simple statement into a personal affront. An artist quoted as saying he doesn’t paint cows because it “doesn’t mean anything,” offended the part of me who’s insecure in my lack of formal artistic training.

In my mind I defended my work — that while my art is not about social injustice or political statements, people experiencing it relate to the emotions they feel in my expressive animal paintings. Aesthetic work, though bucolic or banal, can still speak through the way it’s expressed.

Then I found myself thinking, just like that artist: “My paintings say more than art of the ____ style.” Sonja, you’re such a hypocrite! Don’t we all do this at times: place our work and ourselves on a sliding scale of assessment against those we regard as above or below us in our particular preference? If not with what we create, we likely do this in some manner with our appearance, occupation, income, religion, political beliefs or social standing.

Mark Twain said, “Comparison is the death of joy.” If our self-worth is based on where we or our work stand on the scale of public opinion, we’re missing the point; likewise, if we’re judging others on this same scale, we’re missing experiences that will help us relate and grow as artists and as people.

Many artists prefer art which lies close on the spectrum to their own style, or what they are striving for in their work. People identify genres they consider “not real art.” We’re all biased for or against particular styles of art, just as we are with music, books and food. Some people see “love and joy” in my loose, painterly works, yet many others, especially in this area, prefer photorealism, merely tolerate my work, and disparage more modern, or abstract art. In another part of the world, the public opinion would be flipped over.

I’m grateful to live in an area where cow paintings are appreciated, to make a decent living creating what some consider “not real art.” But instead of placing my work on a mental hierarchy against work I don’t appreciate, I can explore what the artist was expressing. Instead of agreeing with and indulging people’s biases, I can help them understand art they don’t favor by pointing out qualities that make it “art,” and thereby aid viewers to experience and accept a broader world of artistic styles. They don’t have to like it, but I can encourage them to search for meaning in it.

Knowing that as artists, our art won’t please everyone, we shouldn’t disregard any artist’s work or genre until we’ve seen it in person. I didn’t esteem Mark Rothko’s work as “real art” until I walked into a room of his large color field paintings at the National Gallery in Washington, D.C. Personally experiencing the extreme emotion of color on large canvases spoke volumes, compared to the boring little strips of colors on pages of books, that didn’t say or mean anything to me.

If instead of categorizing it “not real art,” we sought to personally experience art we don’t like or understand, it could broaden our minds to trying new foods, music, books, and, in turn, reduce our need to fit in, judge or compare ourselves or our work to others.

Sonja Caywood is a local artist in Dayton.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

40 Random Bits of Trivia About Artists and the Artsy Art That They Articulate – Cracked.com

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

40 Random Bits of Trivia About Artists and the Artsy Art That They Articulate  Cracked.com

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

John Little, whose paintings showed the raw side of Montreal, dies at 96 – CBC.ca

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

John Little, whose paintings showed the raw side of Montreal, dies at 96  CBC.ca

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

A misspelled memorial to the Brontë sisters gets its dots back at last

Published

 on

 

LONDON (AP) — With a few daubs of a paintbrush, the Brontë sisters have got their dots back.

More than eight decades after it was installed, a memorial to the three 19th-century sibling novelists in London’s Westminster Abbey was amended Thursday to restore the diaereses – the two dots over the e in their surname.

The dots — which indicate that the name is pronounced “brontay” rather than “bront” — were omitted when the stone tablet commemorating Charlotte, Emily and Anne was erected in the abbey’s Poets’ Corner in October 1939, just after the outbreak of World War II.

They were restored after Brontë historian Sharon Wright, editor of the Brontë Society Gazette, raised the issue with Dean of Westminster David Hoyle. The abbey asked its stonemason to tap in the dots and its conservator to paint them.

“There’s no paper record for anyone complaining about this or mentioning this, so I just wanted to put it right, really,” Wright said. “These three Yorkshire women deserve their place here, but they also deserve to have their name spelled correctly.”

It’s believed the writers’ Irish father Patrick changed the spelling of his surname from Brunty or Prunty when he went to university in England.

Raised on the wild Yorkshire moors, all three sisters died before they were 40, leaving enduring novels including Charlotte’s “Jane Eyre,” Emily’s “Wuthering Heights” and Anne’s “The Tenant of Wildfell Hall.”

Rebecca Yorke, director of the Brontë Society, welcomed the restoration.

“As the Brontës and their work are loved and respected all over the world, it’s entirely appropriate that their name is spelled correctly on their memorial,” she said.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending