adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

On rare occasions, politicians do right by admitting their mistakes

Published

 on

Open this photo in gallery:

Immigration Minister Marc Miller recently acknowledged that the volume of international students – especially those drawn by fraudulent programs – and postgraduate work permits were issues Canada needed to ‘get under control.’Spencer Colby/The Canadian Press

Marc Miller, the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship, gave a press conference in early December to announce tweaks to Canada’s admission policies for international students. He said some really weird stuff.

A reporter asked if the minister had numbers on how many fewer people would come to Canada because of a rule change requiring them to demonstrate greater financial resources. Mr. Miller said he and his team were “currently looking at that,” but acknowledged things would change.

“I mean, it is what it is,” he said. “We compete with other countries for some of the top talent, but clearly, we have become a country that has been targeted for abuse and exploitation by some unsavoury actors and we need to be able to address that head-on.”

Did you catch that? He openly acknowledged that a rule change would cause something to happen, but argued the trade-off was worth it. And then he acknowledged that the current state of affairs had caused big problems.

Another journalist asked about reports that some Canadians had been told their Palestinian grandchildren could not be evacuated from the Mideast war zone while others had obtained exit visas for their Israeli grandchildren.

“It doesn’t make sense to deny children,” Mr. Miller agreed. “We have a limited window to advocate for a limited group of people in a different context – we are talking about a war zone. And it’s one where we have tried our best to be flexible and mistakes are made at times, with the fact that it costs, sometimes, people’s lives.”

So: He admitted to information he didn’t have, acknowledged things are unfolding quickly and imperfectly and admitted not only that mistakes happen, but that they can have life-or-death consequences

A couple of weeks later, Mr. Miller was at it again in a different press conference. This time a reporter cited a Bank of Canada report that suggested Canada would need to build new housing about as fast as rudimentary Lego kits. The reporter asked if the minister thought it was fair to bring in so many students and temporary foreign workers in the face of our existing housing problems.

“It’s clear that that does put pressure on the system and particularly our housing needs,” Mr. Miller said. He conceded that the volume of international students – especially those drawn by fraudulent programs – and postgraduate work permits were things Canada needed to “get under control.”

Colour commentary: He did not scold a reporter for having an uncouth question and he acknowledged a huge increase in temporary residents had exacerbated the shortage of affordable and available housing in Canada.

That is some wild stuff.

Assuming that you are a healthy and normal person who does not watch press conferences on the regular, I might need to underline how unusual all of this is, how it registers like a trickle of cool water in the brain-baking desert of good-vibes-only defensiveness that is Justin Trudeau’s Ottawa.

Around here, one simply does not acknowledge difficult trade-offs or the need to change tactics. In this town, you don’t announce a new policy because the old one didn’t work out; you simply “continue to” do the effective and valorous work you’ve been doing all along. Mistakes don’t exist, and if they did, you sure don’t point at them.

The refusal to use the filthy M-word is rampant in politics well beyond the government Mr. Miller belongs to, of course. But there have been a few notable exceptions who found admitting mistakes so useful that it became part of their political identity.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford has at times governed by applause metre, as if he was living inside some old-timey game show where the cheers or hisses from the audience told him what to do. In the face of widespread public howling, he’s undone policies including halting random police stops to enforce pandemic restrictions and invoking the notwithstanding clause to impose a contract on education workers. In September, he walked back his government’s decision to open up the Greenbelt to development, saying he was “very, very sorry” for breaking a promise, and that doing so had been “a mistake.”

For late Alberta premier Ralph Klein, gamely admitting to a screw-up was part of what that made Albertans adore him as their everyman “Ralph.” Policy false starts, inappropriate comments lobbed in public and blatant flip-flops were all diffused by his walk-backs.

Not long after winning his third decisive electoral victory, in 2001, a drunken Mr. Klein wandered into a homeless shelter, told the people there to get a job and flung some money on the floor. Once the story went public, he tearfully admitted to a drinking problem and suffered no apparent damage to his reputation.

Mr. Klein and Mr. Ford were both populist conservatives, so maybe it’s a bit easier to choke out a mea culpa if you can lace it with the word “folks,” or if it further endears you to a public that already likes your messy un-elite humanity.

But whether in life or politics, saying “I screwed up” is often both the right thing to do and useful.

Whether it’s crafting public policy or making things right with a spouse whose feelings you’ve hurt, there is no path to doing something better that doesn’t pass through admitting you weren’t doing so well in the first place.

And anyone who’s ever been stuck in a protracted argument knows the best way to diffuse things is to simply say you were wrong. Your angry spouse – or, say the surly public that is just absolutely done with your government’s whole deal after eight years – may not be mollified by your mea culpa. But they’re sure not getting less angry as long as you keep insisting you’ve been right all along.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending