adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

Online harms debate pits real threats against elaborate fears

Published

 on

Announcing the government’s new online harms legislation on Monday, Justice Minister Arif Virani led with the realities the bill is supposed to address.

After introducing two women who spoke about their own experiences with child abuse and harassment, Virani said his bill would create three “overarching obligations” for major online platforms: “a duty to protect children, a duty to act responsibly and the duty to remove the most egregious content.”

Specifically, Virani said, C-63 “targets the worst of what we see online, content that sexually victimizes children or revictimizes survivors, intimate content shared without consent, content that incites violence, extremism or terrorism, or foments hatred and content that is used to bully a child or induce a child to self-harm.”

Virani then made a point of underlining what he says the bill won’t do.

“It does not undermine freedom of speech,” the minister said.

That statement almost certainly was aimed at Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, who rejected the bill last week before getting a chance to read it.

Poilievre’s pre-emptive criticism

Asked about the impending legislation last Wednesday — five days before it was tabled in the House of Commons — Poilievre described it as “Justin Trudeau’s latest attack on freedom of expression,” part of a “woke authoritarian agenda” that would see Trudeau ban “unacceptable views.”

“Go down the list of things that Justin Trudeau disapproves of and you can imagine all of the things that will be criminalized,” Poilievre said.

The Conservative leader’s predictions had something in common with his party’s opposition to an earlier piece of legislation, the Online Streaming Act. The government introduced and passed that bill with the stated purpose of compelling major Internet platforms to promote and support Canadian content. The Conservatives said it was “censorship.”

It might be tempting to conclude that the Conservatives are simply opposed to all regulation of the Internet — and willing to indulge the worst fears of their supporters. But then, Poilievre also has said a government led by him would compel websites showing pornographic content to verify the ages of their users.

Online harms bill sparks personal attacks from opposition

 

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is taking aim at the prime minister and the government’s plan to fight online hate. Poilievre launched a very personal attack against his political rival, pointing to his past use of blackface. Justin Trudeau fought back, arguing Poilievre’s only plan is to sow division.

The Conservatives also can’t quite claim to be completely opposed to restrictions on speech. Poilievre was a minister in a Conservative government that made it a crime to promote terrorism. His deputy leader, Melissa Lantsman, has said that the “glorification of terror” should not be allowed.

What C-63 does and doesn’t do

Poilievre may have been disappointed on Monday afternoon when the legislation was finally tabled. After running their intentions through multiple rounds of consultations, the government ended up with a rather narrow piece of legislation.

Platforms will be required to produce “digital safety plans” to mitigate the risk that users will be exposed to harmful content, and they will be subjected to new oversight and transparency requirements. But they will only be required to remove two types of content — material that sexually victimizes a child and intimate content posted without consent.

The legislation does not deal with “misinformation” or “disinformation” and it does not cover private communication — thus avoiding some of the most fraught questions about the digital world.

The bill would create three new bodies to enforce these new rules and assist users. Some pundits will grumble about “bureaucracy.” On the other hand, rules don’t magically enforce themselves.

New online harms bill proposes changes to Criminal Code | Power & Politics

 

The Liberal government introduced its long-promised online harms bill Monday, proposing new regulatory bodies and changes to a number of laws in new legislation to tackle online abuse. Justice Minister Arif Virani discusses the new bill. Plus, Emily Laidlaw, Canada research chair in cybersecurity law weighs in.

In a written statement released on Tuesday, Poilievre suggested police and the courts should be sufficient to deal with harmful content. That might lead the government to restate part of the justification for its legislation — that the justice system isn’t nimble enough to deal with a fast-moving problem.

While the harms being targeted by the legislation are real, the onus is always on the government to tread carefully when it acts to regulate expression — and C-63 deserves to be thoroughly poked and prodded by a parliamentary committee. Even if experts in digital issues were largely pleased with what they saw on Monday, many acknowledged that the details will matter.

If anything is going to provoke a debate, it might be the government’s desire to restore the Canadian Human Rights Commission’s authority to hear complaints about hate speech. That could revive a fight from more than a decade ago that ended with Conservative MPs voting to repeal an earlier provision in the Canada Human Rights Act that was accused of putting a chill on free speech.

Virani argues that the legislation’s definition of “hatred” — involving “detestation and vilification,” not simply something that is insulting — is specific and narrow and informed by Supreme Court jurisprudence. But small armies of lawyers and civil liberties experts will now pore over the finer points.

In his written statement, Poilievre again raised the spectre of the government “banning opinions that contradict the Prime Minister’s radical ideology.” But if such a thing is plausibly foreseeable under the proposed legislation, it should be possible for someone to point to a specific part of the bill and explain how it might happen.

Given the real issues at play, the debate should be based in demonstrable reality. But given that the subject is the internet, it might be hard to keep the discussion grounded.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

News

STD epidemic slows as new syphilis and gonorrhea cases fall in US

Published

 on

 

NEW YORK (AP) — The U.S. syphilis epidemic slowed dramatically last year, gonorrhea cases fell and chlamydia cases remained below prepandemic levels, according to federal data released Tuesday.

The numbers represented some good news about sexually transmitted diseases, which experienced some alarming increases in past years due to declining condom use, inadequate sex education, and reduced testing and treatment when the COVID-19 pandemic hit.

Last year, cases of the most infectious stages of syphilis fell 10% from the year before — the first substantial decline in more than two decades. Gonorrhea cases dropped 7%, marking a second straight year of decline and bringing the number below what it was in 2019.

“I’m encouraged, and it’s been a long time since I felt that way” about the nation’s epidemic of sexually transmitted infections, said the CDC’s Dr. Jonathan Mermin. “Something is working.”

More than 2.4 million cases of syphilis, gonorrhea and chlamydia were diagnosed and reported last year — 1.6 million cases of chlamydia, 600,000 of gonorrhea, and more than 209,000 of syphilis.

Syphilis is a particular concern. For centuries, it was a common but feared infection that could deform the body and end in death. New cases plummeted in the U.S. starting in the 1940s when infection-fighting antibiotics became widely available, and they trended down for a half century after that. By 2002, however, cases began rising again, with men who have sex with other men being disproportionately affected.

The new report found cases of syphilis in their early, most infectious stages dropped 13% among gay and bisexual men. It was the first such drop since the agency began reporting data for that group in the mid-2000s.

However, there was a 12% increase in the rate of cases of unknown- or later-stage syphilis — a reflection of people infected years ago.

Cases of syphilis in newborns, passed on from infected mothers, also rose. There were nearly 4,000 cases, including 279 stillbirths and infant deaths.

“This means pregnant women are not being tested often enough,” said Dr. Jeffrey Klausner, a professor of medicine at the University of Southern California.

What caused some of the STD trends to improve? Several experts say one contributor is the growing use of an antibiotic as a “morning-after pill.” Studies have shown that taking doxycycline within 72 hours of unprotected sex cuts the risk of developing syphilis, gonorrhea and chlamydia.

In June, the CDC started recommending doxycycline as a morning-after pill, specifically for gay and bisexual men and transgender women who recently had an STD diagnosis. But health departments and organizations in some cities had been giving the pills to people for a couple years.

Some experts believe that the 2022 mpox outbreak — which mainly hit gay and bisexual men — may have had a lingering effect on sexual behavior in 2023, or at least on people’s willingness to get tested when strange sores appeared.

Another factor may have been an increase in the number of health workers testing people for infections, doing contact tracing and connecting people to treatment. Congress gave $1.2 billion to expand the workforce over five years, including $600 million to states, cities and territories that get STD prevention funding from CDC.

Last year had the “most activity with that funding throughout the U.S.,” said David Harvey, executive director of the National Coalition of STD Directors.

However, Congress ended the funds early as a part of last year’s debt ceiling deal, cutting off $400 million. Some people already have lost their jobs, said a spokeswoman for Harvey’s organization.

Still, Harvey said he had reasons for optimism, including the growing use of doxycycline and a push for at-home STD test kits.

Also, there are reasons to think the next presidential administration could get behind STD prevention. In 2019, then-President Donald Trump announced a campaign to “eliminate” the U.S. HIV epidemic by 2030. (Federal health officials later clarified that the actual goal was a huge reduction in new infections — fewer than 3,000 a year.)

There were nearly 32,000 new HIV infections in 2022, the CDC estimates. But a boost in public health funding for HIV could also also help bring down other sexually transmitted infections, experts said.

“When the government puts in resources, puts in money, we see declines in STDs,” Klausner said.

___

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

World’s largest active volcano Mauna Loa showed telltale warning signs before erupting in 2022

Published

 on

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Scientists can’t know precisely when a volcano is about to erupt, but they can sometimes pick up telltale signs.

That happened two years ago with the world’s largest active volcano. About two months before Mauna Loa spewed rivers of glowing orange molten lava, geologists detected small earthquakes nearby and other signs, and they warned residents on Hawaii‘s Big Island.

Now a study of the volcano’s lava confirms their timeline for when the molten rock below was on the move.

“Volcanoes are tricky because we don’t get to watch directly what’s happening inside – we have to look for other signs,” said Erik Klemetti Gonzalez, a volcano expert at Denison University, who was not involved in the study.

Upswelling ground and increased earthquake activity near the volcano resulted from magma rising from lower levels of Earth’s crust to fill chambers beneath the volcano, said Kendra Lynn, a research geologist at the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory and co-author of a new study in Nature Communications.

When pressure was high enough, the magma broke through brittle surface rock and became lava – and the eruption began in late November 2022. Later, researchers collected samples of volcanic rock for analysis.

The chemical makeup of certain crystals within the lava indicated that around 70 days before the eruption, large quantities of molten rock had moved from around 1.9 miles (3 kilometers) to 3 miles (5 kilometers) under the summit to a mile (2 kilometers) or less beneath, the study found. This matched the timeline the geologists had observed with other signs.

The last time Mauna Loa erupted was in 1984. Most of the U.S. volcanoes that scientists consider to be active are found in Hawaii, Alaska and the West Coast.

Worldwide, around 585 volcanoes are considered active.

Scientists can’t predict eruptions, but they can make a “forecast,” said Ben Andrews, who heads the global volcano program at the Smithsonian Institution and who was not involved in the study.

Andrews compared volcano forecasts to weather forecasts – informed “probabilities” that an event will occur. And better data about the past behavior of specific volcanos can help researchers finetune forecasts of future activity, experts say.

(asterisk)We can look for similar patterns in the future and expect that there’s a higher probability of conditions for an eruption happening,” said Klemetti Gonzalez.

___

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Waymo’s robotaxis now open to anyone who wants a driverless ride in Los Angeles

Published

 on

 

Waymo on Tuesday opened its robotaxi service to anyone who wants a ride around Los Angeles, marking another milestone in the evolution of self-driving car technology since the company began as a secret project at Google 15 years ago.

The expansion comes eight months after Waymo began offering rides in Los Angeles to a limited group of passengers chosen from a waiting list that had ballooned to more than 300,000 people. Now, anyone with the Waymo One smartphone app will be able to request a ride around an 80-square-mile (129-square-kilometer) territory spanning the second largest U.S. city.

After Waymo received approval from California regulators to charge for rides 15 months ago, the company initially chose to launch its operations in San Francisco before offering a limited service in Los Angeles.

Before deciding to compete against conventional ride-hailing pioneers Uber and Lyft in California, Waymo unleashed its robotaxis in Phoenix in 2020 and has been steadily extending the reach of its service in that Arizona city ever since.

Driverless rides are proving to be more than just a novelty. Waymo says it now transports more than 50,000 weekly passengers in its robotaxis, a volume of business numbers that helped the company recently raise $5.6 billion from its corporate parent Alphabet and a list of other investors that included venture capital firm Andreesen Horowitz and financial management firm T. Rowe Price.

“Our service has matured quickly and our riders are embracing the many benefits of fully autonomous driving,” Waymo co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana said in a blog post.

Despite its inroads, Waymo is still believed to be losing money. Although Alphabet doesn’t disclose Waymo’s financial results, the robotaxi is a major part of an “Other Bets” division that had suffered an operating loss of $3.3 billion through the first nine months of this year, down from a setback of $4.2 billion at the same time last year.

But Waymo has come a long way since Google began working on self-driving cars in 2009 as part of project “Chauffeur.” Since its 2016 spinoff from Google, Waymo has established itself as the clear leader in a robotaxi industry that’s getting more congested.

Electric auto pioneer Tesla is aiming to launch a rival “Cybercab” service by 2026, although its CEO Elon Musk said he hopes the company can get the required regulatory clearances to operate in Texas and California by next year.

Tesla’s projected timeline for competing against Waymo has been met with skepticism because Musk has made unfulfilled promises about the company’s self-driving car technology for nearly a decade.

Meanwhile, Waymo’s robotaxis have driven more than 20 million fully autonomous miles and provided more than 2 million rides to passengers without encountering a serious accident that resulted in its operations being sidelined.

That safety record is a stark contrast to one of its early rivals, Cruise, a robotaxi service owned by General Motors. Cruise’s California license was suspended last year after one of its driverless cars in San Francisco dragged a jaywalking pedestrian who had been struck by a different car driven by a human.

Cruise is now trying to rebound by joining forces with Uber to make some of its services available next year in U.S. cities that still haven’t been announced. But Waymo also has forged a similar alliance with Uber to dispatch its robotaxi in Atlanta and Austin, Texas next year.

Another robotaxi service, Amazon’s Zoox, is hoping to begin offering driverless rides to the general public in Las Vegas at some point next year before also launching in San Francisco.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending