adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

Online news bill is flawed and won’t help media outlets, Google tells MPs

Published

 on

Google took its case against Canada’s proposed Online News Act to a parliamentary committee Tuesday, warning MPs that the legislation is flawed and won’t address the challenges faced by struggling Canadian news organizations.

Colin McKay, head of public policy and government relations for Google Canada, told members of the Canadian Heritage committee that while it supports a sustainable future for Canadian journalism, Bill C-18, the Online News Act — which would force online platforms to compensate Canadian news organizations for the use of their content — won’t do what the government hopes it will do.

“In its current form, C-18 will make it harder for Canadians to find and share trusted and authoritative news online,” McKay said. “It will also have, at best, unpredictable outcomes for the evolving Canadian news ecosystem.”

McKay said the legislation directs platforms like Google to not give “undue preference” that could work to the disadvantage of any news business. He said it also offers a very broad definition of what constitutes an eligible news operation and doesn’t require such operations to adhere to “basic journalistic standards.”

“This will lead to the proliferation of misinformation and clickbait,” said McKay. “Combined with the ‘undue preference’ provision, this means Canadians could be served foreign propaganda outlets alongside reporting from Le Devoir or the Globe and Mail.”

McKay argued in favour of voluntary contracts to compensate media outlets for content distributed online, like the ones it has reached with Le Devoir and dozens of other news organizations across Canada. But he refused to reveal details of any of those deals, saying they’re subject to non-disclosure agreements.

Colin McKay of Google Canada warned the Online News Act, Bill C-18, needs to be amended. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)

Google found no support for its position among the other organizations that appeared before the committee Tuesday.

While those five other organizations offered the committee suggestions to improve the legislation, they generally supported Bill C-18 and said it would help Canadian news organizations.

Bill C-18, introduced by Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez in April, seeks to throw a lifeline to foundering Canadian news organizations that have seen once lucrative advertising revenue move to online news giants like Google and Facebook.

According to government data, Google and Facebook are between them getting 80 per cent of all online ad revenue in Canada — about $9.7 billion a year.

Minister of Canadian Heritage Pablo Rodriguez says the Liberal government is introducing legislation to force digital giants to compensate news publishers for the use of their content.

Meanwhile, thousands of jobs in journalism have disappeared, media outlets have closed and many Canadian communities have turned into news deserts with no local news coverage.

When introducing the bill in April, Rodriguez described the situation as a “market imbalance” allowing Google and Facebook to benefit from news content on their sites for free.

“News outlets and journalists must receive fair compensation for their work,” he said. “It shouldn’t be free.”

Similar legislation has been adopted in Australia. Witnesses told the committee Tuesday that money has started to flow to Australian news organizations as a result.

While Google initially fought the Australian legislation, McKay said Tuesday the legislation is working.

“We spoke quite loudly about the need for a workable solution in Australia, which they have landed upon,” he said.

MPs push back on poll

Last week, Google continued its fight against Bill C-18 by releasing a public opinion poll it commissioned from Abacus Data. After posing general questions about the bill, the poll outlined some of Google’s concerns regarding the legislation and asked respondents whether they thought it should be amended.

McKay faced some pointed questions from a number of MPs about that poll Tuesday.

“You often present Google as a rampart against disinformation,” said Bloc Québécois MP Martin Champoux.

“You have often said Bill C-18 will open the door to disinformation. This week, we all received the data from a poll that you commissioned from Abacus Data, in which some of the questions commissioned by Google leave me a bit perplexed as to that determination that you have to counter disinformation.”

Champoux cited a question in the poll that suggested the bill gives the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) “unprecedented, sweeping new powers to regulate every aspect of the news industry.”

“When you asked your question, did you clearly explain what the powers of the CRTC would be?” he asked. “Because if so, you are better than us because we still don’t know what powers the CRTC will have exactly if C-18 is adopted.

“What question did you ask exactly to arrive at the conclusion that 70 per cent of people are worried about the inordinate powers the CRTC will have?”

Champoux also pointed to a section of the poll that suggested that Canadians would have to pay a cost if Bill C-18 is adopted.

New Democratic Party MP Peter Julian echoed Champoux’s concerns.

“I was very disturbed by how Google approached that particular opinion poll,” he said.

Representatives of media outlets who testified before the committee, including the Canadian Association of Broadcasters and the Alberta Weekly Newspapers Association, described the challenges their organizations have faced and the importance of quality news coverage.

Several stressed the need for the legislation to help small-town and emerging news organizations that may have difficulty employing two journalists full-time.

Ben Scott is director of Reset, a public policy group that focuses on the intersection of technology and democracy. He recommended that the legislation prioritize fairness between large and small news organizations and require that any new revenue go to the production of journalism. He also called for more transparency or oversight on deals worked out between online platforms and media outlets.

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Trump could cash out his DJT stock within weeks. Here’s what happens if he sells

Published

 on

Former President Donald Trump is on the brink of a significant financial decision that could have far-reaching implications for both his personal wealth and the future of his fledgling social media company, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG). As the lockup period on his shares in TMTG, which owns Truth Social, nears its end, Trump could soon be free to sell his substantial stake in the company. However, the potential payday, which makes up a large portion of his net worth, comes with considerable risks for Trump and his supporters.

Trump’s stake in TMTG comprises nearly 59% of the company, amounting to 114,750,000 shares. As of now, this holding is valued at approximately $2.6 billion. These shares are currently under a lockup agreement, a common feature of initial public offerings (IPOs), designed to prevent company insiders from immediately selling their shares and potentially destabilizing the stock. The lockup, which began after TMTG’s merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), is set to expire on September 25, though it could end earlier if certain conditions are met.

Should Trump decide to sell his shares after the lockup expires, the market could respond in unpredictable ways. The sale of a substantial number of shares by a major stakeholder like Trump could flood the market, potentially driving down the stock price. Daniel Bradley, a finance professor at the University of South Florida, suggests that the market might react negatively to such a large sale, particularly if there aren’t enough buyers to absorb the supply. This could lead to a sharp decline in the stock’s value, impacting both Trump’s personal wealth and the company’s market standing.

Moreover, Trump’s involvement in Truth Social has been a key driver of investor interest. The platform, marketed as a free speech alternative to mainstream social media, has attracted a loyal user base largely due to Trump’s presence. If Trump were to sell his stake, it might signal a lack of confidence in the company, potentially shaking investor confidence and further depressing the stock price.

Trump’s decision is also influenced by his ongoing legal battles, which have already cost him over $100 million in legal fees. Selling his shares could provide a significant financial boost, helping him cover these mounting expenses. However, this move could also have political ramifications, especially as he continues his bid for the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential race.

Trump Media’s success is closely tied to Trump’s political fortunes. The company’s stock has shown volatility in response to developments in the presidential race, with Trump’s chances of winning having a direct impact on the stock’s value. If Trump sells his stake, it could be interpreted as a lack of confidence in his own political future, potentially undermining both his campaign and the company’s prospects.

Truth Social, the flagship product of TMTG, has faced challenges in generating traffic and advertising revenue, especially compared to established social media giants like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook. Despite this, the company’s valuation has remained high, fueled by investor speculation on Trump’s political future. If Trump remains in the race and manages to secure the presidency, the value of his shares could increase. Conversely, any missteps on the campaign trail could have the opposite effect, further destabilizing the stock.

As the lockup period comes to an end, Trump faces a critical decision that could shape the future of both his personal finances and Truth Social. Whether he chooses to hold onto his shares or cash out, the outcome will likely have significant consequences for the company, its investors, and Trump’s political aspirations.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Arizona man accused of social media threats to Trump is arrested

Published

 on

Cochise County, AZ — Law enforcement officials in Arizona have apprehended Ronald Lee Syvrud, a 66-year-old resident of Cochise County, after a manhunt was launched following alleged death threats he made against former President Donald Trump. The threats reportedly surfaced in social media posts over the past two weeks, as Trump visited the US-Mexico border in Cochise County on Thursday.

Syvrud, who hails from Benson, Arizona, located about 50 miles southeast of Tucson, was captured by the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office on Thursday afternoon. The Sheriff’s Office confirmed his arrest, stating, “This subject has been taken into custody without incident.”

In addition to the alleged threats against Trump, Syvrud is wanted for multiple offences, including failure to register as a sex offender. He also faces several warrants in both Wisconsin and Arizona, including charges for driving under the influence and a felony hit-and-run.

The timing of the arrest coincided with Trump’s visit to Cochise County, where he toured the US-Mexico border. During his visit, Trump addressed the ongoing border issues and criticized his political rival, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, for what he described as lax immigration policies. When asked by reporters about the ongoing manhunt for Syvrud, Trump responded, “No, I have not heard that, but I am not that surprised and the reason is because I want to do things that are very bad for the bad guys.”

This incident marks the latest in a series of threats against political figures during the current election cycle. Just earlier this month, a 66-year-old Virginia man was arrested on suspicion of making death threats against Vice President Kamala Harris and other public officials.

Continue Reading

Media

Trump Media & Technology Group Faces Declining Stock Amid Financial Struggles and Increased Competition

Published

 on

Tech News in Canada

Trump Media & Technology Group’s stock has taken a significant hit, dropping more than 11% this week following a disappointing earnings report and the return of former U.S. President Donald Trump to the rival social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. This decline is part of a broader downward trend for the parent company of Truth Social, with the stock plummeting nearly 43% since mid-July. Despite the sharp decline, some investors remain unfazed, expressing continued optimism for the company’s financial future or standing by their investment as a show of political support for Trump.

One such investor, Todd Schlanger, an interior designer from West Palm Beach, explained his commitment to the stock, stating, “I’m a Republican, so I supported him. When I found out about the stock, I got involved because I support the company and believe in free speech.” Schlanger, who owns around 1,000 shares, is a regular user of Truth Social and is excited about the company’s future, particularly its plans to expand its streaming services. He believes Truth Social has the potential to be as strong as Facebook or X, despite the stock’s recent struggles.

However, Truth Social’s stock performance is deeply tied to Trump’s political influence and the company’s ability to generate sustainable revenue, which has proven challenging. An earnings report released last Friday showed the company lost over $16 million in the three-month period ending in June. Revenue dropped by 30%, down to approximately $836,000 compared to $1.2 million during the same period last year.

In response to the earnings report, Truth Social CEO Devin Nunes emphasized the company’s strong cash position, highlighting $344 million in cash reserves and no debt. He also reiterated the company’s commitment to free speech, stating, “From the beginning, it was our intention to make Truth Social an impenetrable beachhead of free speech, and by taking extraordinary steps to minimize our reliance on Big Tech, that is exactly what we are doing.”

Despite these assurances, investors reacted negatively to the quarterly report, leading to a steep drop in stock price. The situation was further complicated by Trump’s return to X, where he posted for the first time in a year. Trump’s exclusivity agreement with Trump Media & Technology Group mandates that he posts personal content first on Truth Social. However, he is allowed to make politically related posts on other social media platforms, which he did earlier this week, potentially drawing users away from Truth Social.

For investors like Teri Lynn Roberson, who purchased shares near the company’s peak after it went public in March, the decline in stock value has been disheartening. However, Roberson remains unbothered by the poor performance, saying her investment was more about supporting Trump than making money. “I’m way at a loss, but I am OK with that. I am just watching it for fun,” Roberson said, adding that she sees Trump’s return to X as a positive move that could expand his reach beyond Truth Social’s “echo chamber.”

The stock’s performance holds significant financial implications for Trump himself, as he owns a 65% stake in Trump Media & Technology Group. According to Fortune, this stake represents a substantial portion of his net worth, which could be vulnerable if the company continues to struggle financially.

Analysts have described Truth Social as a “meme stock,” similar to companies like GameStop and AMC that saw their stock prices driven by ideological investments rather than business fundamentals. Tyler Richey, an analyst at Sevens Report Research, noted that the stock has ebbed and flowed based on sentiment toward Trump. He pointed out that the recent decline coincided with the rise of U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential nominee, which may have dampened perceptions of Trump’s 2024 election prospects.

Jay Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida, offered a grim long-term outlook for Truth Social, suggesting that the stock would likely remain volatile, but with an overall downward trend. “What’s lacking for the true believer in the company story is, ‘OK, where is the business strategy that will be generating revenue?'” Ritter said, highlighting the company’s struggle to produce a sustainable business model.

Still, for some investors, like Michael Rogers, a masonry company owner in North Carolina, their support for Trump Media & Technology Group is unwavering. Rogers, who owns over 10,000 shares, said he invested in the company both as a show of support for Trump and because of his belief in the company’s financial future. Despite concerns about the company’s revenue challenges, Rogers expressed confidence in the business, stating, “I’m in it for the long haul.”

Not all investors are as confident. Mitchell Standley, who made a significant return on his investment earlier this year by capitalizing on the hype surrounding Trump Media’s planned merger with Digital World Acquisition Corporation, has since moved on. “It was basically just a pump and dump,” Standley told ABC News. “I knew that once they merged, all of his supporters were going to dump a bunch of money into it and buy it up.” Now, Standley is staying away from the company, citing the lack of business fundamentals as the reason for his exit.

Truth Social’s future remains uncertain as it continues to struggle with financial losses and faces stiff competition from established social media platforms. While its user base and investor sentiment are bolstered by Trump’s political following, the company’s long-term viability will depend on its ability to create a sustainable revenue stream and maintain relevance in a crowded digital landscape.

As the company seeks to stabilize, the question remains whether its appeal to Trump’s supporters can translate into financial success or whether it will remain a volatile stock driven more by ideology than business fundamentals.

Continue Reading

Trending