adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Opinion | We all agree on who shouldn't be allowed to make political donations. Then it gets tricky – NiagaraFallsReview.ca

Published

 on


Voters are massively opposed to big business or big unions ever again donating to — or distorting — the political process.

And they are grappling with how to get the old money politics under control.

We know this thanks to a new poll for the Toronto Star carried out by Campaign Research, which probed public attitudes to Premier Doug Ford latest campaign finance reforms. Amid growing public cynicism about how politicians from all parties raise private funds — and how governments in power spend public funds — it’s a point worth driving home:

People want our politics kept free of corrosive corporate influences that corrupt decision-making. Our politicians must not only be clean, but seen to be clean.

A lopsided 69 per cent of Ontarians support a ban on business and union contributions, with only 10 per cent opposed, according to the poll. That’s a strong majority in favour of policing the political process, which is why we posed the question.

The bigger question is what should replace it. And here the answers are surprising, sometimes confusing, and something of a challenge for people who care about democratic reform.

The numbers don’t lie. Just as we must follow the money, we must also follow the polling data to make sense of public opinion.

This month’s survey comes against the backdrop of continued controversy over how the Progressive Conservative government deals with sensitive development issues, and whether the pristine Greenbelt is up for grabs. The increased resort to so-called “Ministerial Zoning Orders” (MZOs) by Ford’s Tories — which short circuit routine environmental safeguards and zoning rules — risks playing into the hands of developers with deep pockets.

This province was the Wild West of money politics until recently, with top cabinet ministers in former premier Kathleen Wynne’s government raising hundreds of thousands of dollars each to fill individual quotas set by the Liberal party. Amid much controversy (and a lot of column inches in the Toronto Star), Wynne did what no other party in power had ever done in Ontario — she banned the financial power of private interests, notably the big brewers, the Beer Store and their labour unions (with outsized influence on both Liberals and New Democrats).

Ontario cleaned up its act. But how do we keep it clean going forward?

Under pressure, Wynne agreed to replace prohibited private funding with public funding — allocated per vote received — so that the major political parties wouldn’t be bankrupted by the switch. It worked, until it almost came unravelled.

Campaigning as a populist outsider in 2018, Ford vowed to eliminate the so-called “per-vote subsidy” if he ever won power. His government quickly announced plans to phase out the roughly $2.50 per vote allocation, and Ford told me last October he was determined not to waver.

But to his credit, in mid-pandemic, the premier had second thoughts on campaign finance reform — as he has on other matters that matter. Last month he quietly extended the public financing of political parties for at least another three years, throwing a lifeline to the democratic process at a time when voters are tapped out by COVID-19.

It turns out Ontarians are almost evenly split.

About the premier’s decision to extend per vote subsidies: 35 per cent for, versus 36 per cent against.

(Campaign Research polled 1,344 people across Ontario from March 8-11 using Maru/Blue’s online panel; it is an opt-in poll, but for comparison purposes, a random sample of this size would have a margin of error of plus or minus 2.7 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.)

For Ford, who got into politics as an anti-government populist — but now runs the government as a popularity-conscious premier still riding high in the polls — the public split, and the high level of indecision, gave him manoeuvring room to reconsider. After all, the facts have changed since he made what he thought would be a popular promise — people are hurting, which makes it harder for parties to make their fundraising pitches (until someone’s stumble gives them an opening).

Loading…

Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…Loading…

Which means the premier won’t pay a price, either way, for doing the right thing — except, perhaps, among his most right-wing supporters. Among Tories, fully 42 per cent opposed the premier’s decision to extend public subsidies, with 34 per cent opposed.

Liberals were evenly split, while New Democrats broadly backed Ford’s extension — 47 per cent in favour versus 27 per cent opposed (not as wide a margin as the NDP might imagine).

Interestingly, Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner, who passionately favours per vote subsidies, may be out of step with his own supporters: 37 per cent oppose the extension of public funding, and 27 per cent support it, which suggests Greens sometimes see blue.

Schreiner is right to back public funding, as I do. But the polling numbers suggest a democratic disconnect.

Under cover of extending the per vote subsidy, the premier also doubled the limits on individual donations from $1,650 a year to $3,300 annually. The polling shows voters split down the middle on this, with 38 per cent supporting the move and 36 per cent opposed.

It turns out Ford has threaded the needle on campaign funding. It’s all in the polling data.

If democracy activists want to lower those contribution limits — which are in the middle of the pack, among provinces, but too high by my measure — the best way to persuade politicians like Ford to do the right thing is to win public support for tougher rules.

It’s hard to persuade public opinion. But that’s democracy.

In practice, private money distorts decision making. In principle, public money doesn’t.

But if you want to win the day on democratic reforms, you first have to win the campaign to persuade people. That’s politics.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending