adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

Opinion: What if the economy can in fact save Joe Biden?

Published

 on

Open this photo in gallery:

U.S. President Joe Biden waits to speak during a meeting of his Competition Council in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 5.BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/Getty Images

John Rapley is an author and academic who divides his time among London, Johannesburg and Ottawa. His books include Why Empires Fall (Yale University Press, 2023) and Twilight of the Money Gods (Simon and Schuster, 2017).

There’s a handy little metric that political scientists sometimes use to gauge a president’s likely re-election prospects. It’s called the misery index, and it’s calculated by adding the unemployment and inflation rates – the lower the index, the better an incumbent’s prospects. U.S. President Joe Biden’s problem is that even though it’s come down a lot in the past two years, it’s still higher than it was in the later stages of the Trump presidency.

Whether he deserves credit or not, the fact is that under Donald Trump’s watch the economy grew. What did it in for Mr. Trump in 2020 was the pandemic, which sent the misery index soaring just as he was bungling the crisis (as memorably chronicled by comedian Sarah Cooper). Now that the worst has passed, many voters are looking back fondly to the pre-COVID days and wondering why things can’t be like they were then.

So, despite Mr. Biden’s economic boasts at his combative State of the Union address, he can’t hope to win this election on a straight ‘are you better off than you were four years ago’ question, because too many will feel they aren’t.

However, by looking to the future, he may yet have a path to victory. That’s because of a curious paradox revealed in the polls. When asked about the state of the economy and the direction of the country, people say it’s bad. But when asked about their own condition, they report themselves to be doing well.

Former president Bill Clinton’s triangulation strategy in his 1992 election – “It’s the economy, stupid,” as his strategist James Carville famously put it – was rooted in neoclassical economic theory and assumed people to be self-interested. The key to electoral success was to gather as much data about voters, figure out what various groups wanted for themselves, then produce policies with something for enough of them to assemble a winning coalition.

But it may be that Americans aren’t as selfish as Mr. Clinton thought, or at least not as selfish as they were then. The same economic boom that produced AI, the Magnificent Seven and Tesla has led to a corporate concentration that has drained the life from many of the towns and small cities where Mr. Trump built his base. In place of the diners and malt shops they grew up with, people now see box stores, chain restaurants and boarded-up buildings. Instead of Sunday gatherings with the family, there are Zoom calls, since the children have moved to the big cities where the jobs are.

When Mr. Trump spoke of American carnage, he struck a chord with these people who, even if they felt well-off, feared their children wouldn’t inherit the country they loved. Mr. Biden needs to persuade them that the new industrial revolution under way will address these ills – by reviving the life of their neighbourhoods, and by limiting the rise of the corporate behemoths that are starting to dominate the country and its politics. His recent advocacy of a so-called billionaire’s tax seems to have gone down well with the electorate, but he also needs to reassure them about the levels of debt the country is accumulating, because Americans are growing increasingly alarmed at a sum that rises by a trillion dollars every 100 days.

The United States is in the midst of a profound transformation of its economy, with a massive investment in renewable energy, artificial intelligence and a new economic model built around remote working. By their nature, such industrial revolutions are highly disruptive to the existing order. But they also herald a new future that could, if properly harnessed, improve ordinary people’s lives. Mr. Biden needs to tell the story of how this will happen, to make the bold new future feel present, so that voters opt to stay the course and not turn back.

One time-honoured rule in American politics is that an optimistic message beats a gloomy one. However, statistics won’t do it, stories will, and the President must tell one with a happy ending. If he can do that, he’s still in with a chance.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

September merchandise trade deficit narrows to $1.3 billion: Statistics Canada

Published

 on

OTTAWA – Statistics Canada says the country’s merchandise trade deficit narrowed to $1.3 billion in September as imports fell more than exports.

The result compared with a revised deficit of $1.5 billion for August. The initial estimate for August released last month had shown a deficit of $1.1 billion.

Statistics Canada says the results for September came as total exports edged down 0.1 per cent to $63.9 billion.

Exports of metal and non-metallic mineral products fell 5.4 per cent as exports of unwrought gold, silver, and platinum group metals, and their alloys, decreased 15.4 per cent. Exports of energy products dropped 2.6 per cent as lower prices weighed on crude oil exports.

Meanwhile, imports for September fell 0.4 per cent to $65.1 billion as imports of metal and non-metallic mineral products dropped 12.7 per cent.

In volume terms, total exports rose 1.4 per cent in September while total imports were essentially unchanged in September.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending