When COVID-19 began to shut down the world in February 2020, I was startling awake every night in a panic about my future as my parents’ only remaining child.
My sister Tej had died the previous year, when she was 52, and I was 50 years old. She was the person I loved most in the world.
Though we rarely lived in the same city as adults, we spoke most days, she calling me from her home in The Hague, where she lived with her daughter, or I calling her from my home in Toronto, where I live with my Canadian partner.
Her death was not my family’s first experience of grief.
Six years previously, my brother Bhaskar had died of a heart attack, leaving behind his wife and their two sons in California. He was 49 years old — the eldest of our parents’ three children.
At that time, I had channelled my energies into ensuring that our parents, who had retired in our home country, Nepal, would survive the loss.
This time around, I knew I was in trouble. I might not survive my sister’s loss.
I concentrated on holding my broken self together so that I might eventually mend.– Manjushree Thapa
It is customary in Nepal to take a year off to mourn for our loved ones. I let myself put aside my novel-in-progress and turn down new professional commitments.
In between organizing my sister’s memorial and settling her estate, I concentrated on holding my broken self together so that I might eventually mend.
Seeking solace
I sought help through therapy, Buddhist meditation, yoga, journaling — but mainly, I spent time with family in the Netherlands, Nepal, the United States, and of course Canada.
En route, I splurged on trips to Lisbon, Naples, and London in search of relief. My partner and I camped often, and trekked through the foothills of Mount Everest.
Along the way, I resumed writing in fits and starts, and had tentatively completed a draft of my novel. My partner and I were in the United Kingdom then, housesitting for friends in Oxford in order to spend time with my niece, who had started her first year of college shortly after losing her mother.
We returned to Toronto and settled into our new reality of quarantine, isolation, and heightened anxiety about ourselves and our scattered family.
I dabbled in a few “pandemic projects” to steady my nerves, listening to classical music, cooking tofu, trying out mocktail recipes, and reading Proust, before settling on one I’d put off for decades: to reacquire my lost art skills.
Returning to art
I had attended the Rhode Island School of Design in my youth, but had switched to writing afterwards, finding this discursive form of expression more suited to social and political subjects.
I’d always wanted to return to art — for love, not money — and had been stockpiling art supplies for years. But it took the pandemic for me to pick up a paintbrush.
I began by sketching simple household objects. The results were mixed, so I abandoned all hope of making “good” art and focused, instead, on keeping a visual journal of whatever was in front of me, or on my mind.
I played around with pencils and acrylics and gouache watercolour through our springtime isolation, painting the mundane: our last precious container of disinfectant; a houseplant; my shaggy, overgrown hair. I regained my grasp of colour theory over safe, socially-distanced summertime outings, painting on camping trips and a road trip to Lake of the Woods, where my partner gave me a crash course in sailing.
I could sit with my emotions, dark and light, as I painted.– Manjushree Thapa
Something powerful happened when I painted: my discursive mind — the overactive thinking mind — gave way to image, sensation, free-association, and feeling. I could sit with my emotions, dark and light, as I painted.
And I could reconnect with my younger self: the person I had been before my brother drifted away, in adulthood, into science and engineering, and my sister into philosophy and law.
I could appreciate how I — the impressionable youngest — had been formed by my siblings. I could feel their presence in my life.
I also experienced serenity while painting, and something else besides: joy.
“I love painting. I’m not sure why I ever stopped,” I wrote under a sketch of a dragonfly.
When I said as much to my mother, she replied, “Even as a child, you’d stop crying as soon as I handed you crayons.”
Painting through the pandemic has reminded me, mid-life, who I’ve always been. It has brought joy back into my days.
And that joy is mending me now. I would even venture to say I’m happy. I miss my siblings keenly, of course, but I’m grateful that I ever had their love.
Manjushree Thapa is a Canadian essayist, fiction writer (All Of Us in Our Own Lives), translator and editor of Nepali descent. She lives in Toronto.
LONDON (AP) — With a few daubs of a paintbrush, the Brontë sisters have got their dots back.
More than eight decades after it was installed, a memorial to the three 19th-century sibling novelists in London’s Westminster Abbey was amended Thursday to restore the diaereses – the two dots over the e in their surname.
The dots — which indicate that the name is pronounced “brontay” rather than “bront” — were omitted when the stone tablet commemorating Charlotte, Emily and Anne was erected in the abbey’s Poets’ Corner in October 1939, just after the outbreak of World War II.
They were restored after Brontë historian Sharon Wright, editor of the Brontë Society Gazette, raised the issue with Dean of Westminster David Hoyle. The abbey asked its stonemason to tap in the dots and its conservator to paint them.
“There’s no paper record for anyone complaining about this or mentioning this, so I just wanted to put it right, really,” Wright said. “These three Yorkshire women deserve their place here, but they also deserve to have their name spelled correctly.”
It’s believed the writers’ Irish father Patrick changed the spelling of his surname from Brunty or Prunty when he went to university in England.
Raised on the wild Yorkshire moors, all three sisters died before they were 40, leaving enduring novels including Charlotte’s “Jane Eyre,” Emily’s “Wuthering Heights” and Anne’s “The Tenant of Wildfell Hall.”
Rebecca Yorke, director of the Brontë Society, welcomed the restoration.
“As the Brontës and their work are loved and respected all over the world, it’s entirely appropriate that their name is spelled correctly on their memorial,” she said.