adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

Why the Bank of Canada’s Interest rate hike is exactly what the economy needs

Published

 on

It tastes awful, but it works. Let’s just hope the side effects are minimal

The economy is slowing. Housing prices are in free fall. Many fear a recession next year. Consumer price growth is easing. Yet the Bank of Canada is still raising interest rates aggressively, with last week’s half-point hike the sixth successive outsized move. Average people are wondering if it’s necessary, whether prior rate increases were enough. Why the heavy foot on the brake pedal?

I’m part of a dying species — the generation that actually experienced our last inflationary bout. As kids in grade school, we talked about sky-high oil prices, food shortages, running out of this and that, out-of-control inflation and leaders madly scrambling for solutions. The 1970s spilled into the 1980s, and despite much effort, the inflation beast remained untamed.

Like today, prices back then were pretty tame for over a decade before inflation hit in the early 1970s. At that point, prices accelerated rapidly due to sustained strong demand, and vaulted into double-digits with the oil price shocks. The impact was quite sudden, and took a long time to subside. This time around, a 31-year run of programmed price stability was not enough to counter a sharp run up in prices.

Why? Well, it began with specific prices. The pandemic interrupted a finely tuned, pan-global logistics network by hitting different countries at different times. It wasn’t initially a problem, as global consumption also fell. But when the economy started firing again, many products simply couldn’t keep pace — think energy, other commodities and semiconductors. The Russia-Ukraine conflict further constrained energy supply while adding food to the mix.

Initially, central banks waved it off, expecting that bottlenecks would be temporary and that prices would soon calm down. Clearly, that didn’t happen. In fact, as the weeks passed, inflation’s reach rapidly spread to a much wider range of goods and services; it was no longer just the volatile, non-core elements of the price indexes that were misbehaving. It gets particularly complicated when goods that are used in just about everything are in short supply. Back in the 70s, the high intensity of oil use in the economy saw energy price increases spread everywhere. Intensity is much lower now, so oil isn’t as influential as before. But what about semiconductors? They may be a small part of the cost of final products, but they are in just about everything. Cut off the supply, and suddenly shortages are widespread.

At that point, a more generalized inflation is almost unavoidable and reining things in becomes a lot more complicated. Shortages, real or rumoured, create a rush of extra demand and a willingness to pay the asking price. Suddenly, price sensitivity isn’t as great and prices are determined by what the market will bear. This is where price expectations, anchored for decades, become unhinged. And if there happens to be ample liquidity in the economy — low interest rates and quantitative easing assured that — then there’s even less to restrain price growth.

Enter the moral dilemma: if goods and services are perceived to be in short supply, and buyers are willing to pay whatever just to get what they need, profit-maximizing sellers can get opportunistic. Regardless of whether shortages are real, if consumers and businesses are prepared to pay 15-20 per cent more … well, why not?

It doesn’t stop here. With prices riding well ahead of wages, employees at all levels get antsy — especially at annual review time. Given record-low unemployment and our current paucity of skilled workers, businesses aren’t in a strong bargaining position. Fail to meet expectations, and turnover could soar. Meet expectations, and you could be out of business. One way or another, a jump in wage growth is almost impossible to resist. That’s when demand-pull inflation turns into cost-push inflation — a much harder beast to tame, as wage-price spirals can set in.

The dynamics of pricing haven’t changed over time. But we haven’t seen them for so long that we likely forgot how they work: that it’s not so much prices, but price expectations, that matter. And that reining them in requires heavy monetary medicine. It tastes awful, but it works. Let’s just hope the side effects are minimal.

Peter Hall is chief executive of Econosphere Inc. and a former chief economist at Export Development Canada.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending