adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

Planned Obsolescence Versus The Circular Economy – Forbes

Published

 on


“They don’t make them like they used to.”

It may be the nostalgic lament of our grandparents’ generation, but it’s true: so many products just aren’t built to last anymore. And that’s not just down the race to the bottom inevitably created by the need to manufacture products as cheaply as possible to maximise profits in competitive industries. It’s often a deliberate choice to create products that will sooner or later need replacing. After all, if your product is so good that customers only need to buy it once, they have no reason to come back to you. And we all know the value of repeat business.

This artificial limiting of products’ lifespans is the thinking behind ‘planned obsolescence’, the – at best inadvertent, at worst morally dubious – practice of manufacturing products that won’t stand the test of time. That could be because they’re made from inferior materials. It could be because support and spare parts are withdrawn for older models. Or, as in the case of many a tech product, it could be because the design is updated so regularly that customers have no choice but to upgrade to the latest model to enjoy the latest features.

The ‘Batterygate’ scandal in which Apple found themselves embroiled is a classic example of planned obsolescence. Users were forced to upgrade to more recent iPhone models because the regular software updates required to maintain their phones’ security were causing models with older batteries to slow down. And of course, you can’t change the battery in an iPhone. The company’s sudden change to the Lightning charging cable also left millions of devices and chargers redundant. But it’s by no means just a phone thing.

Recommended For You

The original proponent of planned obsolescence was the notorious Phoebus Cartel of the 1920s and 30s, which produced lightbulbs with a lifespan artificially limited to 1,000 hours (other bulbs at the time achieved 2,500 hours). Looking at other kinds of product, how many uses does anyone get from a pair of stockings before they’re laddered and need replacing? Seasonable fashion as a concept is arguably a kind of planned obsolescence, giving clothes a limited lifespan as trends go in and out of fashion. To take another example, it’s hard to imagine the IKEA furniture of today gracing the antiques shops of tomorrow.

It’s obvious why businesses adopt this approach; at the end of the day, they need to make money, and repeat business can account for a significant chunk of many businesses’ revenue. But in an age when, as a nation, we’re more aware than ever of waste and its impact on the environment, how long will consumers – and indeed the law – continue to allow this?

Enter the circular economy. An antidote to the prolific waste generated by planned obsolescence, the circular economy is all about keeping products in circulation for as long as possible. That means products that are built to last. Products that can be mended and used again and again. Products that will always have replacement parts available.

Can this circularity be built into a business model? Of course it can. But it means designing products that stand the test of time. It might mean creating products that can be updated or sold on for further use when the buyer fancies a change. It might mean offering an option to rent rather than own. It might mean offering second hand or refurbished products alongside new ones, perhaps for consumers with a lower budget. Failing that, products should at least be capable of being broken down into materials that can go back into the supply chain.

All this is indeed perfectly possible. So how many businesses will rise to the challenge of designing products that are built to last rather than built to fail? As sustainability finally starts to take centre stage, and with the global economy on shaky grounds amidst a major pandemic, this might just turn out to be what separates the winners from the losers in the years ahead.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending