adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Poilievre wants to topple the Liberal government with a non-confidence motion on the carbon tax – CBC.ca

Published

 on


Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre introduced a non-confidence motion Wednesday that’s designed to topple the government and trigger a federal election — a parliamentary manoeuvre that’s likely to fail.

Poilievre and his party are ramping up the pressure on the Liberal government to drop a plan to increase the federal carbon tax.

The levy is set to rise by about 23 per cent on April 1, which means consumers can expect to pay about three cents more for a litre of gas than they do now.

“If [Prime Minister Justin] Trudeau does not declare today an end to his forthcoming tax increases on food, gas and heat, we’ll introduce a motion of non-confidence,” Poilievre said at a Conservative caucus meeting on Parliament Hill.

“Canadians cannot afford to eat, heat and house themselves,” he said to a standing ovation from MPs and senators. “I call for the House to be dissolved so Canadians can vote in a carbon tax election.”

WATCH: Poilievre plans a non-confidence motion on carbon tax 

Poilievre plans a non-confidence motion on carbon tax

9 hours ago

Duration 0:45

In a speech before his national caucus, Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre says he will introduce a motion of non-confidence if Prime Minister Justin Trudeau doesn’t stop the increase on the federal price on carbon, which is set for April 1.

The non-confidence motion is likely dead on arrival because the NDP has agreed to prop up the government through 2025.

The government’s supply-and-confidence agreement with the fourth party gives it enough support in the Commons to defeat the motion, which will go to a vote Thursday evening.

Poilievre hammered Trudeau on the carbon tax in question period Wednesday, using nearly all of his questions to the government to criticize the program and demand its repeal.

After some back and forth over the utility of carbon pricing, Poilievre said, “Why don’t we end the debate and let Canadians decide in a carbon tax election?”

“An election on the price of pollution? We had three of them and we won them all,” Trudeau fired back.

“Well, he shouldn’t be afraid to have one more,” Poilievre said. “If he really believes in it — why doesn’t he call a carbon tax election now?”

Trudeau and Poilievre also traded shots by citing different Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) reports about the financial effect the tax has on Canadians.

Duelling PBO reports

Trudeau pointed to a PBO report that found most households will see a net fiscal gain — the federal rebate will more than cover what those households pay in carbon taxes.

But the PBO also said, in another report that is frequently cited by Poilievre, that when taking into account the knock-on economic effects of the carbon tax, most households will actually see a net loss.

The PBO said the tax will have a negative effect on the larger economy, leading to a loss of employment and investment income for some families.

The federal rebates won’t be enough to offset both the tax and the slightly lower incomes some Canadians will collect as a result of the levy, the PBO said.

That PBO report did not, however, consider the cost of doing nothing about climate change.

“That’s what the Conservative Party is standing against right now — money in the pockets of Canadians and a real plan to fight climate change that is working, that is bringing down emissions,” Trudeau said.

“Luckily, a majority in this house wants to fight climate change.”

The government has a plan to gradually raise the tax to $170 per tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions by 2030, an increase that eventually will add nearly 40 cents a litre to the price of gas. The levy also will increase the price of other fuels like natural gas and propane.

Poilievre has been on a cross-country “spike the tax” tour to stir up opposition to the federal climate change measure. Hundreds of supporters turned out in Halifax on St. Patrick’s Day.

a politician stands on a stage with a crowd around him. He holds a beer. Supporters hold signs that say 'axe the tax' and spike the hike'
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre held an anti-carbon tax rally in Halifax on St. Patrick’s Day. (Jeorge Sadi/CBC)

The party also tabled another opposition day motion in the House of Commons Wednesday to force a vote on the increase itself. The motion to halt the increase was defeated, with Bloc Québécois, Liberal and NDP MPs voting against it.

The Conservatives also requested a separate “emergency” debate on the subject, a request that was denied Monday by Speaker Greg Fergus.

The carbon tax is a central plank in the Liberals’ climate policybook and they have strenuously opposed a years-long, Conservative-led attempt to overturn it.

The levy is designed to increase the cost of fossil fuels to encourage consumers and businesses to pursue cleaner, greener alternatives.

The government has said all of the money collected from the tax is returned to people through the Canada carbon rebate, a quarterly payment made based on family size.

Minister of Environment and Climate Change Steven Guilbeault makes as a funding announcement
Minister of Environment and Climate Change Steven Guilbeault makes a funding announcement at the Fletcher Wildlife Garden in Ottawa on Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2024. (Patrick Doyle/Canadian Press)

“Eight out of 10 Canadians, low-income to middle-income Canadians, get more money back than they’re paying for carbon pricing. That is a reality, that is a fact. And as carbon pricing goes up, so does the carbon rebate,” said Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault, citing the PBO.

“That is one thing you’ll never hear Pierre Poilievre talk about. The other thing you’ll never hear Pierre Poilievre talk about is the impacts of climate change and how much it’s costing Canadians.”

But the government also levies HST on the carbon tax — income that goes into federal coffers.

The PBO has said Ottawa stands to gain about $600 million in the next fiscal year from this tax on a tax — funds that are not explicitly earmarked for climate initiatives.

The federal carbon tax was initially designed as a “backstop” measure that would only apply in provinces and territories that don’t have carbon prices of their own in place.

Now, after a number of provincial governments dismantled their pricing programs, the federal tax is applied in eight provinces. B.C. has its own carbon tax while Quebec has a cap-and-trade program.

Seven provincial premiers — including Liberal Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Andrew Furey — have asked Ottawa to stop the April 1 hike because of ongoing cost of living concerns.

“Premier Furey has always been clear that the federal carbon tax is not the appropriate instrument to mitigate climate change at this time,” said a spokesperson for the Liberal premier.

Other provincial Liberal leaders, including New Brunswick’s Susan Holt and Nova Scotia’s Zach Churchill, have also voiced opposition to the pending carbon tax hike.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

RFK Jr. says Trump would push to remove fluoride from drinking water. ‘It’s possible,’ Trump says

Published

 on

 

PHOENIX (AP) — Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent proponent of debunked public health claims whom Donald Trump has promised to put in charge of health initiatives, said Saturday that Trump would push to remove fluoride from drinking water on his first day in office if elected president.

Fluoride strengthens teeth and reduces cavities by replacing minerals lost during normal wear and tear, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The addition of low levels of fluoride to drinking water has long been considered one of the greatest public health achievements of the last century.

Kennedy made the declaration Saturday on the social media platform X alongside a variety of claims about the heath effects of fluoride.

“On January 20, the Trump White House will advise all U.S​. water systems to remove fluoride from public water,” Kennedy wrote. Trump and his wife, Melania Trump, “want to Make America Healthy Again,” he added, repeating a phrase Trump often uses and links to Kennedy.

Trump told NBC News on Sunday that he had not spoken to Kennedy about fluoride yet, “but it sounds OK to me. You know it’s possible.”

The former president declined to say whether he would seek a Cabinet role for Kennedy, a job that would require Senate confirmation, but added, “He’s going to have a big role in the administration.”

Asked whether banning certain vaccines would be on the table, Trump said he would talk to Kennedy and others about that. Trump described Kennedy as “a very talented guy and has strong views.”

The sudden and unexpected weekend social media post evoked the chaotic policymaking that defined Trump’s White House tenure, when he would issue policy declarations on Twitter at virtually all hours. It also underscored the concerns many experts have about Kennedy, who has long promoted debunked theories about vaccine safety, having influence over U.S. public health.

In 1950, federal officials endorsed water fluoridation to prevent tooth decay, and continued to promote it even after fluoride toothpaste brands hit the market several years later. Though fluoride can come from a number of sources, drinking water is the main source for Americans, researchers say.

Officials lowered their recommendation for drinking water fluoride levels in 2015 to address a tooth condition called fluorosis, that can cause splotches on teeth and was becoming more common in U.S. kids.

In August, a federal agency determined “with moderate confidence” that there is a link between higher levels of fluoride exposure and lower IQ in kids. The National Toxicology Program based its conclusion on studies involving fluoride levels at about twice the recommended limit for drinking water.

A federal judge later cited that study in ordering the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to further regulate fluoride in drinking water. U.S. District Judge Edward Chen cautioned that it’s not certain that the amount of fluoride typically added to water is causing lower IQ in kids, but he concluded that mounting research points to an unreasonable risk that it could be. He ordered the EPA to take steps to lower that risk, but didn’t say what those measures should be.

In his X post Saturday, Kennedy tagged Michael Connett, the lead attorney representing the plaintiff in that lawsuit, the environmental advocacy group Food & Water Watch.

Kennedy’s anti-vaccine organization has a lawsuit pending against news organizations including The Associated Press, accusing them of violating antitrust laws by taking action to identify misinformation, including about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines. Kennedy is on leave from the group but is listed as one of its attorneys in the lawsuit.

What role Kennedy might hold if Trump wins on Tuesday remains unclear. Kennedy recently told NewsNation that Trump asked him to “reorganize” agencies including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration and some agencies under the Department of Agriculture.

But for now, the former independent presidential candidate has become one of Trump’s top surrogates. Trump frequently mentions having the support of Kennedy, a scion of a Democratic dynasty and the son of former Attorney General Robert Kennedy and nephew of President John F. Kennedy.

Kennedy traveled with Trump Friday and spoke at his rallies in Michigan and Wisconsin.

Trump said Saturday that he told Kennedy: “You can work on food, you can work on anything you want” except oil policy.

“He wants health, he wants women’s health, he wants men’s health, he wants kids, he wants everything,” Trump added.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Danielle Smith receives overwhelming support at United Conservative Party convention

Published

 on

Danielle Smith receives overwhelming support at United Conservative Party convention

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

America’s Election: What it Means to Canadians

Published

 on

Americans and Canadians are cousins that is true. Allies today but long ago people were at loggerheads mostly because of the British Empire and American ambitions.

Canadians appreciate our cousins down south enough to visit them many millions of times over the year. America is Canada’s largest and most important trading partner. As a manufacturer, I can attest to this personally. My American clients have allowed our firm to grow and prosper over the past few decades. There is a problem we have been seeing, a problem where nationalism, both political and economic has been creating a roadblock to our trade relationship.

Both Democrats and Republicans have shown a willingness to play the “buy only American Made product” card, a sounding board for all things isolationist, nationalistic and small-mindedness. We all live on this small planet, and purchase items made from all over the world. Preferences as to what to buy and where it is made are personal choices, never should they become a platform of national pride and thuggery. This has brought fear into the hearts of many Canadians who manufacture for and service the American Economy in some way. This fear will be apparent when the election is over next week.

Canadians are not enemies of America, but allies and friends with a long tradition of supporting our cousins back when bad sh*t happens. We have had enough of the American claim that they want free trade, only to realize that they do so long as it is to their benefit. Tariffs, and undue regulations applied to exporters into America are applied, yet American industry complains when other nations do the very same to them. Seriously! Democrats have said they would place a preference upon doing business with American firms before foreign ones, and Republicans wish to tariff many foreign nations into oblivion. Rhetoric perhaps, but we need to take these threats seriously. As to you the repercussions that will come should America close its doors to us.

Tit for tat neighbors. Tariff for tariff, true selfish competition with no fear of the American Giant. Do you want to build homes in America? Over 33% of all wood comes from Canada. Tit for tat. Canada’s mineral wealth can be sold to others and place preference upon the highest bidder always. You know who will win there don’t you America, the deep-pocketed Chinese.

Reshaping our alliances with others. If America responds as has been threatened, Canadians will find ways to entertain themselves elsewhere. Imagine no Canadian dollars flowing into the Northern States, Florida or California? The Big Apple without its friendly Maple Syrup dip. Canadians will realize just how significant their spending is to America and use it to our benefit, not theirs.

Clearly we will know if you prefer Canadian friendship to Donald Trumps Bravado.

China, Saudi Arabia & Russia are not your friends in America. Canada, Japan, Taiwan the EU and many other nations most definitely are. Stop playing politics, and carry out business in an unethical fashion. Treat allies as they should be treated.

Steven Kaszab
Bradford, Ontario
skaszab@yahoo.ca

Continue Reading

Trending