adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Politics Chat: Breaking Down The Political Responses To The Atlanta Shootings – NPR

Published

 on


We take a look at how lawmakers view the Georgia shootings, the fate of the Dreamer immigration bill headed to Senate, and how Democrats and Republicans might work together on the infrastructure bill.



LULU GARCIA-NAVARRO, HOST:

How to talk about the shootings, the victims, the suspects and the media coverage have all been dominant themes in this tough week because there is also a political divide in how these killings are seen. NPR national political correspondent Mara Liasson joins us now. Good morning.

MARA LIASSON, BYLINE: Good morning, Lulu.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: A horrific event, Mara.

LIASSON: Yes, absolutely horrible.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: Yeah. And it does filter, though, through this political lens. We’ve seen a lot of the Democratic response highlighting former President Trump’s anti-Asian rhetoric. But that kind of rhetoric continued post-Trump, we have to acknowledge, you know, making Asians seem a possible threat just because of their home country has been attacked during the border crisis. I’m going to play you Republican Representative Carlos Gimenez speaking to Morning Edition this past week just before the attack in Atlanta.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

CARLOS GIMENEZ: Our Customs and Border Patrol agents are saying that not only are they seeing people from Mexico, Honduras and Guatemala, et cetera, coming in, but they’re also seeing people from Iran, they have a lot of Chinese nationals are coming in who are paying $35,000 a head to be transported across the border.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: So what has been the Republican response to the attack now?

LIASSON: We should also point out that Gimenez, who’s a Republican, voted for the DREAM Act last week in Congress, so immigration is very complicated.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: It is.

LIASSON: But in general, while Democrats are talking about the attack, the racist and misogynist aspects of it, Republicans are focusing on the it-was-one-crazy-guy theory. And in Georgia, Representative Barry Loudermilk, Republican who represents the district where the shootings happened, told Politico that even though there had been an increase in the attacks against Asian Americans, this particular shooting didn’t seem to be related to that. He said, quote, “this is just a mental health issue. It’s tragic.” He seemed to be echoing the Cherokee County Sheriff’s Captain Jay Baker, who told reporters that the alleged shooter was, quote, “having a really bad day,” and it’s since been found that his Facebook page – a Facebook page seemingly belonging to Baker featured posts promoting racist anti-Asian T-shirts. But on the whole, Republicans and conservative media are far more focused on the situation at the border than they are on this attack.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: Right, the southern border, which has become a huge challenge for this administration. We are two months into the Biden administration, a month and a half since the head of Homeland Security has been confirmed, and yet they own this now.

LIASSON: They absolutely own this now. We are seeing an uptick as we see every spring at the border. But remember, Joe Biden sent two messages that were contradictory. One is don’t come yet. And two, we’re going to be more welcoming in our immigration policy. So guess which one of those resonated with desperate people in Central America? Of course, the second one. And this is a problem that Biden has to solve. On the other hand, it’s a political weapon for Republicans because immigration is one of the few issues that still unites them as they go through their identity crisis as a party. And it has worked. It’s been very effective for the Republicans as a political weapon to energize their base and to energize Republican-leaning independents. So it’s a huge political issue.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: It’s a huge political issue. We saw the Democratic Party-controlled House last week pass two bills trying to address some of immigration, giving DREAMers and farm workers paths to citizenship; DREAMers, of course, being undocumented children brought to the U.S. and raised here. Do these bills stand a chance in the Senate?

LIASSON: Not right now. The influx of asylum-seekers at the border makes this a very inopportune moment for those bills to be going to the Senate. One of the co-sponsors of the DREAM Act, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, said even he can’t vote for it as long as there’s a crisis at the border. He said, quote, “I’m not in support of legalizing one person until you’re in control of the border and there is no pathway for anything right now.”

GARCIA-NAVARRO: Of course, things that are a priority right now are many. Is there anything that Democrats and Republicans can maybe come together on?

LIASSON: Well, the next big priority for the White House is infrastructure – that’s the build back better agenda. And infrastructure has always in the past been bipartisan. But it’s definitely in President Biden’s interest to be seen as cooperating, trying as hard as possible to get bipartisan consensus because he’s made a campaign promise to not just make politics more civil but to actually work across the aisle. And some of those suburban Republican voters who voted for him and made the difference for him want him to do that. On the other hand, we don’t know if Republicans have a lot of political incentives to cooperate because they answer to a smaller, more homogenous partisan base.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: That was NPR’s Mara Liasson. Mara, thank you very much.

LIASSON: You’re welcome. Thank you, Lulu.

Copyright © 2021 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending