adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Politics Is a Lonely Place for U.S. Business – Bloomberg

Published

 on


Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. Click here to subscribe.

I wouldn’t want to be a political strategist for U.S. business right now.

The natural position of business in U.S. politics is to be an independent interest group, aligned with neither party. That allows business interests to lobby whichever party is in office. And in theory it’s a viable strategy; after all, few politicians are comfortable with flat-out anti-business rhetoric — and even many of those who bash business in public know that employers are important to their constituencies, even if they don’t like the way business treats workers.

During a time of strong partisan polarization, however, that’s a difficult stance to maintain. Unless businesses choose sides, they’re apt to lose influence.

Business for the last century has generally been more comfortable on the Republican side. But today’s Republicans are a mess. Not only are they increasingly using anti-business rhetoric, but … well, have you looked at today’s Republicans?

Business tends to be uncomfortable with the anti-democratic Republican agenda — many corporate political action committees cut off donations to members of Congress who voted against accepting the presidential election results on Jan. 6, although many have resumed that funding. Even when Republicans aren’t trying to overturn elections and risk all sorts of chaos, their opposition to pragmatic deal-making and compromise are hardly the kind of atmosphere that’s good for business.

Business leaders are presumably even more uncomfortable with Republican policies that seem destructive for no particular reason at all. A botched reaction to the pandemic was bad, but could perhaps be written off as simply a consequence of having Donald Trump in the White House. But now Republican agitation (including in Republican-aligned media) against the vaccine is both a big threat to the economy and can’t be blamed on Trump, who more or less supports vaccination.

Trump’s erratic policy leadership on trade, immigration and more had already sometimes pushed business away from the Republican Party. That’s even more true now. And with Trump as their leader, many Republicans aren’t hesitant to use government power to punish those they feel have betrayed them.

But it’s not as if a move to the Democratic Party is an appealing option for a lot of business executives. While Republicans have become increasingly incoherent on policy, Democrats have moved in a liberal direction, as demonstrated clearly by President Joe Biden’s initiative last week to increase competition and boost employee bargaining power, which drew prompt business opposition.

Whether it’s taxes or any number of regulatory issues, the mainstream of the Democratic Party is on the wrong side of numerous policies from the standpoint of business. Yes, business interests could overlook many of those issues and choose to accept arguments of liberal economists that many seemingly friendly deregulatory and tax policies have produced an era of mediocre growth. Indeed, there are quite a few Democratic policies business could theoretically support out of enlightened self-interest. But whatever the merits of that idea, it’s quite unlikely to prevail, especially considering the hostility from the part of the Democratic Party led by Senator Bernie Sanders and the more militant members of the House of Representatives.

Of course, business is hardly a monolith. Even during the era when the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other large business groups were firmly aligned with the Republican Party, there were plenty of corporate interests that supported both parties, and plenty of local companies and organized business groups that worked well with Democratic politicians in their areas. But at the national level, and even at the local level in many instances, it’s harder and harder to do so without courting backlash

I can think of a lot of greater tragedies in U.S. politics than headaches for the Chamber’s political strategists, or diminished influence for business interests in general. But the real problem isn’t about business interests. It’s about the collapse of the Republicans’ ability to create policy and function within a democracy, along with partisan polarization that pushes both parties away from pluralistic policy agendas. That’s bad news for everyone.

  1. Ray La Raja on the Eric Adams Democratic coalition in New York.
  2. Michael Albertus at the Monkey Cage on authoritarianism in Latin America.
  3. David Roberts on the top climate priority.
  4. Michele Goodwin on abortion and women’s health.
  5. My Bloomberg Opinion colleague Andrea Gabor on broadband and the infrastructure bills.
  6. Perry Bacon Jr. on flaws in Biden’s democracy agenda.
  7. And Dan Nexon on Wilsonian — or perhaps Rooseveltian — foreign policy. A good point. FDR and his supporters deliberately placed many of his ideas in a semi-fictional historical context that made sense within Democratic Party internal politics of the 1930s and 1940s, which is not today’s Democratic Party politics. Certainly not when it comes to Woodrow Wilson. Or, for that matter, Andrew Jackson.

Get Early Returns every morning in your inbox. Click here to subscribe. Also subscribe to Bloomberg All Access and get much, much more. You’ll receive our unmatched global news coverage and two in-depth daily newsletters, the Bloomberg Open and the Bloomberg Close.

    This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

    To contact the author of this story:
    Jonathan Bernstein at jbernstein62@bloomberg.net

    To contact the editor responsible for this story:
    Jonathan Landman at jlandman4@bloomberg.net

    Adblock test (Why?)

    728x90x4

    Source link

    Politics

    ‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

    Published

     on

     

    HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

    Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

    A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

    Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

    “If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

    In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

    “I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

    Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

    Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

    Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

    “I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

    “My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

    “Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

    Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

    “We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

    NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

    “I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

    This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

    The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

    Source link

    Continue Reading

    Politics

    Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

    Published

     on

     

    REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

    Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

    She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

    Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

    Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

    The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

    This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

    The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

    Source link

    Continue Reading

    Politics

    Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

    Published

     on

     

    HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

    Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

    “That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

    Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

    “I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

    The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

    In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

    “(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

    In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

    “The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

    Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

    Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

    “It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

    In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

    In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

    “Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

    Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

    “Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

    The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

    “That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

    Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

    “Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

    This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

    — With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

    Source link

    Continue Reading

    Trending