adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Real eState

RE/MAX | Toronto Real Estate: Sales vs. Rental Trends – RE/MAX News

Published

 on


Did Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. (CMHC) get it wrong about the national housing sector, particularly the Vancouver and Toronto real estate markets? In the aftermath of the peak of the coronavirus pandemic, the mortgage loan insurance Crown Corporation warned of a sharp decline in housing prices, forecasting a plunge of as much as 18% over the next 12 months.

Many industry observers dismissed the warning, calling it “panic-inducing and irresponsible.” So far, it seems like the skepticism is justified as the Canadian real estate market is on a steady rebound. Although most of the country’s housing markets are undervalued, a lot of cities and regions are experiencing renewed sales activity and a bump in prices a couple of months after the province-wide lockdown.

Have things returned to normal in Canada’s largest city? Real estate is booming in Toronto again, but there are also some unique trends unfolding in property ownership and the rental market.

300x250x1

Toronto Real Estate: Sales vs. Rental Trends

It continued to be a record-breaking August for Toronto real estate, with the Toronto Regional Real Estate Board reporting more than 10,775 homes trading hands – a 40.3% increase compared to the same time a year ago. Detached homes and condominiums continued to post impressive numbers.

A lot of people had anticipated the public health crisis and subsequent recession would crash one of the world’s hottest markets. But the opposite conditions have unfolded. When a two-bedroom, one-bathroom tiny-home near Little Italy is selling for $999,999 and captures local headlines, it is evident that Toronto is roaring again. But is it sustainable?

The Bank of Canada (BoC) recently signalled that it is keeping its historically low interest rates unchanged for the foreseeable future. Plus, the major banks and the federal government have revealed that they are willing to employ every appropriate measure to prop up the housing sector. These factors are instilling confidence in not just the real estate industry, but also in the broader financial markets.

But what is happening in the rental market? Things are a little bit different for apartments and condos.

For the first time in years, rents have softened, giving renters an advantage in a market that had been extraordinarily tight. According to TRREB’s Q2 rental market report, the number of condo rental units on the market surged 42% in the second quarter from the same time a year ago. These units have also decreased in price by about 5%, pegging the average monthly rate for a one-bedroom apartment at $2,083.

“Following very tight market conditions in 2018, we have seen a consistent trend toward balance in the GTA condominium apartment rental market over the past year-and-a-half. Accelerating growth in rental listings were at the root of this trend, but the COVID-19- related drop-off in rental transactions had a marked impact as well. Increased choice led to more negotiating power for renters, resulting in year-over-year declines in average rents in the second quarter of 2020,” said Jason Mercer, TRREB’s Chief Market Analyst, in a statement.

TorontoRental.com examined some of the neighbourhoods that have experienced significant declines in rent. In its “Toronto GTA July Rent Report 2020,” the website found that rent in the Waterfront Communities of Toronto is down 10%, Little Portugal has slumped 11%, and South Parkdale has witnessed a 12% slide. One of the few areas of the city to see an increase was North St. James Town, with a 10% gain in average rent.

As a result, many buildings across the city are beginning to offer incentives again, such as one month of free rent, a discount, or a free television. This was common about a decade ago, but with the vacancy rate as low as it had been, property management companies had little need to entice renters with additional perks.

There are three key factors at play which can explain this surprising development:

  1. First, there is a greater supply of rental units in the city’s core, which has been matched by a decline in demand. A contributing factor has been the lack of movement of immigrants, foreign students and out-of-province workers.
  2. Second, many condo units that were previously listed on Airbnb as short-term rentals have been converted to long-term rentals.
  3. Finally, the province’s eviction freeze has been lifted, so analysts are sounding the alarm about an uptick in eviction numbers over the next few months.

If you’re on the look-out for an apartment to rent, you’re in luck. Could this be a permanent trend? The Greater Toronto Area attracts approximately 100,000 new immigrants each year. With immigration down amid the decline in international travel, the housing market may not have that injection of demand. Moreover, Queen’s Park recently removed rent controls on new rental units, which has added inventory to the overall market. The permanence of this softened market depends largely on a swing in demand, and with immigration temporarily stalled, the timing of this swing remains unknown.

The New Normal

The Canadian real estate market has been resilient, mainly due to the tireless efforts of agents who have worked through the coronavirus pandemic and took advantage of digital tools to service their clients. In Toronto, the hallmarks of a hot market are back with a vengeance: bidding wars, bully bids, and blind auctions. Despite a slowdown at the height of the virus outbreak and bearish real estate estimates, North America’s fourth-largest city has rebounded admirably.

Pent-up demand, falling mortgage costs, and cheap money are likely to dispel the CMHC’s dire report this past spring. The current landscape is beneficial for sellers and renters. But for how long? That is the $999,999 question.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Real eState

Botched home sale costs Winnipeg man his right to sell real estate in Manitoba – CBC.ca

Published

 on


A Winnipeg man’s registration as a real estate salesman has been cancelled after a family vacated their home on a tight deadline for a sale that never went through, then changed brokerages and, months later, got $60,000 less for their house than what they expected when they moved out.

A Manitoba Securities Commission panel found Reginald Wayne Kehler engaged in professional misconduct and conduct unbecoming a registrant when he signed a document on behalf of sellers without their knowledge, reduced the listing price of a home without their approval, and didn’t tell them for nearly a month that a potential buyer hadn’t paid a promised $100,000 deposit.

The sellers, identified as D.R. and P.R. in the panel decision released Wednesday, were awarded $10,394 from the real estate reimbursement fund. Kehler was ordered to pay $12,075 to cover costs of the investigation and hearing.

300x250x1

The sellers were a military family who had to move in 2020 after the husband was posted to Ottawa.

They chose Kehler as their listing agent, because he had helped them find the home when they moved to Winnipeg in 2018, and they had a good relationship with him, the panel’s decision says.

They  listed their house in May and on June 15, 2020, accepted an offer of $570,000 with possession on July 15. A deposit of $100,000 was to be paid within 72 hours of acceptance of the offer.

Kehler was the salesperson for both the buyer and the sellers — but the sellers say he never told them that.

A form that indicated the sellers knew he was also representing the buyer, dated June 15, 2020, was filed.

While it appeared to be signed with the sellers’ names, they said they didn’t see it until March 2021. One of the two wasn’t even in Winnipeg on June 15.

“Kehler, in his interview with commission staff, acknowledges that the sellers never signed this document — we note that the purported signatures on the form look nothing like the actual signatures of the sellers on other documents,” the decision says.

Kehler told commission staff he’d been authorized to sign on the sellers’ behalf, which they denied. The panel found them more believable.

Once the deal was made, the sellers, believing they had just a month before the buyer would take possession of their home, quickly packed up and prepared to move with their two young children.

Buyer never made deposit

Meanwhile, the buyer hadn’t made the $100,000 deposit before the deadline — but Kehler didn’t tell the sellers.

Kehler told commission staff that was because he thought the deposit was still coming, and he didn’t want to cause more stress for the sellers.

On July 10, just five days before the buyer was to take possession and the day before the family was leaving Winnipeg, the sellers spoke to Kehler — but he still didn’t tell them the deposit hadn’t been paid.

Kehler “said everything was fine,” according to the decision.

It wasn’t until the evening of July 13, when the family arrived in Toronto on their way to Ottawa and just 36 hours before the scheduled closing, that Kehler told them he’d never received the deposit.

Eventually, they received $4,000 of the deposit, but the sale of the house never closed. The sellers scrambled to extend the insurance on their old home and make sure they continued to pay the utility bills, the decision says.

Home relisted

Kehler then recommended they relist the home, and it went back on the market at $574,900.

On Aug. 10, 2020, Kehler recommended the price be reduced to $569,900. Instead, the seller said he should reduce the price to $567,900.

But when the seller looked at the online listing on Aug. 22, it was listed at $564,900.

The sellers also asked Kehler about maintaining the property, since they were no longer in Winnipeg. He agreed he would, but friends ended up going and mowing the lawn, the decision says.

The sellers asked Kehler and his brokerage about what could be done to “make things right,” the decision says, but they never received any responses.

On Sept. 5, they hired a new brokerage to sell the home. Under the new real estate salesman, they accepted an offer on Dec. 13, and closed the deal Jan. 2, 2021, receiving $507,500 for the home.

Kehler’s actions were “contrary to the best interests of the public” and undermined “public confidence in the real estate industry,” the decision says.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Real eState

Dr. Phil left speechless after real estate agent claims that squatting is justified by colonization – New York Post

Published

 on


Dr. Phil spoke with property owners about how squatters are using legal loopholes to occupy properties, but one real estate agent argued it can be justified because of a history of “colonization.”

Wednesday’s episode of “Dr. Phil Primetime” featured one guest named Kristine, a real estate agent who “doesn’t think adverse possession is immoral,” but believes that “people with no housing dying from the elements is immoral.” According to the Legal Information Institute, adverse possession is where a “person in possession of land owned by someone else may acquire valid title to it, so long as certain requirements are met, and the adverse possessor is in possession for a sufficient period of time.” The requirements and period of time vary by state and city.

In her introduction on the show, Kristine argued that there are “multi-million dollar projects, and they’re just abandoned.” She added that she believes the land of those abandoned projects can be reclaimed.

300x250x1

She also noted she is working with a client who is “trying to occupy a property” that’s around 300 or 500 acres.

“It’s something that’s so large that you wouldn’t even notice what 2 acres is compared to how many acres are on there,” she said. “Adverse possession is a law that’s left over from both Spanish and English colonization, it is how they took the land from the native people, and it’s a process we can use to take that land back.”


Dr. Phil
Dr. Phil’s guest explained that adverse possession is a law that’s left over from colonization. Youtube/Merit Street Media

“You said that if I’ve got 100 acres or 1,000 acres and somebody goes and gets in a corner of it and adversely possesses 5 acres of it, I’m not gonna miss it, I’ve got 1,000 acres anyway?” Dr. Phil asked Kristine.

“Well, yeah,” she responded. “Can you tell me, if you’re looking at 1,000 acres, could you tell me what 5 acres was?”

Dr. Phil’s jaw dropped, and he said, “Hell yes.”


Real estate agent Kristine
The real estate agent asked Dr. Phil he could pick 5 acres out of 1000. Youtube/Merit Street Media

A landlord named Tony argued with Kristine about how she believes the manner in which people inherit property should be taken into account when it comes to adverse possession.

“We’re not in 1776, we’re in 2024,” Tony said, sparking a wave of applause from the audience.

“Do you think that a corporation that makes over a billion dollars a year is injured by someone taking 5 acres of land?,” Kristine argued.

Another guest quickly interjected with “somebody is.”

Another guest named Patti confronted Kristine by arguing she does not use her car 24-hours-a-day.

“Playing out your scenario, then theoretically anyone on the street should be able to boost your car and drive it, because that car is just sitting around unused,” Patti said, sparking applause from the audience.

“I don’t have a billion-dollar net worth,” Kristine argued, which made Barry ask if having a billion dollars is where Kristine draws the line.

Dr. Phil concluded the episode by commending Kristine for her willingness to defend her beliefs, but said he “100%” disagreed with her.

“It is a lawful thing to do if you do it in the right way, I 100% disagree with your philosophy, but your facts are correct,” he said. “She’s not suggesting people go squat in someone’s home when they go on vacation, she’s talking about something completely different, at another level, and if you’re not a billionaire, she isn’t targeting you.”

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Real eState

Botched home sale costs Winnipeg man his right to sell real estate in Manitoba – CBC.ca

Published

 on


A Winnipeg man’s registration as a real estate salesman has been cancelled after a family vacated their home on a tight deadline for a sale that never went through, then changed brokerages and, months later, got $60,000 less for their house than what they expected when they moved out.

A Manitoba Securities Commission panel found Reginald Wayne Kehler engaged in professional misconduct and conduct unbecoming a registrant when he signed a document on behalf of sellers without their knowledge, reduced the listing price of a home without their approval, and didn’t tell them for nearly a month that a potential buyer hadn’t paid a promised $100,000 deposit.

The sellers, identified as D.R. and P.R. in the panel decision released Wednesday, were awarded $10,394 from the real estate reimbursement fund. Kehler was ordered to pay $12,075 to cover costs of the investigation and hearing.

300x250x1

The sellers were a military family who had to move in 2020 after the husband was posted to Ottawa.

They chose Kehler as their listing agent, because he had helped them find the home when they moved to Winnipeg in 2018, and they had a good relationship with him, the panel’s decision says.

They  listed their house in May and on June 15, 2020, accepted an offer of $570,000 with possession on July 15. A deposit of $100,000 was to be paid within 72 hours of acceptance of the offer.

Kehler was the salesperson for both the buyer and the sellers — but the sellers say he never told them that.

A form that indicated the sellers knew he was also representing the buyer, dated June 15, 2020, was filed.

While it appeared to be signed with the sellers’ names, they said they didn’t see it until March 2021. One of the two wasn’t even in Winnipeg on June 15.

“Kehler, in his interview with commission staff, acknowledges that the sellers never signed this document — we note that the purported signatures on the form look nothing like the actual signatures of the sellers on other documents,” the decision says.

Kehler told commission staff he’d been authorized to sign on the sellers’ behalf, which they denied. The panel found them more believable.

Once the deal was made, the sellers, believing they had just a month before the buyer would take possession of their home, quickly packed up and prepared to move with their two young children.

Buyer never made deposit

Meanwhile, the buyer hadn’t made the $100,000 deposit before the deadline — but Kehler didn’t tell the sellers.

Kehler told commission staff that was because he thought the deposit was still coming, and he didn’t want to cause more stress for the sellers.

On July 10, just five days before the buyer was to take possession and the day before the family was leaving Winnipeg, the sellers spoke to Kehler — but he still didn’t tell them the deposit hadn’t been paid.

Kehler “said everything was fine,” according to the decision.

It wasn’t until the evening of July 13, when the family arrived in Toronto on their way to Ottawa and just 36 hours before the scheduled closing, that Kehler told them he’d never received the deposit.

Eventually, they received $4,000 of the deposit, but the sale of the house never closed. The sellers scrambled to extend the insurance on their old home and make sure they continued to pay the utility bills, the decision says.

Home relisted

Kehler then recommended they relist the home, and it went back on the market at $574,900.

On Aug. 10, 2020, Kehler recommended the price be reduced to $569,900. Instead, the seller said he should reduce the price to $567,900.

But when the seller looked at the online listing on Aug. 22, it was listed at $564,900.

The sellers also asked Kehler about maintaining the property, since they were no longer in Winnipeg. He agreed he would, but friends ended up going and mowing the lawn, the decision says.

The sellers asked Kehler and his brokerage about what could be done to “make things right,” the decision says, but they never received any responses.

On Sept. 5, they hired a new brokerage to sell the home. Under the new real estate salesman, they accepted an offer on Dec. 13, and closed the deal Jan. 2, 2021, receiving $507,500 for the home.

Kehler’s actions were “contrary to the best interests of the public” and undermined “public confidence in the real estate industry,” the decision says.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending