adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Art

‘Rear View,’ a Show About Butts, Is Forward Thinking

Published

 on

At LGDR’s new gallery, blue-chip buttocks by 60 artists, from Degas and Klimt to Cecily Brown and Andy Warhol.

The four art dealers who trade together as LGDR have opened a gallery on East 64th Street with a preposterous inaugural exhibition — but before you take that the wrong way, remember the etymology. Preposterous, adjective: from the Latin prae-, meaning “before,” and posterus, or “coming after.” Something preposterous is turned the wrong way. It puts up front what belongs in the back. It repositions the posterior as anterior. …

I had better stop; “Rear View,” with more than 60 paintings, sculptures and photographs of human figures facing the more interesting way, invites a preposterous amount of wordplay. This show unites blue-chip buttocks by the likes of Francis Bacon, Andy Warhol, John Currin and Cecily Brown; dorsal drawings and pastels by Degas, Klimt and Schiele; and some market-oriented novelties from Issy Wood, Jenna Gribbon and other undistinguished young figurative painters. The bottoms on display are male and female, nude and clothed, seen from a forensic distance or in fetishistic close-up, but rarely lascivious. All together the show is well-bred and understated, with just a little cheekiness and some pretty good jokes, above all from Domenico Gnoli, the great painter of the postwar Italian bourgeoisie, who depicts the backside of … a painter’s canvas.

Many of the artists in “Rear View” channel their backward glances through the classical ideal. Greek and Roman sculptors lavished care on the backsides of their statues, such as the Callipygian Venus, whose bare bottom has drawn admirers for centuries to the National Archaeological Museum in Naples, Italy. (Callipygian, adjective: from the Greek kalli-, “beautiful,” and pyge, “buttocks.”) In this show, the hushed black-and-white photographs of Harry Callahan show the artist’s wife, Eleanor, in various classical poses: bent slightly at the hips like the Venus de Milo, or lounging bottom-up like the Sleeping Hermaphroditus. Michelangelo Pistoletto, the Arte Povera artist, places a concrete copy of the Aphrodite of Knidos in a pile of trash. Urs Fischer offers a literally waxen redeployment of antique statuary: a candle in the shape of the Three Graces, the central goddess facing backward, their absent heads turned into burning wicks.

300x250x1
Harry Callahan, “Eleanor,” conceived c. 1948, printed c. 1970s.via the Estate of Harry Callahan, Pace Gallery and LGDR

Longtime students of the rear view will have other vocabulary to draw from. First fundamental term: Rückenfigur, noun, German, a “figure from the back,” looking away from the viewer, establishing a frontier between the picture plane and the background. The most famous Rückenfigur is Caspar David Friedrich’s “Wanderer Above the Sea of Fog” (1818), who gazes out on the overcast mountains and valleys of Saxony in the archetype of Romantic melancholy. That Romantic view of the German landscape would, a century later, be perverted by totalitarian ideology — a legacy taken up by the young Anselm Kiefer in his much-debated “Occupations” photographs, from 1969. A half-dozen prints here depict Kiefer in the same rear view Friedrich favored; he performs the Hitler salute, but with slovenly hair, rumpled clothes, the picture of German failure. In the 2000s, the American photographer Carrie Mae Weems would also take up this politicized auto-Rückenfigur, facing away from the camera as we look through an antebellum doorway in Louisiana, or onto the cane fields of Cuba.

Carrie Mae Weems, “Passageway II,” 2003.via Carrie Mae Weems, Jack Shainman Gallery, New York and LGDR

Second fundamental term: académie, noun, French, a depiction of a nude model, made from life by an art student mastering the rudiments of painting and drawing. Models in the traditional academies were almost always men, and by the 20th century the artists who sketched them were losing some of their inhibitions about the curves and volumes they depicted. Paul Cadmus, whose retrograde male nudes are enjoying an unmerited revival in attention, appears here with yet more anemic drawings of standing and reclining musclemen, none more consequential than the gents on a Calvin Klein underwear box. (For what it’s worth, the gay male artists in this show all come out looking second-rate, with none of the perverse intelligence of Degas, Schiele and the other straight bros. Did Michelangelo die for this?) There’s a much finer update of the académie from Barkley L. Hendricks, who in “Pat’s Back” (1968) paints a nude Black model against an empty expanse of white: hips gently widening, shoulder blades gently arced, an anatomy lesson that’s also an ennoblement.

Barkley L. Hendricks, “Pat’s Back,” 1968, oil on canvas. The nude model stands against an empty expanse of white, “an anatomy lesson that is also an ennoblement,” says our critic.via the Estate of Barkley L. Hendricks and Jack Shainman Gallery, New York and LGDR

Third fundamental term: contrapposto, noun, Italian, a pose in which the body’s weight rests on one foot, resulting in a dynamic composition that puts the hips and shoulders at odds. All the great bottoms of art history are in contrapposto — the Farnese Hercules, hip thrust out like a soccer goalie’s; Michelangelo’s David, who cradles his slingstone beside his perked right cheek. The same pose is adopted by the most beautiful picture in “Rear View”: a small painting of a female model’s hindquarters by the uptight Swiss painter Félix Vallotton.

Félix Vallotton, “Étude de Fesses,” a study of buttocks from 1884 at LGDR’s new gallery.Fondation Félix Vallotton, Lausanne; via LGDR

In this “Étude de Fesses,” painted around 1884 and a rare loan from a private collection, the right cheek droops inches below the left, which is squared off where the sitzfleisch meets the thigh. The left hip arcs grandly, while the right one nearly disappears into a vertical line. Gentle shadowing picks out small passages of cellulite, and cool, clean vertical brushwork gives his oils the appearance of pastel. Cropped at the waist and the thighs, the study is certainly a fetish object. But the visible satisfaction of the model’s pose — arm akimbo, hand jauntily on hip, bottom thrust out with confidence — also marks a forceful break with the passivity of the female nude.

If you think this is all some museological booty call … well, you’d be partly right. As the art historian Patricia Lee Rubin writes in “Seen From Behind,” her 2018 book on backsides in Renaissance painting and sculpture, artistic depictions of the human rear have always had “a double life”: both base and noble, both desired and disgusting, “at once connected to the highest values of high art” and still “obscene, carnivalesque, comical or villainous.” These are the body parts most haunted by the specter of the ideal, and the derrières of this show might at their best inspire a commitment to finding a little more dignity in vice and a little more comedy in virtue. In my own case I also left committed to doing more leg presses.

Rear View
Through June 3. LGDR, 19 East 64th St., Manhattan; lgdr.com

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

Enter the uncanny valley: New exhibition mixes AI and art photography – Euronews

Published

 on


In 2023, Boris Eldagsen revealed that he won a prestigious photography award by submitting an AI-generated image. Now, a London gallery is putting on an exhibition of his work to demonstrate the power of AI in art.

Not long after the Sony World Photography Award Creative Category winner was announced last year, the victor came clean with a surprising revelation. German photographer Boris Eldagsen admitted that his first prize-winning photograph ‘The Electrician’ was actually an AI-generated image.

Eldagsen had created the image using the popular AI-image creating tool DALL-E 2. He turned down the prize, citing his motivation for entering to see if “competitions are prepared for AI images. They are not.”

300x250x1

A year on from his famous refusal, the Palmer Gallery in London is hosting an exhibition of his and other artists’ works to demonstrate the ways art and AI are being used together.

‘Post-Photography: The Uncanny Valley’ features the works of Eldagsen alongside artists Nouf Aljowaysir and Ben Millar Cole. Eldagsen is exhibiting ‘The Electrician’ as part of a series of photography works that blend natural imagery with the synthetic.

Saudi-born and New York-based artist and design technologist Aljowaysir has examined the biases in AI-image creation in her work Ana Min Wein: Where am I from?, to recover her Saudi Arabian and Iraqi lineage from more the stereotypes AI tools rely upon.

British artist Millar Cole’s work toys with the now-publicly understood telltale signs of AI-doctored images and blurs that line with more sophisticated imagery, to create an uncannily off image.

“The artists in the exhibition engage with the current possibilities of creative collaboration with AI tools, harnessing the unique affordances brought on by the various technologies, whilst thinking about their implications,” says AI-art curator Luba Elliott.

“Image recognition tools highlight the imperfection of the machine gaze, whereas photorealistic text-to-image models focus on portraying our collective imagination down to the smallest detail, with the prompt engineer at the steering wheel – taking the viewer to the next stage of art history,” Elliott continues.

The term “uncanny valley” was first invented in 1970 by Japanese robotics professor Masahiro Mori. He described it as the way that humans will increasingly empathise with anthropomorphous-robots until a threshold when they become too humanlike and we find them unsettling.

As a concept, the uncanny was popularised by psychologists Ernst Jentsch and Sigmund Freud in their description of how familiar things can become strange when they present themselves as a facsimile of another part of ordinary life – they used dolls as a primary example.

The case against

While the Palmer Gallery is embracing a dialogue between AI and contemporary artists, other artists have been less willing to engage with the controversial technology.

Earlier this month, over 200 musicians signed an open letter from Artist Rights Alliance calling on artificial intelligence tech companies, developers, platforms, digital music services and platforms to stop using AI “to infringe upon and devalue the rights of human artists.”

Signatories of the letter included: Stevie Wonder, Robert Smith, Billie Eilish, Nicki Minaj, R.E.M., Peter Frampton, Jon Batiste, Katy Perry, Sheryl Crow, Smokey Robinson, and the estates of Bob Marley and Frank Sinatra.

While the full letter did acknowledge the value that AI could bring to areas of art, it was primarily concerned with the way non-creatives will rely on these nascent tools to further undermine the value of human creativity.

“Unchecked, AI will set in motion a race to the bottom that will degrade the value of our work and prevent us from being fairly compensated for it,” the letter writes. “This assault on human creativity must be stopped. We must protect against the predatory use of AI to steal professional artists’ voices and likenesses, violate creators’ rights, and destroy the music ecosystem.”

Similarly, Australian musician Nick Cave has spoken out against AI’s influence on art. When sent the lyrics to a ChatGPT generated impression of his work, he responded vociferously.

“Songs arise out of suffering, by which I mean they are predicated upon the complex, internal human struggle of creation and, well, as far as I know, algorithms don’t feel. Data doesn’t suffer. ChatGPT has no inner being, it has been nowhere, it has endured nothing, it has not had the audacity to reach beyond its limitations, and hence it doesn’t have the capacity for a shared transcendent experience, as it has no limitations from which to transcend.”

“ChatGPT’s melancholy role is that it is destined to imitate and can never have an authentic human experience, no matter how devalued and inconsequential the human experience may in time become,” Cave said.

During last year’s Writers Guild of America (WGA) strike that demanded restrictions on the use of AI to replace creative work, I also wrote against the over-valuation of AI’s talents: “The real human experiences that inspire art is what makes us fall in love with them. AI may be increasingly accurate at capturing an artist’s aesthetic, but that’s only skin-deep. It may be a useful tool for many aspects of an artist’s career, but it could never replace an artist entirely.”

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

First Nations art worth $60K stolen in Saanich, B.C. | CTV News – CTV News Vancouver

Published

 on


A large collection of First Nations art worth more than $60,000 was stolen in Saanich earlier this month, police announced Thursday.

The Saanich Police Department said in a statement that the art was taken from a residence in Gordon Head on April 2.

“The collection includes several pieces by First Nations artist Calvin Moreberg as well as Inuit carvings that are estimated to be over 60 years old,” the statement reads.

300x250x1

Photos of several of the stolen pieces were included in the news release. Police did not elaborate on how or at what time of day they believe the art was stolen, nor did they say why they waited more than two weeks to issue an appeal to the public for help finding it.

Anyone who has seen the missing art pieces or has information related to the investigation should call Saanich police at 250-475-4321 or email majorcrime@saanichpolice.ca, police said.

Saanich police provided images of several of the stolen art pieces in their release. (Saanich Police Department)

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

Art in Bloom returns – CTV News Winnipeg

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Art in Bloom returns  CTV News Winnipeg

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending