Connect with us


Remarks by President Biden on the Economy – The White House



11:43 A.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, good morning.  Tomorrow marks exactly six months since my administration began.  I think it’s a fitting moment to take a look at our economy — where we were six months ago, what we’ve achieved since then, and what I believe we’ve — I believe where we’re headed. 
Before I took office, there was a lot of folks out there — a lot of folks out there making some pretty bold predictions about how things would turn out.  You might remember some of the predictions.  That if I became President, we’d, quote, “see a depression the likes of which we’ve never seen.”  End of quote. 

Well, it’s true that the economy was sputtering before I got here, adding only 60,000 jobs per month for the three months before I was sworn in.  But now, six months later, we’ve changed that. 

We’ve gone from 60,000 jobs per month to 60,000 jobs every three days — more than 600,000 jobs per month since I took office.  More than 3 million new jobs all told.  That’s the fastest growth, I’m told, at this point in any administration’s history.

Another prediction — that is my favorite one, I must add — is that if I got elected, I’d bring the end to capitalism.  (Laughs.)  I never understood that one, but we’ve heard — we’ve heard it an awful lot.  Well, in six months into my administration, the U.S. economy has experienced the highest economic growth rate in nearly 40 years. 

And we know we’ve — and now we knew that we needed to launch a war-time effort to get the — America vaccinated and pass a powerful American Rescue Plan. 

We did both those things.  And now, the forecasters have doubled their projections for growth this year in the economy to 7 percent or higher.  In fact, the U.S. is the only developed country in the world where growth projections today are stronger than they were before the pandemic hit. 

At the same time, companies across the country are giving workers a raise.  Unusual thing.  (Laughs.)  And the number of new unemployment claims has been cut by more than half since I took office. 

And by the way, two weeks ago, I issued a major executive order promoting fair and open competition, which is the cornerstone — the cornerstone of American capitalism, banning non-compete clauses that suppress workers’ wages; lowering the price of things like hearing aids, prescription drugs, Internet service; along with dozens of other actions. 

Folks, it turns out capitalism is alive and very well.  We’re making serious progress to ensure that it works the way it’s supposed to work: for the good of the American people.

So, for all those predictions of doom and gloom, six months in, here’s where we stand: record growth, record job creation, workers getting hard-earned breaks. 

Look, we’ve brought this economy back from the brink.  And we designed our strategy not only to provide for a temporary boost, but to lay the foundation for a long-term boom that brings everyone along.

You know, that’s why we designed the American Rescue Plan to help not just all those — everyone at once, but over the course of a full year and beyond so we could help families and small businesses weather the ups and downs of our — as the economy recovers from an historic pandemic.  And I — there are going to be ups and downs.

We saw a great example of that just last week.  For the first time, monthly payments began going out to nearly every working family raising a child in the United States of America.  Thanks to the expanded Child Tax Credit in the American Rescue Plan: $300 a month going out for each child under the age of six, and $250 for every child 6 through 17, every month for the next six months, with more coming in the spring. 

That money is a game-changer.  For some, it’s a lifesaver.  Think of the single mom, struggling to put food on the table each month.  The parent who has to tell their kid, “I’m sorry, honey, but we can’t afford those dance classes or the sports team you want to play on this fall.  We can’t do it.”  You know, they can’t wait for the credit against their taxes to be coming next year as a tax credit.  They need cash in their pockets today. 

For families with the least, this money will do the most — dramatically reducing child poverty in America.  And for millions of middle-class families, it will give them a little bit of breathing room every month.  That’s just one example of how we’re building an economy from the bottom up and the middle out.  

But despite that progress, we cannot afford to be complacent.  We know that our economic recovery hinges on getting the pandemic under control. 

You know, and by fully vaccinating 160 million Americans, 80 percent of our seniors, we’ve fundamentally changed the course of the pandemic — from one that threatens all Americans, to a disease that has the most severe impacts only on the unvaccinated people in the country.  But we can’t let up, especially since and because of the Delta variant, which is more transmis- — more transmissible and more dangerous. 

Unfortunately, cases are now rising, particularly in communities with very low vaccination rates.  Just four states account for nearly 40 percent — four states, 40 percent of all cases last week.  Virtually all hospitalizations and deaths are occurring among unvaccinated Americans.  These tragedies are avoidable. 

The data couldn’t be clearer: If you’re fully vaccinated, you have a high degree of protection against severe illness, hospitalization, and death.  If you’re unvaccinated, you are not protected. So, please, please get vaccinated.  Get vaccinated now.  It works.  It’s safe.  It’s free.  It’s convenient.

You know, this virus doesn’t have to hold you back any longer.  It doesn’t have to hold our economy back any longer.  But the only way we put it behind us is if more Americans get vaccinated.

We also know that as our economy has come roaring back, we’ve seen some price increases.  Some folks have raised worries that this could be a sign of persistent inflation.  But that’s not our view.  Our experts believe and the data shows that most of the price increases we’ve seen are — were expected and expected to be temporary.

The reality is, you can’t flip the global economic light back on and not expect this to happen.  As demand returns, there’s going to be global supply chain challenges.  We’ve seen that in semi-conductors, which are used in automobiles.  That global shortage has slowed vehicle production, creating a temporary spike in car prices.  That’s a real challenge.  And my administration is doing everything we can to address it.  But again, these disruptions are temporary. 

Lumber prices are another example.  They spiked early in our recovery, but in recent weeks, they’ve began to fall — they’ve fallen by more than 50 percent. 

In the hospitality industry, prices are returning to where they used to be.  Economists call all of these things “transitory effects.”  And they account for about 60 percent of the price increases we’ve seen over the last few months. 

Now, I want to be clear: My administration understands that if we were to ever experience unchecked inflation over the long term that would pose real challenges to our economy.  So while we’re confident that isn’t what we are seeing today, we’re going to remain vigilant about any response that is needed. 

As I made clear to Chairman Powell of the Federal Reserve when we met recently, the Fed is independent.  It should take whatever steps it deems necessary to support a strong, durable economic recovery.  But whatever different views some might have on current price increases, we should be united on one thing: passage of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework, which we shook hands on.  We shook hands on it.  And my Build Back Better plan will be a force for achieving lower prices for Americans looking ahead.  It’s another reason why these investments are so important. 

If we make a prudent, multi-year investments in better roads, bridges, transit systems, and high-speed Internet, and a modern, resilient electric grid, here’s what will happen: It breaks up the bottlenecks in our economy.  Goods get to consumers more rapidly and less expensively.  Small businesses create and innovate much more seamlessly.  If we increase the availability of quality, affordable childcare, eldercare, paid leave, more people will enter the workforce. 

These steps will enhance our productivity — raising wages without raising prices.  That won’t increase inflation.  It will take the pressure off of inflation, give a boost to our workforce, which leads to lower prices in the years ahead. 

So, if your primary concern right now is inflation, you should be even more enthusiastic about this plan.  And as we promote — as we promote fair competition in our economy through the executive order I mentioned, it will drive down prices even further.  New businesses will get in the game, competing against those giant corporations who have been free to ramp up prices because they haven’t had any real competition.

Look, the bottom line is this: What the best companies do and what we as a country should do is make smart, sustainable investments with appropriate financing to make this nation more productive, to advance America’s leadership on clean energy to win the jobs of the future while meeting the threat of climate change, and to ensure that all working Americans benefit from the growth they’re helping produce. 

The independent experts who have analyzed my plans have found that they would do just that: expand output and enable millions of Americans to enter the labor workforce now, just this year — not just for the next — but not just this year, but for decades in the future.  It’s not temporary.

This is the best strategy to create millions of jobs and lift up the middle-class families and grow wages and keep prices affordable for the long term. 

What we can’t do is go back to the same old trickle-down theories that gave us nearly $2 trillion in deficit-financed corporate tax giveaways that did nothing to make our economy more productive or resilient.  The same people who cheered on that approach are now telling us it isn’t [is] a problem if big companies have actually to compete for workers and offer them a fair wage with some dignity.

I could not disagree more.  We can’t go back to the old, failed thinking.  We need to grow the economy from the bottom up and the middle out, as I’ve said before. 

The investments I’m proposing are investments the American people want and investments that our country needs.  And if we get this done, a wide range of independent forecasters project that it will have an incredibly significant impact on GDP and jobs — good-paying jobs with prevailing wages.  And the majority of these jobs will go to people without a college degree. 

I’ve said it before, and it’s true: This is a blue-collar blueprint for building an American economy back.  Simply put, we can’t afford not to make these investments.  And we’re going to pay for them responsibly as well, by ensuring that our largest corporations and the very wealthiest among us pay their fair share by reforming our international tax system with a minimum global tax, which we’ve led the world to agree to. 

Let me close with this: When I arrived in office, it had been a long time since the government had worked for the people.  Things had been great for big corporations and folks at the top.  Those 55 major corporations that paid zero in income tax while making billions in profits, they had no complaints. 

But when I took office, I made a commitment — a commitment to the American people that we were going to change that paradigm so working families could have a fighting chance again to get a good education; to get a good job and a raise; to take care of the elderly parent or the child with the disability and still be able to go out and earn a good living; to stop losing hours of their lives stuck in traffic because the streets are crumbling; or waiting for slow, spotty Internet to connect them to the world. 

That’s what the economy we’re building is all about.  That’s why we passed the American Rescue Plan.  And that’s why we need the investment of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework and my Build Back Better plan. 

Our economy has come a long way over the last six months.  We can’t slow down now.  We can make this boom we’re experiencing today one that will ensure that all Americans have an opportunity to share in it for years to come.  And we can show the world that American democracy can deliver for the people. 

I look forward to continuing to build this economy.  And I’m incredibly optimistic about what we’re going to be able to build together in the next six months and the years to come. 

Thank you all for listening.  May God bless you.  And I’ll take a few questions.

Q    Mr. President, you said last week that companies and platforms like Facebook are “killing people” by letting them —

THE PRESIDENT:  Let me (inaudible) precisely what I said.  I’m glad you asked me that question.  One, I had just read that — on the Facebook — Facebook pointed out that — it was pointed out that Facebook, of all the misinformation, 60 percent of that misinformation came from 12 individuals.  That’s what the article said. 

So, I was asked that question about what do I think is happening.  Facebook isn’t killing people; these 12 people who are out there giving misinformation — anyone listening to it is getting hurt by it.  It’s killing people.  It’s bad information.

My hope is that Facebook, instead of taking it personally — that somehow I’m saying Facebook is killing people — that they would do something about the misinformation — the outrageous informa- — misinformation about the vaccine.  That’s what I meant.

Q    Have they done enough in your opinion to stop —

THE PRESIDENT:  I haven’t — to be completely honest with you, I don’t know that they did anything today.  Up to — over the weekend, I don’t think they had.  But I don’t know.  I don’t know the answer to that question.

Q    Will you hold them accountable if they don’t do more to stop the spread?

THE PRESIDENT:  I’m — when you say “hold accountable,” I just want to — I’m not trying to hold people account- — I’m trying make people to look at themselves.  Look in the mirror.  Think about that misinformation going to your son, your daughter, your relatives, someone you love.  That’s what I’m asking.

All the way in the back. 

Q    Yes, thank you, Mr. President.  At what point would you consider inflation unchecked to a point at which you would either consider taking action or you would want to see the Fed take action?

And secondly, why do you believe that the budget bill is appropriate legislation for a pathway to citizenship?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, first of all, I think we need to find pathways to citizenship.  The budget bill is an appropriate way to get around the filibuster to be able to make a judgment as to whether or not they should have a pathway.  That’s for the Parli- — Parliamentarian to decide, though — not for Joe Biden to decide.

Your first ques- — part of the question was?

Q    It was on inflation.  You mentioned unchecked inflation.

THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.  There’s nobody suggesting there’s unchecked inflation on the way — no serious economist.  That’s totally different. 

I mean, look, the stock market is higher than it has been in all of history, even went down this month — even down this month.

Now, I don’t look at the stock market as a means by which to judge the economy like my predecessor did.  But he’d be very — he’d be talking to you every day for the last five months about how the stock market is so high — higher than any time in history, still higher than any time in history.

So, that’s not how I judge whether or not we have economic growth.
Q    Mr. President, on China and cyber hacking —

THE PRESIDENT:  She jumps up before you do.  (Laughter.)

Q    Effectively, your administration is naming and shaming China, but no sanctions.  Why?  And is that effective enough?

THE PRESIDENT:  They’re still determining exactly what happened.  The investigation is not finished. 

Thank you all very much.

Q    On China real quick — on China real quick: What is your understanding of the biggest difference between what they’ve done versus what Russia has done in terms of cyber hacking?

THE PRESIDENT:  That’d take a longer explanation.

Q    We have all the time in the world.  What is it?

THE PRESIDENT:  No, we don’t.  I have to go see the King of Jordan. 

Look, to the best of my knowledge — and I’m getting a report tomorrow morning on this, a detailed report — my understanding is that the Chinese government, not unlike the Russian government, is not doing this themselves, but are protecting those who are doing it and maybe even accommodating them being able to do it.  That may be the difference. 

Thank you.

Q    Should the Olympics go forward, Mr. President?


12:02 P.M. EDT

Adblock test (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


$2T needed to reach 2050 target of net-zero economy: RBC – BNN



OTTAWA — A new report says the country will need roughly $2 trillion to put the economy on a path to net-zero emissions in 30 years, including government spending on things like skills training and backstops to prod the necessary investments.

The report from RBC Economics estimates governments, businesses and communities would have to spend at least $60 billion annually to cut emissions by 75 per cent of current levels and reach the 2050 target of net zero.

Money will be needed to build out the electricity system to handle the expected rise in electric vehicles, which will also need some subsidies to get them off assembly lines and onto Canadian roads, the report says.

There will also have to be investment in retrofitting old buildings faster than current federal plans predict, retraining 100,000 workers with new skills for fast-growing green sectors, and skills training programs to add 200,000 more into the labour force by 2030.

The numbers add up to a massive effort to meet the Trudeau Liberals’ short-term and long-term promises on climate change, but one the Royal Bank report estimates is possible if the government eyes a few key areas.

It’s not about ideology, it’s about math. And we’ve done the math and said, OK, here is how we can get those numbers down towards zero, and this is what it is going to cost,” said John Stackhouse, senior vice-president in the office of the CEO at Royal Bank.We think that it’s doable. So let’s focus in a very kind of business-minded way on the key drivers of emissions change.”

Parliament approved legislation last spring that required the country to eliminate as many greenhouse gas emissions as possible, and capture whatever is left to get to net zero by 2050.
The Liberals haven’t outlined the course to the long-term goal, and won’t before a United Nations climate change conference, known as COP26, looming at the end of the month in Glasgow, Scotland.

The government has increased its emissions-reduction targets for 2030 as required by the climate agreement.

Internal government documents suggest the Liberals are acutely aware of the cost to shift the country to net zero and have looked to push banks and other private sector investors to help with funding and financing.

Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland’s officials wrote in a September 2020 briefing note that the country’s financial sector, including banks, will need to play a major role” to create a net-zero economy. The briefing note created ahead of Freeland’s meeting with bank CEOs also noted how their institutions needed to do more tofoster the right conditions to support the acceleration of sustainable investment.”

Unlocking some of the needed spending will require federal politicians to create new platforms to channel private investment into green endeavors that may be akin to the Canada Infrastructure Bank.

The Liberals created the agency in 2017 to use federal dollars as a way to entice funding from private-sector investors, but its efforts and existence have become highly politicized with vows from the NDP and Conservatives to dismantle it if either are elected to govern.

Stackhouse said the country needs organizations similar to the infrastructure bank that can be semi-autonomous in terms of investment selections, but subject to government oversight.

Whatever gets created to spur investment has to survive successive governments through to 2050, and should be depoliticized for a better chance of success, he said.

“This is a 30-year project. There will be different governments during those 30 years. So let’s create entities that can channel both public investment and crowd-in private investment to focus on the key strategic drivers,” Stackhouse said.

But the report also warns of moving too fast, too soon. If there was a sudden and severe decline in oil and gas production, government revenues would fall by about $8 billion annually, which the report says could hamper, not help, the transition.

Adblock test (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


Minister of Finance to Release 2021 Ontario Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review on November 4 – Government of Ontario News



[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Minister of Finance to Release 2021 Ontario Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review on November 4  Government of Ontario News

Source link

Continue Reading


U.S. Federal Reserve survey finds economy facing supply chain, other drags – The Globe and Mail



Trucks transport cargo containers at the Port of Baltimore in Baltimore, Maryland. Supply bottlenecks and labor shortages have slowed U.S. economic growth and contributed to a sharp rise in prices, the Federal Reserve said Oct. 20, 2021.


The U.S. Federal Reserve reports that the economy faced a number of headwinds at the start of this month, ranging from supply chain disruptions and labour shortages to uncertainty about the Delta variant of COVID-19.

In its latest survey of business conditions around the U.S., the Fed said Wednesday that a majority of its 12 regions viewed consumer spending, the main driving force for the economy, as remaining positive despite the various speed bumps.

The report noted wide differences in performance, however. It noted that auto sales suffered because of constrained inventories resulting from problems obtaining critical semi-conductor components. Manufacturing, meanwhile, was growing either moderately or robustly depending on which Fed district was reporting.

“Outlook for near-term economic activity remained positive, overall, but some districts noted increased uncertainty and more cautious optimism than in previous months,” the Fed said in the report on business conditions around the country, known as the beige book.

The report, based on surveys of business contacts by the Fed’s 12 regional banks, will form the basis for discussion when central bank officials next meet on Nov. 2-3.

The Fed is widely expected to announce at that meeting that it will begin to reduce, or taper, its US$120-billion in monthly bond purchases starting either in November or December.

Those purchases have been designed to give the economy an extra boost by holding down long-term interest rates.

A move to trim the purchases is expected to be followed in the second half of next year with the first rate hikes. The Fed’s benchmark interest rate has been at an ultralow zero to 0.25 per cent since the COVID pandemic struck with force in the spring of 2020 but there are growing calls to begin removing its support in the face of rising price pressures this year.

The beige book found “significantly elevated” prices with widespread increases across industry sectors in large part because of supply chain bottlenecks.

Prices for steel, electronic components and shipping costs all “rose markedly” during the survey period, the report said.

Expectations for future price increases varied, the Fed report said, with some business contacts expecting prices to remain high or even increase further, while others expected prices to moderate over the next 12 months.

Fed board member Randall Quarles said in a speech Wednesday that he believes elevated inflation will start to “decline considerably next year from its currently very elevated rate.” That reflects his belief that the factors now disrupting the economy, such as supply bottlenecks, “appear likely to fade over time.”

The beige book report noted that while the demand for labour was high, job gains had been dampened by a low supply of workers, forcing many retail, hospitality and manufacturing companies to cut hours or production because they did not have enough employees.

“Firms reported high turnover as workers left for other jobs or retired,” the Fed report said. “Child-care issues and vaccine mandates were widely cited as contributing to the problem.”

In an effort to deal with the labour shortages, the Fed said many companies were offering more training to prospective workers and also boosting wages.

In addition to higher starting wages and increased pay to retain workers, companies reported offering signing and retention bonuses, flexible work schedules or increased vacation time as other incentives, the Fed survey found.

The Fed’s report was based on interviews conducted by the 12 regional banks on or before Oct. 8.

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Adblock test (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading