adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Tech

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra review: Is its $1,400 price tag justified? – Business Insider – Business Insider

Published

 on


  • I’ve spent a little over a week with the Galaxy S20 Ultra, and I love this phone. At the same time, I better love this phone, considering its $1,400 price tag. 
  • I’ve loved its large screen, great battery life, fast charger, and excellent camera.
  • I wish Samsung offered the Galaxy S20 Ultra in more colors, and more than anything, that it didn’t cost $1,400. 
  • The 100x zoom that can be achieved with the Galaxy S20 Ultra is a bad gimmick, and no one should buy it for that feature. 
  • The fast 5G networks are currently sparse, and the slower long-range 5G hasn’t offered much more over 4G LTE so far — upgrading to the Galaxy S20 Ultra for 5G will ultimately lead to disappointment. 
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

I’ve been using the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra for a little over a week, and I’ve been loving it!

Of course I’ve been loving it — it’s a $1,400 smartphone. For that price, I better have been loving it.

Considering Samsung’s pedigree for making great smartphones, it’s no surprise the company has made a truly powerful, gorgeous, insanely feature-packed smartphone. But I have to pinch myself back to reality and remember that I didn’t pay for this $1,400 thing, and I’m not entirely sure you should, either.

Check out things I liked and disliked about Samsung’s Galaxy S20 Ultra:

Starting off with the things I liked: The screen beats almost every other smartphone out there.

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra iPhone 11 Pro Max Google Pixel 4XL smart phone



Crystal Cox/Business Insider


No surprises here — Samsung’s smartphone screens tend to be the best in the business, and the Galaxy S20 Ultra carries on that tradition. 

Combined with Samsung’s AMOLED display, the sheer 6.9-inch size of the screen on the Galaxy S20 Ultra makes anything and everything look superb. 

Sprinkle on the 120Hz option on the Galaxy S20 Ultra, and you have yourself an undisputed winner. The phone glides through the Android operating system and apps effortlessly due to the higher refresh rate, and it looks and feels better than any previous Samsung Galaxy phone, or any other phone with standard 60Hz screens.

The 120Hz screen on its own isn’t a reason to upgrade from a recent phone — there’s no particular rush to experience it, and it’s not going anywhere. But the point is that Samsung has set a very high bar. When you do upgrade to a new smartphone — and assuming you usually get premium flagships — get a phone with a high refresh rate screen. 

A couple of things to note here:

  • All of Samsung’s Galaxy S20 phones have 120Hz refresh rate screen, so you don’t necessarily have to buy the $1,400 S20 Ultra to get the experience. 
  • The 120Hz option is only available when the screen is set to its FHD 1080p resolution, not its full-fat WQHD 1440p resolution. WQHD is sharper than FHD, but in all honesty, I never longed for a sharper resolution while using the phone at FHD, and the 120Hz refresh rate is so good that it makes up for any loss of sharpness.

The battery life on the Galaxy S20 Ultra has been excellent.

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra iPhone 11 Pro Max Google Pixel 4XL smart phone



Crystal Cox/Business Insider


A big screen means a big phone, which often means a big battery. Indeed, the 5,000mAh battery in the Galaxy S20 Ultra is among the largest in any smartphone, and battery life does not disappoint. 

Samsung or any other company hasn’t yet reinvented the battery, so you’ll still be charging the phone every day, or every day and a half. But I never got the sense that the battery was draining too quickly, and I was confident that the battery would easily last me the entire day. By the end of the day, I would have about 45% battery life remaining.

For reference, screen-on-time ranged between three hours and four-and-a-half hours during my time with the Galaxy S20 Ultra. I also use the mobile hotspot on most days for about an hour, stream YouTube videos for at least an hour, taking photos, streaming music, browsing the web and social media, and anything else the average person would do with their phone, like getting directions (driving directions, included) in Google Maps and so on. 

The Galaxy S20 Ultra comes with a very fast charger.

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra iPhone 11 Pro Max Google Pixel 4XL smart phone



Crystal Cox/Business Insider


Big batteries also often come with longer charging times, so I was pleased to find that Samsung included its fast 25W charger with the Galaxy S20 Ultra. With that said, the S20 Ultra supports Samsung’s 45W charger, and the phone really should have come with that charger instead, especially if you’re paying $1,400. 

Still, the 25W charger makes quick work of charging, which is especially appreciated when you don’t have much time to charge the phone. And even if you don’t get it to 100%, the charger is fast enough that it gives the phone a big battery boost, and gives the confidence the phone will last until the next charging opportunity. 

The Galaxy S20 Ultra’s camera takes stunning photos.

galaxy s20 ultra photo 1wtc



Antonio Villas-Boas/Business Insider


Thanks to Google and LG’s latest devices that only have two cameras that actually capture a photo, Samsung’s Galaxy S20 Ultra and its triple-lens camera system shines brighter than almost any other smartphone right now.

Having used the Google Pixel 4XL for months, which comes with a regular camera and a zoomed lens, the versatility of the Galaxy S20 Ultra’s cameras that includes a regular, zoomed, and ultra-wide-angle camera have been incredibly refreshing, especially with its ultra-wide-angle lens. 

A personal side-note: As usual, Samsung’s cameras take great photos, but they typically have an overly processed look for my taste. Samsung is still trying too hard to make your photos look good, and the effort often backfires. I’ve found that the Galaxy S20 Ultra can add too much brightness to a photo, and it can remove a photo’s depth as a result of brightening up shady areas and shadows. And colors can look overly saturated, too. But for the most part, I’m pleased with the photos.

The 108-megapixel camera captures a stunning amount of detail compared to a standard 12-megapixel camera.

galaxy s20 ultra 108 megapixel camera vs 12

The Galaxy S20 Ultra’s 108-megapixel camera mode (right) versus its 12-megapixel mode (left).

Antonio Villas-Boas/Business Insider


You can clearly see above that the photo on the left taken with the S20 Ultra’s 108-megapixel camera is sharper and has more detail than the photo on the right, which was taken with the S20 Ultra’s standard 12-megapixel mode. 

More megapixels translates to more detail, and it’s clear that the Galaxy S20 Ultra’s 108-megapixel camera is working.

And for reference, here’s the original photo:

Now for the things I don’t like about the Galaxy S20 Ultra: It’s a shame it’s only available in gray or back.

galaxy s20 blue



Antonio Villas-Boas/Business Insider


Samsung offers the Galaxy S20 and S20 Plus in blue (and pink exclusively for the smaller Galaxy S20), and it’s too bad you don’t get that option for the S20 Ultra. 

The “cloud blue” option would look great on a phone with such a large, plain surface like the S20 Ultra’s back. But you’re stuck with either gray or black, which I find dull and uninspiring. 

The 100x zoom is a bad gimmick.

galaxy s20 ultra 100x zoom



Antonio Villas-Boas/Business Insider


I’ve taken several 100x zoom photos with the S20 Ultra, and I wouldn’t show any of them to friends and family. 

To be fair, it’s a feat that a phone can zoom in to 100x, even if it’s the inferior digital zoom compared to superior optical zoom. But the S20 Ultra’s 100x zoomed photos are blurry and void of detail, and they look plain bad. Do not get this phone because of the 100x zoom. 

With that said, the S20 Ultra has better zooming capabilities than its siblings, which means it can zoom further while maintaining enough detail. It can zoom up to 30x zoom and photos can still look decently presentable. Meanwhile, the zoom lens on the regular S20 and S20 Plus aren’t as powerful, and you likely won’t be able to zoom in as far as the Galaxy S20 Ultra and still have a presentable photo. 

Samsung phones historically don’t get big Android updates very quickly, and there’s nothing to indicate that anything will be different with the Galaxy S20 Ultra.

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra iPhone 11 Pro Max Google Pixel 4XL smart phone



Crystal Cox/Business Insider


Samsung phones aren’t the slowest when it comes to receiving big Android updates, like a new version of Android. But they’re not the fastest, either. 

The Galaxy S10 phones started getting updates from Android 9 to Android 10 in December 2019, about two or so months after Google released Android 10 on its Pixel devices in October. 

For a Google Pixel user, or someone switching over from Apple’s iPhone, the delay in receiving a big operating system update could be jarring. Still, Samsung has been good about releasing monthly security updates on time. 

Its biggest negative: the $1,400 price tag.

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra iPhone 11 Pro Max Google Pixel 4XL smart phone



Crystal Cox/Business Insider


Despite the complaints from reviewers and users alike that smartphones are getting too expensive, Samsung doubled down on high price tags in 2020.

There’s no doubt that the Galaxy S20 Ultra is a fantastic smartphone, but it doesn’t differentiate itself enough from its cheaper siblings to justify $1,400. At the same time, it’s not like the cheaper siblings are that much cheaper, either. And if you’re considering the Galaxy S20 Ultra, I’d imagine the only other alternative would be the $1,200 Galaxy S20 Plus with a large 6.7-inch screen rather than the $1,000 6.2-inch Galaxy S20. 

Still, a high price tag isn’t an issue if the product justifies it — and I’m torn with the Galaxy S20 Ultra. On one hand, the Galaxy S20 Ultra has two defining features that justifies a higher price tag than its cheaper sibling, the $1,200 Galaxy S20 Plus. Those two features are a larger screen and a larger battery. 

On the other hand, it’s hard to say that just 0.2 inches of screen size and an 500mAh of battery size is really worth an extra $200. 

The Galaxy S20 Ultra does offer a few more things over the Galaxy S20 Plus, including a 108-megapixel camera versus the 12-megapixel camera. But, for the average person, even one who appreciates tech and photography, I can’t say that’s worth an extra $200, either. 

What about 5G?

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra iPhone 11 Pro Max Google Pixel 4XL smart phone



Crystal Cox/Business Insider


At the moment, 5G shouldn’t be a massive selling point for the Galaxy S20 Ultra, which supports low-band, mid-band, and the fastest high-band versions of 5G. 

5G connectivity isn’t something that differentiates the S20 Ultra from the S20 Plus — both phones support the three main 5G bands. It only differentiates against the regular Galaxy S20, which doesn’t support the fastest high-band 5G. 

With that said, fast high-band 5G networks are sparse, and it’s unlikely to be the primary network that most people will be connecting to. 5G coverage, namely high-band coverage, will surely improve over time, but it’s more of a novelty at the moment.

Rather, more people are likely to connect to long-range low-band 5G networks that are slower, but have significantly more coverage. And at the time of writing, only T-Mobile has a wide-reaching low-band 5G network, which means T-Mobile customers will have the highest chance of connecting to a 5G network when the Galaxy S20 is fully released. 

Unfortunately, I didn’t experience much of a difference from regular 4G LTE when I was checking out T-Mobile’s long-range 5G network.

All in all, upgrading to the Galaxy S20 Ultra — and any of the S20 models, for that matter — for 5G will probably lead to disappointment. At least, that’s going to be the case until 5G networks are more fully fleshed out and available. And a lot of that hinges on cellular carriers. 

Get the latest Google stock price here.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

News

The Internet is Littered in ‘Educated Guesses’ Without the ‘Education’

Published

 on

Although no one likes a know-it-all, they dominate the Internet.

The Internet began as a vast repository of information. It quickly became a breeding ground for self-proclaimed experts seeking what most people desire: recognition and money.

Today, anyone with an Internet connection and some typing skills can position themselves, regardless of their education or experience, as a subject matter expert (SME). From relationship advice, career coaching, and health and nutrition tips to citizen journalists practicing pseudo-journalism, the Internet is awash with individuals—Internet talking heads—sharing their “insights,” which are, in large part, essentially educated guesses without the education or experience.

The Internet has become a 24/7/365 sitcom where armchair experts think they’re the star.

Not long ago, years, sometimes decades, of dedicated work and acquiring education in one’s field was once required to be recognized as an expert. The knowledge and opinions of doctors, scientists, historians, et al. were respected due to their education and experience. Today, a social media account and a knack for hyperbole are all it takes to present oneself as an “expert” to achieve Internet fame that can be monetized.

On the Internet, nearly every piece of content is self-serving in some way.

The line between actual expertise and self-professed knowledge has become blurry as an out-of-focus selfie. Inadvertently, social media platforms have created an informal degree program where likes and shares are equivalent to degrees. After reading selective articles, they’ve found via and watching some TikTok videos, a person can post a video claiming they’re an herbal medicine expert. Their new “knowledge,” which their followers will absorb, claims that Panda dung tea—one of the most expensive teas in the world and isn’t what its name implies—cures everything from hypertension to existential crisis. Meanwhile, registered dietitians are shaking their heads, wondering how to compete against all the misinformation their clients are exposed to.

More disturbing are individuals obsessed with evangelizing their beliefs or conspiracy theories. These people write in-depth blog posts, such as Elvis Is Alive and the Moon Landings Were Staged, with links to obscure YouTube videos, websites, social media accounts, and blogs. Regardless of your beliefs, someone or a group on the Internet shares them, thus confirming your beliefs.

Misinformation is the Internet’s currency used to get likes, shares, and engagement; thus, it often spreads like a cosmic joke. Consider the prevalence of clickbait headlines:

  • You Won’t Believe What Taylor Swift Says About Climate Change!
  • This Bedtime Drink Melts Belly Fat While You Sleep!
  • In One Week, I Turned $10 Into $1 Million!

Titles that make outrageous claims are how the content creator gets reads and views, which generates revenue via affiliate marketing, product placement, and pay-per-click (PPC) ads. Clickbait headlines are how you end up watching a TikTok video by a purported nutrition expert adamantly asserting you can lose belly fat while you sleep by drinking, for 14 consecutive days, a concoction of raw eggs, cinnamon, and apple cider vinegar 15 minutes before going to bed.

Our constant search for answers that’ll explain our convoluted world and our desire for shortcuts to success is how Internet talking heads achieve influencer status. Because we tend to seek low-hanging fruits, we listen to those with little experience or knowledge of the topics they discuss yet are astute enough to know what most people want to hear.

There’s a trend, more disturbing than spreading misinformation, that needs to be called out: individuals who’ve never achieved significant wealth or traded stocks giving how-to-make-easy-money advice, the appeal of which is undeniable. Several people I know have lost substantial money by following the “advice” of Internet talking heads.

Anyone on social media claiming to have a foolproof money-making strategy is lying. They wouldn’t be peddling their money-making strategy if they could make easy money.

Successful people tend to be secretive.

Social media companies design their respective algorithms to serve their advertisers—their source of revenue—interest; hence, content from Internet talking heads appears most prominent in your feeds. When a video of a self-professed expert goes viral, likely because it pressed an emotional button, the more people see it, the more engagement it receives, such as likes, shares and comments, creating a cycle akin to a tornado.

Imagine scrolling through your TikTok feed and stumbling upon a “scientist” who claims they can predict the weather using only aluminum foil, copper wire, sea salt and baking soda. You chuckle, but you notice his video got over 7,000 likes, has been shared over 600 times and received over 400 comments. You think to yourself, “Maybe this guy is onto something.” What started as a quest to achieve Internet fame evolved into an Internet-wide belief that weather forecasting can be as easy as DIY crafts.

Since anyone can call themselves “an expert,” you must cultivate critical thinking skills to distinguish genuine expertise from self-professed experts’ self-promoting nonsense. While the absurdity of the Internet can be entertaining, misinformation has serious consequences. The next time you read a headline that sounds too good to be true, it’s probably an Internet talking head making an educated guess; without the education seeking Internet fame, they can monetize.

______________________________________________________________

 

Nick Kossovan, a self-described connoisseur of human psychology, writes about what’s

on his mind from Toronto. You can follow Nick on Twitter and Instagram @NKossovan.

 

Continue Reading

Tech

Tight deadlines on software projects can put safety at risk: survey

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – A new survey says a majority of software engineers and developers feel tight project deadlines can put safety at risk.

Seventy-five per cent of the 1,000 global workers who responded to the survey released Tuesday say pressure to deliver projects on time and on budget could be compromising critical aspects like safety.

The concern is even higher among engineers and developers in North America, with 77 per cent of those surveyed on the continent reporting the urgency of projects could be straining safety.

The study was conducted between July and September by research agency Coleman Parkes and commissioned by BlackBerry Ltd.’s QNX division, which builds connected-car technology.

The results reflect a timeless tug of war engineers and developers grapple with as they balance the need to meet project deadlines with regulations and safety checks that can slow down the process.

Finding that balance is an issue that developers of even the simplest appliances face because of advancements in technology, said John Wall, a senior vice-president at BlackBerry and head of QNX.

“The software is getting more complicated and there is more software whether it’s in a vehicle, robotics, a toaster, you name it… so being able to patch vulnerabilities, to prevent bad actors from doing malicious acts is becoming more and more important,” he said.

The medical, industrial and automotive industries have standardized safety measures and anything they produce undergoes rigorous testing, but that work doesn’t happen overnight. It has to be carried out from the start and then at every step of the development process.

“What makes safety and security difficult is it’s an ongoing thing,” Wall said. “It’s not something where you’ve done it, and you are finished.”

The Waterloo, Ont.-based business found 90 per cent of its survey respondents reported that organizations are prioritizing safety.

However, when asked about why safety may not be a priority for their organization, 46 per cent of those surveyed answered cost pressures and 35 per cent said a lack of resources.

That doesn’t surprise Wall. Delays have become rampant in the development of tech, and in some cases, stand to push back the launch of vehicle lines by two years, he said.

“We have to make sure that people don’t compromise on safety and security to be able to get products out quicker,” he said.

“What we don’t want to see is people cutting corners and creating unsafe situations.”

The survey also took a peek at security breaches, which have hit major companies like London Drugs, Indigo Books & Music, Giant Tiger and Ticketmaster in recent years.

About 40 per cent of the survey’s respondents said they have encountered a security breach in their employer’s operating system. Those breaches resulted in major impacts for 27 per cent of respondents, moderate impacts for 42 per cent and minor impacts for 27 per cent.

“There are vulnerabilities all the time and this is what makes the job very difficult because when you ship the software, presumably the software has no security vulnerabilities, but things get discovered after the fact,” Wall said.

Security issues, he added, have really come to the forefront of the problems developers face, so “really without security, you have no safety.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 8, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:BB)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Beware of scams during Amazon’s Prime Big Deal Days sales event: cybersecurity firm

Published

 on

 

As online shoppers hunt for bargains offered by Amazon during its annual fall sale this week, cybersecurity researchers are warning Canadians to beware of an influx of scammers posing as the tech giant.

In the 30 days leading up to Amazon’s Prime Big Deal Days, taking place Tuesday and Wednesday, there were more than 1,000 newly registered Amazon-related web domains, according to Check Point Software Technologies, a company that offers cybersecurity solutions.

The company said it deemed 88 per cent of those domains malicious or suspicious, suggesting they could have been set up by scammers to prey on vulnerable consumers. One in every 54 newly created Amazon-related domain included the phrase “Amazon Prime.”

“They’re almost indiscernible from the real Amazon domain,” said Robert Falzon, head of engineering at Check Point in Canada.

“With all these domains registered that look so similar, it’s tricking a lot of people. And that’s the whole intent here.”

Falzon said Check Point Research sees an uptick in attempted scams around big online shopping days throughout the year, including Prime Days.

Scams often come in the form of phishing emails, which are deceptive messages that appear to be from a reputable source in attempt to steal sensitive information.

In this case, he said scammers posing as Amazon commonly offer “outrageous” deals that appear to be associated with Prime Days, in order to trick recipients into clicking on a malicious link.

The cybersecurity firm said it has identified and blocked 100 unique Amazon Prime-themed scam emails targeting organizations and consumers over the past two weeks.

Scammers also target Prime members with unsolicited calls, claiming urgent account issues and requesting payment information.

“It’s like Christmas for them,” said Falzon.

“People expect there to be significant savings on Prime Day, so they’re not shocked that they see something of significant value. Usually, the old adage applies: If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.”

Amazon’s website lists a number of red flags that it recommends customers watch for to identify a potential impersonation scam.

Those include false urgency, requests for personal information, or indications that the sender prefers to complete the purchase outside of the Amazon website or mobile app.

Scammers may also request that customers exclusively pay with gift cards, a claim code or PIN. Any notifications about an order or delivery for an unexpected item should also raise alarm bells, the company says.

“During busy shopping moments, we tend to see a rise in impersonation scams reported by customers,” said Amazon spokeswoman Octavia Roufogalis in a statement.

“We will continue to invest in protecting consumers and educating the public on scam avoidance. We encourage consumers to report suspected scams to us so that we can protect their accounts and refer bad actors to law enforcement to help keep consumers safe.”

Falzon added that these scams are more successful than people might think.

As of June 30, the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre said there had been $284 million lost to fraud so far this year, affecting 15,941 victims.

But Falzon said many incidents go unreported, as some Canadians who are targeted do not know how or where to flag a scam, or may choose not to out of embarrassment.

Check Point recommends Amazon customers take precautions while shopping on Prime Days, including by checking URLs carefully, creating strong passwords on their accounts, and avoiding personal information being shared such as their birthday or social security number.

The cybersecurity company said consumers should also look for “https” at the beginning of a website URL, which indicates a secure connection, and use credit cards rather than debit cards for online shopping, which offer better protection and less liability if stolen.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 8, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending