adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

Sell, trade in or keep: What to do if you’re underwater with your car loan

Published

 on

 

Some drivers who bought their vehicle within the past couple of years when auto prices were hovering around record highs are now facing the reality that they’re underwater with their car loans.

“We saw some rare (price) appreciation during the time that consumers were purchasing these high-priced cars,” Daniel Ross of Canadian Black Book said of the auto market during the pandemic years.

Global supply chain disruptions stemming from the pandemic left the auto market with low inventory — and coupled with high consumer demand — auto prices surged, Ross said.

Some of those issues have since begun to normalize, allowing prices to ease, but it’s left some consumers owing more on their auto loan than the car is now currently worth. It’s referred to as negative equity, or being underwater.

As with the vast majority of vehicles, they’re a depreciating asset, so for those who purchased their car when prices were high, their “vehicle will continue to lose lots of value because it was probably overpriced at that time,” Ross said.

On average, people who were underwater saw the negative equity in their cars climb to a record high of US$6,255 in the second quarter this year, compared with US$4,487 in the second quarter of 2022, a July report from auto retail platform Edmunds showed.

Trade-ins with negative equity also jumped, Edmunds said in its report.

“If you’re in a negative equity position, it’s not easy to get out of that,” Ross said.

For drivers who are in this situation, it’s better to drive that car into the ground and just keep paying off the loan, he said.

“It’s wisest to work with the devil, so to speak, as opposed to getting into something else — a new scenario,” such as trading in or buying a new vehicle.

Halifax-based financial planner and Aergo Financial Planning founder Ben Mayhewsaid negativeequityis usually resolved when left to itself.

When a driver stays the course — keeps the car and pays down the loan — the value of the loan will cross the car’s value and balance out at some point, Mayhew said.

But if a driver must get out of the negative equity situation, Mayhew suggested refinancing the loan at a lower rate. Many people got into higher interest rate loans during the big supply crunch and rising interest rates, he said.

“It will be beneficial to both refinance to a lower rate as well as to a shorter term … to reduce that financial strain,” Mayhew said.

Delinquencies were rising in the second quarter of 2024 for both non-bank and bank loans, an Equifax report showed. Missed payments on bank loans for vehicles were at their highest since 2019 while the 90-day balance delinquency rate for non-bank loans was up 26.8 per cent from a year ago.

If refinancing is off the table, car owners could look into paying down the loan faster and narrowing the loan-to-equity gap, though Mayhew said that can be challenging as many people are also contending with the high cost of living.

Although not ideal, Mayhew said drivers can consider trading in their vehicles with negative equity for another car and roll the current debt into the new loan.

“The thing to be careful about is that we don’t want to have a perpetual cycle,” Mayhew warned. He added the payment plan of the new vehicle shouldn’t only be based on what the driver can afford.

Instead, a driver should be aware of the price of the car, the negative equity that’s getting rolled into it and how that’s going to look — not just today but over the life of the loan and the vehicle, Mayhew said. He suggested going for older vehicles that have already passed the steep depreciation curve.

“Being underwater on a new car when driving off the lot is definitely a tough spot to be in,” he said.

It’s better to buy a new car with as big of a down payment as possible to avoid piling interest costs on a depreciating asset — and save the rolling negative equity trouble.

Mohamed Bouchama, a consultant with non-profit Car Help Canada, suggests not falling for tempting leasing and financing advertisements to avoid the risk of being underwater.

“If you can’t afford it, don’t buy it, buy something cheaper,” he said.

Bouchama said the golden rule to avoid negative equity is to not go over a five-year term for financing, or a three- or four-year term for leasing, and to budget with other related costs in mind, such as gas, insurance and maintenance.

“When you buy a car, make sure you can afford it,” he said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 24, 2024.

Source link

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

September merchandise trade deficit narrows to $1.3 billion: Statistics Canada

Published

 on

OTTAWA – Statistics Canada says the country’s merchandise trade deficit narrowed to $1.3 billion in September as imports fell more than exports.

The result compared with a revised deficit of $1.5 billion for August. The initial estimate for August released last month had shown a deficit of $1.1 billion.

Statistics Canada says the results for September came as total exports edged down 0.1 per cent to $63.9 billion.

Exports of metal and non-metallic mineral products fell 5.4 per cent as exports of unwrought gold, silver, and platinum group metals, and their alloys, decreased 15.4 per cent. Exports of energy products dropped 2.6 per cent as lower prices weighed on crude oil exports.

Meanwhile, imports for September fell 0.4 per cent to $65.1 billion as imports of metal and non-metallic mineral products dropped 12.7 per cent.

In volume terms, total exports rose 1.4 per cent in September while total imports were essentially unchanged in September.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending