adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Sports

Sheldon Keefe on Jon Cooper's comments about scoring on the Leafs: "I think it's his way of being confident in his team… If I were in his position, I'd say a similar thing" – Maple Leafs Hot Stove

Published

 on


Sheldon Keefe, Toronto Maple Leafs

After practice on Saturday, Sheldon Keefe discussed Michael Bunting’s play through two games, Jon Cooper’s comments about his lack of concern about the Lightning’s ability to score on the Leafs, Justin Holl’s performance in his first game of the series, and much more.


Practice Lines – May 7


What is the mood around the team after last night’s win?

Keefe: We’re obviously feeling good any time you come off of a win in the playoffs. At the same time, I think it is very business-like. We feel good about winning the game on the road here and giving ourselves a 2-1 lead in the series, but I know our team can play better and is going to have to play better. That is our focus. Today is a bit of a recovery day for our team, but certainly, as we go into tomorrow, we are looking to play even better.

When you are going up against the two-time Cup champions, is it about trying to impart on the team that you can’t give them any life?

300x250x1

Keefe: That is what I am talking about. We like a lot of things we did in the game, but I look at it, and I still see a ton of things we can do better as a team and things we can do better as individuals. That is our focus: to continue to build.

It is still early in the series here. Through three games, you’ve got a pretty good indication and feel for your opponent and they for us, I am sure. I still think that we haven’t played our best hockey. I think we can still be better.

Coming back from his injury, where do you think Michael Bunting is at?

Keefe: In terms of the injury, I think he is fine. I don’t think there are any issues there. It is coming back from an injury, and you are also coming back and playing in the playoffs for the first time.

Especially when you are going to play on that line, it is not easy minutes. I thought that line had a hard time last night. I thought it got better when we made the change. We’ll look to start that way tomorrow.

Bunts is an important player for us. He scored a big goal for us in Game 2. I think he will continue to get better the more reps that he gets.

What is it about Alex Kerfoot that he seems to elevate in the playoffs?

Keefe: Kerf is a very competitive guy. He is very responsible. He is very good in all areas of his game. That translates very well to this time of year. His details and his habits are good. Those don’t change.

Last night, he made a bit of a mistake there in the second period on the penalty kill. That doesn’t change who he is. We give him an opportunity to move up in the lineup after that and do a good job. It seems like whatever line he is on improves.

Why does it seem like it raises his game in the playoffs? I don’t know if it’s raising his game or if it just continuing to play his game despite the fact that it gets harder. Whatever it is, we like it, and he is an important guy for us.

Did you talk to him about that mistake?

Keefe: It was very obvious that he knew. He was well aware of it. I talked to him before the third period began just about shaking it off but more so that I needed him to go help that line. They were going to face a tough matchup. I needed him to have a good third period for us.

He seems to be the template for the kind of player you really like as someone who can play so many positions. You have a number of guys who can do that — Blackwell and others. How important is that kind of player in the playoffs and in general?

Keefe: Very important. We have our stars — our real difference-makers — and they get a lot of attention for good reason, but when you are building a team, you need to be able to have a diverse team of guys who can do different things and different types of players.

Within the season, even when you slot someone in and you have your lineup with everyone slotted in where you think is ideal, hockey happens. Mistakes happen. Guys’ games go up and down. Injuries happen, and matchups.

You need to be able to move people. You need depth to be able to do that. Your depth has to be versatile or you are really locked into a lot of different things. When I look at our team last season, we lost John early in the playoffs. I thought Kerf elevated and did a great job for us in that spot, but we were really limited and locked into a lot of other spots that didn’t allow us a great of flexibility.

This season, because of the Kampfs, Kases, Buntings, Engvall, Kerf, and adding Blackwell, there is extra versatility to the group. There is no doubt. We have taken advantage of that all season.

How do you get an offensive player like William Nylander to buy into defensive responsibility at this time of year?

Keefe: I think it is understanding that you have to be good both ways, especially in the playoffs when you are playing against one of the top teams in the league. Any time you are in the playoffs, you are going to play against the top 16 teams in the league. They’re all that is left. Certainly, in our case, we are facing the back-to-back champs. The depth that they have is going to create great challenges.

You have to play both sides. It is not just Will. It is Auston. It is Mitch. It is our guys on the other end of it. You talk about Kampf, who is so great defensively. There are going to be times he has to step up offensively on that side of it. He did that last night by scoring us a huge goal.

It is just what it takes: both sides. There is a level of intensity required on both sides of the puck in order to succeed. That goes for all of our players.

Are you looking to spend a little more time in the offensive end than you did in the second half of the game? Does that go a long way to helping the likes of Nylander and Tavares get more involved offensively?

Keefe: I thought we had some really excellent offensive-zone time — maybe our best in the series — in the first half of the first period last night. There were some times we had trouble getting out of our own end and it caused some problems.

From there, against a team like that, if you don’t get out of your zone within the first 10 seconds or quicker than that, they are going to gain control, spread you out, and it is going to be really hard to get out. From there, you are pretty much putting yourself in a position where now we are containing and trying not to give up a high-danger chance in the slot.

We were in that mode a lot last night, especially in the second half of the game, so it took away from a lot of the offense. Our focus has to be on exiting quickly. Both teams are trying to accomplish the same things. We are a lot to handle. If we get by that 10-second threshold or so, we usually wear you down and are in control of play.

They are very, very similar and as good as any team in the league in that regard.  It is a big challenge for us defensively.

Jon Cooper said he is not worried about scoring goals against you guys. What are your thoughts on that?

Keefe: I think it is just his way of being confident and showing belief in his team. I think, if I were in his position, I would say a similar thing.

He was asked about Jack Campbell specifically and said his team had scored seven in the past two. How do you feel about how Jack has handled what Tampa has thrown at him?

Keefe: I think last night was a great indication of how he is playing. He is confident. He believes in himself. Even at times when it looks like he is beat, he finds ways to keep the puck out. He is tracking it really well.  It is the playoffs. Teams are going to try to make it hard on the goaltenders. We are trying to do the same at the other end.

We have to continue to do a better job of limiting chances and trying to help Jack out. Both goaltenders, for that matter, in the third period last night made game-saving type of saves. If Matthews scores on his breakaway or the rebound right after, or if Marner scores instead of hitting the crossbar and the post right after, they probably don’t have much of a push the rest of the way.

Vasilevskiy keeps them in, and then they score shortly after. Jack made a couple of game-saving saves for us down the stretch. The goalies were battling back and forth down. It is great to see Jack stand in there.

Did you get what you wanted switching Justin Holl and Timothy Liljegren?

Keefe: A big reason why Liljegren got the upper hand starting the series was the chemistry between him and Giordano that they displayed down the stretch of the regular season. That was a big part of it.

In the first couple of games, that pairing didn’t do as well as it had. On that end of it, especially coming off of a tough night on the penalty kill, you want to get Holl involved. I thought he did help on the penalty kill. I thought he did some good things in the game. There were a couple of mistakes inside there that we need him to do a better job on, and our forwards can help the cause as well.

To go directly to the question, I would say Justin went in and gave us a good game. We have to try to limit a couple of the mistakes that hurt us a bit last night.

We haven’t really seen low-scoring games in the playoffs like we often expect. Any idea why we haven’t seen it across the league so much?

Keefe: Hard to say. Obviously, the amount of special teams I am sure has been a factor. I haven’t followed the other series to see how much goal-scoring has been happening or whether the disruption of flow has helped and sort of broken down teams defensively.

Maybe it is just a continuation of the trend in the regular season at the same time.  There was an uptick of offense in the regular season.

I wouldn’t have the answer for certain on that other than to say it is also early. Teams, in each series, are still adjusting to each other, to the playoffs, and to the way the games are being called.

We are certainly going into every game prepared for it to be extremely tight.

Have you heard Jack Campbell’s communication in the net with his defenseman? The guys remark on it a lot.

Keefe: Not so much myself, but with the defensemen, they talk about that, and Dean [Chynoweth] talks about it. Steve Briere values it. You have someone like Jack who is an upbeat guy and has energy. You want to use that to your advantage when it comes to communication.

That is a good thing to hear and it is a good thing to have. It helps make things a lot easier. There has been some chatter on our bench about the importance of talking on the ice because things are pretty chaotic in the playoffs. It is 60 minutes of noise. It is loud.

You have to sort through that and play through that. When you are in proximity to communicate, it helps. A lot of times, you don’t have time to see what is happening because the plays close so fast. What you think maybe there isn’t.

Any help you can get from any of your teammates is helpful. In the goaltender’s case, he sees the whole game. That is a good, positive thing to have.

TJ Brodie seems to be having a great first half of the series. What are you seeing from him specifically?

Keefe: He cleans up a lot of mistakes and makes very few himself. I think he manages the puck well and rarely turns it over. Positionally, he is in good spots. He doesn’t take too many chances to put himself in bad situations. When his partner or the forwards make a mistake, he has the ability to clean it up with good reads, good sticks, and an ability to break up plays.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

NHL teams, take note: Alexandar Georgiev is proof that anything can happen in the playoffs

Published

 on

It’s hard to say when, exactly, Alexandar Georgiev truly began to win some hearts and change some minds on Tuesday night.

Maybe it was in the back half of the second period; that was when the Colorado Avalanche, for the first time in their first-round Stanley Cup playoff series against the Winnipeg Jets, actually managed to hold a lead for more than, oh, two minutes or thereabouts. Maybe it was when the Avs walked into the locker room up 4-2 with 20 minutes to play.

Maybe it was midway through the third, when a series of saves by the Avalanche’s beleaguered starting goaltender helped preserve their two-goal buffer. Maybe it was when the buzzer sounded after their 5-2 win. Maybe it didn’t happen until the Avs made it into their locker room at Canada Life Centre, tied 1-1 with the Jets and headed for Denver.

At some point, though, it should’ve happened. If you were watching, you should’ve realized that Colorado — after a 7-6 Game 1 loss that had us all talking not just about all those goals, but at least one of the guys who’d allowed them — had squared things up, thanks in part to … well, that same guy.

300x250x1

Georgiev, indeed, was the story of Game 2, stopping 28 of 30 shots, improving as the game progressed and providing a lesson on how quickly things can change in the playoffs — series to series, game to game, period to period, moment to moment. The narrative doesn’t always hold. Facts don’t always cooperate. Alexandar Georgiev, for one night and counting, was not a problem for the Colorado Avalanche. He was, in direct opposition to the way he played in Game 1, a solution. How could we view him as anything else?

He had a few big-moment saves, and most of them came midway through the third period with his team up 4-2. There he was with 12:44 remaining, stopping a puck that had awkwardly rolled off Nino Niederreiter’s stick; two missed posts by the Avs at the other end had helped spring Niederreiter for a breakaway. Game 1 Georgiev doesn’t make that save.

There he was, stopping Nikolaj Ehlers from the circle a few minutes later. There wasn’t an Avs defender within five feet, and there was nothing awkward about the puck Ehlers fired at his shoulder. Game 1 Georgiev gets scored on twice.

(That one might’ve been poetic justice. It was Ehlers who’d put the first puck of the night on Georgiev — a chip from center ice that he stopped, and that the crowd in Winnipeg greeted with the ol’ mock cheer. Whoops.)

By the end of it all, Georgiev had stared down Connor Hellebuyck and won, saving nearly 0.5 goals more than expected according to Natural Stat Trick, giving the Avalanche precisely what they needed and looking almost nothing like the guy we’d seen a couple days before. Conventional wisdom coming into this series was twofold: That the Avs have firepower, high-end talent and an overall edge — slight as it may be — on Winnipeg, and that Georgiev is shaky enough to nuke the whole thing.

That wasn’t without merit, either. Georgiev’s .897 save percentage in the regular season was six percentage points below the league average, and he hadn’t broken even in expected goals allowed (minus-0.21). He’d been even worse down the stretch, putting up an .856 save percentage in his final eight appearances, and worse still in Game 1, allowing seven goals on 23 shots and more than five goals more than expected. That’s not bad; that’s an oil spill. Writing him off would’ve been understandable. Writing off Jared Bednar for rolling him out there in Game 2 would’ve been understandable. Writing the Avs off — for all of Nathan MacKinnon and Cale Makar’s greatness — would’ve been understandable.

It just wouldn’t have been correct.

The fact that this all went down now, four days into a two-month ordeal, is a gift — because the postseason thus far has been short on surprises, almost as a rule. The Rangers and Oilers are overwhelming the Capitals and Kings. The Hurricanes are halfway done with the Islanders. The Canucks are struggling with the Predators. PanthersLightning is tight, but one team is clearly better than the other. BruinsMaple Leafs is a close matchup featuring psychic baggage that we don’t have time to unpack. In Golden KnightsStars, Mark Stone came back and scored a huge goal.

None of that should shock you. None of that should make you blink.

Georgiev being good enough for Colorado, though? After what we saw in Game 1? Strange, surprising and completely true. For now.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

"Laugh it off": Evander Kane says Oilers won’t take the bait against Kings | Offside

Published

 on

The LA Kings tried every trick in the book to get the Edmonton Oilers off their game last night.

Hacks after the whistle, punches to the face, and interference with line changes were just some of the things that the Oilers had to endure, and throughout it all, there was not an ounce of retaliation.

All that badgering by the Kings resulted in at least two penalties against them and fuelled a red-hot Oilers power play that made them pay with three goals on four chances. That was by design for Edmonton, who knew that LA was going to try to pester them as much as they could.

That may have worked on past Oilers teams, but not this one.

300x250x1

“We’ve been in a series now for the third year in a row with these guys,” Kane said after practice this morning. “We know them, they know us… it’s one of those things where maybe it makes it a little easier to kind of laugh it off, walk away, or take a shot.

“That type of stuff isn’t gonna affect us.”

Once upon a time, this type of play would get under the Oilers’ skin and result in retaliatory penalties. Yet, with a few hard-knock lessons handed down to them in the past few seasons, it seems like the team is as determined as ever to cut the extracurriculars and focus on getting revenge on the scoreboard.

Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, the longest-tenured player on this Oilers team, had to keep his emotions in check with Kings defender Vladislav Gavrikov, who punched him in the face early in the game. The easy reaction would be to punch back, but the veteran Nugen-Hopkins took his licks and wound up scoring later in the game.

“It’s going to be physical, the emotions are high, and there’s probably going to be some stuff after the whistle,” Nugent-Hopkins told reporters this morning. “I think it’s important to stay poised out there and not retaliate and just play through the whistles and let the other stuff just kind of happen.”

Oilers head coach Kris Knoblauch also noticed his team’s discipline. Playoff hockey is full of emotion, and keeping those in check to focus on the larger goal is difficult. He was happy with how his team set the tone.

“It’s not necessarily easy to do,” Knoblauch said. “You get punched in the face and sometimes the referees feel it’s enough to call a penalty, sometimes it’s not… You just have to take them, and sometimes, you get rewarded with the power play.

“I liked our guy’s response and we want to be sticking up for each other, we want to have that pack mentality, but it’s really important that we’re not the ones taking that extra penalty.”

There is no doubt that the Kings will continue to poke and prod at the Oilers as the series continues. Keeping those retaliations in check will only get more difficult, but if the team can continue to succeed on the scoreboard, it could get easier.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Thatcher Demko injured, out for Game 2 between Canucks and Predators – Vancouver Is Awesome

Published

 on


Thatcher Demko returned from injury just in time for the start of the Stanley Cup Playoffs but now is injured again.

After the Vancouver Canucks’ victory in Game 1, Demko was not made available to the media as he was “receiving treatment.” This is not unusual, so was not heavily reported at the time. Monday’s practice was turned into an optional skate — just nine players participated — so Demko’s absence did not seem particularly significant.

But when Demko was also missing from Tuesday’s gameday skate, alarm bells started going off.

300x250x1

According to multiple reports — and now the Canucks’ head coach, Rick Tocchet —Demko will not play in Game 2 and is in fact questionable for the rest of their series against the Nashville Predators.

Demko made 22 saves on 24 shots, none bigger — and potentially injury-inducing — than his first-period save on Anthony Beauvillier where he went into the full splits.

While this is not necessarily where Demko got injured, it would be understandable if it was. Demko still stayed in the game and didn’t seem to be experiencing any difficulties at the time.

Demko is a major difference-maker for the Canucks and his injury casts a pall over the team’s emotional Game 1 victory

Tocchet confirmed that Demko will not start in Game 2 but said Demko did skate on Monday on his own. He also said that Demko’s injury is unrelated to the knee injury he suffered during the season that caused him to miss five weeks. Instead, Tocchet suggested Demko was day-to-day, leaving open the possibility for his return in the first round. 

TSN’s Farhan Lalji, however, has reported that Demko’s injury could indeed be to the same knee, even if it is not the same exact injury.

If Demko does indeed miss the rest of the series, the pressure will be on Casey DeSmith, who had a strong season when called upon intermittently as the team’s backup but struggled when thrust into the number-one role when Demko was injured. Behind DeSmith is rookie Arturs Silovs, who has come through with heroic performances in international competition for Latvia but hasn’t been able to repeat those performances at the NHL level.

DeSmith played one game against the Predators this season, making 26 saves on 28 shots in a 5-2 victory in December.

While DeSmith has limited experience in the Stanley Cup Playoffs, his one appearance was spectacular.

On May 3, 2022, DeSmith had to step in for the injured Tristan Jarry for the Pittsburgh Penguins, starting their first postseason game against the New York Rangers. DeSmith made 48 saves on 51 shots before leaving the game in the second overtime with an injury of his own, with Louis Domingue stepping in to make 17 more saves for the win.

The Canucks will look to allow significantly fewer than 51 shots on Tuesday night.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending