BARRIE – As more details emerge about the presence of the United Kingdom variant of COVID-19, it could also mean more changes to protective measures in long-term care homes, the local community, and abroad.
There are 127 residents — which represents all but two residents — who have tested positive for the virus, as well as 86 workers, which represents approximately half of the entire staff. Six residents and one staff member are currently hospitalized at Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre (RVH).
The outbreak at the 137-bed Roberta Place long-term care home was first declared on Jan. 8.
This week, it was reported that a worker may have brought the virus into the Essa Road facility after being in contact with an international traveller. Simcoe–Muskoka medical office of health Dre. Charles Gardner was asked if charges could be laid if someone wasn’t following quarantine rules.
“When we look at the situation, we actually don’t see violation of any of the recommendations from the province, nor was there a violation of the Quarantine Act with regards to the individual who was travelling,” he said Saturday during a Zoom call with reporters. “So the exposure in question did not take place out in the community.”
The staff member who contracted the virus did not show symptoms at the beginning when they went to work, the doctor noted.
“They were asymptomatic when they were tested routinely,” Gardner said.
Public health officials have been reluctant to release any information that could identify either the staff member or the traveller, but Gardner did confirm traveller is a resident of Simcoe–Muskoka.
“There’s no requirement to be in isolation and not go into work solely because one has been in contact with a traveller who’s asymptomatic,” Gardner said.
“We need to keep learning about this virus as we go,” he added. “I have no doubt that, with this variant, we’re going to continue to have to change and tighten up requirements.”
Questions have also been raised about staff at Roberta Place going between rooms of residents who were positive for the virus and others who were not.
“I would agree that the home never successfully put in place the kind of cohorting… where you maintain the restriction on the movement of staff, or the exposure of staff to cases and non-cases,” Gardner said. “That was something that certainly was not the optimum practice in an outbreak and that wasn’t established, in part because of how quickly this spread and in part because the number of staff that became ill, they had such a difficulty maintaining the adequate staffing in the first place.”
Cohorting is a strategy to reduce risk of transmission by assigning health-care workers to patients or groups of patients based on patient exposure or infection.
Gardner said it can be “challenging” to do that, however, during a fast-moving outbreak.
“This moved very quickly,” he said. “There were 40 cases that emerged over the course of a single weekend at the very beginning. The rapid pace made it difficult to put those measures in place.”
David Jarlette, president of Jarlette Health Services, which operates Roberta Place, said the virus came into the long-term care home so quickly they weren’t able to achieve cohorting “in a quick and timely fashion.”
With so many staff and team members infected at Roberta Place, Gardner said they have had to take a multi-faceted approach to ensure staffing levels are sufficient at the facility. Jarlette Health Services has reallocated staff and also brought in temporary workers from outside organizations, such as the Red Cross.
An occupational health and safety team has been formed involving the health unit and other health-care partners. They also want to make sure all employees are offered the vaccine, Gardner said.
“From what we have seen, the uptake for this has been very, very strong, but we need to continue that as new people come into the facility,” he added.
There will be ongoing monitoring at Roberta Place through rapid testing by Orillia Soldiers’ Memorial Hospital (OSMH), which has been granted temporary leadership of the long-term care home following an order under the Health Protection and Promotion Act (HPPA). Testing will be done on a twice-weekly basis. Anyone who shows symptoms or who has a positive result will be placed in isolation at home, or hospitalized if needed.
Gardner said they hope to contain the variant to the site and limit spread into the community. This includes “a more strict threshold” for people who are at higher risk and more intensive follow-up. In cases where the person cannot isolate at home, they could be put up in a hotel to reduce the risk of spread to household members, he added.
“Our goal is to avoid transmission into the community,” the doctor said.
Gardner conceded community spread involving the UK variant is likely already happening.
“It’s certainly on the edge,” he said. “It would depend on their contacts beyond their household and whether or not we’re starting to see spread there. We haven’t seen that yet, but we’re on the very edge.”
Gardner said health officials also want to protect long-term care homes and retirement facilities from community spread.
If outbreaks are seen at other facilities, Gardner said he will have the genome sequencing done to determine whether the variant is showing up in those other facilities.
With the local emergence of the UK variant, BarrieToday asked Gardner if any modifications to protocols or protective measures will be put in place at other long-term care homes in Simcoe–Muskoka.
In regard to Roberta Place, case and contact management has already changed to identify people who are considered high-risk.
“If in fact there’s been an exposure that’s just momentary, rather than 15 minutes or more, we’re considering that a high-risk contact and those individuals go into isolation or quarantine,” Gardner said.
As well, people in full protective gear who have been in a confined space for more than 30 minutes with an infected person, they will also be considered a high-risk exposure. The isolation period for such instances is being extended from 10 days to 14.
“The experience that has been seen with the UK variant in other countries has been of a higher viral load and therefore possibly a longer period of viral shedding,” said Gardner, resulting in a longer period of isolation. “We certainly will have to learn from this with regard to what we do at other sites. The whole province will have to learn as we go.
“All eyes are watching us right now,” the doctor added.
Gardner said the situation at Roberta Place will have a “profound” effect on other long-term care homes.
“We all need to be on the alert,” he said.
The immunization of all residents retirement homes is another immediate change in protocol at long-term care homes, Gardner said. Last weekend, vaccinations were completed for all residents of long-term care homes in Simcoe–Muskoka. That focus has now shifted to retirement homes in the region. There are still 16 homes to go, which Gardner expected to be done by Wednesday.
***This information has been updated with the most recent numbers.
Some Ontario doctors have started offering a free shot that can protect babies from respiratory syncytial virus while Quebec will begin its immunization program next month.
The new shot called Nirsevimab gives babies antibodies that provide passive immunity to RSV, a major cause of serious lower respiratory tract infections for infants and seniors, which can cause bronchiolitis or pneumonia.
Ontario’s ministry of health says the shot is already available at some doctor’s offices in Ontario with the province’s remaining supply set to arrive by the end of the month.
Quebec will begin administering the shots on Nov. 4 to babies born in hospitals and delivery centers.
Parents in Quebec with babies under six months or those who are older but more vulnerable to infection can also book immunization appointments online.
The injection will be available in Nunavut and Yukon this fall and winter, though administration start dates have not yet been announced.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 21, 2024.
-With files from Nicole Ireland
Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.
ISLAMABAD (AP) — Polio cases are rising ahead of a new vaccination campaign in Pakistan, where violence targeting health workers and the police protecting them has hampered years of efforts toward making the country polio-free.
Since January, health officials have confirmed 39 new polio cases in Pakistan, compared to only six last year, said Anwarul Haq of the National Emergency Operation Center for Polio Eradication.
The new nationwide drive starts Oct. 28 with the aim to vaccinate at least 32 million children. “The whole purpose of these campaigns is to achieve the target of making Pakistan a polio-free state,” he said.
Pakistan regularly launches campaigns against polio despite attacks on the workers and police assigned to the inoculation drives. Militants falsely claim the vaccination campaigns are a Western conspiracy to sterilize children.
Most of the new polio cases were reported in the southwestern Balochistan and southern Sindh province, following by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province and eastern Punjab province.
The locations are worrying authorities since previous cases were from the restive northwest bordering Afghanistan, where the Taliban government in September suddenly stopped a door-to-door vaccination campaign.
Afghanistan and Pakistan are the two countries in which the spread of the potentially fatal, paralyzing disease has never been stopped. Authorities in Pakistan have said that the Taliban’s decision will have major repercussions beyond the Afghan border, as people from both sides frequently travel to each other’s country.
The World Health Organization has confirmed 18 polio cases in Afghanistan this year, all but two in the south of the country. That’s up from six cases in 2023. Afghanistan used a house-to-house vaccination strategy this June for the first time in five years, a tactic that helped to reach the majority of children targeted, according to WHO.
Health officials in Pakistan say they want the both sides to conduct anti-polio drives simultaneously.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Millions of people with private health insurance would be able to pick up over-the-counter methods like condoms, the “morning after” pill and birth control pills for free under a new rule the White House proposed on Monday.
Right now, health insurers must cover the cost of prescribed contraception, including prescription birth control or even condoms that doctors have issued a prescription for. But the new rule would expand that coverage, allowing millions of people on private health insurance to pick up free condoms, birth control pills, or “morning after” pills from local storefronts without a prescription.
The proposal comes days before Election Day, as Vice President Kamala Harris affixes her presidential campaign to a promise of expanding women’s health care access in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to undo nationwide abortion rights two years ago. Harris has sought to craft a distinct contrast from her Republican challenger, Donald Trump, who appointed some of the judges who issued that ruling.
“The proposed rule we announce today would expand access to birth control at no additional cost for millions of consumers,” Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra said in a statement. “Bottom line: women should have control over their personal health care decisions. And issuers and providers have an obligation to comply with the law.”
The emergency contraceptives that people on private insurance would be able to access without costs include levonorgestrel, a pill that needs to be taken immediately after sex to prevent pregnancy and is more commonly known by the brand name “Plan B.”
Without a doctor’s prescription, women may pay as much as $50 for a pack of the pills. And women who delay buying the medication in order to get a doctor’s prescription could jeopardize the pill’s effectiveness, since it is most likely to prevent a pregnancy within 72 hours after sex.
If implemented, the new rule would also require insurers to fully bear the cost of the once-a-day Opill, a new over-the-counter birth control pill that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved last year. A one-month supply of the pills costs $20.
Federal mandates for private health insurance to cover contraceptive care were first introduced with the Affordable Care Act, which required plans to pick up the cost of FDA-approved birth control that had been prescribed by a doctor as a preventative service.
The proposed rule would not impact those on Medicaid, the insurance program for the poorest Americans. States are largely left to design their own rules around Medicaid coverage for contraception, and few cover over-the-counter methods like Plan B or condoms.
