adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

Survivors call for reversal of Canada’s ‘cut’ to residential school search spending

Published

 on

OTTAWA – Residential school survivors say the federal government is keeping the truth about those institutions in the dark by cutting back on funding for records and ground searches looking for unmarked graves of children who died at the schools.

More than 150,000 children were forced to attend residential schools, and many survivors detailed the horrific abuse they suffered to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. An estimated 6,000 children died while attending the schools, although experts say the actual number could be much higher.

In 2021, after numerous First Nations reported locating what appeared to be human remains on the sites of former residential schools, Ottawa stepped in with more than $116 million to search for unmarked graves and to memorialize the children who died. As of March 2024, the government had actually provided $216 million through 146 different funding agreements.

That ended up averaging about $71 million a year.

In the most recent budget, the government allocated $91 million over the next two years to continue to work to look for graves, or $45.5 million a year.

Laura Arndt, the lead for the Survivors’ Secretariat, a survivor-led organization seeking to document and uncover the truth of what happened at the Mohawk Institute in Brantford, Ont., criticized what she says cannot be characterized as anything but a funding cut.

Communities and organizations have been investigating residential schools for decades, including through records. The more recent ground searches, using ground-penetrating radar, are being done in the hopes of finding and bringing the deceased home.

“We’re trying to uncover a history that’s 150 years old, and the limited funding we’ve been provided in three years is not doable,” Arndt said.

The Survivors Secretariat has indicated the change will have a dramatic impact on communities who have started their searches and those hoping to secure funding of their own. Communities and organizations were informed via a teleconference with federal government officials, and they say they had their microphones muted and reduced ability to push back on the cut.

“They’re waiting for us poor old residential school people to die,” said Roberta Hill, a survivor of the Mohawk Institute in Six Nations of the Grand River near Hamilton, Ont.

“Well, we’re not going anywhere — not yet, that I know of. I said I’ll live as long as I can because I want answers and I want the truth. There is no reconciliation — absolutely none — if you’re going to lie to us and do this to us.”

Over the summer, Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Gary Anandasangaree reversed a decision to limit each individual community to $500,000 toward a search. Previously individual allotments were capped at $3 million, and Anandasangaree said that original cap would be restored.

Speaking on Parliament Hill during the Truth and Reconciliation Day ceremony Monday, Anandasangaree wouldn’t discuss the funding issue.

“I’ll be glad to address this in a more wholesome way later on what we have done,” he said in an interview. “And I’ve heard from survivors and I think we’ve done the right thing in terms of lifting the cap and we will continue to work with all those who are impacted. And I look forward to having this conversation at a later point.”

Scott Hamilton, a professor of anthropology at Lakehead University who has been involved with residential school investigations, said the federal government is obligated to provide communities with the supports needed to complete the work they’re doing.

“If we choose to gloss over, if we choose to ignore, if we continue to live in la-la-land that these terrible things didn’t happen, or they might not have been as bad as what was said, we’re kind of choosing to close our eyes and hum a song so we don’t have to bear witness to what happened — to confront the fact that terrible things were done in the name of our nation,” said Hamilton.

“An important part of Canadian legacy is to grapple with those dark, painful facts and try to heal from (and) try and seek reconciliation. But one doesn’t get reconciliation without acknowledgment of those painful truths.”

The Survivors Secretariat released a report Monday calling for 23 million documents to be released to the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation, along with RCMP records related to missing children and unmarked burials.

It also says Canada needs to provide stable, long-term funding for those investigations, and that it allow communities to determine what supports they need to carry out their work.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 30, 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

B.C. Conservative Leader Rustad vows to ‘unleash potential’ for Indigenous prosperity

Published

 on

B.C. Conservative Leader John Rustad says the federal government has been “absent” and failing to live up to commitments to First Nations on housing and clean water issues, and his government would step in and then send Ottawa the bill.

Rustad says if his party wins the Oct. 19 provincial election, B.C. would partner with First Nations and “unleash the potential” for prosperity through mining, forestry and other resource projects.

The B.C. Conservative Leader has previously pledged to repeal B.C. legislation adopting the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and his party says in a release it would instead honour the declaration “as it was intended,” with laws advancing economic reconciliation and Indigenous autonomy.

Rustad, speaking in Cultus Lake, B.C., on the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation, says his government would create a loan guarantee program for First Nations to allow full participation in large projects.

He says he’s committed to returning 20 per cent of the province’s forestry volume to First Nations, who would be “landlords of that land” and reap the benefits rather than governments getting stumpage fees with only a fraction going to First Nations.

Greens Leader Sonia Furstenau meanwhile says B.C. has been a leader recognizing Indigenous rights, warning that some want to “undo that progress and go back to a paternalistic relationship” with First Nations.

She said in Victoria on Monday that governments need to abandon the past of “transactional approaches” to First Nations that she says have been “used to dispossess Indigenous peoples of land, culture and language, and move to relationships that are rooted in recognition of Aboriginal rights and title.”

The party leaders in B.C. all acknowledged Indigenous issues on the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation, as the province’s election campaign entered its second week.

Furstenau said the Green party wants “ubiquitous” First Nations leadership in the province.

NDP Leader David Eby was attending a ceremony at the University of British Columbia marking the day.

Rustad, wearing an orange shirt pin on his lapel, was accompanied at Cultus Lake by Sq’ewlets First Nation Chief Joseph Chapman and Indigenous candidates Chris Sankey and A’aliya Warbus,

Rustad, a former minister of Indigenous relations and reconciliation, said provincial legislation had created “friction” with the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and his government would remove and replace laws that get in the way of full economic reconciliation.

Nominations for the election officially closed on Saturday, and with their teams of candidates in place, leaders are looking ahead to their upcoming televised debate.

The Oct. 8 debate will be one of the few occasions B.C. voters will see the leaders of the New Democrats, B.C. Conservatives and the Greens face each other during the campaign.

Eby and Rustad spent the first week of the campaign taking verbal personal swings at each other and criticizing their policies.

Eby said Rustad’s “conspiracy theory” anti-vaccine position could end up hurting people and the health care system, while Rustad said the NDP leader was damaging the province with weak leadership and left-wing viewpoints.

Elections BC said its final list of nominated candidates for the vote includes 93 from the NDP, 93 from the B.C. Conservatives, 69 from the Greens and 40 Independents.

The list from Elections BC does not contain any official Opposition BC United candidates but does include five Freedom Party of B.C. hopefuls, four Libertarians, three representing the Communist Party of B.C. and two candidates from the Christian Heritage Party of B.C.

— With files from Brenna Owen

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 30, 2024.

Note to readers: This is a corrected story. A previous version said the leaders’ debate would take place on Oct. 9. In fact, it is scheduled to take place on Oct. 8.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

New Brunswick election: Relations between province, Indigenous Peoples in spotlight

Published

 on

FREDERICTON – New Brunswick’s Liberal leader says that if her party wins the October election she would rebuild the provincial government’s relationships with First Nations.

Susan Holt made the comments today at an event in Tobique First Nation, on National Day for Truth and Reconciliation, a public commemoration of the painful legacy of the residential school system.

Both the Liberals and Greens say they would take the province in a new direction after years of difficult relations between Indigenous Peoples and the government under the Progressive Conservatives.

St. Mary’s First Nation Chief Allan Polchies said today at a Truth and Reconciliation event in Fredericton that he wasn’t endorsing any party but that Progressive Conservative Leader Blaine Higgs “needs to go.”

Higgs, who is seeking his third term as premier, has faced criticism for his reluctance to call a public inquiry into systemic racism affecting First Nations, and for his government’s general approach to Indigenous issues.

The Tory leader has no public events today and his team did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 30, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

A ‘weird’ debate: vice-presidential hopefuls to face off ahead of razor-thin election

Published

 on

 

WASHINGTON – Tim Walz and JD Vance are set to face off Tuesday in the only debate for the vice-presidential hopefuls during the razor-thin race to November’s election.

Walz, the Democratic governor of Minnesota, and Vance, the Republican senator from Ohio, are expected to play the political attack dog.

Todd Graham, a professor of debate at Southern Illinois University, said Walz has one main job: to keep saying Vance is too weird for the White House.

“Vance is going to say, basically show, ‘I’m not weird and I can be trusted to be president,'” he said.

That may seem like a strange prediction for the focus of a vice-presidential debate, but Walz made it to national prominence by labelling rival Republicans as “weird.”

That has become the most successful attack for Democrats after a tumultuous summer that began with a disastrous debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden and the president taking himself out of the race.

It was also a contributing factor for Vice-President Kamala Harris to bring Walz onto the reinvigorated Democratic ticket in August.

The attack has particularly focused on Vance for his comments on abortion, on “childless cat ladies” and his previous suggestions that political leaders who didn’t have biological children “don’t really have a direct stake” in the country.

Online memes and videos have targeted those remarks, as well as Vance’s interactions with voters, including a viral encounter at a doughnut shop.

But he has also shown he can circumvent criticism and has doubled down on controversial comments.

He stood by a false claim that Haitian immigrants in Ohio were eating pets, something that Trump repeated during the presidential debate earlier this month.

Officials in Springfield said there was no evidence that was true, but Vance told CNN on Sept. 15 he heard firsthand accounts from constituents and blamed the news media for ignoring issues around immigration.

“If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do,” Vance said.

He could prove to be a fierce opponent for Walz, said Aaron Kall, the director of debate for the University of Michigan.

“They can both deliver sharp barbs and give exchanges, but they can do it with a smile,” Kall said.

The 40-year-old Vance rose to fame with the 2016 publication of his memoir, “Hillbilly Elegy.” Formerly a Trump critic, he was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2022 after becoming one of the former president’s loudest supporters.

He was chosen to connect to white working-class voters who are important for Trump’s chances in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan.

Those states swung Republican when Trump won in 2016, and in 2020 they helped put Biden in the White House.

Democrats are hoping that 60-year-old Walz’s “Minnesota nice” demeanour, his history as a football coach and plain-spoken delivery will connect with those same crucial voters.

Graham said both will have three tasks in the debate: defend the top of their ticket, attack the top of the other ticket and prove they are capable of being the president if they had to step in.

While Trump was victorious in June’s debate against Biden, political experts have said Harris dominated when the two squared off.

She prodded Trump over the crowd sizes at his rallies and the 2020 loss, baiting him into tirades far from his intended goals of focusing on immigration and the economy.

It’s unlikely Vance will fall for the same strategy.

“No matter what Walz will try to say, he’s not going to fall for that bait. He’s going to stick to the issues,” Kall said.

Both vice-presidential picks have a Canadian connection. Walz’s state shares an 885-kilometre border with Ontario and Manitoba. Not too long ago he tossed around a football with Ontario Premier Doug Ford.

Meanwhile, Vance went to university with Jamil Jivani, the Conservative MP for Durham. Jivani has called Vance his best friend from Yale and performed a Bible reading at the American politician’s wedding.

But both parties have pitched policies experts have called protectionist. Trump has repeated plans for a 10 per cent tariff on imports and Vance is a vocal opponent of U.S. military aid to Ukraine to fend off Russia’s invasion.

Last week, Harris highlighted that she was one of 10 U.S. senators to vote against the Canada-United States-Mexico agreement under Trump, saying it wasn’t sufficient to protect American workers. If she becomes president, Harris said, she will push the trade pact’s review in 2026.

Matthew Lebo, a specialist in U.S. politics at Western University in London, Ont., said Canadians watching Tuesday’s debate are unlikely to glean much detail about those trade policies. Walz and Vance will talk about personal economic issues and inflation to connect with American voters.

“In an election that is so close, the VP can reflect on the judgment of the presidential pick,” Lebo said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 30, 2024.

— With files from The Associated Press

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending