adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

The CPAC question: Do you still think the media skewed coronavirus coverage? – The Washington Post

Published

 on


Fran Finnegan, who lives in the San Francisco suburbs, was among the CPAC attendees quizzed by the Erik Wemple Blog about Mulvaney’s remarks. Would the media really do something this underhanded? Would it goose its coronavirus stories to hurt Trump’s chances at reelection? “Oh, absolutely. Part of the media. … The liberal left media like your organization, New York Times, you know — that kind of stuff. The networks,” Finnegan said, adding that “to some extent” media bias affects the coverage of a potential pandemic.

Since returning home from CPAC, Finnegan has had cause to dig deeper into all things coronavirus. Last Tuesday, his wife started feeling ill, with symptoms including shortness of breath and coughing. This was extraordinary: In 32 years of marriage, says Finnegan, his wife had gotten sick once. “All of a sudden on Tuesday she started feeling terrible,” he recalls.

The symptoms persisted into Thursday, so the Finnegans went to the emergency room. “They were aware of the coronavirus thing, but they didn’t think the symptoms were enough that it was the coronavirus,” says Finnegan, whose wife also attended CPAC.

On Saturday, the Finnegans received word through a mass email from the American Conservative Union that an attendee at the conference had tested positive for coronavirus. “The exposure occurred previous to the conference. A New Jersey hospital tested the person, and CDC confirmed the positive result,” reads the email, which goes on to say, “During this time, we need to remain calm, listen to our health care professionals, and support each other.”

Listening to our health-care professionals, of course, is easiest when you can contact them. After reading the ACU email, the Finnegans called the emergency room with this additional information. They were told, however, that the emergency room didn’t do coronavirus testing — best to contact a doctor or the county health department. Finnegan says the couple couldn’t reach a doctor over the weekend, so they attempted to get someone from Contra Costa County on the line. By Monday evening, those attempts had failed.

They finally got through to a doctor, though no luck there, either. They got word that the doctor was ill-equipped to handle a potential coronavirus patient with symptoms. “All of a sudden, she’s really sick, and there’s no one you can turn to to get tested,” says Finnegan, who adds that the state of California “really messed up on this.”

The Erik Wemple Blog on Tuesday discussed the situation with Rohan Radhakrishna, deputy health officer at Contra Costa Health Services, the county health department. Last week, Radhakrishna says, the county tested 40 people per day, all in compliance with the screening guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The criteria are laid out here. “People who are two or three degrees removed from a possible unknown contact who don’t have all the required symptoms do not merit testing,” Radhakrishna says, though he notes that the testing situation changes every few days or so.

The Finnegans, in other words, had moved straight from CPAC into the country’s coronavirus testing crunch. “Anybody who wants a test gets a test,” Trump said last Friday in one of his optimistic pronouncements about coronavirus. Realities in the actual U.S. health-care system are less utopian; a doctor or a health official must prescribe a test, said Health and Human Services Secretary Alex M. Azar in a briefing. Problem is, there aren’t enough of them. The CDC botched its initial attempt to produce test kits, and authorities are now hustling to meet ever-increasing demand.

After wading through this health industry thicket, Finnegan says he still trusts Trump over the media as a source of information on coronavirus. “The whole thing is murky, and it’s changing a lot every day, but if I had to pick one, I’d say Trump,” he says. As for the media’s alleged skewing of the coronavirus story, Finnegan says he still believes that has happened. However: “I don’t oppose it in any way. You have to sell papers in a sense, and there’s nothing else much going on,” he says. “I will tell you also that I think this is possibly more serious, so it’s all right if the media overhypes it at this point.”

And what about Trump’s claim about anybody who wants a test, gets a test? It seems that Finnegan’s own experience contradicts this presidential boast. “He’s a big-picture guy and I don’t hold that against him,” says the 68-year-old Finnegan. “You have to have lived in New York to understand Trump,” he says. “New Yorkers say things in a certain way and you have to have been there to understand what they’re really saying.”

The Erik Wemple Blog interviewed other CPAC attendees who endorsed Mulvaney’s analysis. William Rodebaugh of Philadelphia told us at the conference he’d trust the president to tell the truth about the crisis. Trump “doesn’t need the money. The Washington Post needs the press, needs the money,” Rodebaugh said. When contacted on Monday, he stuck to his guns, complimenting Trump and his aides for “taking action.” “The media isn’t doing anything but reporting,” he said.

Hank Foley, a CPAC attendee and president of Race Fans for Trump 2020, also told us in a follow-up interview, “I definitely trust the president over the media. I think things are changing constantly, and I think the CDC and the president’s team are adapting to the changes, working on the vaccinations.”

Read more:

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Media

Trump could cash out his DJT stock within weeks. Here’s what happens if he sells

Published

 on

Former President Donald Trump is on the brink of a significant financial decision that could have far-reaching implications for both his personal wealth and the future of his fledgling social media company, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG). As the lockup period on his shares in TMTG, which owns Truth Social, nears its end, Trump could soon be free to sell his substantial stake in the company. However, the potential payday, which makes up a large portion of his net worth, comes with considerable risks for Trump and his supporters.

Trump’s stake in TMTG comprises nearly 59% of the company, amounting to 114,750,000 shares. As of now, this holding is valued at approximately $2.6 billion. These shares are currently under a lockup agreement, a common feature of initial public offerings (IPOs), designed to prevent company insiders from immediately selling their shares and potentially destabilizing the stock. The lockup, which began after TMTG’s merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), is set to expire on September 25, though it could end earlier if certain conditions are met.

Should Trump decide to sell his shares after the lockup expires, the market could respond in unpredictable ways. The sale of a substantial number of shares by a major stakeholder like Trump could flood the market, potentially driving down the stock price. Daniel Bradley, a finance professor at the University of South Florida, suggests that the market might react negatively to such a large sale, particularly if there aren’t enough buyers to absorb the supply. This could lead to a sharp decline in the stock’s value, impacting both Trump’s personal wealth and the company’s market standing.

Moreover, Trump’s involvement in Truth Social has been a key driver of investor interest. The platform, marketed as a free speech alternative to mainstream social media, has attracted a loyal user base largely due to Trump’s presence. If Trump were to sell his stake, it might signal a lack of confidence in the company, potentially shaking investor confidence and further depressing the stock price.

Trump’s decision is also influenced by his ongoing legal battles, which have already cost him over $100 million in legal fees. Selling his shares could provide a significant financial boost, helping him cover these mounting expenses. However, this move could also have political ramifications, especially as he continues his bid for the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential race.

Trump Media’s success is closely tied to Trump’s political fortunes. The company’s stock has shown volatility in response to developments in the presidential race, with Trump’s chances of winning having a direct impact on the stock’s value. If Trump sells his stake, it could be interpreted as a lack of confidence in his own political future, potentially undermining both his campaign and the company’s prospects.

Truth Social, the flagship product of TMTG, has faced challenges in generating traffic and advertising revenue, especially compared to established social media giants like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook. Despite this, the company’s valuation has remained high, fueled by investor speculation on Trump’s political future. If Trump remains in the race and manages to secure the presidency, the value of his shares could increase. Conversely, any missteps on the campaign trail could have the opposite effect, further destabilizing the stock.

As the lockup period comes to an end, Trump faces a critical decision that could shape the future of both his personal finances and Truth Social. Whether he chooses to hold onto his shares or cash out, the outcome will likely have significant consequences for the company, its investors, and Trump’s political aspirations.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Arizona man accused of social media threats to Trump is arrested

Published

 on

Cochise County, AZ — Law enforcement officials in Arizona have apprehended Ronald Lee Syvrud, a 66-year-old resident of Cochise County, after a manhunt was launched following alleged death threats he made against former President Donald Trump. The threats reportedly surfaced in social media posts over the past two weeks, as Trump visited the US-Mexico border in Cochise County on Thursday.

Syvrud, who hails from Benson, Arizona, located about 50 miles southeast of Tucson, was captured by the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office on Thursday afternoon. The Sheriff’s Office confirmed his arrest, stating, “This subject has been taken into custody without incident.”

In addition to the alleged threats against Trump, Syvrud is wanted for multiple offences, including failure to register as a sex offender. He also faces several warrants in both Wisconsin and Arizona, including charges for driving under the influence and a felony hit-and-run.

The timing of the arrest coincided with Trump’s visit to Cochise County, where he toured the US-Mexico border. During his visit, Trump addressed the ongoing border issues and criticized his political rival, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, for what he described as lax immigration policies. When asked by reporters about the ongoing manhunt for Syvrud, Trump responded, “No, I have not heard that, but I am not that surprised and the reason is because I want to do things that are very bad for the bad guys.”

This incident marks the latest in a series of threats against political figures during the current election cycle. Just earlier this month, a 66-year-old Virginia man was arrested on suspicion of making death threats against Vice President Kamala Harris and other public officials.

Continue Reading

Media

Trump Media & Technology Group Faces Declining Stock Amid Financial Struggles and Increased Competition

Published

 on

Tech News in Canada

Trump Media & Technology Group’s stock has taken a significant hit, dropping more than 11% this week following a disappointing earnings report and the return of former U.S. President Donald Trump to the rival social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. This decline is part of a broader downward trend for the parent company of Truth Social, with the stock plummeting nearly 43% since mid-July. Despite the sharp decline, some investors remain unfazed, expressing continued optimism for the company’s financial future or standing by their investment as a show of political support for Trump.

One such investor, Todd Schlanger, an interior designer from West Palm Beach, explained his commitment to the stock, stating, “I’m a Republican, so I supported him. When I found out about the stock, I got involved because I support the company and believe in free speech.” Schlanger, who owns around 1,000 shares, is a regular user of Truth Social and is excited about the company’s future, particularly its plans to expand its streaming services. He believes Truth Social has the potential to be as strong as Facebook or X, despite the stock’s recent struggles.

However, Truth Social’s stock performance is deeply tied to Trump’s political influence and the company’s ability to generate sustainable revenue, which has proven challenging. An earnings report released last Friday showed the company lost over $16 million in the three-month period ending in June. Revenue dropped by 30%, down to approximately $836,000 compared to $1.2 million during the same period last year.

In response to the earnings report, Truth Social CEO Devin Nunes emphasized the company’s strong cash position, highlighting $344 million in cash reserves and no debt. He also reiterated the company’s commitment to free speech, stating, “From the beginning, it was our intention to make Truth Social an impenetrable beachhead of free speech, and by taking extraordinary steps to minimize our reliance on Big Tech, that is exactly what we are doing.”

Despite these assurances, investors reacted negatively to the quarterly report, leading to a steep drop in stock price. The situation was further complicated by Trump’s return to X, where he posted for the first time in a year. Trump’s exclusivity agreement with Trump Media & Technology Group mandates that he posts personal content first on Truth Social. However, he is allowed to make politically related posts on other social media platforms, which he did earlier this week, potentially drawing users away from Truth Social.

For investors like Teri Lynn Roberson, who purchased shares near the company’s peak after it went public in March, the decline in stock value has been disheartening. However, Roberson remains unbothered by the poor performance, saying her investment was more about supporting Trump than making money. “I’m way at a loss, but I am OK with that. I am just watching it for fun,” Roberson said, adding that she sees Trump’s return to X as a positive move that could expand his reach beyond Truth Social’s “echo chamber.”

The stock’s performance holds significant financial implications for Trump himself, as he owns a 65% stake in Trump Media & Technology Group. According to Fortune, this stake represents a substantial portion of his net worth, which could be vulnerable if the company continues to struggle financially.

Analysts have described Truth Social as a “meme stock,” similar to companies like GameStop and AMC that saw their stock prices driven by ideological investments rather than business fundamentals. Tyler Richey, an analyst at Sevens Report Research, noted that the stock has ebbed and flowed based on sentiment toward Trump. He pointed out that the recent decline coincided with the rise of U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential nominee, which may have dampened perceptions of Trump’s 2024 election prospects.

Jay Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida, offered a grim long-term outlook for Truth Social, suggesting that the stock would likely remain volatile, but with an overall downward trend. “What’s lacking for the true believer in the company story is, ‘OK, where is the business strategy that will be generating revenue?'” Ritter said, highlighting the company’s struggle to produce a sustainable business model.

Still, for some investors, like Michael Rogers, a masonry company owner in North Carolina, their support for Trump Media & Technology Group is unwavering. Rogers, who owns over 10,000 shares, said he invested in the company both as a show of support for Trump and because of his belief in the company’s financial future. Despite concerns about the company’s revenue challenges, Rogers expressed confidence in the business, stating, “I’m in it for the long haul.”

Not all investors are as confident. Mitchell Standley, who made a significant return on his investment earlier this year by capitalizing on the hype surrounding Trump Media’s planned merger with Digital World Acquisition Corporation, has since moved on. “It was basically just a pump and dump,” Standley told ABC News. “I knew that once they merged, all of his supporters were going to dump a bunch of money into it and buy it up.” Now, Standley is staying away from the company, citing the lack of business fundamentals as the reason for his exit.

Truth Social’s future remains uncertain as it continues to struggle with financial losses and faces stiff competition from established social media platforms. While its user base and investor sentiment are bolstered by Trump’s political following, the company’s long-term viability will depend on its ability to create a sustainable revenue stream and maintain relevance in a crowded digital landscape.

As the company seeks to stabilize, the question remains whether its appeal to Trump’s supporters can translate into financial success or whether it will remain a volatile stock driven more by ideology than business fundamentals.

Continue Reading

Trending