adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

The EPA imposes stricter standards to protect children from exposure to lead paint

Published

 on

WASHINGTON (AP) — Two weeks after setting a nationwide deadline for removal of lead pipes, the Biden administration is imposing strict new limits on dust from lead-based paint in older homes and child-care facilities.

A final rule announced Thursday by the Environmental Protection Agency sets limits on lead dust on floors and window sills in pre-1978 residences and child-care facilities to levels so low they cannot be detected.

Paint that contains lead was banned in 1978, but more than 30 million American homes are believed to still contain it, including nearly 4 million homes where children under the age of 6 live. Lead paint can chip off when it deteriorates or is disturbed, especially during home remodeling or renovation.

“There is no safe level of lead,” said Michal Freedhoff, EPA’s assistant administrator for chemical safety and pollution prevention. The new rule will bring the United States “closer to eradicating lead-based paint hazards from homes and child care facilities once and for all,” she said.

The EPA estimates the new rule will reduce the lead exposures of up to 1.2 million people per year, including 178,000 to 326,000 children under age 6.

Lead is a neurotoxin that can irreversibly harm brain development in children, lower IQ, cause behavioral problems and lead to lifelong health effects. It also affects other organs, including the liver and kidneys.

The new rule, which takes effect early next year, targets levels of lead dust generated by paint. Currently, 10 micrograms per square foot is considered hazardous on floors, and a concentration 10 times that high is considered hazardous on window sills. The new rule brings both of those levels down to no detectable lead.

The proposed rule also would reduce what level is allowed when a lead-abatement contractor finishes work on a property where lead has been identified as a problem. These levels would be 5 micrograms per square foot on the floor and 40 micrograms per square foot for sills.

Individuals and firms that perform abatement work must be certified and follow specific work practices. Testing is required afterward to ensure dust-lead levels are below the new standards.

Environmental justice and public health experts called the EPA rule long overdue, noting that lead poisoning disproportionately affects low-income communities and communities of color.

“We can all breathe a little easier now that the EPA has significantly lowered its dust lead standard to protect children,” said Peggy Shepard, co-founder and executive director of WE ACT for Environmental Justice, a New York-based advocacy group.

Shepard, who serves on the White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council, said public health experts have long understood there is no safe level of lead in a child’s blood, yet New York state leads the nation in cases of children with elevated blood levels. Black children in Harlem living below the poverty line are twice as likely to suffer from lead poisoning as poor white children, she said.

The U.S. government has gradually been reducing the standard for what counts as poisonous levels of lead in children’s blood, with the most recent change occurring in 2021. But the EPA rule marks an effort to take more proactive action.

“When you are relying on the blood lead level in children to indicate whether there is lead in the environment, we are basically using the children as canaries in the mine,” said Dr. Philip Landrigan, a Boston College biology professor who directs the school’s Program for Global Public Health and the Common Good.

The National Child Care Association said when the lead rule was proposed last year that it could hurt many financially struggling child-care centers — especially those in low-income neighborhoods, where the facilities tend to be older. Without appropriate federal funding, the rule could push small, local child-care centers to close, the group said.

Earlier this month, the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development announced $420 million in grants to remove lead hazards from homes, including HUD-assisted homes. Additional HUD grants will continue to be available to help with lead paint removal, the White House said.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

British killer nurse Lucy Letby loses appeal bid for attempted baby murder conviction

Published

 on

LONDON (AP) — British killer nurse Lucy Letby lost her bid Thursday to challenge her conviction for the attempted murder of a baby girl in her care.

Letby, 34, is serving multiple life sentences with no chance of release after being convicted of murdering seven babies and trying to murder seven others while working as a neonatal nurse at the Countess of Chester Hospital in northwestern England between June 2015 and June 2016.

Her attorney argued that her retrial in July on a charge of attempting to kill an infant identified in court as Child K in February 2016 should not have gone ahead because it was overshadowed by “overwhelming and irremediable prejudice” from news coverage of her first trial in 2023.

The retrial was held after Manchester Crown Court jurors failed to reach a verdict on the charge involving Child K.

Letby, who testified that she never harmed a child, has continued to proclaim her innocence. She watched the hearing from a prison video link and showed no emotion when judges denied her petition to appeal.

The court issued a similar decision in May in her effort to appeal her multiple earlier convictions.

The ruling comes as an inquiry is underway to examine failures by the hospital to recognize why babies were dying in the neonatal unit and to stop Letby sooner.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

As federal workers fight office mandate, study finds remote work has climate benefits

Published

 on

Federal public servants in Ottawa who work remotely contributed 25 per cent fewer emissions than those who worked only from the office, a new report suggests as a major public sector union fights against more mandated office days.

Remote workers in Quebec contributed even fewer emissions thanks largely to greener homes heated by electric baseboards rather than natural gas, and the province’s virtually all-renewable energy grid, the report said.

The report funded by the federal government is based on surveys of roughly 1,500 employees across three government offices and it looks at emissions from homes, offices, transportation and internet use.

The analysis suggests each additional weekday a hybrid employee in the National Capital Region worked remotely is associated with annual emissions reductions between about 235 and 350 kilograms of carbon emissions, roughly equivalent to burning 150 litres of gasoline.

Those savings are largely attributed to lower transportation emissions from commuting and an assumed reduction in the federal government’s office space.

“The major takeaway for this is that telework is … a more sustainable version compared to in-office work,” said report co-author Farzam Sepanta. He said that’s the case as long as teleworkers and hybrid workers make an “informed decision regarding their habits and behaviours.”

While those reductions may be relatively small on their own, they add up when applied to thousands of federal public servants, said Sepanta, who is a PhD candidate at Carleton University. The results were specific to the federal government, but he said they also had “major takeaways for people working in the private sector.”

The results track with similar studies that try to quantify the emissions of remote and hybrid work models. A study out of Cornell University and Microsoft last year estimated remote workers could have a 54 per cent smaller carbon footprint compared to on-site workers, once lifestyle choices and work arrangements were considered.

Notably, the survey of federal employees does not consider the long-term emissions implications, such as whether people may migrate from urban centres to larger suburban homes with longer commutes. The survey also draws no conclusions about how remote work could impact other facets of work, such as worker expectations, organizational culture or client satisfaction, said Sepanta.

A major public-sector union was quick to laud the results as further evidence of the benefits of remote work.

In a written statement, Public Service Alliance of Canada national president Sharon DeSousa called the study “eye-opening,” and suggested the government was “squandering” a chance to build a modern workforce that “paves the way to a sustainable future.”

“This eye-opening study proves what we’ve been saying all along: remote work is better work,” the statement read.

Unions representing public servants promised a “summer of discontent” after the federal government announced it would mandate federal workers back to the office three days a week, up from two. The previous policy was put in place March 2023, two years after people began working remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Treasury Board secretariat said the government funded the report as part of a broader effort to understand the emissions associated with – but not directly resulting from – its operations. The department said in a statement that the results offer helpful baseline information about emissions, as well as recommendations in several areas relating to “greening” transportation and office space.

“The Public Service’s approach to hybrid work marries the benefits of in-person collaboration, with the flexibility of remote work, while helping green government operations,” read the statement.

The report’s policy recommendations include downsizing physical office spaces to reduce emissions and promoting the use of flexible shared office spaces to maximize the use of buildings. It also recommends subsidies or tax incentives for employees to buy electric vehicles or take public transportation, and floats the idea of free public transit passes for employees who commit to using the system regularly.

Ottawa Mayor Mark Sutcliffe has blamed the city’s transit budget shortfall on lost ridership due to the rise of remote work, saying it could take decades for the city to catch up to ridership forecasts that underpin its transit expansion.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 23, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Montreal climate protesters charged after climbing Jacques Cartier Bridge

Published

 on

MONTREAL – A pair of environmental activists who scaled Montreal’s Jacques Cartier Bridge Tuesday morning will remain detained after being charged with mischief and wilfully resisting or obstructing a peace officer.

Olivier Huard and Jacob Pirro appeared in court Wednesday, along with a third protester.

The third person, Michèle Lavoie, is facing only a mischief charge, in relation to obstructing, interrupting or interfering with the lawful use of property.

Their lawyer, Barbara Bedont, said all three remain detained pending their next court date on Oct. 31 after the prosecution objected to their release.

Huard and Pirro climbed to the top of the bridge early Tuesday as part of a climate protest, leading police to close one of the main access points onto the island for several hours during the morning rush hour.

The groups Last Generation Canada and Antigone Collective took credit for the protest, demanding an end to fossil fuel extraction and denouncing government inaction on climate change.

The groups urged supporters to rally outside the courthouse Wednesday morning.

Bedont, reached by phone, described the prosecutor’s decision to oppose the activists’ release as “incomprehensible.”

“There’s a long history of civil disobedience leading to very positive changes in our society,” she said, adding that her clients were not violent. “This is an important part of a democratic system.”

Laura Sullivan, a spokesperson for Last Generation Canada, reiterated a call for the protesters’ release, and for the federal government to “commit to ending fossil fuels by 2030.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 23, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending