Republicans from across the political spectrum heaped praise on conservative talk radio giant Rush Limbaugh following the news of his death Wednesday from complications of lung cancer.
Lead among them was former President Donald Trump, who called Limbaugh a “legend” and “fantastic” in an interview with Fox News.
“He would just talk for two hours, three hours, just talk and that’s not an easy thing to do,” Trump said. “And I once asked him, I said do you study for the show? And he said actually, ‘I study very hard. … That, a little bit, surprised me. But he was a fantastic man, a fantastic talent.”
The former president also took the occasion to spread the falsehood that he actually won the last election, saying that Limbaugh thought so, too.
“Well, Rush thought we won, and so do I, by the way,” Trump said, adding Limbaugh “was quite angry about it, quite angry.”
Limbaugh’s death marked the end of a three-decade career leading the conservative talk radio scene and serving as a defining voice on the right. Limbaugh, who Trump honored last year by awarding him the Presidential Medal of Freedom, was long condemned as a bigot by critics for his lengthy history of sexist, homophobic and racist remarks about public figures like Chelsea Clinton and former President Barack Obama, among others.
To his fans, who called themselves “dittoheads” and numbered in the millions, Limbaugh provided an outlet for right-wing discourse that was not presented in mainstream media.
“While he was brash, at times controversial, and always opinionated, he spoke his mind as a voice for millions of Americans and approached each day with gusto,” former President George W. Bush said in a statement. “As he battled hearing loss and cancer late in life, he was sustained by the support of friends and family, his love of sports and rock ‘n’ roll, and his belief in God and country. Rush Limbaugh was an indomitable spirit with a big heart, and he will be missed.”
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called Limbaugh a “generational media trailblazer.”
“He gave a voice to millions of conservative Americans whom the mainstream media had not even tried to represent,” McConnell said. “His impact is impossible to overstate. May he rest in peace.”
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said Limbaugh “revolutionized American radio.”
“His voice guided the conservative movement for millions every day,” he wrote. “Rest In Peace, Rush.”
Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., called Limbaugh, a native Missourian, “a voice for the voiceless.”
“He changed talk radio, but more importantly, Rush changed the conversation to speak up for the forgotten, and challenge the establishment,” he said. “He lived the First Amendment and told hard truths that made the elite uncomfortable, but made sure working men and women had a seat at the table.”
There was little reaction from Democrats to news of Limbaugh’s death. White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Biden’s “condolences go out to the family and friends of Rush Limbaugh.”
Progressive figures online also sought to ensure that Limbaugh’s history of incendiary remarks was not set aside in discussion of his death.
“Rush Limbaugh helped create today’s polarized America by normalizing racism, bigotry, misogyny and mockery,” tweeted Shannon Watts, founder of the gun control group Moms Demand Action. “He was a demagogue who got rich off of hate speech, division, lies and toxicity. That is his legacy.”
The empty, performative politics of Marjorie Taylor Greene – CNN
How to make African politics less costly – The Economist
AYISHA OSORI, a Nigerian lawyer and author, has vividly described running for political office in her country. She twists the arms of party elders, flatters their wives and hands over wads of banknotes—the cleaner the better. “Without money”, she concludes, “most aspirations would evaporate like steam.”
Politics costs money everywhere, but the link between cash and power is especially corrosive in Nigeria and across much of Africa. In rich democracies parties choose candidates and subsidise their campaigns. In many African ones aspiring politicians pay vast sums to run on a party ticket and then shell out even more to cover their own costs. They give voters handouts, which serve both as bribes and as hints of future generosity. Once in office, they keep spending: on constituents’ school fees, medical bills, funeral costs and construction projects (see article). Individual politicians, in effect, act as mini welfare states. Some 40% of ambulances in Uganda are owned by MPs. Their spending often dwarfs their official salaries.
This is bad for Africa. When a life in politics costs so much, the impecunious and honest will be excluded. Many MPs will either be rich to begin with, or feel the need to abuse power to recoup their expenses, or both. Even if they are not corrupt, MPs are a poor substitute for a genuine welfare state. Their largesse may go to those who ask loudest, or to a favoured ethnic group.
So long as states are weak, it makes sense for voters to ask their MPs for handouts, rather than for better laws or help to navigate the bureaucracy. It is also rational for MPs to neglect legislative work in favour of gifts and pork, if this is what voters say they want. But as Africa develops, this should change. As voters grow richer, they will be harder to buy. As governments grow more effective, MPs will have fewer gaps to fill. Alas, these shifts could take decades.
Africans need something better, sooner. Outsiders often suggest tougher campaign-finance laws, but these seldom work. They are often ignored. And laws copied from the West tend to miss the point, by regulating spending by parties before elections, rather than by sitting MPs.
Better would be to take a different approach. One aim would be to strengthen institutions that expose and punish corruption. Last year Malawians booted out the graft-ridden regime of Peter Mutharika thanks, in large part, to independent judges. Politicians who see graft punished are more likely to stay clean.
Another aim would be to encourage parties to run on policies, rather than ethnicity or patronage. African NGOs, trade unions and business groups should nudge them in this direction—or help set up alternatives. New parties, such as Bobi Wine’s National Unity Platform in Uganda, are gaining popularity partly because they oppose the old rot. Philanthropists could give them money—and ask nothing in return.
The essential thing is to curb MPs’ informal role as sources of welfare. The long-term fix would be to make local governments work properly. A stopgap is to improve Constituency Development Funds. These are pots of public money to be spent largely at the discretion of MPs. More than a dozen African countries have them. They are not as grubby as they sound. Research from Kenya finds that voters judge MPs on how they use these funds, so they offer some accountability. With greater transparency, they would offer more.
Africa has grown more democratic in the past 30 years. Multi-party elections are common, albeit often flawed. Opposition parties are gaining ground. Most leaders leave office peacefully, rather than in coups. Politics is becoming more competitive. The next step is to make it less costly. ■
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Fixing Africa’s pricey politics”
ICRC Humanitarian Law & Policy blog: The grand scheme: power and politics in the climate crisis – World – ReliefWeb
Even in the midst of a pandemic, during a seemingly endless cascade of events, climate change remains a defining issue. Its effects are even more severe for people affected by conflict and violence, who find themselves navigating the collision of war and environmental crises. How can the humanitarian community work with affected people to design policies and practices that have an impact?
In this post, Malvika Verma, a project development officer for ACTED Sri Lanka and India, argues that to strengthen climate action in conflict settings, a solid understanding of people’s vulnerabilities and adaptive capacities must be informed by the bigger picture – an analysis of pre-existing circuits of power and political relationships.
Read the full blog post here
B.C. economy set to grow in 2021, 2022, forecast suggests – News 1130
Art Beat: 2021 writers' festival looking up – Coast Reporter
Dairy farmers advised to stop adding palm oil to feed as butter controversy heats up – CBC.ca
Silver investment demand jumped 12% in 2019
Iran anticipates renewed protests amid social media shutdown
Galaxy M31 July 2020 security update brings Glance, a content-driven lockscreen wallpaper service
Health15 hours ago
Computer programmer shares workaround to Alberta COVID-19 vaccine booking issues – Global News
Economy3 hours ago
BMO: West will be best as Canadian economy bounces back – Wealth Professional
Tech4 hours ago
When And Where To Buy An Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Graphics Card Today – Forbes
Economy16 hours ago
Forecasts for Canada’s TSX hiked as analysts eye global recovery: Reuters poll
Business16 hours ago
J&J's single-shot COVID-19 vaccine is safe and effective, says FDA – Yahoo Canada Finance
Sports14 hours ago
Why no one should count out a Tiger Woods comeback after car crash
Economy18 hours ago
PACE Releases Guidance for Circular Economy Transition in Five Sectors | News | SDG Knowledge Hub | IISD – IISD Reporting Services
Business14 hours ago
GameStop shares surge more than 100 per cent – CTV News