adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

The Politician Recap: Geronimo – Vulture

Published

4 years ago

 on


The Politician

Cancel Culture
Season 2

Episode 3
Editor’s Rating

1 stars

Photo: Courtesy of Netflix/NICOLE RIVELLI/NETFLIX

A 6-year-old kid wears a Halloween costume. He’s dressed like Apache leader Geronimo. The kid is white. It’s not cool. “Cancel Culture,” the frustrating-at-best third episode of The Politician’s second season, takes this idea and builds an entire episode around it. For 41 long, silly minutes, The Politician attempts to argue for nuance while being reductive and then ends with a twist. Take a shot every time someone says “canceled” and you’ll have a good time, assuming you’re willing to have a hangover tomorrow.

The most frustrating thing about “Cancel Culture” is that, despite what the title might suggest, there are actually interesting ideas here. There’s probably an effective way to do this — to make these stories both righteous and ridiculous at once — but it happens, at most, in flashes, and those are rarely glimpsed between all the fists being shaken at clouds. In this episode, chewing gum carries more weight than offering up dates with a woman as currency without her knowledge or consent, and the surest way to get into your opponent’s head is a selfie with a Speedo and a headdress.

Actually, scratch that — the most frustrating thing is that Ben Platt throws himself into every scene so entirely and the episode itself simply can’t measure up. For all its flaws, this is perhaps the funniest outing of the series so far for Platt; his meltdown about a six-second cold shower is unspeakably weird and perfect. But try to pin down what “Cancel Culture” has to say about anything at all at your peril. Thanks to Platt, Payton at least has an emotional throughline, and his obvious fear, disappointment, anger, and frustration bubble over in nearly every scene.

It starts for Payton with an early morning phone call in his dorm. (This episode helpfully confirms that yes, Payton at least is still living, frolicking, and watching Gilmore Girls in his dorm; do any of them actually attend classes?) His horrid twin brothers find a photo of him in a yearbook; he’s 6 and dressed as Geronimo. They send it to Hadassah, who thinks it’s a gift. When Payton gets that phone call, it’s to tell him there’s a photo of his 6-year-old self on the front page of the Post being a very white cultural appropriator. Alice tells Skye she should stand beside Payton as he issues a mea culpa; Skye reluctantly accepts, citing her own pragmatism, but tells Payton that he crossed a line and that he has to go out with her to register young voters of color. (Are we meant to believe that Payton’s campaign wasn’t doing that already? Really?)

While there are certainly hiccups after this scene, it’s also the high watermark for cognitive dissonance in this episode. On the one hand, there are lines like Andrew asking why Payton hates Native Americans or Alice saying, “He doesn’t see black or white or rich or poor, he just sees [sigh] voters.” On the other, Skye’s let-me-educate-you-about-why-appropriation-is-bad speech, which plays as totally sincere. In his speech, Payton says that the fact that he was 6 doesn’t excuse anything, also played sincerely; then talks about it as a personal failing without bringing in any nuance, and things only get more pandering from there.

The speech stabilizes his polling numbers, but the writing is on the wall, and not even another inspirational climate-centered campaign event with Infinity can change that. Zoey Deutch also makes a meal of this episode, anchoring the subplot in the joy Infinity takes in shutting down anything toxic in her life, literally or metaphorically. Andrew gets his extremely creepy “date” with her and she shuts him down hard; she encounters Beijing’s smog and decides to cancel pollution and waste; she references the abusive and toxic relationships of her past, which she seems to have wholly left behind; and when she sees Payton and Skye not quite walking the climate change walk (at least from her perspective), she sees an opportunity to take advantage of the power she has and demand a change from them both. It’s also, she points out, a move away from hypocrisy. She’s right to tell them both that they need to practice what they preach.

But then the episode pivots again, and suddenly it’s ridiculous. One moment the viewers are admiring Infinity’s zero-waste lifestyle; the next, everyone’s drinking “booty coffee” from recycled shower water. Pick a lane, show — and if you can’t or don’t want to, then embrace the complexity, rather than reducing arguments only to the extremes.

Ultimately, the episode sees Payton using outrage to his advantage, turning that first photo into an opportunity to embed McAfee in the Standish campaign. The mechanics of this storyline are a little foggy, and perhaps the next episode will offer some clarity. Still, let’s try to reason this out now. First, the terrible twins send the Geronimo photo to Hadassah, who leaks it to the Post. Payton gives the speech, admits he’s losing, and thanks all his friends. Then he takes a photo of himself in a Speedo and headdress and sends it to the Standish campaign himself; Dede calls him in, tells him she won’t do anything with it, and tells him he ran a good campaign. Here’s where things get complicated. Andrew tells Payton that the photo could only have been taken by someone with access to his phone and Payton pretends to be surprised and outraged, holding a big meeting where he asks his inner circle about the leak. Alice takes partial responsibility, citing her jealousy of Astrid, who she thinks is getting more romantic attention from Payton than Alice herself. She sent the photo to James, who sent it to everyone else, and they all had a meeting about it. Then McAfee says she leaked it to the Standish campaign, and Payton “fires” her. She gets a job from Hadassah, outs Andrew as the mole, and then meets up with Payton to discuss next steps now that she’s the mole.

So, is McAfee the only one in on the ruse? If so, why? Payton himself was the leak, so they’re not smoking anyone out. Did Alice really just see the photo by accident? Why not just pretend that Payton figured out that McAfee was the leak? It doesn’t make any sense. Yet that’s a minor complaint compared to the larger tonal issues of this episode. At least Payton will always have a handkerchief handy now — a lucky thing, as he seems to be crying more and more as the series goes on and defeat seems more and more certain.



Talking points

Wouldn’t that photo of Payton as a child be a much, much bigger problem for his mother, who is currently running for Governor in California?

More echoes of season one: Alice once again pretending not to have hurt feelings in a way that bodes very ill for their relationship.

I cannot get over the idea that they’ve been having sex in that tiny twin bed in that dorm room shared by three people, on the regular. What the hell.

Hadassah on McAfee: “She looks like a sherbert Diane Keaton, which I love.”

Costume of the episode: Infinity’s let’s-tell-off-Andrew coat.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

News

Beyoncé channels Pamela Anderson in ‘Baywatch’ for Halloween video asking viewers to vote

Published

2 days ago

 on

November 5, 2024

By

 

NEW YORK (AP) — In a new video posted early Election Day, Beyoncé channels Pamela Anderson in the television program “Baywatch” – red one-piece swimsuit and all – and asks viewers to vote.

In the two-and-a-half-minute clip, set to most of “Bodyguard,” a four-minute cut from her 2024 country album “Cowboy Carter,” Beyoncé cosplays as Anderson’s character before concluding with a simple message, written in white text: “Happy Beylloween,” followed by “Vote.”

At a rally for Donald Trump in Pittsburgh on Monday night, the former president spoke dismissively about Beyoncé’s appearance at a Kamala Harris rally in Houston in October, drawing boos for the megastar from his supporters.

“Beyoncé would come in. Everyone’s expecting a couple of songs. There were no songs. There was no happiness,” Trump said.

She did not perform — unlike in 2016, when she performed at a presidential campaign rally for Hillary Clinton in Cleveland – but she endorsed Harris and gave a moving speech, initially joined onstage by her Destiny’s Child bandmate Kelly Rowland.

“I’m not here as a celebrity, I’m not here as a politician. I’m here as a mother,” Beyoncé said.

“A mother who cares deeply about the world my children and all of our children live in, a world where we have the freedom to control our bodies, a world where we’re not divided,” she said at the rally in Houston, her hometown.

“Imagine our daughters growing up seeing what’s possible with no ceilings, no limitations,” she continued. “We must vote, and we need you.”

The Harris campaign has taken on Beyonce’s track “Freedom,” a cut from her landmark 2016 album “Lemonade,” as its anthem.

Harris used the song in July during her first official public appearance as a presidential candidate at her campaign headquarters in Delaware. That same month, Beyoncé’s mother, Tina Knowles, publicly endorsed Harris for president.

Beyoncé gave permission to Harris to use the song, a campaign official who was granted anonymity to discuss private campaign operations confirmed to The Associated Press.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Justin Trudeau’s Announcing Cuts to Immigration Could Facilitate a Trump Win

Published

2 days ago

 on

November 5, 2024

By

Outside of sports and a “Cold front coming down from Canada,” American news media only report on Canadian events that they believe are, or will be, influential to the US. Therefore, when Justin Trudeau’s announcement, having finally read the room, that Canada will be reducing the number of permanent residents admitted by more than 20 percent and temporary residents like skilled workers and college students will be cut by more than half made news south of the border, I knew the American media felt Trudeau’s about-face on immigration was newsworthy because many Americans would relate to Trudeau realizing Canada was accepting more immigrants than it could manage and are hoping their next POTUS will follow Trudeau’s playbook.

Canada, with lots of space and lacking convenient geographical ways for illegal immigrants to enter the country, though still many do, has a global reputation for being incredibly accepting of immigrants. On the surface, Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver appear to be multicultural havens. However, as the saying goes, “Too much of a good thing is never good,” resulting in a sharp rise in anti-immigrant sentiment, which you can almost taste in the air. A growing number of Canadians, regardless of their political affiliation, are blaming recent immigrants for causing the housing affordability crises, inflation, rise in crime and unemployment/stagnant wages.

Throughout history, populations have engulfed themselves in a tribal frenzy, a psychological state where people identify strongly with their own group, often leading to a ‘us versus them’ mentality. This has led to quick shifts from complacency to panic and finger-pointing at groups outside their tribe, a phenomenon that is not unique to any particular culture or time period.

My take on why the American news media found Trudeau’s blatantly obvious attempt to save his political career, balancing appeasement between the pitchfork crowd, who want a halt to immigration until Canada gets its house in order, and immigrant voters, who traditionally vote Liberal, newsworthy; the American news media, as do I, believe immigration fatigue is why Kamala Harris is going to lose on November 5th.

Because they frequently get the outcome wrong, I don’t take polls seriously. According to polls in 2014, Tim Hudak’s Progressive Conservatives and Kathleen Wynne’s Liberals were in a dead heat in Ontario, yet Wynne won with more than twice as many seats. In the 2018 Quebec election, most polls had the Coalition Avenir Québec with a 1-to-5-point lead over the governing Liberals. The result: The Coalition Avenir Québec enjoyed a landslide victory, winning 74 of 125 seats. Then there’s how the 2016 US election polls showing Donald Trump didn’t have a chance of winning against Hillary Clinton were ridiculously way off, highlighting the importance of the election day poll and, applicable in this election as it was in 2016, not to discount ‘shy Trump supporters;’ voters who support Trump but are hesitant to express their views publicly due to social or political pressure.

My distrust in polls aside, polls indicate Harris is leading by a few points. One would think that Trump’s many over-the-top shenanigans, which would be entertaining were he not the POTUS or again seeking the Oval Office, would have him far down in the polls. Trump is toe-to-toe with Harris in the polls because his approach to the economy—middle-class Americans are nostalgic for the relatively strong economic performance during Trump’s first three years in office—and immigration, which Americans are hyper-focused on right now, appeals to many Americans. In his quest to win votes, Trump is doing what anyone seeking political office needs to do: telling the people what they want to hear, strategically using populism—populism that serves your best interests is good populism—to evoke emotional responses. Harris isn’t doing herself any favours, nor moving voters, by going the “But, but… the orange man is bad!” route, while Trump cultivates support from “weird” marginal voting groups.

To Harris’s credit, things could have fallen apart when Biden abruptly stepped aside. Instead, Harris quickly clinched the nomination and had a strong first few weeks, erasing the deficit Biden had given her. The Democratic convention was a success, as was her acceptance speech. Her performance at the September 10th debate with Donald Trump was first-rate.

Harris’ Achilles heel is she’s now making promises she could have made and implemented while VP, making immigration and the economy Harris’ liabilities, especially since she’s been sitting next to Biden, watching the US turn into the circus it has become. These liabilities, basically her only liabilities, negate her stance on abortion, democracy, healthcare, a long-winning issue for Democrats, and Trump’s character. All Harris has offered voters is “feel-good vibes” over substance. In contrast, Trump offers the tangible political tornado (read: steamroll the problems Americans are facing) many Americans seek. With Trump, there’s no doubt that change, admittedly in a messy fashion, will happen. If enough Americans believe the changes he’ll implement will benefit them and their country…

The case against Harris on immigration, at a time when there’s a huge global backlash to immigration, even as the American news media are pointing out, in famously immigrant-friendly Canada, is relatively straightforward: During the first three years of the Biden-Harris administration, illegal Southern border crossings increased significantly.

The words illegal immigration, to put it mildly, irks most Americans. On the legal immigration front, according to Forbes, most billion-dollar startups were founded by immigrants. Google, Microsoft, and Oracle, to name three, have immigrants as CEOs. Immigrants, with tech skills and an entrepreneurial thirst, have kept America leading the world. I like to think that Americans and Canadians understand the best immigration policy is to strategically let enough of these immigrants in who’ll increase GDP and tax base and not rely on social programs. In other words, Americans and Canadians, and arguably citizens of European countries, expect their governments to be more strategic about immigration.

The days of the words on a bronze plaque mounted inside the Statue of Liberty pedestal’s lower level, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…” are no longer tolerated. Americans only want immigrants who’ll benefit America.

Does Trump demagogue the immigration issue with xenophobic and racist tropes, many of which are outright lies, such as claiming Haitian immigrants in Ohio are abducting and eating pets? Absolutely. However, such unhinged talk signals to Americans who are worried about the steady influx of illegal immigrants into their country that Trump can handle immigration so that it’s beneficial to the country as opposed to being an issue of economic stress.

In many ways, if polls are to be believed, Harris is paying the price for Biden and her lax policies early in their term. Yes, stimulus spending quickly rebuilt the job market, but at the cost of higher inflation. Loosen border policies at a time when anti-immigrant sentiment was increasing was a gross miscalculation, much like Trudeau’s immigration quota increase, and Biden indulging himself in running for re-election should never have happened.

If Trump wins, Democrats will proclaim that everyone is sexist, racist and misogynous, not to mention a likely White Supremacist, and for good measure, they’ll beat the “voter suppression” button. If Harris wins, Trump supporters will repeat voter fraud—since July, Elon Musk has tweeted on Twitter at least 22 times about voters being “imported” from abroad—being widespread.

Regardless of who wins tomorrow, Americans need to cool down; and give the divisive rhetoric a long overdue break. The right to an opinion belongs to everyone. Someone whose opinion differs from yours is not by default sexist, racist, a fascist or anything else; they simply disagree with you. Americans adopting the respectful mindset to agree to disagree would be the best thing they could do for the United States of America.

______________________________________________________________

 

Nick Kossovan, a self-described connoisseur of human psychology, writes about what’s

on his mind from Toronto. You can follow Nick on Twitter and Instagram @NKossovan.

Continue Reading

Politics

RFK Jr. says Trump would push to remove fluoride from drinking water. ‘It’s possible,’ Trump says

Published

3 days ago

 on

November 4, 2024

By

 

PHOENIX (AP) — Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent proponent of debunked public health claims whom Donald Trump has promised to put in charge of health initiatives, said Saturday that Trump would push to remove fluoride from drinking water on his first day in office if elected president.

Fluoride strengthens teeth and reduces cavities by replacing minerals lost during normal wear and tear, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The addition of low levels of fluoride to drinking water has long been considered one of the greatest public health achievements of the last century.

Kennedy made the declaration Saturday on the social media platform X alongside a variety of claims about the heath effects of fluoride.

“On January 20, the Trump White House will advise all U.S​. water systems to remove fluoride from public water,” Kennedy wrote. Trump and his wife, Melania Trump, “want to Make America Healthy Again,” he added, repeating a phrase Trump often uses and links to Kennedy.

Trump told NBC News on Sunday that he had not spoken to Kennedy about fluoride yet, “but it sounds OK to me. You know it’s possible.”

The former president declined to say whether he would seek a Cabinet role for Kennedy, a job that would require Senate confirmation, but added, “He’s going to have a big role in the administration.”

Asked whether banning certain vaccines would be on the table, Trump said he would talk to Kennedy and others about that. Trump described Kennedy as “a very talented guy and has strong views.”

The sudden and unexpected weekend social media post evoked the chaotic policymaking that defined Trump’s White House tenure, when he would issue policy declarations on Twitter at virtually all hours. It also underscored the concerns many experts have about Kennedy, who has long promoted debunked theories about vaccine safety, having influence over U.S. public health.

In 1950, federal officials endorsed water fluoridation to prevent tooth decay, and continued to promote it even after fluoride toothpaste brands hit the market several years later. Though fluoride can come from a number of sources, drinking water is the main source for Americans, researchers say.

Officials lowered their recommendation for drinking water fluoride levels in 2015 to address a tooth condition called fluorosis, that can cause splotches on teeth and was becoming more common in U.S. kids.

In August, a federal agency determined “with moderate confidence” that there is a link between higher levels of fluoride exposure and lower IQ in kids. The National Toxicology Program based its conclusion on studies involving fluoride levels at about twice the recommended limit for drinking water.

A federal judge later cited that study in ordering the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to further regulate fluoride in drinking water. U.S. District Judge Edward Chen cautioned that it’s not certain that the amount of fluoride typically added to water is causing lower IQ in kids, but he concluded that mounting research points to an unreasonable risk that it could be. He ordered the EPA to take steps to lower that risk, but didn’t say what those measures should be.

In his X post Saturday, Kennedy tagged Michael Connett, the lead attorney representing the plaintiff in that lawsuit, the environmental advocacy group Food & Water Watch.

Kennedy’s anti-vaccine organization has a lawsuit pending against news organizations including The Associated Press, accusing them of violating antitrust laws by taking action to identify misinformation, including about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines. Kennedy is on leave from the group but is listed as one of its attorneys in the lawsuit.

What role Kennedy might hold if Trump wins on Tuesday remains unclear. Kennedy recently told NewsNation that Trump asked him to “reorganize” agencies including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration and some agencies under the Department of Agriculture.

But for now, the former independent presidential candidate has become one of Trump’s top surrogates. Trump frequently mentions having the support of Kennedy, a scion of a Democratic dynasty and the son of former Attorney General Robert Kennedy and nephew of President John F. Kennedy.

Kennedy traveled with Trump Friday and spoke at his rallies in Michigan and Wisconsin.

Trump said Saturday that he told Kennedy: “You can work on food, you can work on anything you want” except oil policy.

“He wants health, he wants women’s health, he wants men’s health, he wants kids, he wants everything,” Trump added.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending