adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Real eState

The quick rise and public fall of Vancouver’s Coromandel Properties

Published

 on

Coromandel Properties burst onto the Vancouver real estate scene about a decade ago with a splashy site purchase and land assemblies on the city’s west side. The company had a vision for getting these rezoned for mixed use and condo developments, while promoting itself as focused on long-term relationships built on trust.

Helmed by a sole director, Coromandel appeared eager to be known in the community. It built its brand by backing a popular festival and appeared alongside big corporate names and philanthropists as a top-tier sponsor of the Vancouver Art Gallery. In 2019, it brought on five-time Vancouver city councillor and former mayoral candidate Raymond Louie as its chief operating officer.

But now, Coromandel finds itself under scrutiny and the talk of the town. Its recent petition to B.C. Supreme Court seeking creditor protection reveals a pattern of high levels of leverage and repeated borrowing to hold onto properties while failing to develop them quickly enough.

The company has declared it is in financial trouble with $700 million in outstanding debts on 16 prime Vancouver properties, most of which are potential development sites. It is seeking relief under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, seeking time for the company to be restructured.

Coromandel’s creditor protection application was delayed in a B.C. Supreme Court hearing on Thursday, around the same time hundreds of real estate industry professionals were gathered three blocks away in a hotel ballroom to hear Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim speak at an event hosted by the Urban Development Institute (UDI).

 

It’s a fall from grace for a company that grew relatively quickly to amass a portfolio of 16 prime Vancouver properties. Coromandel’s petition pegs the combined appraised value of those sites, based on their existing use or Coromandel’s plans for them, at more than $1 billion.

 

Coromandel Properties’ Jerry Zhong sponsored Takashi Murakami’s retrospective exhibition, as well, was the successful bidder of a commissioned portrait by the contemporary artist. (Fred Lee photo)
Coromandel Properties’ Jerry Zhong sponsored Takashi Murakami’s retrospective exhibition, as well, was the successful bidder of a commissioned portrait by the contemporary artist. (Fred Lee photo) PNG

Coromandel Properties began as CM Bay Properties. In 2014, the company paid $15.8 million for a former gas station site near Oakridge Centre that was notable for a proposal to build a mixed-use condo and retail complex in what media reports at the time described as a record-setting per buildable-square-foot price.

The company spent another $15 million picking up single-family home lots east of that site, as well as marketing a condo development on West Broadway and another one in Fairview Slopes.

 

In 2015, it moved into offices on the 18th floor of a building on West Georgia Street in downtown Vancouver and announced it would be known as Coromandel Properties, putting forth Jerry Zhong, also known as Zhen Yu Zhong, as its principal.

 

The company now leases 12,000 square feet of space in the Georgia Street office tower for $19,892 a month, according to a list of assets and liabilities included in the court petition.

 

In the following years, Coromandel continued to add to its portfolio. The petition outlines the company’s vision for several of these sites, including tall towers combining hotels, offices, condos and apartments. But figures in the development industry say the company has, to date, completed a limited number of relatively modest projects.

Earlier this month, Coromandel’s website listed nine “future development” projects, four in various stages of development, and only two completed projects.

 

“I would call them a small developer with unusually large land holdings. They’re a small developer, both in terms of their past track record and overall amount of property under development,” said Jon Stovell, who has been in the Metro Vancouver real estate development industry for more than 25 years and is chair of the UDI and president of Reliance Properties.

 

Southview Gardens project is at the centre of a lawsuit between Peakhill Capital and Coromandel Properties.
Southview Gardens project is at the centre of a lawsuit between Peakhill Capital and Coromandel Properties. PHOTO BY JASON PAYNE /PNG

“It’s fair to say it’s a significant event. Everybody is keeping an eye on to see how it sorts itself out. It’s primarily a function of a very, very, very rapid increase in interest rates … and not surprising that some developer, maybe, is caught on the wrong side of that, just the way that their capital is structured,” said Stovell.

“It’s not that often that you see this kind of thing in Vancouver, it’s generally a very well capitalized industry. Of course, like any industry —  airlines or mining, it doesn’t matter what it is — there’s companies that are capitalized well, and other companies that run leaner and are managed with a higher degree of risk. There’s no industry where you don’t have a company here and there getting into difficulty,” said Stovell.

 

Ronn Rapp, CEO of the Homebuilders Association Vancouver, put it this way: “Everyone has to start somewhere, but the order of magnitude in this case is unusual.”

Typically, developers want to sequence their projects “to drive a more evenly balanced cash flow position,” Rapp said, with some projects in early stages while others are under construction and others are completed and driving revenue.

“When the vast majority are in approval process, the cash only flows out — fees, consultants, land acquisition, carrying costs, and overheads with little or no money coming in — it requires deep pockets and bandwidth to sustain delays and market/interest volatility,” Rapp wrote in an email. “The circumstances here are exaggerated by the number and scope of the properties involved.”

 

Coromandel Properties at 2751 Kingsway in Vancouver Feb. 13, 2023.
Coromandel Properties at 2751 Kingsway in Vancouver Feb. 13, 2023. PHOTO BY ARLEN REDEKOP /PNG

In July 2015, Zhong explained in a news release that his company’s new name, Coromandel,  was “derived from the valuable screens that were created in China and shipped all over the world via the Coromandel Coast of southern India. We chose (the name) to honour the heritage of our company’s principals who travelled from China to make Canada their home.”

By 2016, the trend of massive amounts of capital flowing from mainland China to real estate markets around the world was underway. Large developers, equity investors and insurance firms from mainland China were making big purchases in the U.S. and across Europe. In early 2016, Beijing-based Anbang Insurance paid $1 billion to buy a set of four office towers in downtown Vancouver.

 

But there were also much smaller companies, backed by a mix of money from B.C., other Canadian provinces and overseas that were jumping into the market to assemble residential land and buy commercial sites in various part of Metro Vancouver.

 

Coromandel was one of several of these. Some local developers were critical of the way these newer companies seemed to be buying prime lots at top dollar with no pressing plans to develop them. Academics and observers said it wasn’t the first time inflated real estate prices were being blamed on investors and immigrants from Asia, pointing back to the 1980s and 1990s-era exodus of people and money from Hong Kong to Vancouver.

While new development firms emerged in Vancouver’s hot real estate market over the past decade, some of their principals and executives spoke to media to introduce themselves, but Coromandel’s Zhong declined.

Instead, the company threw its support behind popular events like the Vancouver Cherry Blossom Festival and charitable causes such as the Vancouver Sun’s Adopt-A-School program. At the Vancouver Art Gallery, it joined some of the city’s high profile entrepreneurs, such as Artizia founder Brian Hill, as well as big corporate names, such as BMO and TD, in being a lead sponsor and backer of major exhibits, including Claude Monet’s Secret Garden and Takashi Murakami’s The Octopus Eats Its Own Leg.

 

In one of the few public photos of Zhong, he is pictured at the opening of the Murakami exhibit standing with a big cheerful smile next to the Japanese pop artist.

But last week, the cherry blossom festival’s executive director Michael Dove got a call from Coromandel saying it wouldn’t be able to continue with its sponsorship. Dove said it was a “pretty big shock because they’re really the cornerstone” of the festival’s sponsorship and budget, which puts the April 1-23 festival in jeopardy.

 

Southview Gardens project is at the centre of a lawsuit between Peakhill Capital and Coromandel Properties.
Southview Gardens project is at the centre of a lawsuit between Peakhill Capital and Coromandel Properties. PHOTO BY JASON PAYNE /PNG

Like many other more established developers, Coromandel and Zhong also threw money into political contributions. Elections B.C. records show that in 2017 alone, Coromandel donated $20,000 to the B.C. NDP and $35,000 to Vision Vancouver. Ahead of the 2018 election, Zhong also donated to Vision and independent candidate Kennedy Stewart.

 

Zhong attended events and parties, but kept a low-profile in the media.

By contrast, Louie was already a well-known public figure when Coromandel raised its profile by bringing him on as an executive in 2019.

 

Stovell said he does not personally know Zhong, but knows Louie from his time on city council, saying “he was a great councillor and did a lot for the city.”

 

Louie grew up in East Vancouver and his career took him from bundling Vancouver Sun and Province newspapers in the viewless basement of the old Pacific Press building, where he was a union rep, to a key player in Vancouver’s city council chamber, to Coromandel’s board rooms.

 

Louie was first elected to Vancouver council in 2002 representing COPE, as the left-leaning, union-backed party swept to power. He was part of the split from COPE which produced the more centrist Vision Vancouver, the party with which he was re-elected to council in 2005, 2008, 2011 and 2014.

During Vision’s 10-year majority on council, Louie served as Metro Vancouver’s vice-chair and Federation of Canadian Municipalities president. He announced in 2018 that he would not seek re-election, and began working for Coromandel the following year.

 

Coromandel didn’t make Louie and Zhong available for an interview, and declined to answer questions by email.

 

John Nicola, CEO of Nicola Wealth, said his company bought Coromandel out of a joint venture earlier this year to build two apartment towers on a site near Oakridge.

 

“They, at the time, needed a liquidity event,” Nicola said. “They had obviously, in hindsight, pressure from these other projects, and we were committed to going ahead, so therefore we said: ‘OK fine, we are going to continue on our own.’”

Nicola recalled that at that time, he and his colleagues thought: “‘Well, maybe they stretched themselves too thin’ … And that would certainly appear to be the case.”

 

— With research from Carolyn Soltau

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Real eState

Former B.C. Realtor has licence cancelled, $130K in penalties for role in mortgage fraud – CTV News Vancouver

Published

 on


The provincial regulator responsible for policing B.C.’s real estate industry has ordered a former Realtor to pay $130,000 and cancelled her licence after determining that she committed a variety of professional misconduct.

Rashin Rohani surrendered her licence in December 2023, but the BC Financial Services Authority’s chief hearing officer Andrew Pendray determined that it should nevertheless be cancelled as a signal to other licensees that “repetitive participation in deceptive schemes” will result in “significant” punishment.

He also ordered her to pay a $40,000 administrative penalty and $90,000 in enforcement expenses. Pendray explained his rationale for the penalties in a sanctions decision issued on May 17. The decision was published on the BCFSA website Wednesday. 

Rohani’s misconduct occurred over a period of several years, and came in two distinct flavours, according to the decision.

Pendray found she had submitted mortgage applications for five different properties that she either owned or was purchasing, providing falsified income information on each one.

Each of these applications was submitted using a person referred to in the decision as “Individual 1” as a mortgage broker. Individual 1 was not a registered mortgage broker and – by the later applications – Rohani either knew or ought to have known this was the case, according to the decision.

All of that constituted “conduct unbecoming” under B.C.’s Real Estate Services Act, Pendray concluded.

Separately, Rohani also referred six clients to Individual 1 when she knew or ought to have known he wasn’t a registered mortgage broker, and she received or anticipated receiving a referral fee from Individual 1 for doing so, according to the decision. Rohani did not disclose this financial interest in the referrals to her clients.

Pendray found all of that to constitute professional misconduct under the act.

‘Deceptive’ scheme

The penalties the chief hearing officer chose to impose for this behaviour were less severe than those sought by the BCFSA in the case, but more significant than those Rohani argued she should face.

Rohani submitted that the appropriate penalty for her conduct would be a six-month licence suspension or a $15,000 discipline penalty, plus $20,000 in enforcement expenses.

For its part, the BCFSA asked Pendray to cancel Rohani’s licence and impose a $100,000 discipline penalty plus more than $116,000 in enforcement expenses.

Pendray’s ultimate decision to cancel the licence and impose penalties and expenses totalling $130,000 reflected his assessment of the severity of Rohani’s misconduct.

Unlike other cases referenced by the parties in their submissions, Rohani’s misconduct was not limited to a single transaction involving falsified documents or a series of such transactions during a brief period of time, according to the decision.

“Rather, in this case Ms. Rohani repetitively, over the course of a number of years, elected to personally participate in a deceptive mortgage application scheme for her own benefit, and subsequently, arranged for her clients to participate in the same deceptive mortgage application scheme,” the decision reads.

Pendray further noted that, although Rohani had been licensed for “a significant period of time,” she had only completed a small handful of transactions, according to records from her brokerage.

There were just six transactions on which her brokerage recorded earnings for her between December 2015 and February 2020, according to the decision. Of those six, four were transactions that were found to have involved misconduct or conduct unbecoming.

“In sum, Ms. Rohani’s minimal participation in the real estate industry as a licensee has, for the majority of that minimal participation, involved her engaging in conduct unbecoming involving deceptive practices and professional misconduct,” the decision reads.

According to the decision, Rohani must pay the $40,000 discipline penalty within 90 days of the date it was issued. 

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Real eState

Former B.C. Realtor has licence cancelled, $130K in penalties for role in mortgage fraud – CTV News Vancouver

Published

 on


The provincial regulator responsible for policing B.C.’s real estate industry has ordered a former Realtor to pay $130,000 and cancelled her licence after determining that she committed a variety of professional misconduct.

Rashin Rohani surrendered her licence in December 2023, but the BC Financial Services Authority’s chief hearing officer Andrew Pendray determined that it should nevertheless be cancelled as a signal to other licensees that “repetitive participation in deceptive schemes” will result in “significant” punishment.

He also ordered her to pay a $40,000 administrative penalty and $90,000 in enforcement expenses. Pendray explained his rationale for the penalties in a sanctions decision issued on May 17. The decision was published on the BCFSA website Wednesday. 

Rohani’s misconduct occurred over a period of several years, and came in two distinct flavours, according to the decision.

Pendray found she had submitted mortgage applications for five different properties that she either owned or was purchasing, providing falsified income information on each one.

Each of these applications was submitted using a person referred to in the decision as “Individual 1” as a mortgage broker. Individual 1 was not a registered mortgage broker and – by the later applications – Rohani either knew or ought to have known this was the case, according to the decision.

All of that constituted “conduct unbecoming” under B.C.’s Real Estate Services Act, Pendray concluded.

Separately, Rohani also referred six clients to Individual 1 when she knew or ought to have known he wasn’t a registered mortgage broker, and she received or anticipated receiving a referral fee from Individual 1 for doing so, according to the decision. Rohani did not disclose this financial interest in the referrals to her clients.

Pendray found all of that to constitute professional misconduct under the act.

‘Deceptive’ scheme

The penalties the chief hearing officer chose to impose for this behaviour were less severe than those sought by the BCFSA in the case, but more significant than those Rohani argued she should face.

Rohani submitted that the appropriate penalty for her conduct would be a six-month licence suspension or a $15,000 discipline penalty, plus $20,000 in enforcement expenses.

For its part, the BCFSA asked Pendray to cancel Rohani’s licence and impose a $100,000 discipline penalty plus more than $116,000 in enforcement expenses.

Pendray’s ultimate decision to cancel the licence and impose penalties and expenses totalling $130,000 reflected his assessment of the severity of Rohani’s misconduct.

Unlike other cases referenced by the parties in their submissions, Rohani’s misconduct was not limited to a single transaction involving falsified documents or a series of such transactions during a brief period of time, according to the decision.

“Rather, in this case Ms. Rohani repetitively, over the course of a number of years, elected to personally participate in a deceptive mortgage application scheme for her own benefit, and subsequently, arranged for her clients to participate in the same deceptive mortgage application scheme,” the decision reads.

Pendray further noted that, although Rohani had been licensed for “a significant period of time,” she had only completed a small handful of transactions, according to records from her brokerage.

There were just six transactions on which her brokerage recorded earnings for her between December 2015 and February 2020, according to the decision. Of those six, four were transactions that were found to have involved misconduct or conduct unbecoming.

“In sum, Ms. Rohani’s minimal participation in the real estate industry as a licensee has, for the majority of that minimal participation, involved her engaging in conduct unbecoming involving deceptive practices and professional misconduct,” the decision reads.

According to the decision, Rohani must pay the $40,000 discipline penalty within 90 days of the date it was issued. 

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Real eState

Former B.C. Realtor has licence cancelled, $130K in penalties for role in mortgage fraud – CTV News Vancouver

Published

 on


The provincial regulator responsible for policing B.C.’s real estate industry has ordered a former Realtor to pay $130,000 and cancelled her licence after determining that she committed a variety of professional misconduct.

Rashin Rohani surrendered her licence in December 2023, but the BC Financial Services Authority’s chief hearing officer Andrew Pendray determined that it should nevertheless be cancelled as a signal to other licensees that “repetitive participation in deceptive schemes” will result in “significant” punishment.

He also ordered her to pay a $40,000 administrative penalty and $90,000 in enforcement expenses. Pendray explained his rationale for the penalties in a sanctions decision issued on May 17. The decision was published on the BCFSA website Wednesday. 

Rohani’s misconduct occurred over a period of several years, and came in two distinct flavours, according to the decision.

Pendray found she had submitted mortgage applications for five different properties that she either owned or was purchasing, providing falsified income information on each one.

Each of these applications was submitted using a person referred to in the decision as “Individual 1” as a mortgage broker. Individual 1 was not a registered mortgage broker and – by the later applications – Rohani either knew or ought to have known this was the case, according to the decision.

All of that constituted “conduct unbecoming” under B.C.’s Real Estate Services Act, Pendray concluded.

Separately, Rohani also referred six clients to Individual 1 when she knew or ought to have known he wasn’t a registered mortgage broker, and she received or anticipated receiving a referral fee from Individual 1 for doing so, according to the decision. Rohani did not disclose this financial interest in the referrals to her clients.

Pendray found all of that to constitute professional misconduct under the act.

‘Deceptive’ scheme

The penalties the chief hearing officer chose to impose for this behaviour were less severe than those sought by the BCFSA in the case, but more significant than those Rohani argued she should face.

Rohani submitted that the appropriate penalty for her conduct would be a six-month licence suspension or a $15,000 discipline penalty, plus $20,000 in enforcement expenses.

For its part, the BCFSA asked Pendray to cancel Rohani’s licence and impose a $100,000 discipline penalty plus more than $116,000 in enforcement expenses.

Pendray’s ultimate decision to cancel the licence and impose penalties and expenses totalling $130,000 reflected his assessment of the severity of Rohani’s misconduct.

Unlike other cases referenced by the parties in their submissions, Rohani’s misconduct was not limited to a single transaction involving falsified documents or a series of such transactions during a brief period of time, according to the decision.

“Rather, in this case Ms. Rohani repetitively, over the course of a number of years, elected to personally participate in a deceptive mortgage application scheme for her own benefit, and subsequently, arranged for her clients to participate in the same deceptive mortgage application scheme,” the decision reads.

Pendray further noted that, although Rohani had been licensed for “a significant period of time,” she had only completed a small handful of transactions, according to records from her brokerage.

There were just six transactions on which her brokerage recorded earnings for her between December 2015 and February 2020, according to the decision. Of those six, four were transactions that were found to have involved misconduct or conduct unbecoming.

“In sum, Ms. Rohani’s minimal participation in the real estate industry as a licensee has, for the majority of that minimal participation, involved her engaging in conduct unbecoming involving deceptive practices and professional misconduct,” the decision reads.

According to the decision, Rohani must pay the $40,000 discipline penalty within 90 days of the date it was issued. 

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending