Though not always seen as his forte, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau does often take big swings on economic narrative, and he did exactly that at a keynote speech this week in Toronto.
Economy
Theo Argitis: Trudeau’s big swing on economic narrative sparks both hope and concern
Speaking to the U.S.-Canada Summit — a conference organized by Bank of Montreal and Eurasia Group — Trudeau took the opportunity to outline some of the core thinking and motivations behind his recently released budget, and defend what appears to be a pivot toward a more inward-looking and corporate-heavy set of policy choices, particularly around investment.
While Trudeau and his finance minister, Chrystia Freeland, have a tendency to oversell their decisions as responses to “historic moments,” the current situation does have an element of momentousness to it.
The budget we released last week was all about meeting this moment
Justin Trudeau
Yet some of the other touch points in the speech also reveal just how challenging things will be for Trudeau going forward.
The prime minister took pains, for example, to pitch the costly measures as benefiting all Canadians.
Politically, the Liberals know they will need to convince average Canadians that all this money being allocated to businesses (much of it to foreign corporations) is consistent with their underlying governing philosophy to “choose people every time,” as Trudeau said in concluding his speech.
There are also questions about whether the measures are sufficient to do the job. Trudeau spent much time championing not just the new tax credits but the government’s project-by-project direct involvement in recent investments by large multinational firms such as Volkswagen AG and Nokia Corp.
Investment
Then again, at least the government is beginning to think seriously about private investment, an area where it’s struggled to find success these past seven years.
Trudeau characterized his climate measures as an attempt to “crowd in” capital — an apt way of thinking about the problem given how much direct investment our businesses do abroad.
As the world moves away from cheap money, policymakers could become covetous of these monies. That will be especially true as many businesses feel the pull of subsidies south of the border.
But the trend has accelerated, and Biden’s climate transition plan threatens to turn that stream of money going to the U.S. into a flood.
Net direct investment flows between the two countries has favoured the United States to the tune of $320 billion since 2007. About 80 per cent of that “deficit” has come since 2015.
The bulk of these net flows have been driven by Canada’s banks and other financial institutions, which have been keen to grow south of the border. (In manufacturing, for example, Canada continues to draw in U.S. capital.)
Given how much Canadian financial institutions are invested in the United States, it would probably be wise to consider them as critical players in any bid to bring (and keep) capital at home.
Theo Argitis is managing director at Compass Rose Group.
Economy
Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI
The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.
The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.
CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.
This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.
While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.
Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.
The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.
Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.
The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Economy
Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy
As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.
Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.
A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.
More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.
Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.
“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.
“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”
American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.
It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.
“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.
“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”
A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.
Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.
“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.
Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.
With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”
“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.
“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.
The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Economy
September merchandise trade deficit narrows to $1.3 billion: Statistics Canada
OTTAWA – Statistics Canada says the country’s merchandise trade deficit narrowed to $1.3 billion in September as imports fell more than exports.
The result compared with a revised deficit of $1.5 billion for August. The initial estimate for August released last month had shown a deficit of $1.1 billion.
Statistics Canada says the results for September came as total exports edged down 0.1 per cent to $63.9 billion.
Exports of metal and non-metallic mineral products fell 5.4 per cent as exports of unwrought gold, silver, and platinum group metals, and their alloys, decreased 15.4 per cent. Exports of energy products dropped 2.6 per cent as lower prices weighed on crude oil exports.
Meanwhile, imports for September fell 0.4 per cent to $65.1 billion as imports of metal and non-metallic mineral products dropped 12.7 per cent.
In volume terms, total exports rose 1.4 per cent in September while total imports were essentially unchanged in September.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.
The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
-
News24 hours ago
Alberta forestry minister says wolverine, lynx trapping limits lifted to gather data
-
News24 hours ago
Court order will compel release of records in Dye & Durham competition probe
-
News6 hours ago
Time limits were meant to speed up justice. They also halt hundreds of criminal cases
-
News3 hours ago
Telus prioritizing ‘most important customers,’ avoiding ‘unprofitable’ offers: CFO
-
News6 hours ago
Donald Trump election sparks U.S. interest in move to Canada, say immigration lawyers
-
News3 hours ago
Who will buy Infowars? Both supporters and opponents of Alex Jones interested in bankruptcy auction
-
News3 hours ago
‘Big frustration’: How a limited MAID window affects Alzheimer’s patients
-
News18 mins ago
Port of Montreal employer submits ‘final’ offer to dockworkers, threatens lockout